You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in America. [How Obama conquered America]

I found this picture (see below) over at my friend Snooper's Report and it strikes me as something we as a nation have failed at...we have failed because we allowed an avowed anti-American, Islam loving Jihadist into the very position described by Cicero (see below) as the traitor from within.  The statement across the picture certainly rings true even if you cannot find the actual quote for he puts is imprimatur stamp of hate on everybody except Muslims and those that could give a damn what Muslims have up their sleeve.  For all you doubters out there who still cannot fathom how the usurper snuck through and invaded the sanctity of our once free and sovereign nation, this is how he did it (notice the strike through one word) :

"...in order for "worldwide Islamic domination to succeed, every method and path is acceptable, including lying to people"

Tell me this isn't a conspiracy...

You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers ... until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere, like in the tragedies in Algeria, like in 1982 [in] Syria ... like in the yearly disasters and tragedies in Egypt. The time is not yet right. You must wait for the time when you are complete and conditions are ripe, until we can shoulder the entire world and carry it ... You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey America... Until that time, any step taken would be too early—like breaking an egg without waiting the full forty days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside. The work to be done is [in] confronting the world. Now, I have expressed my feelings and thoughts to you all—in confidence ... trusting your loyalty and secrecy. I know that when you leave here—[just] as you discard your empty juice boxes, you must discard the thoughts and the feelings that I expressed here. ~ Fethullah Gulen

Obviously somebody thought it was Obama's time...conditions were apparently ripe!  My question is, "When will America wake up to this atrocity?" ...  is it's goodbye U.S. of A.?

Obama and Hitler, It's a wonder there's no comparison...THEY'RE IDENTICAL !

"Marxism in America"

The Basics of Shariah Law

Obama and Hitler- Same speeches 

The Obama Agenda ~ Starring Zbigniew Brzezinski

Climate Change: The Nut-jobs have finally gor their own disease...I kid you not!

The following from: CO2 Science

The Debilitating Disease of Climate Alarmism
Volume 14, Number 28: 13 July 2011

---

Writing in the International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Searle and Gow (2011) say "there is a growing consensus that increased awareness about climate change is leading to negative emotional reactions in certain individuals (Fritze et al., 2008)," while noting that "expressions of negative psychological states relating to climate change appear in popular commentary, public opinion polls and increasingly in the medical and psychological literature (Searle and Gow, 2009)." And they add that "doctors are reporting that more and more patients, presenting with anxiety and depression, are citing climate change news as something that they are having difficulty coping with" and that "leads to distress and/or interferes with daily living (Fritze et al., 2008)."
The two Australian researchers note that "other climate related pathologies are also emerging," citing the work of Wolf and Salo (2008), who "described a patient with climate change delusions and visions of apocalyptic events who believed that his personal water consumption could lead to the deaths of millions of people," while they write of "an increase in climate-related obsessive compulsive checking behaviors such as checking: gas and power meters to monitor their usage; taps for leaking water; and petrol consumption via the car's odometer reading." In fact, they report that displays of climate change related obsessive and depressive behaviors has led to the creation of the term "carborexia," which "refers to individuals who have a fanatical desire to reduce their personal carbon footprint, to the point where it severely affects their lifestyle and normal daily activities."  The full story here

______________________

Quote of the century:

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." Cicero - 55 BC

FDR couldn't get it right...neither will Obama...(but Obama will bring on a great, great depression)

"You don’t have to be an economist to know that something is terribly wrong..."

Meanwhile we have Debt Beyond Belief

Debt Beyond Belief By Alan Caruba (from Speak Without Corruption)

