Friday, February 15, 2013
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Dead People Vote...in some places!
See video below.
If you think that voter fraud does not exist, you're naive as dodo bird...and that's putting it bluntly. Of course all the naiveté folks are not here reading this. That's because they're controlled by the politic elite and they see no need to read about their corrupt ways. The controllers (aka Eric Holder and company) will take care of things. Nobody that I know of cares a rat's tail that I've personally witnessed voter irregularities (I was an official ballot observer on more than one occasion...in more than one state) and the reason is that nothing ever gets done to correct and/or prevent the wrong doing. Did you know that its physically impossible to trace a person's vote once the ballot has been cast...there is no identification on the ballot, so how are you going to know who voted...maybe the voter who cast the ballot was dead. Why are so many dead people still on the voter registration rolls? In the video below J. Christian Adams explains a lot about what's going on around the entire country but offers no foolproof solutions...but the presentation is worth viewing even if you're naive! ~ Norman E. Hooben
If you think that voter fraud does not exist, you're naive as dodo bird...and that's putting it bluntly. Of course all the naiveté folks are not here reading this. That's because they're controlled by the politic elite and they see no need to read about their corrupt ways. The controllers (aka Eric Holder and company) will take care of things. Nobody that I know of cares a rat's tail that I've personally witnessed voter irregularities (I was an official ballot observer on more than one occasion...in more than one state) and the reason is that nothing ever gets done to correct and/or prevent the wrong doing. Did you know that its physically impossible to trace a person's vote once the ballot has been cast...there is no identification on the ballot, so how are you going to know who voted...maybe the voter who cast the ballot was dead. Why are so many dead people still on the voter registration rolls? In the video below J. Christian Adams explains a lot about what's going on around the entire country but offers no foolproof solutions...but the presentation is worth viewing even if you're naive! ~ Norman E. Hooben
Video courtesy of WND --- See the entire story here: Did Obama steal the 2012 election?
Millions of guns sold since Obama scare...Have you got yours?
| Have you got yours? |
February 11, 2013
By Gregory Gwyn-Williams,
Jr.
There have been 65,376,373
background checks completed for Americans purchasing firearms since February of
2009, the first full month of Barack Obama's presidency.
According to data compiled
by the FBI, the number of Americans purchasing guns has skyrocketed since Obama
was elected.
In 2009, there were
13,984,953 background checks for Americans buying firearms. If we subtract the
1,212,860 checks completed in the month of January, the total checks for the
year under Obama were 12,772,090.
For 2010, background
checks totaled 14,320,489. In 2011, checks were 16,336,732, and in 2012,
19,463,832. Background checks for the month of January 2013 were 2,483,230.This totals 65,376,373 background checks completed since President Obama's first full month in office, or 44,748 background checks per day!
By comparison, the number of background checks in Obama's first term is 91.1% higher than President George W. Bush's first-term total of 34,214,066.
Chris Matthews has no black friends, employees or neighbors
"I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years." ~ President Lyndon B. Johnson
WHITE LIBERALS TELL BLACK LIES ABOUT CIVIL RIGHTS
February 13, 2013
Liberals ignored my book Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama
throughout the fall. Now that I'm
safely home from my book tour, they feel free to jabber on about their make-believe
history of the civil rights movement with abandon.
In the hackiest of all hacky articles, Sam Tanenhaus, the man responsible for ruining The New York Times Book Review, has written a cover story in The New Republic, titled: "Original Sin: Why the GOP is and will continue to be the party of white people."
MSNBC has been howling this cliche for a decade -- or, as MSNBC's Chris Matthews said of Tanenhaus' article, "a bold headline"!
Being interviewed by a giddy Matthews -- who has no black friends, employees or neighbors -- Tanenhaus announced the startling fact that once, long ago, some Republicans supported civil rights!
"In the 1950s, as I say in the piece you read, Republicans looked pretty good on civil rights under Eisenhower. We had the Brown decision, the Central High in Little Rock, where he did the tough thing and sent the troops in, and we had the first modern civil rights act."
It wasn't a "tough" decision for Eisenhower to send troops to Little Rock in 1957.
In the presidential campaign the year before, the Republican platform had expressly endorsed the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. The Democratic platform did not.
To the contrary, that year, 99 members of Congress signed the "Southern Manifesto" denouncing the court's ruling in Brown. Two were Republicans. Ninety-seven were Democrats.
In the hackiest of all hacky articles, Sam Tanenhaus, the man responsible for ruining The New York Times Book Review, has written a cover story in The New Republic, titled: "Original Sin: Why the GOP is and will continue to be the party of white people."
MSNBC has been howling this cliche for a decade -- or, as MSNBC's Chris Matthews said of Tanenhaus' article, "a bold headline"!
Being interviewed by a giddy Matthews -- who has no black friends, employees or neighbors -- Tanenhaus announced the startling fact that once, long ago, some Republicans supported civil rights!
"In the 1950s, as I say in the piece you read, Republicans looked pretty good on civil rights under Eisenhower. We had the Brown decision, the Central High in Little Rock, where he did the tough thing and sent the troops in, and we had the first modern civil rights act."
