Friday, May 15, 2026

If Fauci and all those involved do not lose all their government benefits and end up in jail, consider this entire hearing just another waste of taxpayer dollars.

See full session below:

Sunday, May 3, 2026

"Out of this society of free men great leaders have sprung at every crisis in our history."

A FOREIGN POLICY FOR AMERICANS
By Senator Robert A. Taft
Doubleday & Company, Inc.,  1951

FOREWORD BY THE AUTHOR
.
..
...

3rd paragraph:

"Out of this society of free men great leaders have sprung at every crisis in our history. They have resembled each other singularly. In basic qualities of profound morality, courage, common sense, and foresight Lincoln was one with Washington." ~ Senator Robert A. Taft


I'm certain that if the good Senator were around today he would have added a third name to leaders quoted above.  So I have taken the liberty to rephrase his verbiage in the print below. 
Out of this society of free men great leaders have sprung at every crisis in our history. They have resembled each other singularly. In basic qualities of profound morality, courage, common sense, and foresight Lincoln was one with Washington and Donald Trump was one with both." ~ Author of this blogpost. 

UPDATE 

Foreword by the Author
I HAVE WRITTEN this book to emphasize the fact
that the freedom of the people of the United States is in serious
danger from the foreign policy of the present Administration.
I have frequently written of the danger to liberty at home from
the constant increase in the activity, the spending, and the
power of the Federal Government, but today the threat from
foreign policy is even greater. We have wandered far from its
true purpose to preserve the peace and liberty of the people of
the United States. Even when the purpose has been correctly
understood, mistakes of judgment have led us into dangerous
paths. We are embarked on a voyage at this moment in which
a continued failure of understanding and judgment may wreck
the greatest adventure in freedom the human race has ever
known.
Our forefathers came to a continent of forests, wide plains,
and savages. They lived by the work of their own hands. Those
who did not wish to work for another man opened new land
for themselves. There was no trace in their hard, free life of a
caste system or a feudal system or an inherited aristocracy.
More than a century before Marx was born a frontier equality
in social relations gave us—and still gives us—an unequaled
social democracy in the true sense of those Communist-per-
verted words. The pioneers, who carried with them one book,
the Bible, also laid up for us a moral capital which has not yet 6 Foreword by the Author
Out of this society of free men great leaders have sprung at
every crisis in our history. They have resembled each other
singularly. In basic qualities of profound morality, courage,
common sense, and foresight Lincoln was one with Wash-
ington.
Today we face threats to our liberty and moral foundation
from abroad and from our foreign and domestic programs.
Distance has been so diminished by the airplane, and weapons
have become so destructive, that this threat must be met on a
world scale. If we are foolish in our use of our strength, we
shall not survive; and with our freedom will disappear the
little that remains of freedom in the rest of the world.
Po^vexj^ithput foresight leads to disaster.-Our international
relations have been conducted with so little foresight since
1941 that six years after vast military victories in Europe and
Asia we face a more dangerous threat than any that has
menaced us before. Our soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen
have not failed us. Our political leaders have. By 1941 anyone
who was not bamboozled by Soviet psychological warfare
knew that the Soviet Government was a predatory totalitarian
tyranny intent on establishing Communist dictatorship through-
out the world. But our leaders failed to foresee that the Soviet
Union would turn against us after the defeat of Germany and
Japan. They made no attempt to insure our future against that
eventuality. They brought forth no positive policy for the crea-
tion of a free and united Europe or for the preservation of the
independence of China. They preferred wishful thinking to
facts, and convinced themselves that Stalin would co-operate
with them to create a free world of permanent peace. So at
Teheran, Yalta, and Potsdam they handed Stalin the freedom
of eastern Europe and Manchuria, and prepared our present
peril.
Their foresight was such that in face of all the facts, as late
as May 4, 1950, according to the New York Times, President
Truman "asserted repeatedly that he saw no possibility that Foreword by the Author 7
the 'cold war' wojulddevelop into a shooting war and even
promised to reduce the defense budget next year."
On June 25, 1950, the Korean war began. The deaths and
wounds that Americans have suffered there have at least
served to educate our national Administration—after the
event. It has been the most expensive education that the peo-
ple of the United States have ever paid for.
What is the record?
In 1945, when Mr. Truman became President, the Soviet
Union was exhausted. Much of its industry was destroyed. It
had no atomic bomb, no long-range bombing planes, no seri-
ous navy. Its hold on eastern Europe was shaky. China was
our ally and the Chinese Communists were hemmed into a
small area.
President Truman held such power as no man had ever held
before. Our air force was incomparably superior to any other.
Our navy was more powerful than the combined navies of the
rest of the world. Our army was a superb fighting force at the
peak of efficiency. Our industrial plant, by far the greatest in
the world, was intact. We alone had the atomic bomb which
guaranteed the speedy destruction of any nation that might
dare to risk war with us. We could have seized and held the
initiative for the creation of a free and peaceful world. Our
leaders did not know how or where to lead.
Today Stalin has atomic bombs and long-range bombers
capable of delivering them on the United States. He has 175
Soviet divisions, and 60 satellite divisions in Europe, and a
Chinese Communist army of about 3,000,000 in Asia. He has
some 50,000 tanks and more than 15,000 tactical aircraft. His
Indo-Chinese accomplices are draining the strength of the
French Army. His guerrillas are withstanding the British Army
in Malaya. He has riveted an iron control on eastern Europe.
China is his ally. To face Stalin's 225 divisions the Western
democracies and ourselves are scheduled to have thirty divi-
sions in Europe—perhaps—by the end of 1951. Moreover,
Soviet psychological warfare has been so successful in Western 8 Foreword by the Author
Europe that one fourth of the French and one third of the
Italians vote Communist.
In 1941 Stalin ruled 180 million subjects and was not sure
that he or his empire would survive. In 1951 Stalin directs 800
million people. Unless our foreign policy is conducted more
competently than it has been during the past ten years, our
very survival is in doubt. There may be infinite arguments as
to the wisdom of many steps in our foreign policy since 1943.
But there can be little argument as to its results.
There is an old saying that the road to hell is paved with
good intentions. Our national administration has had good
intentions.
We do not need to seek further than the Sermon on the
Mount to know the first step we must take if freedom under
God is to survive in our country and in the rest of the world:
"A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a
corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
"Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down,
and cast into the fire.
"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.