Have you noticed the many television advertisements urging you to buy gold, to refinance your home, to get a reverse mortgage, or to fix your personal credit score? There’s a reason for this, not just individuals are financially stressed, but the entire nation is broke.
The nation has not seen this level of debt since the end of World War Two. We have debt equal to the entire value of our Gross Domestic Product. The government cannot collect enough taxes to make a dent in it. It has to cut spending. It has to find ways to reduce the need to borrow.
Monday’s Standard & Poors’ downgrade, not of the nation’s triple-A rating for its treasury securities, but a warning that the nation’s “sovereign rating” has a “negative outlook” says that America has wandered into a dangerous area in which worldwide confidence in the dollar is slipping away.
For too long, too many of the economic advisors to presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, have been allowed to cause this damage and then, as often as not, return to their ivory tower jobs secure in the knowledge that more knucklehead economists will fail to apply the brakes.
How does a nation engaged in two foreign wars do that? The answer is that it can’t. No matter how much government waste is exposed, it rarely translates to a reduction. The bureaucrats running federal departments and agencies understand that failure to spend as much of their current budget as possible threatens their ability to ask for and get more
The responses to the S&P news, as reported in Monday’s Wall Street Journal, demonstrate that economists, tightly wrapped in their favorite theories and masses of numbers, are clueless. Mark Thomas of the University of Oregon dismissed the S&P warning, airily saying “the political process will deal with this problem.” It is the political process, specifically decades of interfering with the nation’s housing market that caused the 2008 financial crisis.
Add in interference with the energy marketplace since the days of Jimmy Carter and you have $5.00 a gallon gas by June, maybe sooner.
It is the political process that is blathering about raising the debt ceiling when all it has ever done is raise the debt ceiling. The same political process has proven incapable of eliminating federal government agencies and programs that have ballooned the debt while slowing economic growth.
Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted S&Ps “horrible track record for judging credit worthiness” and, considering that it “gave Lehman, Bear Stearns, and Enron top ratings right up until their collapse”, he’s got a point. Much of the alleged structure in place to avoid banking failures has been a failure.
Steven Richhiuto of Mizuho Securities suggested the “political realities” will make it difficult “to achieve the type of entitlement and tax reform necessary to put the deficit on a credible declining trajectory.” You think? For decades Social Security and later Medicare have been the famed “third rail” of politics.
No one wanted to address the way changing demographics—more older people, fewer working people—had rendered the systems unsustainable. Rep. Paul Ryan’s 2012 proposed budget does, in fact, address these and other problems, but if “political realities” fail to bring about the changes he and several deficit commissions have recommended, then the S&P warning is the equivalent of being on the Titanic.
Paul Krugman, Princeton University’s Nobel Prize winner, and New York Times columnist just repeats that same nonsense that “the U.S. is perfectly capable both of running large deficits now and getting its fiscal house in order over time”, cautiously adding, “but not if the parties cannot agree on any solution.”
The political parties have not been able to agree for decades. When the economy rebounded from President Reagan’s tough love, it still took a 1994 historic change in Congress to Republican control before welfare reform was embraced by President Clinton. He then took credit for an improving economy. In 2010 the voters returned control of the House to the Republicans, but the previous Democrat House and two other branches of government, the Senate and the White House, have plunged the nation into its current crisis by tripling the debt by trillions.
The bottom line is that the nation cannot continue to run large deficits because it cannot afford to pay huge interest rates on every dollar it borrows. That is a cycle that must be broken.
At the heart of present dangers is the Federal Reserve that has been printing money out of thin air for the purpose of buying the bank’s “toxic paper”, the millions in “bundled mortgages” for homes, the ownership of which is often in question. This is called “quantitative easing”. Other nations have gone this route and achieved little as a result.
Writing in November 2010, Bill Bonner, creator of newsletter The Daily Reckoning, said, “America’s own experience with quantitative easing is similarly discouraging. Between the beginning of 2009 and March 2010, the Feb bought $1.7 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities, creating new money specifically for that purpose. Where did the new money go? Into the coffers of the banks. Did it stimulate the economy? Not so’s you’d notice.”
By April 2011, all the major economic and social indices by which a nation’s financial status is measured have been in the negative. Economists and others may choose to ignore the S&P warning, but eventually the nation’s economic system will simply collapse on its own if steps are not taken to dramatically address the issue.
You don’t have to be an economist to know that something is terribly wrong with the way all levels of government have horribly mismanaged the nation’s and the state’s fiscal affairs. You just have to watch the television commercials.
© Alan Caruba, 2011

The Budjet: The practical answer to this problem involves common sense.

Source: The Weekly Standard 

Since the time of the Founders, America has not been a magnet for immigrants seeking a system that penalizes success to pay for largesse. Letters from my great-grandparents who came through Ellis Island suggest they were desperate to get to America to earn their success, not to get great government programs like “cash for clunkers.”

Not Taking Other People’s Money
Isn’t that the morally decent thing to do?
Arthur C. Brooks

July 18, 2011, Vol. 16, No. 41

The problem with socialists, according to Margaret Thatcher, is that “they always run out of other people’s money.” We haven’t hit that point just yet, but we have hit our nation’s legal credit limit of $14.3 trillion. To avoid defaulting on our loans, policymakers must raise that limit.

For many Americans, this is absurd and humiliating: The richest country in the history of the world is teetering on bankruptcy because our government can’t stop itself from spending, like a loathsome celebrity blaming bad behavior on some dubious new addiction. No surprise, then, that more than 60 percent of Americans believe Congress should not raise the federal debt ceiling, according to a recent CBS News poll. This does not mean they want to see America default, of course. Rather, it indicates a strong popular will to see our government stop its ruinous spending.

