Sunday, July 8, 2012

The threat coming from Islam is the defining issue of our time...wake up America!

“The law which their prophet Mohamed has given to muslims, is that any harm done to any one who does not accept Islamic Law, is no sin at all”.
-JOHN QUINCY ADAMS (U.S. PRESIDENT)

Altogether too many Americans are completely in the dark concerning the Muslim threat to our country.  The Muslim threat is real and we all need to band together to purge this so-called religion of peace from our homeland.  Islam is not a religion but rather a system of restraints and empowerment's sanctioned by a government that is guided by the Quran that has as a goal of 'control' over the peoples of the globe to ensure that theirs is the one and only ideology...and they will kill, maim, and/or decapitate those who disagree with them all in the name of Allah. ...they will also soft-talk most Americans that they are harmless until the time is ripe for conquest.  Wake up America and don't be so gullible and naive, the Muslims are here to destroy you!  ~  Norman E. Hooben
ps: Please read the following informative commentary from my friend Gary

Let's Help Eric Allen Bell
Gary Fouse
fousesquawk
http://garyfouse.blogspot.com

Recently, I have had the opportunity to meet film maker Eric Allen Bell. As my readers may know, Eric is heavily involved in the Murfreesboro, Tennessee mosque project. When he initially traveled to Murfreesboro to make a documentary on the construction controversy, he was supportive of the local Muslim community's right to build a place of worship. Yet, the more he learned about the project, the people behind the mosque, and their questionable connections, Eric turned against the mosque project. He is now speaking out publicly about what he has learned-and at great personal cost as his letter below outlines.

For taking another view, Eric, who had described himself as a liberal, has been turned on by his "friends" in Hollywood. Not only that, he has endured threats against himself and his family. At this point, it is an act of courage for Eric to continue to speak out. Most recently, Eric appeared on Fox and Friends to discuss his experiences (which I have posted).


As I stated, I have met with Eric, and I am confident that he holds no animus toward Muslims as people. Yet, he has shown great moral and personal courage in speaking out because he feels so strongly about the jihadist Islamic movement to impose Islam on others. He has learned like the rest of us that there are many so-called Muslim leaders who are spreading a deceitful message to the public (stealth jihadists).

At this point, Eric needs our help. I have sent what I can, and I hope when you read this letter, you will send what you can. Eric is a valuable asset in the anti-jihadist movement, and we need his work to continue. Here is Eric's letter.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"On July 4, 2010 I began production on a documentary called, “Not Welcome” believing I would expose the problem of “Islamophobia” in America. Along the way I was hijacked by the truth about Islam. Since that time I have committed myself to using media to expose the truth, about the most brutal political and legal system in the world – Islam. And it has cost me everything.

I believe strongly that history will show that the threat coming from Islam is the defining issue of our time – and that us so-called “Islamophobes” will be remembered as the voices of reason.

Instead of continuing with a documentary that simply was not true, I gave my financial backers their funding back and I started writing articles about Islam. So far, every single one of those articles has gone viral, worldwide. And I am just getting started. Some of this material has broken out of the Counter Jihad bubble and been seen in the Examiner, the Huffington Post, USA Today and Fox News.

I have gone on the radio over and over to educate the public about the threat the Muslim Brotherhood in America presents to us, as they try to “destroy the West from within”.

I have received so many threats that I can no longer remember them all – but in the beginning there were more than a few sleepless nights. But in time, my fear turned into a fierce determination.

I have paid the high price of telling the truth about Islam, and continue to do so. And I am not ashamed by what I am about to tell you and what I am about to ask of you.

I have lost most of my Liberal friends.

I have lost my reputation in Hollywood.

I have lost my livelihood.

Most of my family members no longer talk to me.

I had to sell my car in order to pay my rent - and it's that money is now gone.

I am late on every single bill.

But I have not allowed any of this to stop me. In fact, I am in the process of writing a book about my awakening on this vital issue, with a call to action to all civilized people to stand up to Islam using the best weapon we have available to us – and that is information.

Although there are several publishers now interested in publishing my yet unfinished book, I have not accepted an advance – because with an advance comes editorial control which I am not willing to give up.
I refuse to tow the media party line and refer to acts of terrorism as “radical Islam”. The truth is that if Muhammad were alive on 9/11, he would have sanctioned the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. Muhammad would have sanctioned the over 19,000 acts of Islamic terrorism that have occurred since. These terrorists are not “radical Muslims” they are just simply devout – following the “highest moral example” in Islam.