Saturday, May 2, 2026

Unbelievable!!! TSA allowed potential terrorists to re-board after causing a commotion and harassing the stewardess. Note: This story is from 2009.

Cancelled Flight- please read!!
source: Cindy Moon

Please read entire story, we should be very, very scared about this!

And to think that Fox News was the only channel that reported this. They may be "politically incorrect", but at least they had the "balls" to report it.

In my opinion, the Muslims are all getting very brave now. Read Tedd Petruna's story below. Can you imagine, our own news media now are so politically correct that they are afraid to report that these were all Muslims?

Unbelievable. Thank God for people like Tedd Petruna.

Tedd Petruna is a diver at the NBL (Neutral Buoyancy Lab) facility at NASA Houston . Tedd happened to be on the AirTran Flight 297, from Atlanta to Houston . Here's his report :

"One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. On Tuesday, the 17th, I returned home. If you read the papers the 18th you may have seen a blurb about where an Air Tran flight was canceled from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone before take- off.. The story was only on Fox News. That was NOT what really happened.

I was seated in 1st class coming home. Eleven Muslim men got on the plane in full Muslim attire. Two of them sat in 1st class and the rest seated themselves throughout the plane, in coach class, all the way to the back. As the plane taxied out to the runway, the stewardesses gave the safety spiel that we are all so familiar with.

At that time, one of the men in 1st class, got on his cell and called one of his companions back in coach. He proceeded to talk on the phone in Arabic very loudly and very, very aggressively. This activity took the 1st stewardess out of action for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones were not permitted at that time. He ignored her as if she were not there. The man, who answered the phone back in the coach section, did the same and this took out the 2nd stewardess. Further back in the plane, at the same time, two younger Muslims, one in the back on the aisle, and one sitting in front of him by the window, began to show footage of a porno video they had taped the night before. They were very loud about it.

The 3rd stewardess informed the two men that they were not to have any electronic devices on at this time. One of the men said "shut up infidel dog!"

The stewardess attempted to take the camcorder and the Muslim began to scream in her face in Arabic. At that exact moment, all eleven of the men got up and started to walk throughout the cabin. I guess that because of the noise, the flight crew must have decided that there was something amiss and changed the plane's directions to head back to the terminal.

The commotion and noise was reaching a feverish pitch, and at this point I had had enough! I got up and started towards the back of 1st class when I heard a voice behind me from another Texan twice my size, say, "I got your back." Then I grabbed the man, who had been on the cell phone, by the arm and said, "You WILL sit down in your seat or you WILL be thrown from this plane!" As I "led" him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed him back to his seat. I then grabbed the 2nd man and said, "You WILL do the same!"

He protested loudly, but my adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to go also. Just as I escorted him forward, the plane stopped, the doors opened and three TSA agents and four police officers entered the cabin. Myself and my new Texas friend were told to cease and desist for they had the situation under control.

