Hillary Clinton...the most despised woman in America! (Then why do YOU still support her [and her husband]? ...you didn't know you did, did you!)

Do you realize that the staff at the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea

Foundation are underwritten by a $16 million United States

grant? In other words, taxpayer dollars are used to pay the

salaries of people that work at it Clinton Foundation.

You Subsidize the Clinton Foundation with $16 Million in Taxpayer Funds
By Larry O'Connor @ IJ Review
A report from Politico reveals that taxpayers are funding portions of the staff and operations of the Clinton Foundation to the tune of $16 million. The foundation has been under fire from reports that it received tens of millions of dollars from foreign countries, and is currently subsidized through the Former Presidents Act. In fact, Clinton and his office has received more tax money to fund his ex-Presidency than any other ex-President:

“Multiple sources familiar with Clinton’s funding say the special federal money has supplemented the salaries of some employees of the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, a global nonprofit that has served as Hillary Clinton’s primary platform as she prepares for a presidential campaign expected to launch in coming weeks.”

The news caught the attention of political pundit Rush Limbaugh, who posted it on his Facebook page: Post by Rush Limbaugh.
According to a spokesperson for the Clintons, taxpayer money was not used to pay for the controversial private email servers Mrs. Clinton used for her official government correspondence as Secretary of State.
This fact appears to contradict Mrs. Clinton’s statement earlier this week, when she asserted that the private server:

“…was set up for President Clinton’s office. And it had numerous safeguards. It was on property guarded by the Secret Service.”

If the servers were set up for President Clinton’s office, and guarded by the Secret Service, it’s unclear how taxpayer funds were not used in the process.

___________________________

 

__________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Climate Change...a full explanation!

 

____________________________________________________

 

Freeing One's Self From The Ravages Of Islam

This ex-Muslim says she was raised in the faith but was never taught the Koran. When she began reading it for herself,...
Posted by CBN News on Saturday, May 16, 2015

The Cornerstone of Christianity is Crumbling...a letter to Pope Francis

 

"...and propose to all that we, too, forgive his Holiness of all his wrongdoings, for HE, too, does not appear to know what he is doing. May God save us all."

Letter to Pope Francis

By Obie Usategui May 17, 2015 @ Canada Free Press

Your Holiness
Pope Francis
Apostolic Palace
Vatican City 00120
 

Your Holiness:
I am one of approximately one million Cubans, who, on a day like today, fled our homeland for good – a Caribbean island, who, discoverer Christopher Columbus, described as: “The most beautiful land that human eyes have ever beheld”. That was Cuba. That same island which on January 1st, 1959, would warmly welcome a cadre of bearded soldiers of fortune, dressed in olive green liveries, impregnated, still, with scents of killing fields; their chests radiantly covered with hanging crosses embodying the same church, which your Holiness now presides – crosses consigned to deceive the fanatical masses of indulging supporters, who gallantly praised the combatants as titans of liberty.
Yes, your Holiness, this was the same Cuba, whose promenades would rampantly turn to walls posting the deaths of martyrs killed by the liberators’ firing squads; the same island, your Holiness, whose prisons would shortly after the takeover would be turned into dungeons of torture; the same island whose plains and prairies would soon be filled with tears of mothers who had lost their sons and daughters; one whose glimmers of faith, hope and courage, would soon turn into brutal cries of anguish and suffering; the same island, your Holiness, whose seas would soon become a graveyard wherein are laid to rest thousands of Cubans, whose only reason for dying was a bold desire to sever their ties from the sustaining tragedies that prevailed under an oppressive communist regime, led by two Cuban assassins, who, for half a century have cherished the agony inflicted on its people; the same assassins that your Holiness has sought to redeem while openly shaking their hands covered with the blood spilled by all whom they had cruelly massacred.
Yes, your Holiness, these are, so to speak, the same murderers who, today, your Holiness, has cuddled and embraced; the same who did not quiver to preach their gospels of hate for the your church, which today, gives these scoundrels, their redemption and undue clemency for all their transgressions, albeit, rewarding their misconducts as such, in spite of a lifetime of willful attempts to challenge and defy all canons of righteousness as those professed by the word of the Lord. Yes, your Holiness, this oppressive tyrant, christened with the name of Raul Castro Ruz, is one of two murderous brothers whose legacy has claimed the lives of thousands of Cubans, hideously massacred and whose only crime, your Holiness, was that of professing their faith in God and their relentless hope to return to a homeland restituted of their despoiled liberties by those, who, your Holiness, treacherously and disingenuously embraces today.
I would strongly urge your Holiness, that on HIS next visit to our beloved island, HE would question his newly befriended dictator, regarding the “Remolcador 13 de Marzo” [13th of March Tug-Boat], wherein 33 Cubans were slain to death, inclusive of helpless women and children, killed by mercenaries of the same enforcer that your Holiness has now chosen to reach-out to, and, while doing so, has given the perpetrators HIS vote of sustenance and support for the villainous crimes committed. I would also urge your Holiness, to question his newly found colleague regarding the merciless downing of the four Brothers-to-the-Rescue planes, piloted by fledgling young pilots, whose mission was that of rescuing their Cuban brothers and sisters venturing into the Florida Straits in home-made crafts defiantly made to challenge death in the seas while searching for freedoms denied them by the rats who, your Holiness, has seen fit to invite to the Holy City at the Vatican, in spite of the later unending crave to disparage and persecute members of the hosting church for the past 55 years.