New mosque construction in the United States, funded primarily by foreign Islamic sources that are hostile to the United States, has doubled since we were attacked on 9/11. This is in keeping iwth a tradition of 1,400 years of Islamic conquest.

So, I have created a website called Global Infidel TV (
www.Globalinfidel.TV) to make information about the human rights abuses in Islam available, in primarily video format for the short attention span. It is worth noting that I had created another website, for another cause, which has had 27 million visitors in the past 2 years. I bring that experience, commitment and expertise to this project as well.

I have created a website called Mosque Confidential (
www.MosqueConfidential.com) where I have received a treasure trove of leaked documents and emails which I am using to expose mosques which are involved in Stealth Jihad. Certain members of the media have become sympathetic to our cause when they see what I have to show them and have expressed a commitment in helping with this cause in any way they can.

I am building bridges, strengthening alliances and never taken my eye off the prize - we just simply must end Sharia in America and dramatically reduce its power in the world overall. I am committed to this cause, as I know you are as well.

I have met with elected officials and shared with them what I have learned and engaged them in the process of taking action, specifically against the mega mosque in Murfreesboro, TN. Using our own laws, our media, and without violating any laws or anyone's civil rights, we will make an example out of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro.

Recently I appeared on “Fox and Friends” and told the truth about Muhammad. Minutes after airing, I received a call from the producers saying that the viewer feedback was so immediately positive that they wanted to know if they could announce right then, live, that I would come back tomorrow. I was invited back the next day for 2, longer segments, where I was able to expose to 2 million people, live on national television, the names of Muslim Brotherhood operatives at the Murfreesboro Mosque, based on my findings - and I was able to demonstrate that you do not have to be afraid to just simply tell the truth when it comes to Islam.

And now I REALLY NEED YOUR HELP!

Contrary to what CAIR and their front organizations are publishing about me, I am not on anyone’s payroll. In fact, in order to continue with this work, I need to be able to pay for my hotel room, occasional security, and other basic costs involved with staying the course on this path which I feel called to - and I'm out of money.

It is critical at this time that we send a loud and resounding message to the foreign Islamic infiltrators, such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi Arabia, that this is not Sweden or Norway or the UK. This is the United States of America and we will not stand by idly while outside forces attempt to impose Islamic law on our society, on our educational system, our media, our culture, our laws. I am committed to playing a critical role in this process, but I need your help and I need it today.

Please, if you can afford to donate anything at all, now more than ever, I really need your help.
I have created a Donate button on both
www.MosqueConfidential.com and on www.Globalinfidel.TV using PayPal. You do not need to have a PayPal account, just a credit or debit card to do your part, to help support my work, in spreading this vital information to the sleeping masses.

These are my short term needs. In closing, it is also worth mentioning that I need some major backing to execute a more long term plan, to shine the light on the attempted Islamization of the West. I welcome any dialogue with anyone who feels called, to throw their hat in with me and become a partner in this important cause.

Thank you for taking the time to read this. You can donate right now by clicking this link:

PayPal
Also, please feel free to contact me at any time at: Eric@BellMedia.org

Best,

Eric Allen Bell
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_________________________________
_______________

