China's Defense Minister Chi Haotian’s Two Major Speeches
Every American needs to read and re-read Chi Haotian’s speech text delivered February, 2006 to all military leaders. The following speech text was recorded and translated by Mr. John R. Rarick, Chairman of the U.S. Day Committee following de-briefing by U.S. Intelligence sources who corroborated its authenticity.
Speech #2
China's Plan To
Conquer
By China's Defense Minister Chi Haotian ~ February 2006
“Comrades,
I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com that was
done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party’s
cause will be carried on. In answering
the question, “Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war,” more than
80 per cent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far
our expectations.
Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey
among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during
which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan,
Diaoyu Islands and the Spratley Islands --- Ott] and mentioned that 20 years of
the idyllic theme of ‘peace and development’ had come to an end, and concluded
that modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase.
I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas. The central issue of this survey appears to be
whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real
significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to
figure out what the Chinese people’s attitude towards war is: If these future
soldiers do not hesitate to kill even non-combatants, they’ll naturally be
doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants.
Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general
attitude people have towards war……..We wanted to know: If China’s global
development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries; will our people
endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?
The fact is, our ‘development’ refers to the great revitalization of the
Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but
also includes the whole world. As everybody knows, according to the views
propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one
single mother in Africa. Therefore no race can claim racial superiority.
However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the
Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in
Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. Therefore,
we can rightfully assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than
a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an
ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two
thousand years.
This is the Chinese nation that calls itself ‘descendants of Yan and Huang.’
During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas
and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas
and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific. We all know that on
account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang
Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the center of
the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable
to ours.
Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure
of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center
of the world shifted to the West. In
reviewing history, one may ask: Will the center of the world civilization shift
back to China?
Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early 1980’s Based on an
historical analysis, he pointed out that the center of world civilization is
shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United
States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th
Century as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century,
then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century!! (Wild applause fills
the auditorium.)
Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race
is superior to theirs. As a result, we
have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our
ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and
great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us
these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability
to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper
for so long. We are destined ‘not to be buried by either heaven or earth’ no
matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our
advantage.
Take response to war as an example. The
reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on
its mainland. Once its enemies aim at
the mainland, the enemies would have already reached Washington before its
congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these
trivial things. Maybe you have now come
to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China
and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and
follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us?
If the common people don’t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader,
begin to question his authority, and want to monitor him; if the religious
followers in our society question why we are leading God in churches can our
Party continue to rule China??
The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This is the biggest focus
of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over
basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast
majority of wars in history. This may
change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less than
those of Germany’s back then.
In addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative
impact, and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short supply. The
environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop
our race, but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much greater
than faced Germany back then.
Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much
better than ours. They have forests
alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds,
while our sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking,
while even our ground water is so polluted that it can’t be drunk without
filtering. They have few people in the
streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential building; in
contrast our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have
to share one room.
Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the
American style of consumption, our limited resources would no longer support
the population and society would collapse once our population reaches 1.3
billion. Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now
relying on imports to sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention
to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue. But we must understand that the term ‘living
space’ (lebensraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany.
The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West’s
association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view
that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s new theory,
‘Human Rights are just living rights’ we only talk about ‘living’ but not
‘space’ so as to avoid using the term ‘living space.’ From the perspective of
history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is
because Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western
countries established colonies all around the world, therefore giving
themselves an advantage on the issue of living space.
To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China; so
that they can develop outside of China. Would the United States allow us to go
out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking
us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other
countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam,
India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada
and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization. Therefore, solving the ‘issue of America’ is
the key to solving all other issues.
First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even
establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the
ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the White race. We
the descendants of the Chinese nation are ENTITLED to the possession of the
land!!!
It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into
unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight. In the long run, the relationship of China and
the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle. Of course, right now it
is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world
still rely on their capital and technology. We still need America. Therefore,
we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn
from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our
country.
Only by using special means to ‘clean up’ America will we be able to lead the
Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many
people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has
been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons
have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past
years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of
‘cleaning up’ America all of a sudden.
When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party
Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to
develop aircraft carrier groups and focused instead on developing lethal
weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.
Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the
Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people
are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take
place.
According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of
the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people!
Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people,
while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion.
This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who know how
soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half of
the population will have to go.
It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that
is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP
leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths, but if
history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of
Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to
safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party.
The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for
military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the
United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily
solved.
Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in
fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the
scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites.
Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of the new
society.
Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China’s century.”
Is
Nazi China emerging?