I was quite happy to oblige, actually. There was still some sort of commotion in the back, but within moments, all eleven Muslim men were escorted off the plane. The TSA agents then had their luggage unloaded. We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happened.

Then suddenly, the door opened again and in walked all eleven Muslim men! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic, (the only way I can describe it) and they were reseated. The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw the men, she was having NONE of it! Since I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agents that there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with the Muslim men. The agent told her that they had searched the men and were going through their luggage with a fine tooth comb. However, nothing had been found and that the men were allowed to proceed on to Houston .

The captain and co-captain came out of the cockpit and told the agent, "We and our crew will not fly this plane!" After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. Five minutes later, the cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on. Again, this was where I had had enough! I got up and asked the TSA agent, "What the hell is going on?

I was told to take my seat. The airlines and TSA were sorry for the delay and we would be home shortly. I said, "I'm getting off this plane". The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off. Now I'm really mad! I said, "I am a grown man who bought this ticket, whose time is mine, with a family at home, and I am going through that door, or I'm going through that door with you under my arm, but I AM going through that door!"

And then I heard a voice behind me say, "So am I!" Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same thing. Within two minutes, I was walking off that plane where I was met by more TSA agents, who asked me to write a statement about the incident. I had five hours to kill at this point waiting for the next flight to Houston , so why the hell not give them my statement. Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it was canceled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6 PM , but I finally got there at 12:30 AM . If you don't believe this, look up the date and then Flight 297 from Atlanta to Houston .

If this wasn't a terrorism dry run, I don't know what is. The terrorists wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it. I'm telling this to you because I want you to know. The threat IS real. I saw it with my own eyes."

Tedd Petruna

Bottom line: Don't board airplane ✈️ with suspicious-looking folks !


Follow up story:

AirTran e-mail stirs up Internet firestorm

The FAA is investigating an incident aboard an AirTran flight from Atlanta to Houston that touched off a firestorm of e-mails. AirTran Flight 297 was delayed on November 17 after a passenger refused to turn off his cell phone.

The FAA is investigating an incident aboard an AirTran flight from Atlanta to Houston that touched off a firestorm of e-mails.

AirTran Flight 297 was delayed on November 17 after a passenger refused to turn off his cell phone.

An e-mail sent out by Houstonian Tedd Petruna, who was on the flight, said that wasn t the whole story. Petruna's e-mail said there were 11 Muslims traveling together on the plane and two of them ignored flight attendants' orders to turn off their cell phones. He said they shouted at the flight attendants, and he and another passenger had to intervene.

Petruna said the 11 Muslims were removed from the plane, but allowed back on after they were searched. That angered the crew and many passengers, according to Petruna.His e-mailsaid the crew left the plane and so did some of the passengers.

According to the e-mail, Petruna and other passengers believed they witnessed a dry run for a terrorist attack.

Petruna said he couldn t talk to 11 News on camera, but Chaplain Keith Robinson, who was also on the flight, did talk with us


Who's dream will come true? Zohran or Jon


 

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

9 to 0 Supreme Court finally makes the right decision.

Monday, April 27, 2026

When a friend* is a friend? When he slams 60 Minutes back into the stoneage where they belong.

WHEN 'JOURNALISM' IS USED AS A WEAPON by Ken Bhirdo 


The O'Donnell interview is a stark example of why there have been 3 assassination attempts on President Trump. Norah O'Donnell just gave us the pettiness of CBS News’ 60 Minutes and yet another disgusting look at what the institution of journalism has become. 

There is a difference between tough journalism and uncalled for cruelty. CBS News correspondent Norah O'Donnell crossed that line Sunday night  and it happened less than 24 hours after Cole Allen stormed the White House Correspondents' Dinner with a shotgun, a handgun, and a couple of knives.

President Trump had just been exposed to what appears to be the third attempt on his life. He sat down with O'Donnell on 60 Minutes, a program which long ago lost its reputation as a serious, consequential place to see real journalism.  The premise of this interview was seemingly to discuss security failures and the shooter's motives. What he got instead was a journalist who couldn't resist the moment to attempt to humiliate him on national television.

O'Donnell read aloud from Cole Allen's alleged manifesto: "I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes." Then she asked Trump: "What's your reaction to that?"

It’s hard to fathom such a thing happening, but it has become all too typical for this one President.  A sitting president, hours after an assassination attempt, was forced to sit on camera and deny being a pedophile and a rapist, words pulled from the document written by the sick mind of the man who just tried to kill him and his entire cabinet. Words he had heard from the very people like the one interviewing Trump. 