Unrelated but interesting read from FrontPageMag.com

Muslim Witch Hunts
Posted By Daniel Greenfield

In response to Congressman Peter King’s hearings on Islamic radicalization, Muslim Brotherhood stooge Suhail Khan authored an article denouncing the hearings as a “witch hunt.” He was echoed by Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR who also branded the hearings a “witch hunt.”
The Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson caught on to this original idea, declaring the hearings, “Peter King’s Modern Day Witch Hunt.” Bob Herbert at the New York Times joined him in branding the hearings a “witch hunt.” At USA Today, an op-ed weighed in on “The Danger of a Muslim Witch Hunt.”
Democratic pols also got in on the act. Congressman Keith Ellison declared the hearings a “witch hunt” and Congresswoman Judy Chu complained that a “witch hunt for Muslim radicals will do little to make our nation safer.”
Wherever you turned, from CNN to Jon Stewart, the consensus of Muslim terrorists and their media collaborators was that investigating Islamism was just like hunting for witches. Except that terrorists exist and witches don’t—a minor fact that was lost on the progressive camp which often mistakes its own talking points for magic spells that alter the nature of reality.
The United States doesn’t hunt witches. It’s the Muslim world that has an unfortunate propensity for engaging in witch hunts.
While the progressive media complex was whipping itself into a frenzy denouncing any investigation of Saudi mosques and organizations as a witch hunt—the Saudis were conducting actual witch hunts. While Congressman King was trying to fight the War on Terror— they were declaring a War on Sorcery.
In Washington D.C. witch hunts might be a metaphor, but in Riyadh, they’re a top priority. While the Saudis operate a revolving door for Islamic terrorists, including the ones we send over to them for rehabilitation, they take important things like witchcraft seriously. A Saudi Al-Qaeda terrorist can expect to spend a little time at a plush rehabilitation facility before being set free to head off to the next conflict zone. But Saudi witches and sorcerers mercilessly have their heads chopped off in car parks.
A Saudi witch hunt is not a committee hearing; it is an actual unit of the Islamic religious police which is tasked with fighting witches and sorcerers, who according to the authorities, in the absence of the Jews, are responsible for most of the problems in the land. While American liberals insist that Islam is as modern as microprocessors and as moderate as vanilla ice cream, in the holy land of Islam, Sharia thugs are storming the dens of palm-readers, faith-healers and old women with too many cats around the premises in a 7th century witch hunt conducted with 21st century technology.
Muslim witch hunts aren’t only limited to Saudi Arabia. In Iran, Ahmadinejad’s allies have been accused of being sorcerers. In Pakistan, witch hunts end the old fashioned away, with a bonfire. One woman, accused of burning the Koran in a magical ritual, had her fingers cut off, her eyes poked out and gasoline poured all over her body. “She burnt the Koran, so we burnt her,” was the explanation.
In the Maldives, Sheikh Abdullah Bin Mohamed called for the passage of an Anti-Sorcery Act. The Maldives already has its own witch hunts and in 1993 arrested a witch for giving magic scrolls to a presidential candidate to help him win an election—a novel form of electoral fraud. It doesn’t however mandate the death penalty for witches, which is what the Sheikh is calling for, in line with Sharia law. “Sorcery has become a social plague in the Maldives which needs to be cured,” he said. And Islam has a reliable way of curing things by chopping their heads off.
Black magic is also a serious problem in the United Arab Emirates. In non-Muslim countries airport security personnel screen for Muslim terrorists carrying explosives and weapons; but in Muslim countries, the local equivalent of the TSA searches for magic wands and potions. Vigilant security personnel at Abu Dhabi International Airport caught one such would-be Harry Potter trying to enter the UAE.
“The airport staff suspected the passenger, so they inspected his luggage and found books that contained spells, mostly in unknown languages, and some suspicious tools which seem to be used for black magic,” said Colonel Rashid Bursheed, the head of the organized crime section at the Criminal Investigations Department.
It might be nice to live in a country where the chief threat in airports comes from the Wizard of Oz, rather than a fellow named Mohammed with incendiary underwear, but unfortunately that would require the United States to switch to operating under Islamic law. But in the meantime, Colonel Rashid Bursheed has asked all citizens to report anyone casting spells to the authorities.
In Qatar, home of Al-Jazeera, the police are also on the lookout for rogue magicians. The same goes for Oman, where dedicated enforcers keep watch for magic amulets, bones or love potions. While the police forces of the Muslim world are not terribly good at combating terrorism, they spring into action when someone claims that a witch cast a spell on his goats. Most of those arrested are usually foreigners; many of them are Africans, which is not surprising in the racist tribal heartland of Islam.
What happens to Harry Potter when he’s caught depends on how Islamic the country is. The more committed a country is to Sharia law, the more likely it is that poor Harry will spend years in prison or even lose his head. A magic potion that might only be punishable by seven years in a dungeon in a liberal place like Dubai might make a man lose his head in properly Islamic Saudi Arabia.
In Washington D.C., witch hunts end with a banging gavel marking the end of a committee meeting. In Saudi Arabia, they end at the point of a sword. Just ask Ali Hussain Sibat, a Lebanese TV psychic, who predicted the future and offered magic potions on the side, who was charged with witchcraft when he made a pilgrimage to Mecca and is awaiting his own turn for the mercy of the executioner’s sword.
In response to the Sibat case, the Boston Globe called it a “A 21st-century witch trial” and “a reminder of why this nation’s Founders sought to separate religious and secular laws.” And yet despite that, the Globe and other liberal newspapers ridicule any attempt at restricting the spread of Islamic Sharia law and investigating Islam as a “witch hunt.” Yet in a terrible irony, investigating Islam may be the only way to prevent actual witch hunts from one day taking place in this country.

