We read in the papers, we hear on the air,
Of killing and stealing, and crime everywhere.
We sigh, and we say, as we notice the trend,
"This young generation! Where will it all end?"
But can we be sure that it’s their fault alone?
That maybe most of it isn’t really our own ?
Too much money to spend and too little time;
Too many movies of passion and crime;
Too many books not fit to be read;
Too much evil in what they hear said;
Too many children encouraged to roam,
By too many parents who won’t stay at home.
Kids don’t make the movies and they don’t write the books,
That paint a bright picture of gangsters and crooks.
They don’t make the liquor and they don’t run the bars,
They don’t pass the laws or make high speed cars.
They don’t make the drugs that addle the brain,
It’s all done by older folks greedy for gain.
Thus, in so many cases it must be confessed,
The label "delinquent" fits older folks best.
Former CBS News president Richard Salant (1961 - 64 and 1966 - 79) explained the major media's role: "Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have." ...and to this very day most Americans haven't noticed they're being brained washed! ~ N. Hooben
Saturday, March 11, 2023
Who is the author?
I thought I would throw this out there just to find out who was the author and more inquisitively, by me, who was the original recording artist? Originally heard over the radio years ago, I just happened upon it during a routine search for something other than this. But when I found it, it brought back memories of yesteryear. Maybe someone out there knows...and thanks if you find an answer. ~ Storm'n Norm'n
Thursday, March 9, 2023
Mr. Biden spare us your presence.
noun: the act or an instance of placing two or more things side by side often to compare or contrast or to create an interesting effect.
Tuesday, March 7, 2023
Sunday, March 5, 2023
Are you a traditional Catholic? Ya'all be careful now, hear!
"In such a debased environment, it seems only a matter of time before Garland’s Justice Department eventually goes after the Bible."
The following editorial is from The American Spectator
Things have gotten out of control.
It never stops getting worse, does it? Just when you think the progressive Left has torpedoed our culture and country to rock bottom, a new hitherto-inconceivable outrage explodes.
Until the Trump years, the law-abiding universally loved the FBI. They protected our country and us, we thought. They investigated domestic threats to America, we thought. They were politically nonpartisan, like the military, we thought. Respect for them was so universal that ABC had a show titled The F.B.I., starring Efrem Zimbalist Jr., which depicted FBI heroism week after week.
And then we inadvertently uncovered worse than our worst fears as a new president came to Washington, D.C., from outside the Beltway culture and started “draining the swamp.” Maybe it was too late, and maybe it now is too late. I have never drained a swamp, but the metaphor seems quite apt. One’s very proximity to a swamp exposes a person to bacteria and other toxic sewage and worse that can poison lungs and other body parts. One would have to be an expert at draining swamps and would have to wear Hazmat garb to undertake it. You can’t just show up in shorts and a T-shirt and drain a swamp. You never know what poison lurks and teems in there.
It’s quite the metaphor. Donald Trump himself and all his MAGA supporters buoyantly chanted the slogan “Drain The Swamp! Drain The Swamp!” It alternated with other catchy three-syllable chants: “U-S-A! U-S-A!” and “Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!” But no one really knew what dangers and poisons they were exposing when they actually would begin to try draining the swamp.
It turned out that the FBI, like the mainstream media, is yet another wing of the Democrat Party. They no longer are nonpartisan. They send SWAT teams to arrest septuagenarian Roger Stone in the middle of the night and “perp walk” the distinguished likes of Peter Navarro while turning a blind eye to crimes by progressives and their favored minions. They destroyed Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. By contrast, Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted, not even a teensy-weensy bit, after publicly spoliating 33,000 emails about yoga classes and wedding dresses and then having the hard drive taken from her bathroom to be hammered to smithereens.
That was the unexpected danger in exposing the swamp to be drained: Nothing really surprises anymore, no matter how low.
And then a new surprise explodes.
