Saturday, May 2, 2026

Unbelievable!!! TSA allowed potential terrorists to re-board after causing a commotion and harassing the stewardess. Note: This story is from 2009.

Cancelled Flight- please read!!
source: Cindy Moon

Please read entire story, we should be very, very scared about this!

And to think that Fox News was the only channel that reported this. They may be "politically incorrect", but at least they had the "balls" to report it.

In my opinion, the Muslims are all getting very brave now. Read Tedd Petruna's story below. Can you imagine, our own news media now are so politically correct that they are afraid to report that these were all Muslims?

Unbelievable. Thank God for people like Tedd Petruna.

Tedd Petruna is a diver at the NBL (Neutral Buoyancy Lab) facility at NASA Houston . Tedd happened to be on the AirTran Flight 297, from Atlanta to Houston . Here's his report :

"One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. On Tuesday, the 17th, I returned home. If you read the papers the 18th you may have seen a blurb about where an Air Tran flight was canceled from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone before take- off.. The story was only on Fox News. That was NOT what really happened.

I was seated in 1st class coming home. Eleven Muslim men got on the plane in full Muslim attire. Two of them sat in 1st class and the rest seated themselves throughout the plane, in coach class, all the way to the back. As the plane taxied out to the runway, the stewardesses gave the safety spiel that we are all so familiar with.

At that time, one of the men in 1st class, got on his cell and called one of his companions back in coach. He proceeded to talk on the phone in Arabic very loudly and very, very aggressively. This activity took the 1st stewardess out of action for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones were not permitted at that time. He ignored her as if she were not there. The man, who answered the phone back in the coach section, did the same and this took out the 2nd stewardess. Further back in the plane, at the same time, two younger Muslims, one in the back on the aisle, and one sitting in front of him by the window, began to show footage of a porno video they had taped the night before. They were very loud about it.

The 3rd stewardess informed the two men that they were not to have any electronic devices on at this time. One of the men said "shut up infidel dog!"

The stewardess attempted to take the camcorder and the Muslim began to scream in her face in Arabic. At that exact moment, all eleven of the men got up and started to walk throughout the cabin. I guess that because of the noise, the flight crew must have decided that there was something amiss and changed the plane's directions to head back to the terminal.

The commotion and noise was reaching a feverish pitch, and at this point I had had enough! I got up and started towards the back of 1st class when I heard a voice behind me from another Texan twice my size, say, "I got your back." Then I grabbed the man, who had been on the cell phone, by the arm and said, "You WILL sit down in your seat or you WILL be thrown from this plane!" As I "led" him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed him back to his seat. I then grabbed the 2nd man and said, "You WILL do the same!"

He protested loudly, but my adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to go also. Just as I escorted him forward, the plane stopped, the doors opened and three TSA agents and four police officers entered the cabin. Myself and my new Texas friend were told to cease and desist for they had the situation under control.

I was quite happy to oblige, actually. There was still some sort of commotion in the back, but within moments, all eleven Muslim men were escorted off the plane. The TSA agents then had their luggage unloaded. We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happened.

Then suddenly, the door opened again and in walked all eleven Muslim men! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic, (the only way I can describe it) and they were reseated. The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw the men, she was having NONE of it! Since I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agents that there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with the Muslim men. The agent told her that they had searched the men and were going through their luggage with a fine tooth comb. However, nothing had been found and that the men were allowed to proceed on to Houston .

The captain and co-captain came out of the cockpit and told the agent, "We and our crew will not fly this plane!" After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. Five minutes later, the cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on. Again, this was where I had had enough! I got up and asked the TSA agent, "What the hell is going on?

I was told to take my seat. The airlines and TSA were sorry for the delay and we would be home shortly. I said, "I'm getting off this plane". The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off. Now I'm really mad! I said, "I am a grown man who bought this ticket, whose time is mine, with a family at home, and I am going through that door, or I'm going through that door with you under my arm, but I AM going through that door!"

And then I heard a voice behind me say, "So am I!" Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same thing. Within two minutes, I was walking off that plane where I was met by more TSA agents, who asked me to write a statement about the incident. I had five hours to kill at this point waiting for the next flight to Houston , so why the hell not give them my statement. Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it was canceled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6 PM , but I finally got there at 12:30 AM . If you don't believe this, look up the date and then Flight 297 from Atlanta to Houston .

If this wasn't a terrorism dry run, I don't know what is. The terrorists wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it. I'm telling this to you because I want you to know. The threat IS real. I saw it with my own eyes."

Tedd Petruna

Bottom line: Don't board airplane ✈️ with suspicious-looking folks !


Follow up story:

AirTran e-mail stirs up Internet firestorm

The FAA is investigating an incident aboard an AirTran flight from Atlanta to Houston that touched off a firestorm of e-mails. AirTran Flight 297 was delayed on November 17 after a passenger refused to turn off his cell phone.

The FAA is investigating an incident aboard an AirTran flight from Atlanta to Houston that touched off a firestorm of e-mails.