Many politicians agree with this sentiment, but understand that refusing to raise the limit would create more problems than it would solve. So they look for other solutions, such as the Republican idea to tie support for an increase in the debt ceiling to equal decreases in public spending. As fair and prudent as this might sound, the president disagrees, insisting that we must raise taxes as well if he is to agree to any cuts. As he said in his remarks two weeks ago, “You can’t reduce the deficit .  .  . without having some revenue in the mix.” Technically, of course, you can reduce the deficit without raising taxes; he simply doesn’t want to.

This has become a recurring theme in all recent budget fights. The government’s vast deficits stimulate calls to cut spending from the right, which are met by calls to raise taxes from the left. The left’s argument is almost always accompanied by the claim that cutting spending is anti-poor, and advocates for cuts are simply tools of the selfish wealthy who resent having to pay their share. According to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, the “angry rich,” as he calls them, are “wallowing in self-pity and self-righteousness.”

The president talks in moral terms about the need to raise taxes. It is, he claims, a matter of basic fairness. “There’s nothing serious about a plan that claims to reduce the deficit by spending a trillion dollars on tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires,” President Obama said of the House Republican budget on April 13.   And in his town hall meeting a week later, he called for a tax code that is “fair and simple” and for spending cuts that are “fair” and require shared responsibility. The message, then, is clear: Americans who don’t think we should cut the deficit by increasing taxes aren’t just guilty of bad math—their morals are shabby too.

For the most part, tax increase opponents have been dumbfounded by the charge. They believe they are right in opposing new taxes but have been unable to coherently counter the allegation that wanting citizens to be able to hold onto their hard-earned money makes them morally degenerate. Tax opponents, then, must arm themselves with both practical and moral arguments.

First, the practical argument. How have we gotten to this fiscal state in our nation? Most of us will say because of overspending by the federal government. This profligacy did not begin with the Obama administration, to be sure. Republicans and Democrats alike have been all too willing to spend vast amounts of other people’s money, often exhibiting their greatest bipartisanship on this point.

The practical answer to this problem involves common sense. What do most of America’s families do when they find they are overspending? They don’t send the kids out to get part-time jobs in order to increase family revenues—they cut back on their spending. Why? Because that’s what works to solve the problem.

The government can learn from families. In fact, the data show that when countries are trying to find their way out of a debt crisis, the more they rely on tax increases as opposed to spending cuts, the more likely they are to fail. My colleagues Kevin Hassett, Andrew Biggs, and Matt Jensen studied 21 developed countries that have attempted fiscal consolidation over the last 37 years. Some succeeded and returned to economic health; -others failed.

On average, failed attempts to close budget gaps relied 53 percent on tax increases and 47 percent on spending cuts. Successful consolidations averaged 85 percent spending cuts and 15 percent tax increases. Some of the most successful financial comebacks—like Finland’s in the late 1990s—involved more than 100 percent spending cuts, so that taxes could be lowered. The spending cuts by the successful countries centered on entitlements and government personnel.

Now let’s look at the moral argument against raising taxes. Why does the president want to increase America’s tax burden? You may think it’s just a way to increase revenues and reduce the deficit. But even the president knows he can’t solve the fiscal crisis by helping himself to bigger and bigger chunks of the income of America’s most successful people. Even if individuals earning more than $200,000 were taxed at a 100 percent marginal rate—and we confiscated their passports so they could not flee—the take would come to $1.27 trillion, or just 77 percent of this year’s deficit.

For the administration, it’s not about the money—as we have heard again and again, it’s about “fairness.” The president believes that we will be a better nation if we redistribute more money from those who have more to those who have less. How much more do we need to redistribute until our system is fair?

As you ponder this question, remember the facts: The wealthiest 5 percent of Americans already account for 59 percent of federal income taxes. Nearly half of our citizens pay no federal income taxes at all—yet two-thirds of us believe that everybody should at least pay something, even if just to remind ourselves that government isn’t free. The Tax Foundation reports that the percentage of Americans who are net takers from the tax system is nearing 70 percent.

If our system is not yet “fair,” what will make it so? If the top 5 percent paid 75 percent of the total? Or 95 percent? If they could, would it be ideal for the top 1 percent to carry all the rest of us so we could finally have a tax code that is “fair and balanced”?

This is not the America that our Founders believed in—nor a debate they would have conducted. They did not struggle to make America the nation of claimants we are rapidly becoming. They would not have recognized our current leaders’ definition of fairness in terms of forced redistribution. And they would most certainly not have agreed that the answer to rampant government overspending is to tax our citizens more.