It wasn't a "tough" decision for Eisenhower to send troops to Little Rock in 1957.
In the presidential campaign the year before, the Republican platform had expressly endorsed the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. The Democratic platform did not.
To the contrary, that year, 99 members of Congress signed the "Southern Manifesto" denouncing the court's ruling in Brown. Two were Republicans. Ninety-seven were Democrats.
As president, Eisenhower pushed through the 1957 Civil Rights Act and the 1960
Civil Rights Act. He established the Civil Rights Commission. It was
Eisenhower, not Truman, who fully desegregated the military.
Meanwhile, the Brown decision was being openly defied by the Democratic
governor of Arkansas (and Bill Clinton pal), Orval Faubus, who refused to admit
black students to Little Rock Central High School.
Liberals act as if Eisenhower's sending federal troops to Little Rock was like
Nixon going to China. No, it was like Nixon going to California.
Only someone who knows no history could proclaim, as Tanenhaus did, that the
1957 act "wasn't great, it wasn't what LBJ gave us, but it was
something."
If Eisenhower's 1957 civil rights bill was weak, it was because of one man:
Lyndon B. Johnson. As Robert Caro explains in his book, "Master of the
Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson," it was LBJ who stripped the bill of
its enforcement provisions. Even after that, the bill was still opposed by 18
senators -- all of them Democrats.
To the easily astounded Chris Matthews, Tanenhaus breathlessly remarked,
"Not one Republican voted against that bill!" -- as if the 1957 Civil
Right Act was a Democratic idea and they were delighted to get any Republican
support at all.
Imagine a modern German historian saying: "Remember -- it wasn't just
Germans who opposed the Holocaust. The English and Americans did too!"
Such a historian would be beaten bloody, quite rightly so.
The 1957 bill was sent to Congress by Eisenhower, passed with the intervention
of Vice President Richard Nixon, and opposed exclusively by Democrats. Not
"Southern Democrats," not "conservative Democrats," but
Democrats, such as Wayne Morse of Oregon, Warren Magnuson of Washington, James
Murray of Montana, Mike Mansfield of Montana and Joseph O'Mahoney of Wyoming.
With absolutely no evidence (because there is none), Tanenhaus then asserted
that Republicans decided "they were not going to be pro-civil rights. ...
They were going to side with the Southern oppressors." Cretin Matthews
seconded this gibberish by saying Nixon was "playing the Southern Strategy
electorally with Strom Thurmond and those boys."
Who exactly does Matthews imagine he means by "Strom Thurmond and those
boys"? Every single segregationist in the Senate was a Democrat. Only one
of them ever became a Republican: Strom Thurmond.
The rest remained not only Democrats, but quite liberal Democrats. These
included such liberal luminaries as Harry Byrd, Robert Byrd, Allen Ellender,
Albert Gore Sr., J. William Fulbright, Walter F. George, Russell Long and
Richard Russell.
Fulbright was Bill Clinton's mentor. Gore was "Al Jazeera" Gore's
father. Sam Ervin headed Nixon's impeachment committee. The segregationists who
were in the Senate in the '50s were rabid Joe McCarthy opponents. In the '60s,
they opposed the Vietnam War and supported LBJ's Great Society programs. In the
'90s, they got 100 percent ratings from NARAL Pro-Choice America.
These "Southern oppressors" were liberal Democrats when they were
racists and remained liberal Democrats after they finally stopped being racists
(in public). If Republicans had a racist "Southern strategy," it
didn't work on the racists.
Nor did Nixon -- or Reagan -- ever win over segregationist voters. Republicans
only began sweeping the South after the segregationists died.
Even as late as 1980, when Reagan won a 44-state landslide, the old
segregationists were still voting Democrat. Although Reagan handily won
Southern states that had been voting Republican since the '20s, he barely won
-- or lost -- the Goldwater states.
According to numerous polls, Reagan swept Southern college students, while
losing college students in the Northeast. Meanwhile, The Washington Post called
the elderly "a bedrock of Carter's southern base."
As LBJ explained to fellow Democrats after doing a 180-flip on civil rights as
president and pushing the 1964 Civil Rights Act (which resembled the 1957 Civil Rights Act he had gutted as a
senator): "I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two
hundred years." That's according to a steward on Air Force One, who
overhead him say it.
It's one thing to rewrite history to say the Holocaust was when the Swedes
killed the Jews. But it's another to say that the Holocaust was when Jews
killed the Germans.
That's how liberals rewrite the history of civil rights in America. For the
truth, get Mugged
.
COPYRIGHT 2012 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106; 816-581-7500
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106; 816-581-7500
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Welocome home soldier...welcome home!
Source: God Fruits Video via YouTube
Applause for the New Waiter! Returning Soldier Turns Food Server to Surprise Wife!
Another returning armed forces member, another creative surprise! This time the wife and family are just having a normal meal in a restaurant, when the new “waiter” delivers the food! Wow! Then all the customers join in to applaud the precious reunion!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