This was not journalism. This was theater. Ugly, planned and calculated theater. O'Donnell made a conscious decision to read those specific words on air. The manifesto reportedly contained a great deal of content with political grievances, references to attending "No Kings" rallies, detailed tactical planning. Trump himself noted in the interview that O'Donnell didn't read the parts about the shooter's radicalization or the "No Kings" rallies that may have influenced him. She extracted  the most inflammatory, most personally degrading sentence she could find.

Trump, in his typical combative style snapped: "I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you're horrible people." Say what you will about the president's tone  he wasn't wrong about the intent. O'Donnell's snarky follow-up question,  "Oh, do you think he was referring to you?" confirmed it. She wasn't informing viewers about a manifesto. She was trying to bait and shame Trump into defending himself against the words of the man who tried to kill him.

Ask yourself this question: Would this have happened to Barack Obama or Joe Biden? Imagine a gunman had tried to assassinate President Obama. Imagine the shooter left behind a manifesto containing vile, false personal accusations. Would any major network journalist  have read those accusations aloud to Obama's face and then asked, "what's your reaction?"

The answer is obvious and would be a resounding no. The outrage would have been instant and career-ending. It would have been called dehumanizing, and an unconscionable abuse of journalism. 

The standard that protects every other president, every other public figure, apparently does not extend to Trump. 

This interview came in the immediate aftermath of a violent event. Journalists were in that very hotel. Members of the media were among those who fled or crouched below tables when gunshots were heard. You might expect some sort of reflection about the violent climate created by the very people who were feeling the same fear felt by the President, his family, and those in his administration. Do they not recognize it was their rhetoric that fed Cole Allen’s anger? And he was using the very lies and hyperbole they themselves have used to characterize Trump?  Amid all this, CBS chose to amplify the words used by them and the would-be assassin on the most-watched news program in America.

This hateful behavior began in 2015 and this interview is the just the end product of all those years of coverage in which the norms of decency vanish when the subject is Donald Trump. Does O’Donnell think she did something brave by reading those lines to a president’s face? It wasn’t brave, it was shameful. Serious questions deserve to be asked about the attempted attack at the Correspondents' Dinner including Secret Service failures, the shooter's radicalization, and whether the political climate is contributing to violence. Those are the questions a serious journalist would have led with and discussed.

Instead, they once again fueled more dissention, more divisiveness and more hatred.  Good job, CBS.

*The author, Ken Bhirdo, is a friend of mine.

Thursday, April 23, 2026

WE ARE ALL READY IN DANGER...but the general public doesn't know it. STRIKE THAT !!! THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DOESN'T KNOW IT!!!

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

SPLC indicted!!! Best news we heard all day!

I don't remember how many years ago it was when we openly talked about the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and its Leftist views, but it was indeed brought up on our radio show by our then host, Ron Arnold...and if it makes any difference, I was the co-host.  Jack Mizell monitored the phone calls.  
Then on another occasion (I cannot mention any names) while attending a classroom setting I had to interrupt the speaker who was preaching pro SPLC propaganda and set him straight about who they really are.  
Now I don't need to get into any of the details about what was said at the time but I'm sure all who are mentioned above will be happy to know we are all exonerated for our past beliefs with the recent indictments of the SPLC.  ~ Norman E. Hooben 



Watch the following video

"Our most valuable assets are not on the ground."

1

Simulating multiple emitters In operational situations, many emitter signals are present at the same time, and pulse-on-pulse situations can easily occur. Cutting-edge radar signal simulation in the lab Cutting-edge radar signal simulation in the lab The key feature of a radar warning receiver is the ability to identify these signals. The EW computer of the platform compares the intercepted signals with emitter parameters that are loaded into an onboard library before the flight. It is vital to ensure a realistic and representative test environment with multiple emitters in the lab from day one of the engineering phase. The R&S®SMW200A vector signal generator together with the R&S®Pulse Sequencer software package is a powerful off the-shelf radar signal simulator. It can simulate RF emitter signals from single or multiple static or moving emitters in the lab.

United States Air Force illustration of a hypothetical Soviet Armed Forces space weapon


Monday, April 20, 2026

THE POPE IS SETTING A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT

 General Mike Flynn

The photo below was taken at a prominent Catholic Church in Florida today. This type of information warfare against “MAGA”, against President Trump, is just beginning. It is dangerous, it is very political, it is fifth generational, and most definitely, it is spiritual warfare.

There are approximately 1.4B Catholics worldwide. The largest Christian denomination in the world. Fact is, without the Catholic vote, one cannot be President of The United States of America.

