Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Facing Reality: No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms

The debate over gun control should be over... And why isn't it?  Perhaps those in favor of gun control have distanced themselves from reality.  Thomas Jefferson was more of a realist when he said, "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."  Whether or not Jefferson said, "When governments fear the people, there is liberty, when the people fear the government, there is tyranny and the strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is to protect themselves against tyranny in government." is still in dispute but the words should be embedded in the minds of all free people else a tyrannical government may emerge.  ...Wait!  What did I just say?  "...a tyrannical government may emerge."  Its already here folks.  The tyrant, Barack Obama, has taken control of the government and it appears there's not a soul in Congress (or elsewhere) with the intestinal fortitude to give control back to the people where it was intended by our Founding Fathers.  Obama and his clan are doing everything just short of an all out civil war to remove all means of self-protection from the populace...but by doing so, he may very well incite the few free men available to that all out war. Perhaps we should all take note and never forget what happened in Nazi Germany.  ~ Norman E. Hooben


Source for the following: Ludwig Von Mises Institute
Gun Control in Nazi Germany
by

Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and “Enemies of the State” by Stephen P. Halbrook, Independent Institute, 2014, 364 pp.
There is no shortage of theories or writings related to the rise of the Third Reich and the subsequent Holocaust. Stephen Halbrook’s 2013 book, Gun Control in the Third Reich offers a compelling and important account of the role of gun prohibition in aiding Hitler’s goals of exterminating the Jews and other “enemies of the state.” While much of the early gun prohibition was created with supposedly good intent, Halbrook carefully and meticulously details how a change in political regime facilitated manipulating some well-intentioned gun registration laws and other gun prohibition to be used in inconceivable ways.
Students of history as well as Second Amendment enthusiasts will find this a fascinating book and will find parallels between gun prohibition in pre-Nazi and Nazi Germany, and attempts to prohibit types of gun ownership and implement other forms of gun prohibition in the United States today. The current climate in the United States surrounding gun prohibition combined with a president who uses his office to impose executive order in ways not historically common gives many citizens pause, especially when looking at the era of the Third Reich. While certain states have imposed gun registration laws recently, enforcement of the laws remains unclear.
While Halbrook is careful to point out that a combination of factors led to the events of the Holocaust, there is no denying that many of the pre-war activities contributed to Hitler’s ability to disarm targeted groups, particularly the Jews. The rapid pace with which Hitler disarmed the populace in Germany is startling. Halbrook’s account is gripping, thorough, and full of legal documentation, leading the reader through the sometimes-daily changes in gun prohibitions that furthered Hitler’s agenda. Ultimately, the prohibitions enacted by the Nazi regime led to monopoly control of firearms by the Nazis and eliminated the ability of many groups in society to defend themselves. A similar progression in contemporary society related to government control of firearms and the firearms industry is a concern of many gun owners in the United States today.
In Part I of the book, a chaotic post-WWI Germany is the backdrop, a time when there were no established policies or laws pertaining to firearm ownership. Concern about firearms not being turned in after the war and conflict between extremist groups and the government led to the implementation of gun control laws. However, well-meaning clauses in the laws were subsequently used to provide the government with complete control over gun ownership, creating registries of gun and ammunition ownership, which ultimately fell into the hands of the Nazis. These lists were methodically used to disarm citizens. Through the first three chapters of the book, Halbrook does a masterful job of detailing the ever-changing gun control policies, ranging from the most extreme (execution on the spot) to the postured ‘relaxation’ of gun control laws that allowed possession of very expensive long arms that would not be affordable for the majority of the population.
Part II of the book opens with the naming of Hitler as chancellor of Germany at the end of January 1933, and the immediate utilization of the Weimar gun control policies to begin the Nazi campaign to seize arms and eradicate the so-called “enemies of the state” (all of whom were tagged as Communists). As a result, less than a month later, Hitler and Göring convinced President Hindenburg that an emergency decree was needed, which ultimately gave the Nazis the ability to eliminate constitutional assurances of liberty and free speech, a free press, the ability to assemble, and the right to privacy in personal communications. Furthermore, search and seizure of homes was authorized. This carte blanche for search and seizure essentially became the modus operandi of the Third Reich.