To the Founders, fairness was a question of rewarding merit. Thomas Jefferson spoke of the need to guarantee to every citizen “a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.” He even wrote to John Adams about their shared belief in “a natural aristocracy among men.” The basis of this hierarchy was not nobleness of birth but “virtue and talents.” Alexander Hamilton praised a community in which “each individual can find his proper element and call into activity the whole vigour of his nature.” And in the following century, Abraham Lincoln declared, “I don’t believe in a law to prevent a man from getting rich” but rather a law that will “allow the humblest man an equal chance to get rich with everybody else.”

Since the time of the Founders, America has not been a magnet for immigrants seeking a system that penalizes success to pay for largesse. Letters from my great-grandparents who came through Ellis Island suggest they were desperate to get to America to earn their success, not to get great government programs like “cash for clunkers.”

In the coming weeks and months, as the debt ceiling debate rages and new budget battles arise, we will hear more and more class-warfare rhetoric about corporate jets, miserly rich people, and the need for higher taxes. Free-enterprise advocates must be ready to make a three-part case. First, it is bad economics to tax our way out of the hole our government has dug for us. Second and more important, it betrays a lack of national moral fiber to say, in effect, “We are too weak to control our spending.” Third and most important of all, it is not “fair” in any traditional American understanding of the word to tax our way out of a spending problem.

Arthur C. Brooks is president of the American Enterprise Institute and author of The Battle: How the Fight Between Free Enterprise and Big Government Will Shape America’s Future.

---

 

Is this the end of America? Three items that will make you a believer...the fourth item is supposed to make me a believer.

Item #1 Oklahoma pharmacist sentenced to life in teen’s death

OKLAHOMA CITY — An Oklahoma pharmacist convicted of murder in the shooting death of a teenager who tried to rob the south Oklahoma City pharmacy where he worked was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole Monday in spite of his defense attorney and supporters’ pleas that he be set free.  Read the rest here: Boston Herald

The injustice here is:  Why should a productive member of society spend any time in jail for some worthless member of society?  Further, while the District Attorney states, "The rule of law applies. No one is above it." he makes a mockery of the system already mocked by the powers to be...if no one is above the law then why hasn't Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Nancy Pelosi, Hilary Clinton, and the rest of them been sentenced to long jail terms for violating existing laws.  Sometimes the rule of law has to be interpreted with common sense rather than the letter of the law.  Common sense tells us that crooked politicians should go to jail and law abiding pharmacists should be exonerated. ~ Norman E. Hooben

Item #2  I received the following video in an email with this message attached:

This is totally unacceptable!!! What do you think about this? Please watch it, and forward it.  Does this make your blood boil? If not, what will? What if your Congressman came into your house and said you can keep your children, but we are going to take a kidney, one leg, an eye, and half of their teeth from each of your children. They say doing this will limit that childs future ability at having happiness and prosperity, but it will help someone else RIGHT NOW who needs those things more than your child!! What would you say? Would you just stand there and say or do NOTHING? That is essentially what is happening. We are doing NOTHING to stop the harmful things that our government is doing to us.  Giving OUR money to fix up mosques in ANY country is BULL CRAP!! The current "Ruling Class" (I say current because I hope a change is coming soon!) is burying us and our children and grandchildren in a debt system that is impossible to repay. They have also allowed our culture to be diluted and destroyed from within.  I still cannot believe what I just watched!!   What do you think? 

Ron

This is further proof of Obama's Muslim leanings (or rather his dedication to the cause of Islam) it also puts into perspective Hilary Clinton's long sought after connections to the Jihadists that Obama hopes (the first half of 'hope and change') will ultimately conquer America (remember her support for Yasser Arafat when she was first lady under Bill Clinton).  Anyone who writes her college thesis that tries to show Saul Alinsky in a positive light is definitely not looking out for American interests...Alinsky was for the overthrow of America and so follows Hilary.  We can beat this thing if we not only throw these people out of office...we must prosecute them!  Prosecute, Prosecute, Prosecute!  On a side note to all of this, someone once asked me what I would do on day one if I were elected to live in the cottage on Pennsylvania Avenue...my answer, "I would immediately arrest four people, Barack Obama, Hilary Clinton, Eric Holder, and Nancy Pelosi"... and as Johnny Carson always said, "More to come." ~ Norman E. Hooben

Item #3 (this one is bad...real bad) It’s Time to Inspect D.C.’s Hack Inspectors

From: TheFightBack – Reporting from the streets of the District of Columbia

(be sure to read 'How Bad Is It?' below)