Merrick Garland — and thank G-d that Mitch McConnell blocked that deeply compromised partisan from ever becoming a Supreme Court justice — has proven to be morally corrupt within the proper confines of the law. He does not appear to have broken any laws, though an impeachment trial might shed interesting light after the House finishes impeaching Alejandro Mayorkas one of these days. And yet Garland could align with those calling concerned parents domestic terrorists because those moms and dads simply want their public school kids protected from the perversions of transgenderism and whatever other corruptions of culture and decency the public schools now are trying to shove down the throats of tender-aged kids who once were exposed instead to wholesome books. Now Dr. Seuss is banned, and Dilbert is banned, but books about “married” homosexuals and transgendered whatevers are deemed appropriate for children, with cross-dressers reading to them at Library Hour.
In such a debased environment, it seems only a matter of time before Garland’s Justice Department eventually goes after the Bible. Have you seen Leviticus 20:13 and its homophobia? Or 20:15–16 and its prejudice against bestiality? Or its anti-Freudian 20:11?
Sen. Josh Hawley, the cure that healed Missouri from the blight of Claire McCaskill, asked Garland a question during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, March 1, 2023. He noted a Jan. 23 FBI memo from its Richmond, Virginia, field office advocating “the exploration of new avenues for tripwire and source development against traditionalist Catholics.”
Wow!
So he asked: “Attorney General, are you cultivating sources and spies in Latin mass parishes and other Catholic parishes across the country?”
Garland conceded the memo was “appalling” and called the document “inappropriate.”
Inappropriate?
When a woman wears white after Labor Day, that is inappropriate. (Ask Don Lemon.) When a person uses the fish fork for salad and the salad fork for fish, that is inappropriate. When the FBI targets “traditionalist Catholics,” that is not “inappropriate” but, to use a favorite aphorism of the Left, it is the “Death of Democracy.”
So Hawley pressed forward and asked how many informants the FBI has in Catholic churches across America. After evading the question, Garland finally said “I don’t know specifically.” (Note from Norm: This is a dead give-away...the head of the FBI just admitted there are informants in the Catholic churches across America, but he just doesn't know how many.)
How could that even be the answer? The only possible answer an American would have expected from the attorney general is: “Zero: Never was, Never will be.”
It is part of Jewish lore that Jews living among Persian Zoroastrians in the 5th century had to contend with persecutions that included the government stationing spies in synagogues to assure that Jews did not recite the Biblical verse “Hear O Israel, the L-rd is our G-d; the L-rd is One” during prayers (Deuteronomy 6:4). Zoroastrians believe in a duality of deities, and — when they had the power to do so — they banned public expressions of monotheism. So, according to that tradition, Jews would wait until the spies left toward the end of the two-hour (and sometimes three-hour) Sabbath services and then, near the very conclusion, once the government officers definitely were gone, Jews inserted the public affirmation: “Sh’ma Yisroel, Hashem Elokeinu; Hashem Echad!” (“Hear O Israel, the L-rd is our G-d; the L-rd is One!”)
To this day, 1600-plus years later, that extra recitation of the Monotheism Affirmation — known as “The Sh’ma” — remains in the Orthodox Jewish prayer book at that same spot toward the end of the worship service. We remember.
So this one strikes close to home.
Things have gotten out of control. Caucasian children have to apologize for being White. Asian children are punished for focusing too heavily on their studies and getting good grades to qualify for great colleges. Jews have to apologize for being Zionists. Catholics have to apologize for being pro-life. For that matter, Catholics and Protestants also have to apologize for being Zionists, and Orthodox Jews and Protestants also have to apologize for being pro-life. We cannot say openly that transgenderism is a perversion of what is normal and that transgender surgery is mutilation of the human body and consigns its recipients to a life of physical ailments requiring hormonal treatment and more. We cannot say that this country is grateful that Christopher Columbus found this continent because he had a messed-up sense of direction, so got here before Arab Muslim Barbary Pirates did first and would have imposed on us the same slavery they imposed on millions of people throughout Europe and Africa.
We cannot say that Advanced Placement courses are a good thing because not all kids are equal, and gifted students should not be held back but encouraged to thrive to their maximum potential. We cannot say that Western culture has proven itself far superior to those of other continents and societies that did not produce what the West produced. To this day, when Zionists want to retaliate against the Arab boycott of Israel by boycotting something produced in the Arab world, we are stymied because they have produced nothing to boycott but slavery.
