Where are all the good people?

Source

Where are the Good People?

What happened to the America of my childhood?

MICHAEL SMITH

MAY 09, 2024

25

11

I was watching the local Houston news tonight (to catch the weather) and there were reports of random shootings, a party that got out of hand at an AirBNB where shots ripped through a neighbor’s house, narrowly missing them sitting inside, a couple of murders and a report of a Houston police chief retiring suddenly after questions were raised about more than 260,000 suspended investigations.

I thought about what it must be like to be a kid today, growing up in the middle of something like this – and if you scan the papers and the internet, crime is everywhere. I saw where a meth lab was busted in a small town in my home state of Mississippi.

Then I started thinking about how different these reports were as compared to what I experienced as a child, and I asked myself:

Where are all the good people?

When I grew up, they were all around me.

And not just my immediate and extended family, there were people not related to me who were friends, surrogate parents (as kids we did not misbehave in front of any adult who knew our parents), mentors, and just friends.

We said “sir” and “ma’am” a lot. It was a sign of respect and that we knew our places.

We shared a lot of things – we helped each other with big tasks, banded together for church and civic causes, saw each other at church services every Sunday and Sunday night and bible study on Wednesday nights. A bus picked us up from school and dropped us off at church for children’s choir practice before bible study. We celebrated together, shared dinners together and generally incorporated each other into our daily lives – but with boundaries. Concern was one thing, interference was another.

God, family, and country first, church second, community next.

I grew up in the deep South, but I cannot remember any use of the word “nigger” by any of the adults with whom we interacted. Sure, the Confederate battle flag was around but was never talked about in racial terms. It was a war flag and an emblem of Dixie (and the Ole Miss Rebels). Did we learn about slavery in school? Yes. Did we learn about the horror of the Civil War? Yes – my hometown was burned to the ground by Union troops. We learned when and why our county was named “Union” after the Civil War.

Yet we were always Americans. The President’s birthdays were holidays, we held parades on Memorial Day, July Fourth, the Boy Scouts raised the flag on Veterans Day, and even students pulled flag duty at our schools. We had special services at church on Christmas and sunrise services on Easter.

Something interesting, even when I became an adult (before and after my wife and I were married, I lived in my home community until I was twenty-nine years old), I never knew who was a Republican or a Democrat or for whom anyone voted. I do not remember any yard signs, candidate posters or flags – other than the American flag.

I can remember when candidates would come and speak at events – church socials, county fairs, Rotary Club meetings - and people, whom I assume came from different political beliefs, would sit and respectfully listen to all candidates speak, those from political parties and those who were from none, and when the talk was over, everybody politely clapping for all of them. The candidates would shake hands with everyone and ask for their vote and when it was over, it was over. People left to their homes with their opinions and choices a secret. Only if you asked, would they tell you – and sometimes not even if you asked would they talk. The generation of my parents took the secret ballot seriously.

And after the elections were over, and the winner announced, everybody saddled up and went back to their lives the next day.

Politics was a part of our lives, not insignificant, but still an exceedingly small part.

Jackson was a long way from our farm out in the wilds of Union County, so we never thought that much about state government, just the standard upset when the legislature raised taxes. Our county government was there to protect us from the state and the state government protected us from the federal government.

Kids of my generation were free to be kids. We had responsibilities at home and chores to do, sure, but we did not have to contend with all the pressures, threats, and distractions of today. We did not get picked before we were ripe – thanks to the good people who surrounded and protected us.

So, I ask again, where are the good people

A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS : Somehow politicians don't get the point.

 

COMING TO A NEIGHBORHOOD NEAR YOU (Why do we keep warning you?)

 

*

* 

Did we warn you about this on August 20, 2010 ?

Click here:  When you finish your homework get ready for battle.

1

OOF !!! Surprise, Surprise! Judge Cannon will not take these new revelations lightly.

