WHITE LIBERALS AND THEIR PAWNS

The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political "football game" that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives. Author: Malcolm X Date:1963

KAMALA HARRIS INTERVIEW WITH BRETT BIER

 

"Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts."*

*It’s apparent to me that Kamala Harris (and the entire Democratic Party going all the back to Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton) should be in jail for violating 1907 Title 8U.S.C. 1324(a)...and I don't think you have to be a lawyer to quote the law.

Further... I don't know who sets the penalties for breaking these laws, but a mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment seems a bit light for such a serious crime. - Storm'n Norm'n 

Criminal Resource Manual

CRM 1500-1999

1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).

Alien Smuggling -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien.

Domestic Transporting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses.

COMMENT: Further discussion of offenses defined in 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a) is set forth in Chapter 3 of Immigration Law, published as part of the Office of Legal Education's Litigation Series, and as part of the USABook computer library.

[cited in JM 9-73.100]

FOUND : a provision for removing anarchists

PRELUDE 

"Islam must rule the world and until Islam does rule the world we will continue to sacrifice our lives," Al-Badr spokesman Mustaq Aksari told CNN 

During the Obama Administration there were abundant pictures and commentary (especially on social media) advocating the takeover of the White House (see examples below) and the government of the United States by groups and individuals who associated themselves with the Islamic nations.

Examples 

1.  

2. They also recorded speeches uploaded onto YouTube in which Choudary called for Islam to achieve “world domination” with the black flag flying from Downing Street and the White House and “kuffar” non-believers being executed.

So now that we've given you a couple of examples of anarchists we can (an should) apply the law that should have been applied upon their entry into the U. S. of A.

It is evident that Islamists* are anti-American and they should be denied entry into the USA.  

*This does not mean we are focused on any one particular group but it includes all the unknown anarchists crossing our southern border as we speak. - Norman Hooben 

Immigration Act of 1903

This law identified anarchists as targets for exclusion and made provision for their removal if detained after entry.

Summary

Less than two years after an anarchist assassin killed President McKinley, Congress enacted the Immigration Act of 1903 targeting anarchists for exclusion. This law codified earlier immigration restrictions, such as prohibitions against immigration by those deemed likely to become public charges (LPCs), leveling fees on arrivals to help pay for immigration services, and strengthening the government’s powers to pursue, round up, and deport anarchists found within the United States.

Source

CHAP. 1012.-An Act To regulate the immigration of
aliens into the United States.


SEC. 2. That the following classes of
aliens shall be excluded from admission into the United States . . . anarchists, or persons who believe in or advocate the overthrow by force or violence of the Government of the United States or of all government or of all forms of law, or the assassination of public officials . . . 

SEC. 38. That no person who disbelieves in or who is opposed to all organized government, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization entertaining and teaching such disbelief in or opposition to all organized government, or who advocates or teaches the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers, either of specific individuals or of officers generally, of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government, because of his or their official character, shall be permitted to enter the United States or any Territory or place subject to the jurisdiction thereof . . . .

SEC. 39. That no person who disbelieves in or who is opposed to all organized government, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization entertaining and teaching such disbelief in or opposition to all organized government, or who advocates or teaches the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers, either of specific individuals or of officers generally, of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government, because of his or their official character, or who has violated any of the provisions of this Act, shall be naturalized or be made a citizen of the United States…

Approved, March 3, 1903.

I hate to tell you this, but we are at war. The enemy within has shown her hand.

There must be a genuine recognition, both on the part of the state and of the people, that our problems are a result of an excessive reliance upon government and our foolish faith in the ability of legislation to resolve flaws in the human character.

*

Claiming that this is all a conspiracy theory is the mindset of a fool.

Merle Haggard once had a best seller of a song, "If we make it through December we'll be fine."  After the November elections lf we make it to December we may have run out of time.  

*

 

1

1

None of the possibilities I have outlined needs to become reality. But all of them could. The worst-case scenarios all share a common root cause: the failure of our politicians to recognize that, in the words of the late Enoch Powell, "the supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils." There must be a genuine recognition, both on the part of the state and of the people, that our problems are a result of an excessive reliance upon government and our foolish faith in the ability of legislation to resolve flaws in the human character. ~ Adam Yoshida

            Read more here. 

It's obvious to a lot of us.

*

Dear Acting Director Rowe,

United States Senatc WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2509

September 18, 2024

COMMITEES JUDICIARY HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS ENERGY SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

My office has received new whistleblower information regarding the most recent attempt on the life of former President Donald Trump raising troubling questions about Secret Service protocols on that day.  A whistleblower with direct knowledge of Secret Service protection at former President Trump's golf course in West Palm Beach, an individual who has in fact protected President Trump at that very location-alleges there are "known vulnerabilities" in the fence line surrounding the course; places that offer a clear line of sight to the former president and others playing the course.  As a result, the whistleblower alleges it has been Secret Service protocol to "post up" agents at these vulnerable spots when Trump visits the course.  That apparently did not happen on September 15.  Instead, the gunman was permitted to remain along or near the fence line for some 12 hours.

It is further unclear from your recent press conference whether agents swept the perimeter of the golf course at any point, or whether drones were used to surveil the fence line.  The reality is that the would-be assassin should never have been able to linger around the course for that long undetected.

Please answer immediately the following questions raised by these new whistleblower allegations:

  Did Secret Service personnel post up" at known vulnerabilities in the perimeter fencing?

  Did Secret Service personnel sweep the perimeter prior to the former president's arrival on the site?

  Did Secret Service use canine units or Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) elements to monitor the perimeter of the golf course?  How were they used? 

If counter surveillance personnel were present at the golf course on September 15, as you stated at a recent press conference, in what manner were they deployed?  Why did they not detect the gunman sooner?

What was the specific counter surveillance mitigation plan for the known vulnerabilities outside the fence line that day? 

Sincerely

Josh Hawley United States Senator