Shame on your Holiness for betraying the pain and suffering of so many for so long

Shame on your Holiness for betraying the pain and suffering of so many for so long, for the reprehensible role played by your Holiness while on HIS recent mission to abridge and uplift the Cuban embargo imposed by the United States in lieu of the cowardly threats continuously professed by the Cuban establishment, whose foremost objective throughout the last five decades was that of destroying those imposing the embargo if only because the enforcers, in fact, symbolized and represented the very same liberties as those embezzled by the Anti-Christ now tortuously subscribed by your Holiness.
Given your Holiness presumptuous desire to aid and abet the oppressed peoples of Cuba, why not direct such labors of love to questioning the Cuban tyrants on the hunger and miseries which ensued from the dictator’s choice to impregnate our beloved island with the inherent evils archetypal to that failed system better known as: communism. I am also troubled that your Holiness’ contravened mercy offered to these villains may have very well been the result of a rather tangled perception, whereby your Holiness mystifies the roles of the victims and their enforcers, of the punished and punishers, the harassers and the harassed, the heroes and the anti-heroes, to where your Holiness may have chagrined the essence of friends and foes, by daunting the first and charming the later. A confusion which, I venture to say, your Holiness may easily put an end to, if willing to extend the expedited visits to the island, perversely designed to show your Holiness, selective and preferred perceptions wholly conceived to perpetuate your Holiness’ entanglement of HIS already twisted perceptions.
Yes, your Holiness, we wholeheartedly despise your antithetical posture challenging the dignity of all Cubans now scattered throughout foreign lands, or laid to rest in cold caskets of eternal stillness; we despise your contravention to all the blood spilled from the wounds infringed upon Cubans by your political kinfolk - those still clamoring to show the same crosses once used to shield the pervasive violations committed against the ongoing violations of human rights in our island, unable, however, to cloud our visions of your Holiness’ warped wishes of helping the peoples of Cuba, while contributing to furthering their slaughter and holocaust shamelessly sponsored by those now sanctioned by your Holiness.
While vehemently reproving your Holiness’ show of insensitivity towards the exiled Cuban communities throughout the world, we are further infuriated reminiscing on the memories that, earlier in history, there was another Argentinian, just like your Holiness; better known as “Che Guevara”, who also befriended the same coterie of tyrants, now kindled by your Holiness, to immolate the Cuban hegemony over their homeland and freedoms. The debauched example, set forth by your Holiness in the Cuban crisis, gives us reason to worry about the impact that such erratic example will bequeath on the faith we now profess to you and to our church. I propose we all look up on your unbecoming model, as a nothing short than a true test of our faith, and that, as such, we forgive you as God forgave those who trespassed HIM, abridging their barbaric ways, while condescendingly assuming that: “they did not know what they were doing”. In God’s image then, I now close this letter and propose to all that we, too, forgive his Holiness of all his wrongdoings, for HE, too, does not appear to know what he is doing. May God save us all.
Respectfully,

Obie Usategui

Hillary Clinton: Ban The Books! Ban The Movies! ...and you dare not criticize me!