We cannot say on campuses or in mixed company that “abortion on demand is murder.” And a Supreme Court nominee cannot even say that a woman is someone who has a uterus and vagina and can bear children, making her different from a man who has a male reproductive organ and can impregnate a woman but cannot bear children. Instead, pressure is applied to professors to include in their signature blocks “He/Him/His” or “She/Her/Hers.” My three pronouns? “Me/Myself/I.”
Is there a red line where even decent 1960s-style liberals — the ones like Sens. Hubert Humphrey and Daniel Moynihan and Henry Jackson — can agree to say: “The encroachment has gone too far!”?
One would hope that line has been reached with the response by the attorney general that he cannot really say under oath whether or not the FBI stations spies in traditionalist Catholic churches.
But maybe our society has traversed even that red line, a line that truly borders the death of democracy.
Until the Trump years, the law-abiding universally loved the FBI. They protected our country and us, we thought. They investigated domestic threats to America, we thought. They were politically nonpartisan, like the military, we thought. Respect for them was so universal that ABC had a show titled The F.B.I., starring Efrem Zimbalist Jr., which depicted FBI heroism week after week.
And then we inadvertently uncovered worse than our worst fears as a new president came to Washington, D.C., from outside the Beltway culture and started “draining the swamp.” Maybe it was too late, and maybe it now is too late. I have never drained a swamp, but the metaphor seems quite apt. One’s very proximity to a swamp exposes a person to bacteria and other toxic sewage and worse that can poison lungs and other body parts. One would have to be an expert at draining swamps and would have to wear Hazmat garb to undertake it. You can’t just show up in shorts and a T-shirt and drain a swamp. You never know what poison lurks and teems in there.
It’s quite the metaphor. Donald Trump himself and all his MAGA supporters buoyantly chanted the slogan “Drain The Swamp! Drain The Swamp!” It alternated with other catchy three-syllable chants: “U-S-A! U-S-A!” and “Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!” But no one really knew what dangers and poisons they were exposing when they actually would begin to try draining the swamp.
It turned out that the FBI, like the mainstream media, is yet another wing of the Democrat Party. They no longer are nonpartisan. They send SWAT teams to arrest septuagenarian Roger Stone in the middle of the night and “perp walk” the distinguished likes of Peter Navarro while turning a blind eye to crimes by progressives and their favored minions. They destroyed Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. By contrast, Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted, not even a teensy-weensy bit, after publicly spoliating 33,000 emails about yoga classes and wedding dresses and then having the hard drive taken from her bathroom to be hammered to smithereens.
That was the unexpected danger in exposing the swamp to be drained: Nothing really surprises anymore, no matter how low.
And then a new surprise explodes.
Merrick Garland — and thank G-d that Mitch McConnell blocked that deeply compromised partisan from ever becoming a Supreme Court justice — has proven to be morally corrupt within the proper confines of the law. He does not appear to have broken any laws, though an impeachment trial might shed interesting light after the House finishes impeaching Alejandro Mayorkas one of these days. And yet Garland could align with those calling concerned parents domestic terrorists because those moms and dads simply want their public school kids protected from the perversions of transgenderism and whatever other corruptions of culture and decency the public schools now are trying to shove down the throats of tender-aged kids who once were exposed instead to wholesome books. Now Dr. Seuss is banned, and Dilbert is banned, but books about “married” homosexuals and transgendered whatevers are deemed appropriate for children, with cross-dressers reading to them at Library Hour.
In such a debased environment, it seems only a matter of time before Garland’s Justice Department eventually goes after the Bible. Have you seen Leviticus 20:13 and its homophobia? Or 20:15–16 and its prejudice against bestiality? Or its anti-Freudian 20:11?
Sen. Josh Hawley, the cure that healed Missouri from the blight of Claire McCaskill, asked Garland a question during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, March 1, 2023. He noted a Jan. 23 FBI memo from its Richmond, Virginia, field office advocating “the exploration of new avenues for tripwire and source development against traditionalist Catholics.”
Wow!