By Rajinder Puri
Issue: Net Edition
| Date: 25 Sep, 2011
For years I have maintained that
China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is a government within a government. I
have repeatedly pointed out that the actions of the Beijing government betray
attributes of Nazi Germany. On September 1, 2004 in an article entitled “The
Real Axis of Evil” I wrote: ”China has emerged as a corporate version
of Nazi Germany.” Now speeches purportedly by the former Defence Minister and
Vice Chairman of China’s Central Military Commission, Chi Haotian, have come to
my notice. The text of one speech is reproduced below. It confirms the worst
fears about the Beijing regime. But is the speech authentic?
The speech also says, “The population,
even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party falls,
everything is gone, and forever gone!”
Chi Haotian’s speeches were posted on
Chinese language websites, www.peacehall.com on February 15, 2005 and on
www.boxun.com on April 23, 2005. The contents of the speeches have not been
contradicted by official sources in China. The background of the posted
speeches remains a mystery. The titles of the two speeches are “War is
approaching us” and “War is
not far from us and is the Midwife of the Chinese Century.” An article by San Renxing in the Falun Gong
owned Epoch Times of August 8, 2005 entitled “The
CCP’s Last-ditch Gamble: Biological and Nuclear War” has analyzed the speeches to judge authenticity.
Renxing, a staffer, wrote: “I will
focus on verifying the authenticity of the speech… Looking at the speech in
isolation, the words and logic both reflect deep understanding of the “Party
culture” represented by Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao.
Also mixed in are the fascist teachings of He Xin, a new favorite of the CCP’s…
For example, the speech cited Mao’s ideas of leading the allies to victory,
“When they benefit from alliance with you, they will support you,” to defend
the “Three Represents.” proposed by Jiang Zemin. This is a very faithful
interpretation… The speech also says, “The population, even if more than half
dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and
forever gone!”
This is almost identical to Mao’s
theory on nuclear war, in which he suggested killing half of the Chinese people
and leaving the other 300 million to build communism…Some people might think
that we can’t establish the authenticity of the speech just because Mao said
something similar. Coincidently, at this critical moment, Professor (General)
Zhu Chenghu of the National Defense University jumped out and announced to the
world very loudly that if the United States got involved in a war between Taiwan
and Mainland China, China would be the first to use nuclear weapons and wipe
out hundreds of cities in the United States, even at the cost of losing every
city east of Xi’An. In an unpublished speech by Professor Zhu, he also revealed
that the CCP will store enough nuclear weapons to destroy half of the human
race… Despite most people’s unrealistic fantasies about the CCP, he
showed what the CCP is really about and authenticated Chi Haotian’s speech… A
low-ranking general would not say such arrogant things without the implicit
approval of the CCP’s “board of directors”… It’s not that the United States
doesn’t know who the true source of disasters in this world is and who the
undisputed axis of evil is. Who are the forerunner and consistent sponsor of
terrorism? Who is spreading nuclear weapons to North Korea, Iran, and Libya
through Pakistan? Who is instigating Kim Jong-Il, Osama Bin Laden…?”
The following is the full text of one
speech by Chi Haotian:
_______________________
Speech #1
“As everybody knows, according to the
views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated
from one single mother in Africa. Therefore, no race can claim racial
superiority. However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese
scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not
originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China.
The Peking Man at Zhoukoudian that we are all familiar with represents a phase
of our ancestors’ evolution. “The Project of Searching for the Origins of the
Chinese Civilization” currently undertaken in our country is aimed at a more
comprehensive and systematic research on the origin, process and development of
the ancient Chinese civilization. We used to say, “Chinese civilization has had
a history of five thousand years.”
But now, many experts engaged in
research in varied fields including archeology, ethnic cultures, and regional
cultures have reached consensus that the new discoveries such as the Hongshan
Culture in the Northeast, the Liangzhu Culture in Zhejiang province, the Jinsha
Ruins in Sichuan province, and the Yongzhou Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Human
province are all compelling evidence of the existence of China’s early
civilizations, and they prove that China’s rice-growing agricultural history
alone can be traced back as far as 8,000 to 10,000 years. This refutes the
concept of “five thousand years of Chinese civilization.” Therefore, we can
assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years,
civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of
five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is
the Chinese nation that calls itself, “descendents of Yan and Huang,” the
Chinese nation that we are so proud of. Hitler’s Germany had once bragged that
the German race was the most superior race on Earth, but the fact is, our
nation is far superior to the Germans.
During our long history, our people
have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific
Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups
in the South Pacific.