Yesterday, Jim Epstein of Reason TV and I were arrested at a public meeting of the D.C. Taxicab Commission (DCTC). The meeting was held at the U.S. Park Police headquarters. Somehow, Park Police officers got roped into becoming the DCTC’s armed security and both Epstein and I have been charged by the Park Police with “Unlawful Entry/Remaining” and “Disorderly Conduct.” Our “crime”? Taking pictures or video.
Less than an hour into the public meeting, a hack (taxi) inspector – with “K. Bears #17″ written on his shirt – told me I couldn’t take pictures. He stood in my way to ensure that I didn’t photograph the DCTC commissioners on the dais. I settled on taking a photo of him instead. Not long after, things went haywire.

“I am troubled by actions taken by the [DCTC],” wrote Ward 6 Councilmember Tommy Wells in a strongly worded letter to Attorney General Irvin Nathan. “While the details are unclear, following a request of DCTC members or staff, two armed Park Police officers entered the auditorium, put a reporter in handcuffs, and removed him from the room. This was reportedly for taking photographs or making a video recording of the proceedings at an open and public meeting.”
As I sat in the front row recording the testimony of Jim Dickson of the American Association of People with Disabilities, two Park Police officers approached me. “You can come with me or you can get locked up,” said one.
“You cannot stop a reporter from [recording]. That’s outrageous,” responded Dickson. Despite the protests of the approximately 200 people in attendance, I was hauled away. Washington Post columnist John Kelly, who was present, wrote, “suddenly, a clot of Park Police officers frogmarched Tucker out of the auditorium.” Epstein caught it all on video, which led to his being placed in the jail cell next to me.
“The folks at the D.C. Taxicab Commission and the U.S. Park Police have got some splainin’ to do [regarding the arrest of] two reporters… during a DCTC meeting for, you know, reporting,” wrote City Paper‘s Alan Suderman. “Is it a public meeting or not?” asked NBC4 reporter Tom Sherwood.
Speaking to Martin Austermuhle of dcist.com, Johnny Barnes, executive director of the ALCU of the Nation’s Capital, said, “We find the actions of the Taxicab Commission to be kind of strange.”
The DCTC has a history of doing strange things, particularly Interim Chair Dena Reed. At DCTC’s March meeting, then-General Counsel Reed attempted to ban Fox5 photojournalist Jason Smith from recording. “If the cameras don’t leave the room, we’re not going to have the meeting,” said Reed, who was overruled by then-Chair Leon Swain.
As interim chair, with no one above her, Reed has gone even further. A notice posted on the DCTC walls before the May meeting read, “NO TELEVISION CAMERAS. NO VIDEO TAPING. NO AUDIO TAPING. ” The subject of the hearing was Ms. Reed’s attempted rewrite of Title 31, the regulatory code that governs the taxicab industry.
Drivers, concerned that the proposed changes to Title 31 will put many of them out of business, attempted to submit a petition with more than 900 signatures. Instead of accepting it, the DCTC pushed drivers out, locked the doors, turned the lights off, called the police, and referred to the drivers as “a mob.”
The DCTC is badly in need of reform. And it’s not just the leadership. Taxi drivers describe widespread mistreatment by hack inspectors, who appear to face little to no consequences for their actions.
The answer, though, is not to abolish the DCTC, as some have called for. Instead, the DCTC should be strengthened and brought into compliance with the 1985 Taxicab Commission Establishment Act which calls for three industry representatives to be on the DCTC. Presently, there are none.
If drivers are included in the political process many issues can be solved before they erupt into a public spectacle. Take, for example, drivers’ response to Dickson’s testimony. The Small Business Association of DC Taxicab Drivers, an umbrella organization representing some 4,000 drivers, is setting up a meeting with Dickson to figure out how to deal with the serious problem of drivers not stopping for those with service animals.
Lastly, there’s no way to explain how so many hard-working, decent people can be excluded from the political process – at times targeted by it – without talking about racism and xenophobia. It took two reporters being arrested to draw attention to the DCTC’s misdeeds. But for years, countless drivers have been raising these concerns.
Maybe it’s time we listen.

How bad is it? Have we become a police state? ...lets look at a definition:

The term police state describes a state in which the government exercises rigid and repressive controls over the social, economic and political life of the population. A police state typically exhibits elements of totalitarianism and social control, and there is usually little or no distinction between the law and the exercise of political power by the executive.  The inhabitants of a police state experience restrictions on their mobility, and on their freedom to express or communicate political or other views, which are subject to police monitoring or enforcement. Political control may be exerted by means of a secret police force force which operates outside the boundaries normally imposed by a constitutional state.