This Pope is consciously choosing political sides. He is emerging as a woke globalist instead of a humble servant of Jesus Christ representing the Church of Peter.

The Pope should represent humility and courage in the face of the evil that walks the earth.

Does he truly see President Donald J. Trump as evil?

I think not.

I believe he is moving at a speed directed by his masters (not God). The Pope, as a man, needs to be reminded that humility in the face of God is courage. Courage without humility in the face of man is dangerous.

It is shocking how many Catholics are upset at Trump currently. It shows the unhealthy allegiance that they hold for any man, including the Pope.

In Revelation 19:10, we are told not to worship even an angel, but only God, so certainly we should not worship a man, even the Pope.

In Acts 10:25, Peter (the first Pope) says that he is just a man and not to worship him but to worship only God.

In Jeremiah 17:5 says that we are cursed if we trust in man or in our strength.

With access to greater knowledge, all of us see a darker underbelly of our international political systems and the depravity of humanity (truly).

So what? Thrust yourselves into the word of God instead of focusing on the word of man. I know that is the challenge of a lifetime, but for some individuals and even for a few nations, it could save lives.

Why? Because all men say dumb things at times. It may be purposeful for a circumstance or it may just be ignorance. If our hope and trust remains in Jesus, that allows us to walk through these uncertain times unphased.

If it isn’t clear enough yet, it will become even more clear in the months ahead.



Saturday, April 18, 2026

NATO: It sounds like they're singing the Chief Joseph song, "I will fight no more forever."

A Foolish NATO Was a Big Loser in the Iran War - Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

NATO members are not legally required to join any member’s military operations that are not formally sanctioned by the alliance or not aimed at protecting the homelands of the membership.

But they often do just that.

Some NATO members joined the Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq on the theory that, in the post-9/11 environment, the Taliban and Saddam Hussein were dangers to all Western security.

They followed the precedent set by America’s 1999 intervention in the distant Balkans, leading a three-month NATO campaign to dismantle Slobodan Milošević’s often bloody ambitions of a Greater Serbia. The U.S. also joined the 2011 U.N.-approved, and French- and British-inspired, NATO “coalition of the willing” bombing campaign in Libya.

That effort proved a seven-month misadventure—especially since the targeted Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi had given up his nuclear weapons program and was desperately trying to cut a deal with the West.
When NATO members in the past have operated unilaterally to defend their own national interests, they have often called on the U.S., as NATO’s strongest member, for overt help.

For nearly 40 years, the U.S. had offered logistical, intelligence, reconnaissance, refueling, and diplomatic support to the French in their unilateral and postcolonial efforts to protect Chad from Libya and, later, Islamists.

During the 1982 Falklands War, a solitary Britain faced enormous logistical challenges in steaming halfway around the world to eject Argentina from its windswept and sparse islands.

U.S. aid was critical to the effort.

So America stepped up to help with intelligence, reconnaissance, the supply of some two million gallons of much-needed gasoline, and crucial restocking of Britain’s depleted Tomahawk missiles.

The American tilt to Britain prompted anger from most Latin American nations of the shared Western hemisphere, as well as from many Hispanic American citizens at home.

No matter—Ronald Reagan rightly saw the importance of solidarity with a NATO member and a long-time American ally. So he gave Britain a veritable blank check for American aid.

Currently, America has not asked NATO members to help bomb Iran—even though Europe, not the U.S., was in range of Iranian ballistic missiles, and soon perhaps nuclear-tipped ones as well.

Europeans are far more vulnerable to Iranian-inspired Islamic terrorism. They are more reliant on foreign oil from the Middle East, some of it passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

All the U.S. had initially asked for was basing support in disarming a common Western enemy that, for nearly half a century, has slaughtered American diplomats and soldiers and tried to kill a U.S. president and secretary of state.

But most NATO members could not even offer tacit help. Some damned the U.S. effort as either illegal or unnecessary.

The American public watched the British waffle for days over permitting Americans to use their Diego Garcia base.

The Spanish banned American use of their NATO bases and airspace.

The Italians refused a request from American bombers to land and refuel at a Sicilian NATO base.

Many NATO heads of state rebuked the U.S. to their domestic audiences while, in typical two-faced fashion, publicly offering empty verbal support for the U.S. effort.

The NATO response to an Iranian missile aimed at fellow NATO member Turkey was anemic.

Even worse was the pathetic British reaction to another Iranian missile launch at a British base at Akrotiri, Cyprus.

Yet a successful American effort in neutering a theocratic Iran was clearly of benefit to Europe. So is preventing the international waters of the Strait of Hormuz from becoming a toll booth run by the Iranian mullahs.