We all know that on account of our
national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our
civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the center of the world
civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours.
Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure
of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center
of the world shifted to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: Will
the center of the world civilization shift back to China?
As we all know, Nazi Germany also
placed much emphasis on the education of the people, especially the younger
generation. The Nazi party and government organized and established various
propaganda and educational institutions such as the “Guiding Bureau of National
Propaganda,” “Department of National Education and Propaganda,” “Supervising
Bureau of Worldview Study and Education,” and “Information Office,” all aimed
at instilling into the people’s minds, from elementary schools to colleges, the
idea that German people are superior, and convincing people that the historical
mission of the Arian people is to become the “lords of earth” that “rule over
the world.” Back then the German people were much more united than we are
today.
Nonetheless, Germany was defeated in
utter shame, along with its ally, Japan. Why? We reached some conclusions at
the study meetings of the Politburo, in which we were searching for the laws
that governed the vicissitudes of the big powers, and trying to analyze Germany
and Japan’s rapid growth. When we decide to revitalize China based on the
German model, we must not repeat the mistakes they made.
Specifically, the following are the
fundamental causes for their defeat: First, they had too many enemies all at
once, as they did not adhere to the principle of eliminating enemies one at a
time; second, they were too impetuous, lacking the patience and perseverance
required for great accomplishments; third, when the time came for them to be
ruthless, they turned out to be too soft, therefore leaving troubles that
resurfaced later on.
Let’s presume that back then Germany
and Japan had been able to keep the United States neutral and had fought a
protracted war step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this
approach, gained some time to advance their research, eventually succeeded in
obtaining the technology of nuclear weapons and missiles, and launched surprise
attacks against the United States and the Soviet Union using them, then the
United States and the Soviet Union would not have been able to defend
themselves and would have had to surrender. Little Japan, in particular, made
an egregious mistake in launching the sneak strike at Pearl Harbor. This attack
did not hit the vital parts of the United States. Instead it dragged the United
States into the war, into the ranks of the gravediggers that eventually buried
the German and Japanese fascists.
Of course, if they had not made these
three mistakes and won the war, history would have been written in a different
fashion. If that had been the case, China would not be in our hands. Japan
might have relocated their capital to China and ruled over China. Afterwards,
China and the whole of Asia under Japan’s command would have brought into full
play the oriental wisdom, conquered the West ruled by Germany and unified the
whole world. This is irrelevant, of course. No more digressions.
So, the fundamental reason for the
defeats of Germany and Japan is that history did not arrange them to be the
“lords of the earth,” for they are, after all, not the most superior race.
Ostensibly, in comparison, today’s
China is alarmingly similar to Germany back then. Both of them regard
themselves as the most superior races; both of them have a history of being
exploited by foreign powers and are therefore vindictive; both of them have the
tradition of worshipping their own authorities; both of them feel that they
have seriously insufficient living space; both of them raise high the two
banners of nationalism and socialism and label themselves as “national
socialism”; both of them worship “one state, one party, one leader, and one
doctrine.”
And yet, if we really are to make a
comparison between Germany and China, then, as Comrade Jiang Zemin put it,
Germany belongs to “pediatrics”-too trivial to be compared. How large is
Germany’s population? How big is its territory? And how long is its history? We
eliminated eight million Nationalist troops in only three years. How many
enemies did Germany kill? They were in power for a transient period of little
more than a dozen years before they perished, while we are still energetic
after being around for more than eighty years. Our theory of the shifting
center of civilization is of course more profound than the Hitler’s theory of
“the lords of the earth.” Our civilization is profound and broad, which has
determined that we are so much wiser than they were.
Our Chinese people are wiser than the
Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we
have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our
ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and
great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us
these heritages.
These two heritages determined that we
have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race
has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined “not to be buried by
either heaven or earth” no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and
national disasters. This is our advantage.
These two heritages determined that we
have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race
has been able to prosper for so long.
Take response to war as an example. The
reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on
its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, they enemies would have
already reached Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes
the president to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial
things. Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, “The Party’s leadership is prompt in
making decisions. Once a decision is made, it is immediately implemented. There’s
no wasting time on trivial things like in capitalist countries. This is our
advantage.” Our Party’s democratic centralism is built on the tradition of
great unity. Although fascist Germany also stressed high-level centralism, they
only focused on the power of the country’s executive, but ignored the
collective leadership of the central group. That’s why Hitler was betrayed by
many later in his life, which fundamentally depleted the Nazis of their war
capacity.
What makes us different from Germany is
that we are complete atheists, while Germany was primarily a Catholic and
Protestant country. Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed
that ordinary citizens had low intelligence, and that leaders should therefore
make decisions, and although German people worshipped Hitler back then, Germany
did not have the tradition of worshipping sages on a broad basis. Our Chinese
society has always worshipped sages, and that is because we don’t worship any
god. Once you worship a god, you can’t worship a person at the same time,
unless you recognize the person as the god’s representative like they do in
Middle Eastern countries. On the other hand, once you recognize a person as a
sage, of course you will want him to be your leader, instead of monitoring and
choosing him. This is the foundation of our democratic centralism.
To resolve the issue of America we must
be able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country
defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the
people in the conquered land”¦
The bottom line is, only China, not
Germany, is a reliable force in resisting the Western parliament-based
democratic system. Hitler’s dictatorship in Germany was perhaps but a momentary
mistake in history.
Maybe you have now come to understand
why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from
the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people
listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us?
If the common people don’t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader,
question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in
our society question why we are leading God in churches, can our Party continue
to rule China?
Germany’s dream to be the “lord of the
earth” failed, because ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission
upon them. But the three lessons Germany learned from experience are what we
ought to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our race.
The three lessons are: Firmly grasp the country’s living space, firmly grasp
the Party’s control over the nation, and firmly grasp the general direction
toward becoming the “lord of the earth.”
What is the third issue we should clinch
firmly in order to accomplish our historical mission of national renaissance?
It is to hold firmly onto the big “issue of America.”
Comrade Mao Zedong taught us that we
must have a resolute and correct political orientation. What is our key,
correct orientation? It is to solve the issue of America.
This appears to be shocking, but the
logic is actually very simple.
Comrade He Xin put forward a very
fundamental judgment that is very reasonable. He asserted in his report to the
Party Central Committee: The renaissance of China is in fundamental conflict
with the western strategic interest, and therefore will inevitably be
obstructed by the western countries doing everything they can. So, only by
breaking the blockade formed by the western countries headed by the United
States can China grow and move towards the world!
Would the United States allow us to go
out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking
us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries!
Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even
Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like
the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need
for mass colonization.
“The enemies are bound to meet on a
narrow road, only the brave will win!”
Therefore, solving the “issue of
America” is the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible
for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under
the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the
ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the white race. We
the descendents of the Chinese nation are entitled to the possession of the
land! It is said that the residents of the yellow race have a very low social
status in United States. We need to liberate them. Second, after solving the
“issue of America,” the western countries in Europe would bow to us, not to
mention to Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the
“issue of America” is the mission assigned to CCP members by history.
How have we managed our foreign affairs
in these years? Even if we had to put on a smiling face in order to please
them, even if we had to give them the right cheek after they had hit our left
cheek, we still must endure in order to further our relationship with the
United States.
I sometimes think how cruel it is for
China and the United States to be enemies that are bound to meet on a narrow
road! Do you remember a movie about Liberation Army troops led by Liu Bocheng
and Deng Xiaoping? The title is something like “Decisive Battle on the Central
Plains.” There is a famous remark in the movie that is full of power and
grandeur: “The enemies are bound to meet on a narrow road, only the brave will
win!” It is this kind of fighting to win or die spirit that enabled us to seize
power in Mainland China. It is historical destiny that China and United States
will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight each other!
The United States, unlike Russia and Japan, has never occupied and hurt China,
and also assisted China in its battle against the Japanese. But, it will
certainly be an obstruction, and the biggest obstruction! In the long run, the
relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.
One time, some Americans came to visit
and tried to convince us that the relationship between China and United States
is one of interdependence. Comrade Xiaoping replied in a polite manner: “Go
tell your government, China and the United States do not have such a
relationship that is interdependent and mutually reliant.” Actually, Comrade
Xiaoping was being too polite, he could have been more frank, “The relationship
between China and United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.” Of
course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our
reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and
technology, we still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to
promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and
use America as an example to reconstruct our country.
How have we managed our foreign affairs
in these years? Even if we had to put on a smiling face in order to please
them, even if we had to give them the right cheek after they had hit our left
cheek, we still must endure in order to further our relationship with the
United States. Do you remember the character of Wuxun in the movie the “Story
of Wuxun”? In order to accomplish his mission, he endured so much pain and
suffered so much beating and kicking! The United States is the most successful
country in the world today. Only after we have learned all of its useful
experiences can we replace it in the future. Even though we are presently
imitating the American tone “China and United States rely on each other and
share honor and disgrace,” we must not forget that the history of our
civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two
tigers to live together.