Now I'm pretty sure that we live (or should that be past tense, "had lived") in a constitutional state and the constitution has kept us united and free for a good number of years...that is until the extremists came into power (we could probably start with Woodrow Wilson but it's the modern extremists we're concerned with here...such as Barack Obama).  So did the police in the video operate outside the boundaries of our constitution?  Lets take a look at the first amendment to the constitution that once kept us free:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Insofar as I know Congress has not made any law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble...all elements depicted in the video.  Just what crimes were committed that warranted the police to make an arrest?  None! Zero!
Zilch! Nada!  In keeping with the above definition is this not the government exercising rigid and repressive controls over the social, economic and political life of the population (in this case an individual)?  I should also point out that there was no distinction between the law and the law-less with the police acting as the latter.  Therefor when police take it upon themselves to arbitrarily arrest someone for no reason (That's no reason whatsoever, and not 'no apparent reason'!) we have fulfilled the meaning of the definition...we now have a police state...and that's very bad, really, really bad!
Though some may not agree with my solution to the problem identified in the video I think in this case it is extremely warranted.  The right to survival comes into play here, and certainly one's freedom is an integral part of survival...as they say in New Hampshire, "Live free, or die!"  Because the police (stealing a line from Obama) acted stupidly, the members of the audience who protested the arrest by walking out of the meeting would have accomplished much for the cause of freedom to have ganged up on the illegal assailants in uniform, stripped them of their weapons and badges and made an example out of them such that they would not dare violate the constitution again...this is not too harsh a punishment...when our Founding Fathers were fighting for our freedom these police would have been tarred and feathered. 
Meanwhile lets hear what Judge Napalotano has to say.





Item #4  Should I be worried?  Would you be worried?

Almost every blogger that uses any kind of site meter to check the number of visits he or she receives on their website knows they have been visited by many government agencies.  This happens because the government computers are identified by their IP address such as this: 

Domain Name		dol.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address		65.196.107.# (FTS 2001/Dept of labor OAS)
ISP		Verizon Business

At one time many bloggers thought that they were being 'watched' or spied upon by such and such government agency only to find out it was some government employee surfing the web while the boss was not watching (the boss was most likely doing the same back in his little cubicle).  But then again, when bloggers write some derogatory stuff that places a politician in questionable circumstances then the guilty politician will click onto the blogger's website to find out what's being said...this happen to me when I wrote a 'nasty' blog about Secretary of State (Massachusetts) Bill Galvin...you can check that out here: TRAITORS...they walk amongst us!     

Well I suppose some bloggers take pride in the number of government agencies and/or politicians that keep watch over their various web sites.  I for one have had almost every government agency known to mankind (I've included some of them in the list below that covers other institutions as well as the government) visiting me from time to time and it didn't concern me none until I had what we call, "an interesting visitor"  The interesting guy turned out to be none other than Barack Obama...go ahead, scroll down, look at the list, you'll find his IP address along with the rest (its highlighted in red).  Some of you know the story of how I was threatened (twice) by Obama's goons and I won't get into that here (but I did keep the phone number of the late night caller...the one I reported to the police).  The whole purpose of this item #4 was to announce another interesting visitor.  Now as I've alluded to before, I'm not in the least concerned about which government agency visits this website except...except maybe this one:

Domain Name		(Unknown)
IP Address		198.81.129.# (Central Intelligence Agency)
ISP		ANS Communications

 

Time of Visit

Jul 12 2011          8:03:52 am

Now it is my understanding that the CIA cannot spy domestically...their area of expertise is suppose to be overseas.  So what are they doing checking in on little ole Storm'n Norm'n?  Should I be worried?  Would you? 

 