Such passivity was in sharp contrast to the five-year-long Ukraine War on the borders of Europe.

Ukraine was not in NATO.

Ukrainian politicos and ambassadors had sometimes played an intrusive, partisan role in the 2016, 2020, and 2024 American presidential elections.

Nonetheless, there were urgent European requests for the U.S. to honor the spirit of NATO solidarity and to get across the Atlantic as quickly as possible to protect the territorial integrity of Europe.

Yet continental Europe is not intrinsically weak. The combined population of the European Union and European NATO members is around 450 million—a population more than 100 million greater than that of the U.S.

These same European nations enjoy an aggregate annual GDP of more than $22 trillion, 10 times the size of the Russian economy.

European diffidence comes on top of the perennial American effort to harangue NATO members to honor their 2 percent of GDP defense commitments—especially in the case of deadbeat Spain and Canada, who for years welched on their pledges.

Trump’s harangues were not what was undermining NATO.

Instead, he ripped off a happy-face scab and exposed a festering wound of increasingly anti-American hypocrisy beneath.

If you wanted to wreck the alliance, there would be no better way than to follow the duplicitous examples of Western European NATO members.

"It's very hard to fully grasp what we just went through." - Artemis II Commander Reid Wiseman

NEW: Artemis II Commander Reid Wiseman reflects on being MOVED to tears by the Christian cross after returning to Earth from the historic expedition:

"When I got back on the... on the ship — I'm not really a religious person — but there was just no other avenue for me to explain anything or to experience anything."

"So I asked for the chaplain on the Navy ship to just come visit us for a minute, and when that man walked in, I'd never met him before in my life. But I saw the cross on his collar, and I just broke down in tears."

"It's very hard to fully grasp what we just went through."

Personally, I don’t think that it will end anytime soon. If history teaches us anything, I'd say we're closer to WWIII than any of us want to admit.

 

Friday, April 17, 2026

What are your principles worth to you?

Certainly one of my most cherished books but as I get closer to the end of the road downsizing becomes a major preoccupation trying to decide who gets what.  So this one went to a friend who I'm sure will keep it in his library and  learn from it...or even quote from it so others can appreciate the unbiasness of an honorable man; Clarence Thomas, my favorite judge at the Supreme Court of the United States.~ Norman E Hooben 

 "I ain't never votin' fo' another
Democrat long as I can draw
breath."  ~ From the book, 'My
Grandfather's Son' by Clarence 
Thomas.  Quote is from 
Thomas's mother.



Thursday, April 9, 2026

Blood Brothers

Paul and I were lifetime friends…actually, there has to be better words to describe us as just ordinary friends…and I have it. We were blood brothers.

We spent nine years of our childhood dreaming of our future and playing like we were American Indians because we enjoyed their connection to nature and their fellow humans. To become bonded to the American Indian, one would make a small cut on the arm closest to the heart while the Indian did likewise. Then the two would tie their bleeding arms together and swear their allegiance to one another for life.
Paul always said he was part Indian and wanted to perform such a ritual between us. And we did! Two 12-year-old boys cutting their arms with a crude jack knife and tying arms with a ragged cloth; we were now bonded for life.
Today I got a call from Avie; Paul has gone to the Great Reservation in the sky…I will say no more forever. 
*
More like 2017... It was at Grumpy's in Dennis on Cape Cod

Paul, Ronnie, Norm, Armand

* Not to be confused with, "I'll fight no more, forever." Chief Joseph

Ronnie                         Jeff                            Paul 


Sunday, April 5, 2026

Once upon a time... AMERICAN HOMEOWNERS GOT THE SHAFT...a wooden shaft 😆 and it's not so funny 😐



..

Kash Patel's Email Breach Exposes K Street Traitors, Soros-Funded Chaos, and a $9.7 Trillion Iranian Vault Scandal

BREAKING: Iran Hacked the Wrong Man: Kash Patel's Email Breach Exposes K Street Traitors, Soros-Funded Chaos, and a $9.7 Trillion Iranian Vault Scandal


They thought they could humiliate FBI Director Kash Patel. Instead, Iran's hackers just lit a fuse that could blow the whole deep state wide open.

On Friday, the Iran-linked Handala Hack Team smashed into Patel's personal Gmail account. They dumped old photos, emails, and a resume online, hoping to embarrass the Trump administration's top cop amid the Iran showdown. The FBI confirmed the breach but stressed no classified material was touched. Patel did not flinch. He triggered CROSSFIRE RETURN, a buried counter-intelligence protocol that traces every hack back to its real source. The trail did not lead only to Tehran. It pointed straight to K Street in Washington, D.C. – the lobbying swamp where insiders play both sides.