We also must never forget what Comrade
Xiaoping emphasized “refrain from revealing the ambitions and put others off
the track.” The hidden message is: we must put up with America; we must conceal
our ultimate goals, hide our capabilities and await the opportunity. In this
way, our mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national anthem with
something peaceful? Why did we not change the anthem’s theme of war? Instead,
when revising the Constitution this time, for the first time we clearly
specified “March of the Volunteers” is our national anthem. Thus we will
understand why we constantly talk loudly about the “Taiwan issue” but not the
“American issue.” We all know the principle of “doing one thing under the cover
of another.” If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan in
their eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able to see the
whole picture of our cause. Over these years, according to Comrade Xiaoping’s
arrangement, a large piece of our territory in the North has been given up to
Russia; do you really think our Party Central Committee is a fool?
To resolve the issue of America we must
be able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country
defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the
people in the conquered land, because back then you could not kill people
effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns.
Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the
people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would
not be able to make many people migrate there.
Only by using special means to “clean
up” America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only
choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or
not. What kind of special means is there available for us to “clean up”
America? Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and
battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear
weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by
using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we
will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using
non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve
America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological
technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another.
Biological weapons are unprecedented in
their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to
die.
Of course we have not been idle; in the
past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We
are capable of achieving our purpose of “cleaning up” America all of a sudden.
When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the
perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups
and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass
populations of the enemy country.
From a humanitarian perspective, we
should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave
America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at
least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because
America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this
strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use
decisive means to “clean up” America, and reserve America for our use in a
moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen,
nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States
as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us.
“¦we need to be ready with air defense
systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can
only move forward fearlessly for the sake of our Party and state and our
nation’s future,
Biological weapons are unprecedented in
their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to
die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal
collapse is bound to take place. According to the computation of the author of
Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be
more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land
supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the
population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of
its capacity. One day, who knows how soon it will come, the great collapse will
occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go.
We must prepare ourselves for two
scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack [on the
United States], the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a
minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails
and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps
suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That
is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and
medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can only move forward
fearlessly for the sake of our Party and state and our nation’s future,
regardless of the hardships we have to face and the sacrifices we have to make.
The population, even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the
Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone!
In Chinese history, in the replacement
of dynasties, the ruthless have always won and the benevolent have always
failed. The most typical example involved Xiang Yu the King of Chu, who, after
defeating Liu Bang, failed to continue to chase after him and eliminate his
forces, and this leniency resulted in Xiang Yu’s death and Liu’s victory (during
the war between Chu and Han, just after the Qin Dynasty (221-206BC) was
overthrown). Therefore, we must emphasize the importance of adopting resolute
measures. In the future, the two rivals, China and the United States, will
eventually meet each other in a narrow road, and our leniency to the Americans
will mean cruelty toward the Chinese people. ?? Here some people may want to
ask me: what about the several millions of our compatriots in the United
States? They may ask: aren’t we against Chinese killing other Chinese?
“¦their technologies are not mature
yet, and it is difficult for us to surpass them in a few years. If it has to be
five or ten years before some breakthroughs can be achieved in genetic weapons,
we cannot afford to wait any longer.
These comrades are too pedantic; they
are not pragmatic enough. If we had insisted on the principle that the Chinese
should not kill other Chinese, would we have liberated China? As for the
several million Chinese living in the United States, this is of course a big
issue. Therefore in recent years, we have been conducting research on genetic
weapons, i.e. those weapons that do not kill yellow people. But producing a
result with this kind of research is extremely difficult. Of the research done
on genetic weapons throughout the world, the Israeli’s is the most advanced.
Their genetic weapons are designed to target Arabs and protect the Israelis.
But even they have not reached the stage of actual deployment. We have
cooperated with Israel on some research. Perhaps we can introduce some of the
technologies used to protect Israelis and remold these technologies to protect
the yellow people. But their technologies are not mature yet, and it is
difficult for us to surpass them in a few years. If it has to be five or ten years
before some breakthroughs can be achieved in genetic weapons, we cannot afford
to wait any longer.