By the end of March, Hitler had succeeded in passing the “Enabling Law” which gave him the ability to create laws as he wished, with no requirement for consultation. Following this, the confiscation of weapons escalated. Municipal governments were informed that military weapons and ammunition had to be surrendered by the end of March. The Jews were targeted next, with a large raid in East Berlin on April 4, 1933. Jews were not forbidden to own firearms until 1938, but the raid led to confiscations and arrests. The 1928 Firearms Law was utilized to identify the so-called enemies of the state, locate them, interview them, and subsequently confiscate their weapons, thereby increasing Nazi control and eliminating private ownership of firearms from the majority of society.
Part III of the book details episodes of enforcement and expansion of gun prohibition by Hitler’s regime. To mark the one-year anniversary of Hitler’s power, the Law for the Reconstruction of the Reich was passed in January 1934, which centralized control over police and led to the replacement of the SA (Sturm Abteilung or Brownshirts) with the SS. Upon President Hindenburg’s death, Hitler assumed the presidency as well, allowing him the ability to rule by decree. Hitler could now declare laws at will and there was no right of appeal for those arrested. The military pledged allegiance to Hitler and the citizenry was instructed to follow Hitler’s decrees.
Confiscated firearms were redistributed to the police and concentration camp guards. The number of searches and arrests continued to escalate, and with the adoption of the Nürnberg Laws in September 1935, Germans or those with ‘kindred blood’ were decreed as citizens, leaving the Jews without citizenship and consequently, without civil rights. A new weapons law was drafted in November that would also forbid Jews from operating in the firearms industry. Though not yet enacted, the draft opened the door for the stealing of the gun manufacturing company, Simson & Co., by Hitler, who claimed that the Jewish owners were guilty of fraud. Additional accounts are given of exploitation of various incidents to further the Nazi campaign against the Jews.
Nazi Party control of the use and ownership of firearms was quickly implemented and far-reaching, with refinements to the Weapons Law continuing over the next few years. Eventually, in April 1938, Jews were required to register their personal assets if valued at over 5,000 marks. Just a few months later, Jews were required to register at local police stations to receive identification cards. Jews began to flee Berlin and other parts of Germany, as they were able.
In the concluding section of the book,Reichskristallnacht (Night of the Broken Glass) is detailed. Jews had been systematically disarmed, and their identity and locations were now on file with local police. It was simply a matter of time before the full shift into deportation and extermination of the Jews would begin. Records support that a campaign to arrest legally registered Jewish owners of firearms was now underway, along with the push by the Nazis to pressure Jews to flee Germany.
The complete confiscation of weapons held by Jews at this point was sparked by the November 7, 1938 assassination attempt of a German diplomat, supposedly by a Polish-Jewish teenager at the embassy in Paris. The Night of the Broken Glass came in the following few days. All Jewish weapons (including such things as letter openers) were confiscated, and all Jewish organizations were deemed illegal. With the Jews disarmed, Hitler’s plans could proceed with a defenseless populace. The majority of the non-Jewish German population was stunned by what had transpired but too afraid to protest. Isolated cases of resistance remained, such as the now well-known case of Oskar Schindler. When deportations commenced in October 1941, the possessions of the Jews were searched by the Gestapo for anything of value, and completed the disarming of the Jews. The dangers of silent witness are now well known.
As has been well documented, Jews were methodically attacked, their homes, businesses, and synagogues ransacked and burned. Upward of 30,000 Jews were arrested. Any Jews resisting arrest were ordered shot on the spot. Attacks on the Jews were to be carried out by the SA, with no interference by police. Jews arrested were to be sent to concentration camps for up to 20 years. The pogrom was so thorough that nearly all age appropriate, Jewish adult males in Stuttgart had been arrested. With the population afraid and disarmed, Hitler could proceed with little worry about resistance. The Court reinforced that there was no judicial review needed for activities of the Gestapo.
Halbrook concludes by noting that less government regulation and a tradition of rejecting tyranny could have led to a different outcome in Germany. Instead, systematic creation and manipulation of firearms registration and regulations, coupled with the decimation of individual citizen’s rights, enabled Hitler’s dictatorship and the slaughter of millions of innocent Jews and citizens of Nazi-occupied countries, as well as tens of thousands of Germans. It remains for all of us to wonder what might have been had people refused to register their firearms. Indeed, we should all take note and never forget.
Audrey D. Kline, Ph.D., is associate professor of economics at the University of Louisville, College of Business. You can email her at audrey.kline@louisville.edu See Audrey D. Kline's article archives. You can subscribe to future articles by Audrey D. Kline via this RSS feed.