Side note:  Well, there's so much stuff out there that I never know from one day to the next what I'm going to post here on this blog.  So today, after I'm finished my bike ride, I decide to review some of the not-so-mainstream media and thought to myself, this one looks good enough to post.  And I turn on the truck's radio and Andrew Wilkow is in the last 15 minutes of his 3-hour show when he squeezes the following story into his full schedule and gives a shout out to its author, Julie Kelly.  If it's good enough for Andrew, then it's good enough for me. I posted a link to his show at the bottom of this page.  Remember, his arguments cannot be broken. ~ Storm'n Norm'n



The DOJ's Doctored Crime Scene Photo of Mar-a-Lago Raid
New disclosures in Special Counsel Jack Smith's espionage case against Donald Trump reveal the FBI tampered with evidence to create the infamous photo--and DOJ has lied about it for nearly two years.

JULIE KELLY
MAY 06, 2024




It is the picture that launched a thousand pearl-clutching articles.

A few weeks after the armed FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, the Department of Justice released a stunning photograph depicting alleged contraband seized from Donald Trump’s Palm Beach estate that day; the image showed colored sheets representing scary classification levels attached to files purportedly discovered in Trump’s private office.

Included as a government exhibit to oppose Trump’s lawsuit requesting a special master to vet the 13,000 items taken from his residence, the crime scene pic immediately went viral—just as Attorney General Merrick Garland, who authorized the unprecedented raid, intended.

At the time, even regime-friendly mouthpieces questioned the need and optics of the raid; the photo helped juice the DOJ’s justification for the storming of Trump’s castle.

“[The] question of whether Trump had classified material with him at his Mar-a-Lago resort has captured the public’s attention. The photo published by the government appears to answer that question quite affirmatively,” Washington Post resident fact checker Philip Bump wrote on August 31, 2022.

Some of Bump’s colleagues were more hyperbolic. An ex-CIA officer told ABC News the cover sheets indicated the highest level of secrecy, which in the wrong hands could have resulted in murder. “People's lives are truly at stake. Without being melodramatic, anything that helps an adversary identify a human source means life and death," intelligence expert Douglas London melodramatically warned in reaction to the photo.

The New York Times insisted the photo was consistent with how the FBI handles criminal investigations. “[It] is standard practice for the F.B.I. to take evidentiary pictures of materials recovered in a search to ensure that items are properly cataloged and accounted for. Files or documents are not tossed around randomly, even though they might appear that way; they are usually splayed out so they can be separately identified by their markings,” reporters Glenn Thrush and Adam Goldman wrote on August 31, 2022.

Except…that is not what happened.
A Stunt with Potentially Case-Killing Consequences for DOJ

New court filings in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s espionage and obstruction case against Trump and two co-defendants conclusively demonstrate that the government used the cover sheets to deceive the public as well as the court. The photo was a stunt, and one that adds more fuel to this dumpster-fire case.

Jay Bratt, who was the lead DOJ prosecutor on the investigation at the time and now is assigned to Smith’s team, described the photo this way in his August 30, 2022 response to Trump’s special master lawsuit:

“[Thirteen] boxes or containers contained documents with classification markings, and in all, over one hundred unique documents with classification markings…were seized. Certain of the documents had colored cover sheets indicating their classification status. (Emphasis added.) See, e.g., Attachment F (redacted FBI photograph of certain documents and classified cover sheets recovered from a container in the ‘45 office’).”

The DOJ’s clever wordsmithing, however, did not accurately describe the origin of the cover sheets. In what must be considered not only an act of doctoring evidence but willfully misleading the American people into believing the former president is a criminal and threat to national security, agents involved in the raid attached the cover sheets to at least seven files to stage the photo.

Classified cover sheets were not “recovered” in the container, contrary to Bratt’s declaration to the court. In fact, after being busted recently by defense attorneys for mishandling evidence in the case, Bratt had to fess up about how the cover sheets actually ended up on the documents.

Here is Bratt’s new version of the story, where he finally admits a critical detail that he failed to disclose in his August 2022 filing:

“[If] the investigative team found a document with classification markings, it removed the document, segregated it, and replaced it with a placeholder sheet. The investigative team used classified cover sheets for that purpose.”

But before the official cover sheets were used as placeholder, agents apparently used them as props. FBI agents took it upon themselves to paperclip the sheets to documents—something evident given the uniform nature of how each cover sheet is clipped to each file in the photo—laid them on the floor and snapped a picture for political posterity. (Emphasis mine. N.E.H.)

That raises many troubling questions, to say the least, about the FBI’s handling of the alleged incriminating documents.

For example, who made the on-site determination as to the classification level appropriate for each document? Did agents have security clearance and expertise related to classification? Did the agents know whether the document had been declassified by Trump while still in office?

The hasty assessment also appears to contradict Bratt’s statements in court about the classification status of the seized documents. Bratt told Judge Aileen Cannon during a hearing last year that the records were undergoing a classification review, presumably conducted by the intelligence community, to determine the correct level of secrecy.

Did the final analysis confirm or dispute the assessments by the field FBI agents who conducted the raid?
Missing Paper Trial and Messy Boxes

But Jack Smith might have bigger problems. During the raid, agents took a box in its entirety if it contained papers with classified markings; the box usually contained other items, which is how the FBI ended up with so many of Trump’s personal belongings.

So, in order to flag the location of the alleged classified record in the box, agents, as Bratt noted, used the cover sheets as placeholders. (The classified records were then placed in a separate secure file.)

But now defense attorneys claim, and the special counsel concedes, that some placeholders do not match the relevant document. “Following defense counsel’s review of the physical boxes…and the documents produced in classified discovery, defense counsel has learned that the cross-reference provided by the Special Counsel’s Office does not contain accurate information,” attorneys representing Trump’s co-defendant Waltine Nauta wrote in a May 1 motion.

The motion forced the special counsel to admit the error. “In many but not all instances, the FBI was able to determine which document with classification markings corresponded to a particular placeholder sheet,” Bratt wrote.

In other words, in their zeal to stage a phony photo using official classified cover sheets, FBI agents might have failed to accurately match the placeholder sheet with the appropriate document. This is a potentially case-blowing mistake, particularly if the document in question is one of the 34 records that represents the basis of espionage charges against Trump.

And there is another issue in connection with the cover sheets. Defense attorneys also noted that in at least one instance, the location of the cover sheet in the physical box didn’t match the FBI’s accounting. “[The] sheet…does not appear for several hundreds of pages later than the FBI Index indicated it would. Defense counsel’s review of these materials calls into question the likelihood that the contents of the physical boxes remains (sic) the same as when they were seized by the FBI on August 8, 2022.”

Which Bratt also admitted is an issue. After the boxes were transported from Florida to the hopelessly corrupt Washington FBI field office (another scandalous aspect of the case since the investigation should have been conducted in southern Florida not in another jurisdiction), a private company took scans of the inside of the boxes. But according to the defense team, the current condition of the boxes does not match the scans taken in August 2022.

Bratt explained that “there are some boxes where the order of items within that box is not the same as in the associated scans.” He then offered a list of excuses including how some “boxes contain items smaller than standard paper such as index cards, books, and stationary, which shift easily when the boxes are carried, especially because many of the boxes are not full.”

It is safe to assume Judge Cannon will not take these new revelations lightly--particularly since Bratt also had to admit in the same filing that he did not tell her the truth when she asked about the condition of the boxes during a hearing last month. On April 12, Cannon directly asked Bratt, “are the boxes in their original, intact form as seized?” Bratt replied yes, but “with one exception, and that is that the classified documents have been removed and placeholders have been put in the documents [place.]”

Oof.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, Jack Smith’s team might need several thousand words to weasel their way out of this mess.

________________________________________

Click here: Andrew Wilkow     The Wilkow Majority on Sirius XMRadio