United Nations Attempts To Destroy the United States Constitution

Headline from Maggie's Notebook
UN Billionaire Tax Hits Daylight: Taxing Skies, Oceans, Currency, Fuels, Electromagnetic Specturm

Story from The Washington Times
U.N. calls for global 'billionaires' tax'
by: Joel Gehrke
Diplomats at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Conference in Rio de Janeiro next week will consider proposals that would levy taxes on American families and energy industries in order to support international efforts to combat global warming, according to a draft agenda for the conference.

"We recognize that subsidies for non-renewable energy development should be eliminated and replaced with a global tax on the production of energy from non-renewable energy sources," the UN draft agenda, amended by non-governmental organizations at the invitation of the UN, says. "The income of this tax should be allocated to renewable energy development." The draft agenda was obtained by the Center for a Constructive Tomorrow, a group skeptical of the UN's position on global warming. ...

Another proposal would spread the cost of investing in other countries throughout society. ... That plan would cost $1,325 for an American family of four, according to CFACT.


John Rocker Grand Slams Obama

“Barack Obama does not hold a single core value or belief consistent with the principles that created this amazing country we call the United States of America...  I would vote for the devil himself over Barack Obama...” ~ John Rocker

John Rocker now throws political hardballs
by Michael Thompson @ WND

“Like hopefully a majority of Americans out there, I’ll be voting against President Obama this year. I won’t necessarily be voting for the Republican candidate as much as I will be voting against Obama. America has been the greatest nation this earth has ever known over the last 150 plus years. In my strong opinion Barack Obama does not hold a single core value or belief consistent with the principles that created this amazing country we call the United States of America. His belief system could not be more foreign from those of the ‘Greatest Generation,’ from the beliefs of a Truman, Roosevelt, Eisenhower, or Reagan. This country cannot sustain four more years of his cancerous ideology. I have always been a big fan of Newt Gingrich. He is one of the most brilliant people I have ever listened to. Unfortunately things didn’t work out for him, but such is our democratic process and a large reason America is the great nation it is. It seems that Governor Romney will be getting my vote, although be it somewhat by default. I would vote for the devil himself over Barack Obama which would actually be tough though as he seems to already be a supporter.”
See full article/interview here http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/john-rocker-now-throws-political-hardballs/
___________________________________

In other news... Who really won the 2008 election?  (a must see video)

The Truth About Obama...the whole truth and nothing but the truth!

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Obama raised taxes on some of the nation’s poorest people ...and other 'good' news (i.e. "...the Court ruled 9-0 that Obamacare was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause)

"...the Affordable Health Care Act is not affordable. It does little or nothing to control health care costs, which are destined to continue to gobble up an ever increasing amount of the total US Gross Domestic Product as well as of corporate profits and families’ incomes."

Insurance Companies Win, Public Left on Life Support
Why the ObamaCare Ruling Stinks from CounterPunch