Monday, May 12, 2014

Obama: The Most Destructive Business Policies In American History...shall we look to India for a better way?

When former Prime Minister of England, Gordon Brown, announced that the New World Order (NWO) is emerging after one of those infamous G20 (or was it G8) Summit meetings nothing positive of economic importance followed the tyrannical remark. In fact, the economy of most capitalistic societies began a downhill slide and continues to do so today (with some exceptions).  You may remember that Barack Obama attended that particular summit meeting (I believe it was his first such meeting) and his policies that followed affected the American economy was some of the most destructive in American history.  Of course we also know that Obama-nomics is just a step increase of the Clinton-nomics, and Carter-nomics of the previous NWO policy makers.  The more the politic elite get closer to reaching their NWO goals by destroying the sovereignty of the individual nations, the more we see other nations opting out by suggesting capitalistic policies to boost their economies.  One such nation is India.  Internationally, India is the emerging Asian economic giant.  Why is that?
If you look at some of their suggestions for improving their economy they come right out of the American conservative/capitalistic playbook.  Get rid of over-regulating rules that hamper business development and get government out of the way.  
Just a reminder of how destructive Obama's policies have been (I call it the worst in American history) lets quote the Washington Post:
The American economy is less entrepreneurial now than at any point in the last three decades. That's the conclusion of a new study out from the Brookings Institution, which looks at the rates of new business creation and destruction since 1978.
Not only that, but during the most recent three years of the study -- 2009, 2010 and 2011 -- businesses were collapsing faster than they were being formed, a first. Overall, new businesses creation (measured as the share of all businesses less than one year old) declined by about half from 1978 to 2011.
Please note those years...the first three years of Obama's policies.  It is the first time in Amercan history that more businesses were collapsing faster than they were being formed.  Wow!  That is a major, major destructive accomplishment... And Obama is proud?  Give me a break!  Amercans ought now to be listening to India rather than Washington.  In the editorial below, Mr. Agarwal lays out some of the basics; something the Obama and the NWO crowd have omitted in their quest to destroy a once prosperous nation. ~ Norman E. Hooben

Source for the following: Economic Times
How new government can generate additional revenue of $1 trillion for the economy
by Anil Agarwal 

Chanakya said about 2,300 years ago, "In the absence of fruitful economic activity, both current prosperity and future growth are in danger of destruction".  India is the world's third largest economy.
But uncertainty prevails towards large national projects. We have a rising import bill of about $500 billion and are losing opportunities to explore, produce and utilise our natural resources.
Here is what the new government should do.
India's falling GDP is primarily a function of manufacturing slowdown. Though India has abundant reserves of bauxite, coal, iron ore, copper and gold, it is spending billions of dollars on imports.
Hundreds and thousands of large, medium and small scale industries can be set up across the nation to process our raw material and further manufacturing, which can create 10-15 crore* jobs and infrastructure. Energy security is a key priority. We need another 20 large companies to enter the energy sector to unlock its potential. The supply of coal through a single company is hampering power generation.