Connect the dots from the last 72 hours and the picture gets ugly fast.

In a recent Senate hearing, Senator John Kennedy stared down Patel and pressed hard on Jeffrey Epstein's files: Did somebody kill him? Were others involved in trafficking minors? The room went dead quiet. Patel confirmed no credible evidence in the files showed Epstein trafficking minors to others beyond the known 2008 case, but the exchange ripped open fresh questions about what the feds are still hiding from the public. Kennedy has hammered this for months, demanding full transparency on the Epstein archives that keep getting stonewalled.

Then came another bombshell. Reuters exposed traders who placed over $500 million in oil futures bets just 15 minutes before President Trump announced a delay in strikes on Iran's energy infrastructure. Oil prices tanked 15 percent in minutes. Same accounts, same clearinghouse. Someone always knows. Someone always profits.

Next, millions hit the streets for "No Kings" protests chanting against Trump. Buses rolled in, identical signs appeared by the millions, and the whole thing looked anything but grassroots. A Fox News probe nailed it: roughly 500 activist groups with a combined $3 billion in annual revenue are bankrolling the operation, including Indivisible (Soros-linked), socialist outfits, and outright communists pushing "revolution." This was not organic outrage. It was a coordinated hit job timed to perfection.

Now the real story. The hack was not just about embarrassing Patel. It was routed through Iran to spark a diplomatic firestorm and kill a planned U.S. ground operation on Kharg Island. That rocky strip in the Persian Gulf is not just Iran's top oil export hub, handling 90 percent of its crude. U.S. officials have it in the crosshairs as a potential target to choke Tehran's cash flow. Intelligence insiders say beneath the surface lie hidden vaults holding the original ledgers of every shady U.S.-Iran financial deal since the 1979 revolution. The figure? $9.7 trillion. That's the same staggering sum tied to the Federal Reserve audit Trump demanded and got blocked on.

Patel's protocol traced the intrusion to a server farm in Northern Virginia. The same location that once housed the Epstein scheduling database – the one with over 14,000 entries mysteriously "deleted" years ago. It was not erased. It was moved. And now the trail leads right there.

This is not about Iran alone. It is about the domestic enemies who feed off endless foreign entanglements, secret slush funds, and blackmailed elites. Patel just got handed the map. Trump has the leverage. The deep state, the K Street fixers, the Soros network, and their Iranian cutouts just made the biggest mistake of their lives.

The ground game is not coming. It is already here. And the people who hacked Patel just showed America exactly where to strike next.

Sources:

Axios  
Al Jazeera  
Wired  
Reuters  
Fox News  
PBS  
CNBC

HT MR POOL

Monday, March 30, 2026

Mary In The Quran

Skip to main contentAccessibility feedback

Mary in the Quran

Listen to the audio version of this content

Many Catholics engaged in evangelization with Muslims point to Islam’s reverence for Mary as a possible bridge between the two religions. What exactly do Muslims believe about our Blessed Mother?

Let us look at what the Quran has to say in the two main sections where it mentions Mary, and examine areas of commonality with Catholic teaching. I’ll also point out some areas where you can ask questions to lead to interesting discussions.

Mary is a big deal in Islam. Only one surah (or chapter) in the entire Quran is named after a woman—Surah 19—and it is named after Mary. In fact, Mary is the only woman who is named at all in the Quran! This has impressed some Islamic authorities (though admittedly a small minority) to consider Mary a nabiyya or prophetess. The majority of Muslims consider her to be exceptionally pious and of the highest spiritual rank among women.

Quran 3:42 says, “O Mary, indeed Allah has chosen you and purified you and chosen you above the women of the worlds.” One Hadith (the Book of Virtuous Qualities 5837) records that neither Jesus nor Mary was “pricked by Satan” at birth— something that happens to everyone else. Needless to say, in Muslim eyes she is exceptional.

Surah 3: The House of Imran

Narrowing our discussion to the Quran, we begin in Surah 3. The treatment begins in verses 33-49 with an explanation that the line from Adam to Noah to Abraham to Imran (the Quranic name for Mary’s father) was chosen by God in a special way. Imran is said to have died before Mary’s birth, and her mother, Hannah (Anna) dedicated her to service in the temple, where Zechariah takes care of her.

A number of angels appear to Zechariah and announce the coming of John, and then, in a scene like the Annunciation, they turn to Mary and tell her that God has chosen her above all women and purified her. The angels then speak of Jesus, describing him as, “A Word from [God],” named the Messiah. The segment wraps up with Mary wondering how this could happen and a statement that God can do whatever he wills whenever he wills.