by DAVE LINDORFF
Looking on the bright side, the Supreme Court has ruled that something that President Obama has done is definitively not unconstitutional.
That’s probably the best that can be said of the 5-4 decision by the High Court today in upholding the ironically named Affordable Health Care Act.
On the downside for Obama, he goes into the final four months of the election campaign saddled with a decision that says he has raised taxes on some of the nation’s poorest people — for that is what the court said will be happening, 18 months from now, when the health insurance mandate part of the new Act takes effect, and people who have no employer-provided health plan, and no other kind of coverage, fail to buy a policy for themselves and their families. They will be socked with a bill by the IRS, and while the Obama administration and supporters of the act in Congress were at pains to say that the payment such people would be hit with would be a fine, the Justices in the majority were adamant that it would be a tax.
Also taking a hit were Republicans, who universally oppose what they have been deprecatingly calling “Obamacare.” Republicans, including their presidential candidate- in-waiting Mitt Romney, have vowed to eliminate the act after the November election if they win, though unless they do surprisingly well in the Senate and come up with close to a 60-40 majority — very unlikely — they will in truth be unable to do that.
Romney, who as governor of Massachusetts launched a state health plan that included an insurance mandate with a fine for not having insurance, which was clearly the model for the federal law, is in the awkward position of another Massachusetts presidential contender, John Kerry, who went down to defeat in part because he voted for an $87-billion bill funding the Iraq War and then voted against it, leaving him lamely explaining to reporters that “I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.” Now Mitt Romney will have to be saying, for the next four months, that “I was for an insurance mandate before I was against it.”
Not an enviable position to be in as a candidate.
The real losers in the latest Supreme Court decision, however, are the people of the United States. Not those who will be required to go out and buy some over-priced, minimal coverage, rip-off insurance plan offered by the private insurance industry, or to pay a “tax” to the IRS for not doing so, but everyone.
This is because the Affordable Health Care Act is not affordable. It does little or nothing to control health care costs, which are destined to continue to gobble up an ever increasing amount of the total US Gross Domestic Product as well as of corporate profits and families’ incomes.
The new federal version of Romneycare simply prolongs the day when the US finally does what it should have done decades ago, should have done during the first Clinton administration, and should have done at the start of the Obama administration: namely expanding Medicare to cover all Americans.
Instead of going for this option when he had broad and enthusiastic support as the newly elected president, Obama deliberately shut out all discussion of the Canadian-style approach to national health coverage — a national program of government insurance for all, with doctors’ rates and hospital charges negotiated by the government — and instead devised a scheme that leaves the whole payment system in the hands of the private insurance industry, and effectively lets doctors and hospitals charge what they can get away with.
Obama did this because he was a huge recipient of money from all sectors of the health care industry — the insurance companies, the hospital companies, the American Medical Association, the big pharmaceutical firms, and the medical supply firms.
ObamaRomneyCare is at its core an enrichment scheme for nearly all elements of the Medical Industrial Complex, with the possible exception of the lowly family practice physician, nurses, and hospital workers.
There is a reason why Canadians, who have better health statistics than US citizens, as measured by access to care, life expectancy, infant mortality rates, etc., spend half as much as we Americans do on health care both as individuals and as a percent of national Gross Domestic Product. There is a reason why the US has far and away the costliest medical system in the world, and yet still has some 50 million people who cannot get preventive care, and who cannot be seen by a physician when they or their family members get sick or injured unless they go to a hospital emergency room.
On balance, Obama probably has a narrow win in the Supreme Court decision, because the alternative — having the Affordable Health Act ruled unconstitutional– would have been an unmitigated disaster for him. There are certainly bragging rights in being able to tell Republican critics that the Supreme Court, including its Chief Justice John Roberts, an appointee of George W. Bush, have ruled that it does pass Constitutional muster.
But it is a pyrrhic victory, both for Obama, who will now have to explain why it is a good thing to tax poor people who can’t come up with the money to buy a crummy mandated health insurance plan, and for the public, who are going to end up having to pay through the nose for this new law.
No “progressives” should be cheering this decision. It stinks.

Dave Lindorff is a founder of This Can’t Be Happening and a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, published by AK Press. Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He lives in Philadelphia.

And from Smart Girl Politics...

"...the Court ruled 9-0 that Obamacare was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause which was Obama’s whole defense of the bill. They also ruled 9-0 on the “necessary and proper” clause. Even better both of these rulings were unnecessary to the decision so it is gravy that we got the libs to concede this and it will make it easier to pare away at both theories in the future, which we must do. Well done."

What does the Roberts' decision mean for our future and the future of our Republic.... Have we been wrong ???