Hillary The Hungry Repressor
by Norman E. Hooben

When the Russian government banned ‘The Kingdom of God Is Within You’ by Leo Tolstoy, they did it because the book was too religious for the godless leaders who didn’t want the citizens at large paying homage to anyone perceived to be a greater power than themselves.  That may not be exactly how historians explained it but it close enough to make my point.  Control the populace; else the populace will control you!

Other repressive governments banned books and anything else that stood in the way of the repressors.  Although I don’t expect too many Americans to remember Pol Pot of Cambodia (our repressive Department of Education keeps it away from current day students), he not only banned books; he banned religion, music, marriage as a sacrament and a host of other things.  Again, you get my point.  Power hungry people do all in their power to control the masses.  First and foremost by controlling the mindset (we use to call this, ‘brainwashing’).

Now comes another repressor hungry for power.  Hillary Rodham Clinton wants to ban books and movies critical of her.  God forbid we find out she’s not the person we expect her to be.  Recently speaking at the ‘Women in the World Summit’ Clinton suggested (more like, ‘demanded’) that religions should change their religious beliefs.  I guess she wants a Hillary Clinton version of the Bible; after all, King James managed to get his version.
To implement her book banning scheme she would also like to control the justices on the Supreme Court:

“Hillary Clinton says that as president, she would have a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees: they must promise to vote to overturn the Citizens United case.”

Apparently Hillary Clinton does not remember that we have three separate branches of government, Legislative, Judicial, and Executive.  When the Executive controls the Judicial, that’s two down and one to go…and then what will we have?

I think they call it a Dictatorship or will they ban that word also.  ~ 

PS: Hillary is a godless person!

 

The following from: Powerline

Hillary Wants the Power to Ban Books and Movies that Criticize Her
by John Hinderaker

Hillary Clinton says that as president, she would have a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees: they must promise to vote to overturn the Citizens United case.

It is easy to understand why Hillary isn’t fond of Citizens United. The case involved a film called Hillary: The Movie that was critical of her. In Citizens United, the Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional to criminalize showings of Hillary within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of a general election, simply because the movie (like all movies) was produced by a corporation. This is how the court’s majority described what was at stake in the case:

The law before us is an outright ban, backed by criminal sanctions. Section 441b makes it a felony for all corporations—including nonprofit advocacy corporations—either to expressly advocate the election or defeat of candidates or to broadcast electioneering communications within 30 days of a primary election and 60 days of a general election. Thus, the following acts would all be felonies under §441b: The Sierra Club runs an ad, within the crucial phase of 60 days before the general election, that exhorts the public to disapprove of a Congressman who favors logging in national forests; the National Rifle Association publishes a book urging the public to vote for the challenger because the incumbent U. S. Senator supports a handgun ban; and the American Civil Liberties Union creates a Web site telling the public to vote for a Presidential candidate in light of that candidate’s defense of free speech. These prohibitions are classic examples of censorship.

If Hillary gets her way and Citizens United is overturned, the path will be cleared for Congress to enact legislation that makes it a crime to criticize President Clinton in a book or movie. So far, the political class has only tried to ban books and movies that endorse or criticize candidates 60 days out from an election, but there is nothing magic about that number. Next time, they could punish anyone who publishes a book or produces a movie critical of Hillary 180 days, or 360 days before the next election. Is there any reason why Hillary’s Supreme Court justices, committed to reversing Citizens United, would balk at such legislation? None that I can see. We are living, after all, in the era of the permanent campaign.

Has there ever been a time when free speech is popular? Perhaps not; certainly not today. Not on the left. But those who might consider supporting Hillary Clinton for president should think carefully about the powers she wants the federal government to wield.

________________________________

 

 ________________________