The Quran exalts Mary because God chose her and because of her purity. She was chosen to serve in the temple, a job seen as more suitable for men. Moreover, her purity is a purity of intention and service, but also a preservation from defilement by others. There is a lot with which Catholic can agree here.

Some other points for discussion in this Surah:

  • It seems likely that some of the traditions recorded in the (apocryphal) Protoevangelium of James have made it into this segment.
  • The parallel between Hannah, the mother of the prophet Samuel, and Hannah, the mother of Mary, is intriguing.
  • There are a number of times in the Quran where names and relations are not accurate—the most obvious in this case is Imran, which is closer to Amram (the father of Miriam, Aaron, and Abraham) than Joachim. Although this can be explained to a degree by typology, it can also be simply confusing two people of the same name. So it bears asking: if the Quran is the perfect word of God, why would there be a number of errors with regard to names and relations? Shouldn’t it be accurate and clear?
  • What does it mean for Jesus to be called a Messiah in the Quran?

Surah 19: Maryam

Surah Maryam 19:16-36 overlaps slightly with Surah Al Imran, jumping in at the Annunciation. Here, Mary has withdrawn from her family when the angel Gabriel comes upon her in the form of a perfect man and announces that God will bestow a perfect boy unto her. She conceives a son and retreats to a palm tree when it is time to give birth.

While giving birth, she cries out, “Would that I had died before this and were a thing forgotten, utterly forgotten!” From below her, either Jesus or the angel (it’s unclear) explains that God has given her water and food from the dates of the palm tree and a rivulet from the base of the tree. Then she swears a vow of silence and returns to her family.

When her family sees her and Jesus, they question why she has a baby without a husband. Mary points to the infant Jesus, who is able to respond,

“Truly I am a servant of God. He has given me the Book and made me a prophet. He has made me blessed where so ever I may be, and has enjoined upon me prayer and almsgiving so long as I live, and [has made me] dutiful toward my mother. And he has not made me domineering, wretched. Peace be upon me the day I was born, the day I die, and the day I am raised alive!”

Purity again comes up as an important theme in this segment. Mary not only comes from the pure Davidic line, but she is also preserved in purity by God as a result of her mother’s prayerful petitions. Mary retreats for solitude so she can worship, emphasizing the necessity of extracting oneself from the world and worldly things in order to spend time in solitude to encounter God.

In the birth scene, God miraculously provides food and water to Mary and she expresses a desire for her own death. Christians agree that God is the author of miracles and that he provides for his people. Moreover, some Muslim commentators use Mary as an example of how we should die to ourselves. This sense of “death to self” is very important within Catholic spirituality as well.

In this chapter is much that is questionable. For Muslims, despite the Virgin Birth, there is no sense of divine paternity. On the contrary, 3:59 says, “In God’s eyes Jesus is just like Adam: He created him from dust, said to him, ‘Be’, and he was.” We should object to this expression of God’s power at the expense of reason. How can it be that Jesus was created from dust if he was born of a woman? If by God’s direct miraculous action a child was conceived without a father, wouldn’t he in some sense be the Father?

Concerning the birth scene, you might ask, what happened to Bethlehem, the shepherds and the Magi? Why are there segments in the Quran that are confusing and deviate so drastically from commonly accepted and established historical facts? The scene where Mary takes a vow of silence and the infant Jesus speaks from the cradle parallels a similar segment in the (apocryphal) Syriac Infancy Gospel, where Jesus likewise speaks about his mission from the cradle in the presence of Mary. If the Quran is God’s unadulterated word, why does it contain information from apocryphal Christian texts like the Syriac Infancy Gospel and the Protoevangelium of James?

Containing much that is false and/or of questionable origin, the Quran’s teachings about Mary are far from a perfect “bridge” between Islam and Christianity. Nonetheless, they give us a broad platform of agreement from which we can attempt to build commonality—and ask probing questions that may point Muslims to the truth of the gospel.

 

We’re a nonprofit —no ads, just truth. Will you help us stay that way? 

More from the Magazine

Who Killed Jesus: The Romans or the Jews?

Fr. Samuel Keyes | 3/29/2026

When Jesus Commands Us to Hate

Matthew Becklo | 3/27/2026

The Pain of Stolen Honey

Steve Ray | 3/26/2026

Talarico Botches the Annunciation

Trent Horn | 3/25/2026
Enjoying this content?  Please support our mission!

Make a difference!

Finish your donation to create an impact today.