List Of Agencies Visiting This Website Adminstrative Office of the Courts Durham North Carolina
ACS Corporate LAN (Anchorage, Alaska)
ALASKA Department of Transportation and Public Fac
Altoona Hospital
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
American Airlines Incorporated
American Association for the Advancement of Science
AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNAL
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIOIN
Amherst College
Armed Forces Europe, Middle East, & Canada
Army (ip Address 143.213.132 Anchorage, Alaska)
Barclays Bank Plc
Bentley College
BlueCross BlueSheild of Illinois
Boston Scientific electricpaper.ie ? (Ireland)
Boulder Valley School District  (BVSD
Brigham Young University
British Telecommunications
Bureau of the Census (U.S. Government)
California Department of Corrections
California Public Employees Retirement System
California State University Network
CallPlus Services Limited callplus.net.nz ? (New Zealand)
CAMPING WORLD (Bowling Green, Kentucky)
Canadian Department of Education
CANTV Servicios, Venezuela Distrito Federal
Case Western Reserve University
CC Services
Central Michigan University
CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNM
CESNET, z.s.p.o utb.cz ? (Czech Republic)
Chello chello.nl ? (Netherlands)
CHILITECH INTERNET SOLUTIONS
China Network Information Center - Chongqing China
CHINANET Hunan province network
Ciba Speciialty Chemicals Basel-Stadt Switzerland
Ciber, Inc. DBA City of New Orleans
City & Islington College of FE (Great Britain)
City of Boston
City of Gainesville
CITY OF GLENDALE (Arizona)
City of Los Angeles
City of New York (U.S. Government)
City of New York - New York City Council
City of Palo Alto, Department of Information Resou
City of Plano, Texas
CNCGROUP Beijing Province Network
Coldwater Board of Public Utilities
College of duPage
Colleges of the Fenway
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, IP Address   146.243.4##
Community Newspaper Company (Westwood, Massachusetts)
Comptroller of the Currency (Washington, DC)
Computer Sciences Corporation District of Columbia
Computer Sciences Corporation Falls Church Virginia
Connecticut State University
Consolidated Communications (memorialhealth.org Lufkin, TX)
Cornell University
Country Anonymous Proxy IP address 209.59.42.# (Global Tac, LLC)
Croatian Academic and Research Network (CARNet
Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May
cuny.edu ? (Educational)
DANGER.com
Dell Computer Corporation
Department of Veterans Affairs va.gov ? (U.S. Government)
Directorate of Automation Services army.mil ?
DIRECTORATE OF LOGISTICS army.mil ? (Military)
DISA CSD, OKC CCC disa.mil (Okalahoma City, OK)
Disney Worldwide Services (Los Angeles, CA)
DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Offic
DOIM - army.mil ? (Military)
DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company
Durham University Local area network United Kingdom
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co
Elias Group (New York)
Embarq Corporation
Emirates Telecommunications Corporation 86.96.227.# Dubai
Emory University
Endless Journey ejourney.com ? (Commercial)
Euronet Digital Communications
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corp
Executive Office Of The President USA   - IP Address   198.137.241.# Barack Obama Looked at this site Radical Muslim Advises Barack Husein Obama
Exxon Mobil Corporation
FDC Servers.net, LLC
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
FedEx
Florida Information Resource Network
Fordham University (NY, NY)
FORT WORTH RESIDENCE INN
FOUR RIVERS PROVISIONING LC
FTS2001/US Court of (United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims)
Fujifilm Sverige AB tdcsong.se ? (Sweden)
GCI Communications
General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
General Motors Corporation
Georgia Institute of Technology
Glendale CCD California State University Network
GMAC Mortgage Corp
Gold Rush World Access .748, Murphys California
GOLDMAN SACHS COMPANY
Google google.com ? (Commercial)
Government of the District of Columbia 164.82.144.#
GRESHAM SAVAGE NOLAN 69.178.154.#
HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORP
Headquarters, USAAISC army.mil ? (Military)
Hickory Ridge Corporation
Hillsdale College
HOLIDAY INN FORT SMITH
HOTCHKISS SCHOOL
HQ US Army Medical Research and Development Command
HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS
HUNT DEVELOPMENT GROUP  Hawaii
HYUNDAI COMMUNICATIONS & NETWORK
IAC Search Media
IAC Search Media  (aka "Ask.com)
IBM Corporation
Indiana University
Info Avenue Internet Services
Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives
Institute for Women's Health - Admin Office
Inter-American Development Bank
Intermountain Health Care
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Jackson Walker LLC, Dallas TX
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
JP Morgan Chase & Co
Keesler Air Force Base
Kentucky Department of Education
Kingman Academy of Learning, Arizona
Lake Erie Educational Computer Association
LBiSat, LLC American Samoa
Legislative Data Center Sacramento California
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico
Library of Congress, Information Technology Service
LICTMAN, TRISTAR,SINGER AND ROSS (768182-P) Wash. DC