Auctions The Only Way

We must auction natural resources in the most sustainable and transparent manner, on a revenue sharing basis or highest royalty. Also, encourage Indian entrepreneurs who will bring world-class technology, build modern plants and big investments in our country.
Only this will ensure the highest standards of environment, health and safety. Unleash the hidden potential of public sector units (PSUs) by divesting 51% stake in each of them. In most democratic countries, the government does not run businesses. In India public sector companies can grow 10 times bigger if we divest at least 51% of their stake and sell them to the public at large.
Divestment should be such that no institution or individual can hold more than 10% of equity. Employees must be guaranteed their jobs and stock options to participate in the upside of the company's performance. We can find many successful examples like Larsen & Toubro, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank and ITC, which are not owner driven but CEO driven companies. ONGC can become another Exxon, and SAIL can become another Vale.

Dig Deeper

The government should form a new ministry of natural resource development. To strengthen the country's economy, we must form a single large ministry to deal with development of all natural resources, and bring oil and gas, mines, coal and steel under a single umbrella and under a strong visionary leader. This new ministry of natural resources would look into the optimum development of our precious mineral resourc.
The government should end discrimination between the public and private sectors. In recent incidents, ONGC has been allowed to explore shale gas while the private sector companies are awaiting approvals.
Despite the iron ore mining ban in Goa and Karnataka (now lifted), NMDC has been continuing mining of iron ore. Similarly, Power Grid Corporation of India is reaping the benefits of being a public sector firm in the transmission business while private players are struggling.
Nalco is exporting alumina at much lower rate than being offered by domestic companies. Discrimination only hurts business sentiments and sends a wrong signal to the community of global investors.

Simplify The Rules

The government should reinforce its focus on women and child development. Two thirds of our population are children and women and their priorities like education, nutrition and health have to be addressed.
Rural women have immense potential to adopt and develop the liberal arts and make that a regular source of livelihood. Our women must become socially and economically empowered. For the dignity of our rural women, it is also important to construct household toilets in each rural house.
India has the largest number of children in the world, with 160 million children of less than six years of age. Around 50% of them are malnourished. The 14 lakh governmentrun Anganwadis need a transformation.
Infrastructure, education, water and sanitation, sufficient nutrition, and regular health checkups are necessary. We need a visionary minister to achieve all this. Bring in public-private partnerships ( PPP) in this area.
The country needs a simpler regulatory framework, based on transparent policies and processes with emphasis on self-declaration and strong deterrents and penalties for non compliance.
India is well positioned to become a powerhouse, and over a period of time the above measures can generate additional revenue of $1 trillion for the economy. People have high hopes from the new government, and so has every section of industry.

The author is Executive Chairman, Vedanta Group.
*A crore is a measurement which is equal to ten million. The term crore is most commonly used in India.

Monday, May 5, 2014

I came across this story last December but you can still laugh out loud in May...plus a solution for most of our current problems

I frequently send myself an email with a link to a story I find interesting and/or suitable enough for someone else's LOL* moment.  Of course these messages to me, from me, sometimes get lost in the volume of legitimate and junk mail I receive on a daily basis...but the intent of SARE (Self Addressed Return Email) is for posting such saved links to this blog at a future time; usually when I find the time.  But as the Roman poet Virgil once said, "Sed fugit interea, fugit inreparabile tempus, singula dum capti circumvectamur amore" (The shorter, more well known, version, "Tempus fugit" ..."Time flies") and my SARE's seem to get lost in the shuffle.  As time flies and these messages become outdated and I go through the deletion process with barely a second glance...but then again, there are some that seem to beg publication; if for no other reason but the LOL moment mentioned above.  I came across this story last December but you can still laugh out loud in May.  Enjoy. ~ Norman E. Hooben
*Laughing Out Loud