Old comrades like us cannot afford to
wait that long, for we don’t have that much time to live. Old soldiers of my
age may be able to wait for five or ten more years, but those from the period
of the Anti-Japanese War or the few old Red Army soldiers cannot wait any
longer. Therefore we have to give up our expectations about genetic weapons. Of
course, from another perspective, the majority of those Chinese living in the
United States have become our burden, because they have been corrupted by the
bourgeois liberal values for a long time and it would be difficult for them to
accept our Party’s leadership. If they survived the war, we would have to
launch campaigns in the future to deal with them, to reform them. Do you still
remember that when we had just defeated the Koumintang (KMT) and liberated
Mainland China, so many people from the bourgeois class and intellectuals
welcomed us so very warmly, but later we had to launch campaigns such as the
“suppression of the reactionaries” and “Anti-Rightist Movement” to clean them
up and reform them? Some of them were in hiding for a long time and were not
exposed until the Cultural Revolution.
History has proved that any social
turmoil is likely to involve many deaths. Maybe we can put it this way: death
is the engine that moves history forward. During the period of Three Kingdoms
[9], how many people died? When Genghis Khan conquered Eurasia, how many people
died? When Manchu invaded the interior of China, how many people died? Not many
people died during the 1911 Revolution, but when we overthrew the Three Great
Mountains [10], and during the political campaigns such as “Suppression of
reactionaries,” “Three-Anti Campaign,” and “Five-Anti Campaign” at least 20
million people died. We were apprehensive that some young people today would be
trembling with fear when they hear about wars or people dying. During wartime,
we were used to seeing dead people. Blood and flesh were flying everywhere,
corpses were lying in heaps on the fields, and blood ran like rivers. We saw it
all. On the battlefields, everybody’s eyes turned red with killing because it
was a life-and-death struggle and only the brave would survive.
Why didnt we conduct the survey through
administrative means instead of through the web? We did what we did for a good
reason.
It is indeed brutal to kill one or two
hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese
century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary
humanitarians, do not want deaths. But if history confronts us with a choice
between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter,
as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people
and the life of our Party. That is because, after all, we are Chinese and
members of the CCP. Since the day we joined the CCP, the Party’s life has
always been above all else! History will prove that we made the right choice.
Now, when I am about to finish my
speech, you probably understand why we conducted this online survey. Simply
put, through conducting this online survey we wanted to know whether the people
would rise against us if one day we secretly adopt resolute means to “clean up”
America. Would more people support us or oppose us? This is our basic judgment:
if our people approve of shooting at prisoners of war, women and children, then
they would approve our “cleaning up” America. For over twenty years, China has
been enjoying peace, and a whole generation has not been tested by war. In
particular, since the end of World War II, there have been many changes in the
formats of war, the concept of war and the ethics of war. Especially since the
collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European Communist states, the
ideology of the West has come to dominate the world as a whole, and the Western
theory of human nature and Western view of human rights have increasingly
disseminated among the young people in China. Therefore, we were not very sure
about the people’s attitude. If our people are fundamentally opposed to
“cleaning up” America, we will, of course, have to adopt corresponding
measures.
Why didn’t we conduct the survey
through administrative means instead of through the web? We did what we did for
a good reason.
First of all, we did it to reduce
artificial inference and to make sure that we got the true thoughts of the
people. In addition, it is more confidential and won’t reveal the true purpose
of our survey. But what is most important is the fact that most of the people
who are able to respond to the questions online are from social groups that are
relatively well-educated and intelligent. They are the hard-core and leading
groups that play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, then the
people as a whole will follow us; if they oppose us, they will play the
dangerous role of inciting people and creating social disturbance.
The Chinese love to label themselves as
a peace-loving people, but actually they are the most ruthless people.
What turned out to be very comforting
is they did not turn in a blank test paper. In fact, they turned in a test
paper with a score of over 80. This is the excellent fruition of our Party’s
work in propaganda and education over the past few decades.
Of course, a few people under the
Western influence have objected to shooting at prisoners of war and women and
children. Some of them said, “It is shocking and scary to witness so many
people approving of shooting at women and children. Is everybody crazy?” Some
others said, “The Chinese love to label themselves as a peace-loving people,
but actually they are the most ruthless people. The comments are resonant of
killing and murdering, sending chills to my heart.”
Although there are not too many people
holding this kind of viewpoint and they will not affect the overall situation
in any significant way, but we still need to strengthen the propaganda to
respond to this kind of argument.”
_______________________
The question is: Is this speech
authentic? If not, why does not Beijing forcefully repudiate it? There is no
doubt at all about the authenticity of the nuclear threat issued by General Zhu
Chenghu. He was even mildly reprimanded by the Chinese government. So what does
Beijing have to say about Chi Haotian? President Hu Jintao may be titular
Chairman of China’s powerful Central Military Commission. But he never served
in the army. Chi Haotian is a former army general.
© Copyright 2020 Indian Defence Review
