Friday, October 16, 2026

End "too big to jail." This is money laundering.

Bank of America was just fined 1.2 billion dollars. For money laundering for China. No one went to prison. The fine will be paid by the bank's shareholders. Those responsible will not see their lives changed at all. The below letter was written by a whistleblower of BOA in 2010 describing how doing the right thing destroyed his life. Long, but well worth the read.

Everett Stern @EverettStern1
Dear Secretary Bessent
@SecScottBessent,

My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.

The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank's profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.

I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.

I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.

Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.

Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with "America" in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.

Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.

A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.

This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.

There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.

Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: "Justice is the defense of our liberty." I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel's money should be standing next to him.

I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.

This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.

Three things would change the math overnight.

Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury's history combined.

End "too big to jail." An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.

And if Bank of America will not act as America's bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.

Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.

I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.

Respectfully,

Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit

Tuesday, October 6, 2026

NEVER FORGET

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

OBAMA’S SECRET USAID PIPELINE TO CHELSEA CLINTON


OBAMA’S SECRET USAID PIPELINE TO CHELSEA CLINTON: $3.9 MILLION A YEAR FOR 11,886 MEALS AT $1,410 APIECE WHILE SHE LIVES LIKE A BILLIONAIRE

By Jonathan Gregory 


Washington D.C. - September 29, 2026

In a revelation that will surprise no one who watched President Trump spend years exposing the foreign-aid swamp, records now show Barack Obama locked in annually recurring USAID funding for Chelsea Clinton’s foundation. The money was sold to the public as a humanitarian program delivering afternoon meals to children in Africa, India, and Bangladesh. Instead it has become a reliable $3.9 million annual transfer from American taxpayers into the Clinton family’s orbit, continuing year after year with almost no public scrutiny.

The results are grotesque. As of today the foundation claims to have served just 11,886 meals. That works out to an astonishing $1,410 per meal, more than many working families spend on food in an entire month. Meanwhile Chelsea Clinton’s personal net worth sits at $70 million, her husband Marc Mezvinsky’s at $45 million, and she has already collected a $52 million inheritance. The couple holds $25 million in real estate, maintains an eight-car collection, and spends $100,000 every month. The contrast between the luxury lifestyle and the tiny number of actual meals delivered is impossible to ignore.

Chelsea Clinton has produced no independent record of accomplishment that would justify this pipeline of public money. She inherited the name, the connections, and now a standing USAID allocation that President Obama put in place. The episode is a textbook example of the waste and self dealing Trump campaigned against; elite families treating foreign-aid accounts as personal endowments while the children the program is supposed to feed remain an afterthought. Voters who backed Trump’s America First approach to foreign spending saw this coming a long time ago.


- Jonathan Gregory 

@TrumpNews


@Storm'n Norm'n 


Monday, September 28, 2026

I wouldn't hesitate for a moment to call the citizens of Boston cowards for not putting Mayor Wu where she belongs. Storm'n Norm'n


Source

#News Democrat Mayor of Boston is paying illegal migrants to complete a training course teaching them how to engage with government officials, how to organize the community (protests) and become an advocate.  

#Boston 

If you are a native-born Bostonian, you are not eligible for the program.  

#Massachusetts 

Meaning, Mayor Michelle Wu is using taxpayer dollars to fund a program for illegal migrants that Boston taxpayers are not allowed to take part in.  

Wu’s Office for Immigrant Advancement is running Immigrants Lead Boston, a 10-week course that pays people $575 for the training “regardless of their immigration status.”  

The city calls this “civic engagement” and “equitable access to government.”  

The rest of the world and people with common sense call it discrimination and an illegal use of American tax dollars.  

They say Wu is teaching illegal migrants how to protest ICE and American values, get elected to government offices and become anti-American advocates.  

People born here who pay the taxes funding the program cannot apply.  

People with no legal status can.  

Illegal migrants who graduated from the class in the past have advocated to get driver's licenses for illegals and rent control.  

Critics say when protests appear overnight, this is the kind of pipeline that makes that possible. 

If taxpayers are footing the bill, should they be eligible to sit in the same class? Is this really a cover for grooming Democrat extremists? 

#ChristinaAguayoNews

I wouldn't hesitate for a moment to 
call the citizens of Boston cowards 
for not putting Mayor Wu where
she belongs. 
Storm'n Norm'n 


Wednesday, September 23, 2026

THE INTERVIEW there are more people dying of heat death than gun deaths

One of the best interviews ever!
Elon tells the interviewer, "You are falling asleep at the switch."