Duct Tape Comes in Handy During Trans-Pacific Flight
from The People's Blog
A passenger attempts Obamacare talk during
flight, with predictable results
An airline passenger had to be duct taped to his seat after becoming insufferably overbearing to other passengers during a trans-Pacific flight.
It happened on an Japan Skyway flight Thursday from Tokyo to New York.
According to witnesses, the unidentified man got up in front of the entire economy section area of the flight just after the captain of the flight had turned off the fasten seat belts sign and demanded everyone to pay attention as it was time for, “talking to all of you about signing up for Obamacare after we land."
The man then started “hitting all the canned OFA talking points,” according to airline spokesman Minoru Sato, who also said the passenger “just kept raising his voice as the boos got louder and louder from all the other passengers on the plane, but he just couldn't or wouldn't take the hint.”
“Finally to ensure a peaceful flight for those on board, he was restrained by passengers and crew and was monitored for his own safety for the duration of the flight,” he added.
Japan Skyway confirmed the incident adding that plastic ties and tape are standard on all flights.
“This equipment is on board all our flights in case an incident like this arises,” Sato said and also added with a bit of pride in his voice, "we made sure he was put back in his assigned seat, because at Japan Skyway when we say if you liked your assigned seating plan, you can keep your assigned seating plan, we actually mean it."
___________________________________
 
The following is the recommended solution for most of our current problems... 

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Driver Hits Boy On Bike... What happens next?

The following from: The Las Vegas Sun
Driver hits child on bike, draws gunfire from onlooker
By
A concerned neighbor fired multiple rounds at an erratic driver who struck a 12-year-old boy riding a bike late Friday, according to Metro Police.
The commotion took place around 9 p.m. in the 1600 block of Joyful Street, near Lake Mead Boulevard and Pecos Road.
The driver hit the boy, started to drive off and then turned around, said Lt. Roger Price.
At that point, a neighbor who feared for the safety of the injured boy and other neighborhood children fired multiple gunshots, but did not strike anyone, Price said.
The child sustained nonlife-threatening injuries and was taken to University Medical Center, Price said.
Price said the driver had been detained but he did not know about the armed neighbor.
Metro is investigating the incident, he said.

Sick Ducks, Sick Country...Are Hillary and Obama Nice?

Well there's probably enough evidence to put Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta and a few more hacks behind bars just in the Benghazi incident alone but the way the current Congress is behaving it will never happen.   Of course I said similar words about Hillary back in the day she and Ted Kennedy were openly violating the immigration laws (aiding and abetting illegal entry) and nothing ever came of it.  One reason these people get away with high crimes and misdemeanors is the fact that the sins are committed during the time their party is in control.  Another reason, and one of the most abhorrent, is what John F. Kennedy called the one-party press.   The press, normally referred to as the main stream media (MSM) has been under the control of six corporations for some time.  But it was in the early 1900's that the communist left began buying up influential news media in order to control what news gets out to the populace.  The long term objective was, and still is, control over the people.  If the people are being fed a steady diet of selective news then the people become selective accordingly.  And that's the way it is today.  A good example of how the MSM controls the mindsets of the people is as follows:
Ask most anyone in Boston (and most Massachusetts towns) about Benghazi and they'll most likely ask, "Ben who?"  Benghazi is just not a big news item with the MSM even though the incident got an ambassador and a few other Americans killed.   Downplaying or not reporting this kind of news is important to the people who want to control us...and currently those people who want control are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (among the many on the left).  So if the news about...lets say, Hillary Clinton, is derogatory the people will not vote for her when she runs for office.  With the one-party press keeping her slate clean they will hopefully maintain the status quo.  What parent has said to their children, "If you cannot say anything nice, don't say anything at all."  And that's exactly what the MSM is doing with Hillary and Obama...everything is nice about them.
 
The reason I picked Boston in the above example is depicted in the newspapers below.
At least a few people in Boston got the word... The other Boston paper keeps most liberals informed of what's going on in their world...today its about sick ducks...nothing said about a sick country, just sick ducks.