So he asked: “Attorney General, are you cultivating sources and spies in Latin mass parishes and other Catholic parishes across the country?”
Garland conceded the memo was “appalling” and called the document “inappropriate.”
Inappropriate?
When a woman wears white after Labor Day, that is inappropriate. (Ask Don Lemon.) When a person uses the fish fork for salad and the salad fork for fish, that is inappropriate. When the FBI targets “traditionalist Catholics,” that is not “inappropriate” but, to use a favorite aphorism of the Left, it is the “Death of Democracy.”
So Hawley pressed forward and asked how many informants the FBI has in Catholic churches across America. After evading the question, Garland finally said “I don’t know specifically.” (Note from Norm: This is a dead give-away...the head of the FBI just admitted there are informants in the Catholic churches across America, but he just doesn't know how many.)
How could that even be the answer? The only possible answer an American would have expected from the attorney general is: “Zero: Never was, Never will be.”
It is part of Jewish lore that Jews living among Persian Zoroastrians in the 5th century had to contend with persecutions that included the government stationing spies in synagogues to assure that Jews did not recite the Biblical verse “Hear O Israel, the L-rd is our G-d; the L-rd is One” during prayers (Deuteronomy 6:4). Zoroastrians believe in a duality of deities, and — when they had the power to do so — they banned public expressions of monotheism. So, according to that tradition, Jews would wait until the spies left toward the end of the two-hour (and sometimes three-hour) Sabbath services and then, near the very conclusion, once the government officers definitely were gone, Jews inserted the public affirmation: “Sh’ma Yisroel, Hashem Elokeinu; Hashem Echad!” (“Hear O Israel, the L-rd is our G-d; the L-rd is One!”)
To this day, 1600-plus years later, that extra recitation of the Monotheism Affirmation — known as “The Sh’ma” — remains in the Orthodox Jewish prayer book at that same spot toward the end of the worship service. We remember.
So this one strikes close to home.
Things have gotten out of control. Caucasian children have to apologize for being White. Asian children are punished for focusing too heavily on their studies and getting good grades to qualify for great colleges. Jews have to apologize for being Zionists. Catholics have to apologize for being pro-life. For that matter, Catholics and Protestants also have to apologize for being Zionists, and Orthodox Jews and Protestants also have to apologize for being pro-life. We cannot say openly that transgenderism is a perversion of what is normal and that transgender surgery is mutilation of the human body and consigns its recipients to a life of physical ailments requiring hormonal treatment and more. We cannot say that this country is grateful that Christopher Columbus found this continent because he had a messed-up sense of direction, so got here before Arab Muslim Barbary Pirates did first and would have imposed on us the same slavery they imposed on millions of people throughout Europe and Africa.
We cannot say that Advanced Placement courses are a good thing because not all kids are equal, and gifted students should not be held back but encouraged to thrive to their maximum potential. We cannot say that Western culture has proven itself far superior to those of other continents and societies that did not produce what the West produced. To this day, when Zionists want to retaliate against the Arab boycott of Israel by boycotting something produced in the Arab world, we are stymied because they have produced nothing to boycott but slavery.
We cannot say on campuses or in mixed company that “abortion on demand is murder.” And a Supreme Court nominee cannot even say that a woman is someone who has a uterus and vagina and can bear children, making her different from a man who has a male reproductive organ and can impregnate a woman but cannot bear children. Instead, pressure is applied to professors to include in their signature blocks “He/Him/His” or “She/Her/Hers.” My three pronouns? “Me/Myself/I.”
Is there a red line where even decent 1960s-style liberals — the ones like Sens. Hubert Humphrey and Daniel Moynihan and Henry Jackson — can agree to say: “The encroachment has gone too far!”?
One would hope that line has been reached with the response by the attorney general that he cannot really say under oath whether or not the FBI stations spies in traditionalist Catholic churches.
But maybe our society has traversed even that red line, a line that truly borders the death of democracy.
Subscribe to The American Spectator.
RELATED:
The FBI Helped Twitter Censor the Biden Laptop Story
FBI Investigation Draws Ire From Israel, Republicans
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)