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Longwood Medical Area network (LMAnet) Boston, MA
Los Angeles County Office of Education
Louisiana Board of Pharmacy
LSG Strategies
Mackenzie Financial Corp - Canada
Maine Libraries/Dept. of Education
Mass Correctional Legal Services (Boston)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massey University massey.ac.nz ? (New Zealand)
Mediatti Communications,Inc
Memorial Health University Medical Center
Merrill Lynch and Company
MessageLabs
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Michigan Legislative Council mi.gov ? (U.S. Government)
Michigan State Government 136.181.195.#
Microsoft Corp microsoft.com ? (Commercial)
Middlesex University Halls of Residence City of London
MINDSHIFT TECHNOLOGIES
Mississippi, Department of Information Technology
Montgomery County Public Schools Silver Spring Maryland
Multikabel quicknet.nl ? (Netherlands)
Nantong University 163data.com.cn ? (China)
National Institute of Standards and Technology nist.gov U.S. Government
NATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA (Washington, DC)
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST
National Institutes of Health
Naval Ocean Systems Center Fort Leonard Wood Missouri
Naval Ocean Systems Center (Florida)
Naval Ocean Systems Center (USAF Academy)
Naval Ocean Systems Center jfcom.mil ? (Military)
Navy Network Information Center (NNIC
Netherlands Cancer Institute
NEW PLACES CONSULTING
New York City Public Schools
New York State University College at Buffalo
NEWS CORPORATION
North Carolina Research and Education Network
Northern Arizona University
Norwich University
Oberlin College
Ocean State Higher Education and Administration Ne
PANGAEA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
Pembroke State University
PHH Corporation
Phoenix Newspapers
Plano Independent School District
PT. Telecomunikasi Indonesia
Quick Technologies
Qwest Communications
R.R. Donnelley & Sons
RAY ELLIOTT FORD LEASING
Raytheon Company, Executive Office
Research Machines plc United Kingdom
Rice University
ROBISON, CURPHY  OCON
Rockefeller Group Technology Solutions
RUAN TRANSPORT CORP, Alleman Iowa
Russian Central Telegraph, Moscow
Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)
Sacramento County Sheriff's Dept.
San Diego City Schools
SAVE THE CHILDREN
SBC Internet Services
SEMO TANK BAKER EQUIPMENT COMPA
Seneca College senecac.on.ca ? (Canada)
Service Provider Corporation
SHEET METAL WORKERS INT
SIA Lattelekom microlink.lv ? (Latvia)
Sinclair Community College (Dayton, Ohio)
Social Security Administration
Somerset College of Arts and Technology United Kingdom
Southern Methodist University
Southwest Ohio Computer Association
St. Louis Customer Market Allocation
Stargate Industries, LLC
State of Connecticut Dept of InformationTechnology
STATE OF TEXAS GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION 204.65.220.#
State of Colorado DOT
STATE OF DELAWARE
State of Florida 160.131.164.#
State of Georgia (DOAS-CSD)
State of Missouri Office of Administration
State of Ohio Network
State of Ohio Network  156.63.133.#
State of Tennessee
STEPTOE & JOHNSON (Washington, DC)
Stillman College Alabama Supercomputer Network
Teale Data Center ca.gov ? (U.S. Government)
Telecom Italia Net
Telesector Resources Group
TelstraClear Christchurch Cable Customers
Texas Department of Health
Texas A&M System Health Science Center
Texas Legislative Council
Texas Mutual Insurance Company
The Home Depot
THE BOEING COMPANY
The Boston Globe Newspaper
The Connecticut Hospital and Affiliates
THE DAVID PROJECT
The Pentagon af.mil ? (Military)
The Pentagon Alexandria Virginia
THE SPECTRUM GROUP
Tribune Company (Chicago, Illinois)
U.S. Department of Transportation
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Government Printing Office
U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms senate.gov ? (U.S. Government)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Unity College (Maine)
University of Calgary (Alberta, Canada)
University of California, Office of the President
University College London
University of Alaska
University of California, Los Angeles
University of Florida
University of Florida/University Medical Center
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
University of Missouri-St. Louis
University of North Carolina at Asheville
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
University of Southern Mississippi
University of Texas at Dallas
University of Virginia
University of Wisconsin Madison
US Signal
US Dept of Justice
US DOI Bureau of Land Management
US Office of Personnel Management
US SENATE  63.82.115.#
USAMITC army.mil ? (Military)
Utah Educational Network
Vaal University of Technology, South Africa
VISP Technologies
WACHOVIA CORP
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
West Virginia University
Wharf T&T Limited Hong Kong Central District
WV Department of Education
York University yorku.ca ? (Canada)
ZAO MTU-Intel mtu-net.ru ? (Russian Fed.) _____________________________________ _________________________

The following video added April 17, 2015

___________________________________

This ↓ guy ↓ will do us all in...if you let him!

 

Update May 2015:

See also: America Is Losing It's Protection...Obama may be doing it but the American people are letting him!