AirTran Flight 297 was delayed on November 17 after a passenger refused to turn off his cell phone.

An e-mail sent out by Houstonian Tedd Petruna, who was on the flight, said that wasn t the whole story. Petruna's e-mail said there were 11 Muslims traveling together on the plane and two of them ignored flight attendants' orders to turn off their cell phones. He said they shouted at the flight attendants, and he and another passenger had to intervene.

Petruna said the 11 Muslims were removed from the plane, but allowed back on after they were searched. That angered the crew and many passengers, according to Petruna.His e-mailsaid the crew left the plane and so did some of the passengers.

According to the e-mail, Petruna and other passengers believed they witnessed a dry run for a terrorist attack.

Petruna said he couldn t talk to 11 News on camera, but Chaplain Keith Robinson, who was also on the flight, did talk with us


Who's dream will come true? Zohran or Jon


 

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

9 to 0 Supreme Court finally makes the right decision.

Monday, April 27, 2026

When a friend* is a friend? When he slams 60 Minutes back into the stoneage where they belong.

WHEN 'JOURNALISM' IS USED AS A WEAPON by Ken Bhirdo 


The O'Donnell interview is a stark example of why there have been 3 assassination attempts on President Trump. Norah O'Donnell just gave us the pettiness of CBS News’ 60 Minutes and yet another disgusting look at what the institution of journalism has become. 

There is a difference between tough journalism and uncalled for cruelty. CBS News correspondent Norah O'Donnell crossed that line Sunday night  and it happened less than 24 hours after Cole Allen stormed the White House Correspondents' Dinner with a shotgun, a handgun, and a couple of knives.

President Trump had just been exposed to what appears to be the third attempt on his life. He sat down with O'Donnell on 60 Minutes, a program which long ago lost its reputation as a serious, consequential place to see real journalism.  The premise of this interview was seemingly to discuss security failures and the shooter's motives. What he got instead was a journalist who couldn't resist the moment to attempt to humiliate him on national television.

O'Donnell read aloud from Cole Allen's alleged manifesto: "I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes." Then she asked Trump: "What's your reaction to that?"

It’s hard to fathom such a thing happening, but it has become all too typical for this one President.  A sitting president, hours after an assassination attempt, was forced to sit on camera and deny being a pedophile and a rapist, words pulled from the document written by the sick mind of the man who just tried to kill him and his entire cabinet. Words he had heard from the very people like the one interviewing Trump. 

This was not journalism. This was theater. Ugly, planned and calculated theater. O'Donnell made a conscious decision to read those specific words on air. The manifesto reportedly contained a great deal of content with political grievances, references to attending "No Kings" rallies, detailed tactical planning. Trump himself noted in the interview that O'Donnell didn't read the parts about the shooter's radicalization or the "No Kings" rallies that may have influenced him. She extracted  the most inflammatory, most personally degrading sentence she could find.

Trump, in his typical combative style snapped: "I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you're horrible people." Say what you will about the president's tone  he wasn't wrong about the intent. O'Donnell's snarky follow-up question,  "Oh, do you think he was referring to you?" confirmed it. She wasn't informing viewers about a manifesto. She was trying to bait and shame Trump into defending himself against the words of the man who tried to kill him.

Ask yourself this question: Would this have happened to Barack Obama or Joe Biden? Imagine a gunman had tried to assassinate President Obama. Imagine the shooter left behind a manifesto containing vile, false personal accusations. Would any major network journalist  have read those accusations aloud to Obama's face and then asked, "what's your reaction?"

The answer is obvious and would be a resounding no. The outrage would have been instant and career-ending. It would have been called dehumanizing, and an unconscionable abuse of journalism. 

The standard that protects every other president, every other public figure, apparently does not extend to Trump. 

This interview came in the immediate aftermath of a violent event. Journalists were in that very hotel. Members of the media were among those who fled or crouched below tables when gunshots were heard. You might expect some sort of reflection about the violent climate created by the very people who were feeling the same fear felt by the President, his family, and those in his administration. Do they not recognize it was their rhetoric that fed Cole Allen’s anger? And he was using the very lies and hyperbole they themselves have used to characterize Trump?  Amid all this, CBS chose to amplify the words used by them and the would-be assassin on the most-watched news program in America.

This hateful behavior began in 2015 and this interview is the just the end product of all those years of coverage in which the norms of decency vanish when the subject is Donald Trump. Does O’Donnell think she did something brave by reading those lines to a president’s face? It wasn’t brave, it was shameful. Serious questions deserve to be asked about the attempted attack at the Correspondents' Dinner including Secret Service failures, the shooter's radicalization, and whether the political climate is contributing to violence. Those are the questions a serious journalist would have led with and discussed.

Instead, they once again fueled more dissention, more divisiveness and more hatred.  Good job, CBS.

*The author, Ken Bhirdo, is a friend of mine.

Thursday, April 23, 2026

WE ARE ALL READY IN DANGER...but the general public doesn't know it. STRIKE THAT !!! THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DOESN'T KNOW IT!!!