Lexington, South Carolina
To all my friends, particularly those conservatives who are despondent over the searing betrayal by Chief Justice John Roberts and the pending demise of our beloved country, I offer this perspective to convey some profound hope and evidence of the Almighty’s hand in the affairs of men in relation to the Supreme Court’s decision on Obamacare.
I initially thought we had cause for despondency when I only heard the results of the decision and not the reason or the make-up of the sides. I have now read a large portion of the decision and I believe that it was precisely the result that Scalia, Alito, Thomas, Roberts and even Kennedy wanted and not a defeat for conservatism or the rule of law. I believe the conservatives on the court have run circles around the liberals and demonstrated that the libs are patently unqualified to be on the Supreme Court. Let me explain.
First let me assure you that John Roberts is a conservative and he is not dumb, mentally unstable, diabolical, a turncoat, a Souter or even just trying to be too nice. He is a genius along with the members of the Court in the dissent. The more of the decision I read the more remarkable it became. It is not obvious and it requires a passable understanding of Constitutional law but if it is explained anyone can see the beauty of it.
The decision was going to be a 5-4 decision no matter what, so the allegation that the decision was a partisan political decision was going to be made by the losing side and their supporters. If the bill was struck down completely with Roberts on the other side there would have been a national and media backlash against conservatives and probably strong motivation for Obama supporters to come out and vote in November. With today’s decision that dynamic is reversed and there is a groundswell of support for Romney and Republicans, even for people who were formerly lukewarm toward Romney before today, additionally Romney raised more than 3 million dollars today.
Next, merely striking the law without the support of Democrats and libs would have left the fight over the commerce clause and the “necessary and proper “ clause and the federal government’s role in general festering and heading the wrong way as it has since 1942. As a result of the decision the libs are saying great things about Roberts; how wise, fair and reasonable he is. They would never have said that without this decision even after the Arizona immigration decision on Monday. In the future when Roberts rules conservatively it will be harder for the left and the media to complain about the Robert’s Court’s fairness. That’s why he as Chief Justice went to the other side for this decision not Scalia, Alito, Thomas or Kennedy, all of whom I believe would have been willing to do it.
Next let’s look at the decision itself. Thankfully Roberts got to write it as Chief Justice and it is a masterpiece. (As I write this the libs don’t even know what has happened they just think Roberts is great and that they won and we are all going to have free, unlimited healthcare services and we are all going to live happily ever after.) He first emphatically states that Obamacare is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause saying you cannot make people buy stuff. Then he emphatically states that it is unconstitutional under the “necessary and proper” clause which only applies to “enumerated powers” in the US Constitution. Justices Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan all went along with these statements. They never would have gone along with that sentiment if that was the basis for striking the law in total. This is huge because this means that the Court ruled 9-0 that Obamacare was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause which was Obama’s whole defense of the bill. They also ruled 9-0 on the “necessary and proper” clause. Even better both of these rulings were unnecessary to the decision so it is gravy that we got the libs to concede this and it will make it easier to pare away at both theories in the future, which we must do. Well done.
Roberts, through very tortured reasoning, goes on to find that the taxing law provides the Constitutionality for the law. Virtually everyone agrees that the Federal government has the power to do this as it does with the mortgage deduction for federal income taxes. This too is huge because Obama assiduously avoided using the term “tax” and now he has to admit this law is a tax and it is on everyone even the poor. That will hurt him hugely in the polls and will help Romney. More importantly though is the fact that this makes this a budgetary issue that can be voted on in the Senate by a mere majority instead of 60 votes needed to stop a filibuster. That means that if the Republicans can gain a majority in the Senate, it can vote to repeal Obamacare in total.
Finally the Court voted 7-2 to strike down the punitive rules that take away money from states that do not expand Medicare as required in Obamacare. This too is huge because we got Kagan and Breyer to join this decision and it can easily be applied to many other cases of extortion the Federal government uses to force states to do things they don’t want to. This is also amazing because Obamacare has no severability clause so by striking the Medicaid mandate portion as unconstitutional the whole bill should have been struck. If that happened none of these other benefits would have been accomplished. I haven’t read far enough to know how he did it but I am sure it is brilliant.
So to recap the Roberts court through a brilliant tactical maneuver has: strengthened the limitations of the commerce clause and the necessary and proper clause by a unanimous decision, made Obama raise taxes on the poor and middle classes, converted Obamacare into a tax program repealable with 51 votes in the Senate, enhanced Romney’s and Republican’s fundraising and likelihood of being elected in November, weakened federal extortion and got the left to love Roberts and sing his praises all without anyone even noticing. Even Obama is now espousing the rule of law just 2 weeks after violating it with his deportation executive order.
That is why I have decided this was a genius decision and that I did in fact get a great birthday present today not to mention U. S. Attorney General Eric Holder being held in contempt. What a day.