Tuesday, January 7, 2020

Is Hillary Clinton looking for Safe Harbor?


News you may have missed.
 
The following headline with accompanying video was posted over at YouTube on Jan 4, 2020:
 
Is Hillary Clinton Trying to Create Safe Extradition Harbor in Northern Ireland?
 
Now this kind of news is not welcomed by the Democratic Party but it’s important for the rest of the country to know what goes unreported by the main stream media.  The question posed by the narrator or maker of the video is certainly viable for Hillary Clinton knows that sooner or later she will be held accountable for her crimes against America. 
Is Hillary’s choice of countries to escape to perchance the halls of justice begin to close in on her simply random?  Not hardly.  For one, her most likely first choice of countries is that they speak English, and equally important, that she will not be extradited for her crimes. And has the video rightly states Northern Ireland’s extradition treaty with the United States would protect Hillary and her friends (including her husband) from ever getting prison time in a federal prison here.
Article 4(3) requires that, notwithstanding the terms of paragraph 2, extradition shall not be granted if the competent authority of the Requested State determines that the request is politically motivated.
Not to take away any credit from the video, if I may give myself an atta-boy, the news is a bit outdated for Hillary has done some previous shopping.  In fact I think I called it, “Country shopping” back in March of 2018 when Hillary began to feel the heat.  She even brought her confidant Huma Abedin along with other friends to India, another country that offers similar protection.  India’s Extradition Treaty Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted if the offense for which extradition is requested is a political offense (It’s also interesting that her husband, Bill Clinton signed this treaty while he was President of the United States thus establishing more proof of a long term planning strategy in case his New World Order scheme failed).  ~ Norman E. Hooben

No comments: