"WE NOW HAVE PROOF THAT THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE"
OBAMA CONFIRMS BIDEN, GEITHNER, EMANUEL BRIBERY
PRESIDENT INTERVENES PERSONALLY TO STOP RELEASES, THEREBY MAKING HIMSELF PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PLUS INTEREST
Sunday 30 May 2010 00:01
• OF UNPRECEDENTED IMPORTANCE: SEE LAWYER A. CLIFTON HODGES' LETTERS TO THE BRITISH MONARCHY DATED 26TH AND 28TH MAY 2010 APPENDED BELOW. THESE LETTERS SPELL OUT THE PRECISE STATE OF PLAY OVER THE RELEASES AND THE EXTREME CRISIS AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL IN WASHINGTON, DC, ARISING FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA'S SABOTAGE OF THE RELEASES ON INSTRUCTIONS FROM GEORGE H. W. BUSH WHO IS BLACKMAILING AND THREATENING HIM. THIS IS A CRISIS WITH NO HISTORICAL PRECEDENT, AND THE FLABBY, COMPROMISED US/UK 'MAINSTREAM' FOURTH ESTATE HAS NO CLUE ABOUT IT.• WE NOW HAVE PROOF THAT THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
• FURIOUS WHITE HOUSE REACTION TO OUR EXPOSURE
OF THE REAL REASONS FOR ADMIRAL BLAIR’S DISMISSAL
• WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE CONFIRMED THE ACCURACY OF OUR REPORT
• RESULTING ABJECT FAILURE OF GEITHNER’S VISITS TO PEKING, LONDON AND PARIS
• TO GET HIMSELF OFF THE HOOK, GEITHNER SIGNED OFF ON THE RELEASES
– ONE DAY AFTER OBAMA STOPPED THEM IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY
• LENINIST MODUS OPERANDI FROM THE BUSH LEXICON
• PRESIDENT OBAMA INTERVENES RECKLESSLY IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY
• PERSONAL LIABILITY OF OBAMA POINTED OUT TO HIM BY HODGES
• BY ACTING ULTRA VIRES, OBAMA HAS EXPOSED AND CRUCIFIED HIMSELF
• GEITHNER TELEPHONED OBAMA FROM PARIS AND ASKED HIM TO DELAY THE RELEASES
• THAT OBAMA TAKES INSTRUCTIONS FROM BUSH SR.
IS NOW WIDELY ACKNOWLEDGED WHERE IT MATTERS
• GEORGE W. BUSH IS MOANING AND WINGEING
THAT HE AND HIS TEXAS BUDDIES ARE ALL BROKE
• SOME CENTRAL BANKS THAT WE THINK ARE INVOLVED
IN FINANCIAL CORRUPTION WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE
• HODGES’ HAND-DELIVERED LETTER TO BUCKINGHAM PALACE DATED 26TH MAY 2010
• HODGES’ HAND-DELIVERED LETTER TO BUCKINGHAM PALACE DATED 28TH MAY 2010
THIS LETTER IS OF EXCEPTIONAL IMPORTANCE AND TELLS YOU THE STATE OF THE CRISIS.
COUNSEL FOR THE BLACK CAUCUS READ MR HODGES LETTER DATED 26TH MAY 2010 TO
OBAMA ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE AND INFORMED HIM THAT HE WILL PERSONALLY BE
LIABLE FOR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS HAVING INTERVENED IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY.
• OBAMA WAS ALSO TOLD THAT IF HE DIDN'T RELEASE THE FUNDS IMMEDIATELY, THE BLACK CAUCUS WOULD ABANDON HIM TO HIS FATE. VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS ALSO MADE AWARE OF THE 26TH MAY LETTER AND COMMENTED THAT AS HE IS PERSONALLY COMPROMISED, HE COULD NOT TAKE OVER FROM OBAMA IN THE EVENT THAT HE IS REMOVED FROM OFFICE.
• SUMMARY OF RECENT DESPERATE ATTEMPTS BY THE CRIMS TO DIVERT THE FUNDS
• FOR THE ATTENTION OF MR LINDELL H. BONNEY, SR.: THE PREMEDITATED SCAMMING
BY LEO WANTA AND RICHMOND-BASED STEVEN GOODWIN OF THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE
ANNOUNCEMENT: 17 MAY 2010: INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW RELEASED WORLDWIDE
Outline details of this week's release of International Currency Review are displayed in the second panel immediately below the NEWS panel on our Home Page. Also released are two further issues of Arab-Asian Affairs. Volume 33, # 5 of this title reveals how the Israeli authorities disguised the physical identity of David Kimche, the Israeli spymaster, drug controller and Director of the Israeli Foreign Office, even after his death, which took place on 8th March 2010.
MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
'Seeing what's at the end of one's nose requires constant effort'. George Orwell.
• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.
• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.
• AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, OUR LANDLINES ARE CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE 'CONTACT US' FACILITY.
NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
WE NOW HAVE PROOF THAT THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
Astonishing evelopments since we last reported have confirmed that the White House is a criminal enterprise. Nothing surprising about that, we we hear you respond.
No, nothing surprising at all – except that all related intelligence on this subject to date, while compelling, has been circumstantial.
• We now have the proof.
FURIOUS WHITE HOUSE REACTION TO OUR EXPOSURE
OF THE REAL REASONS FOR ADMIRAL BLAIR’S DISMISSAL
First, in response to our exposure that Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel have been accepting weekly and monthly Payola bribery checks ordered by the Bush-CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate, the White House exploded in anger.
Specifically, instead of issuing a denial or formulating some immediate dirty trick against the Editor of this service, the White House/CIA rounded on the agent who leaked this information to a contact and ‘chewed him up’.
Of course this fact was duly reported back to us. If the criminal Obama White House had had any residual sense at all it would have resisted the temptation to reprimand the agent for revealing these impeachable offences (in the cases of Messrs Biden and Geithner, BOTH can and should be impeached for taking bribes while holding high office). But no, as this White House is Blacker than Black, it gave way to its visceral fury at having been found out.
WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE CONFIRMED THE ACCURACY OF OUR REPORT
So it rounded on the agent and ‘chewed him’ – thereby CONFIRMING THE ACCURACY OF OUR REPORT. How stupid is that? Not that our report needed confirmation because, really, do you suppose we would have published such damaging intelligence if it had not been true?
Actually, what the White House reacted to was our exposure of the fact that Admiral Dennis C. Blair ‘resigned’ (was ‘asked to resign’) by Barack Obama because he had been pressing for the financial releases and because he had acquired documentary proof of the Payola bribery checks being paid to Biden, Geithner and Emanuel.
By proof we mean that Admiral Blair had obtained COPIES OF SOME OF THE WEEKLY AND MONTHLY BRIBERY CHECKS PAID TO THE CORRUPT BIDEN, GEITHNER AND EMANUEL.
Now, as you will already have deduced, there is another dimension lurking here.
Specifically, as reiterated above:
• Acceptance of bribery Payola payments by holders of high office in the United States is both a criminal and an impeachable offence.
So what does the criminal Obama White House do? Instead of sacking Biden, Geither and Emanuel and handing their cases over to the Justice Department or whatever other appropriate procedure would apply here, NO! It rounds on the agent who, though a signatory of the US equivalent of the British Official Secrets Act, found this behaviour too much even for his steel stomach to digest.
This tells you all you need to know about the Obama White House.
• Like its recent predecessors, it is a CESSPIT OF INIQUITY.
The passage from the preceding report to which the White House reacted in fury, thereby confirming the accuracy of our report, is appended as Note (1) below.
RESULTING ABJECT FAILURE OF GEITHNER’S VISITS TO PEKING, LONDON AND PARIS
The sequel to this was the complete failure of Mr Geithner’s related hurried trips to Peking, London and Paris. Specifically:
• In the Chinese capital, Geither, as we reported in a Newsflash dated 26th May, attempted to ‘do a deal’ with the Chinese authorities, Lien holders against the US Treasury in the aggregate sum of $47 trillion, effective 6th December last year [see reports]. The Chinese authorities refused to entertain any such duplicity and told Geithner as sharply as they could: 'NO. GET IT DONE'.
• In the British capital, Geithner incurred the clearly visible displeasure of George Osborne, the new Chancellor of the Exchequer. A photograph of the two published on page 55 of the Times, London, dated 27th May 2010, showed Osborne clearly annoyed at something Geithner had just said, and Geithner looking at him with extraordinary arrogance. A similar photograph appeared in the Wall Street Journal. The caption to The Times’ picture read as follows:
‘George Osborne appeared to be slightly at odds with the US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, left, over the issue of a specific rescue fund’.
Note the extraordinarily VAGUE description of the fund in question. There seems little doubt that the ambiguous ‘specific rescue fund’ referenced the Dollar Refunding Program which Geithner has been blocking – although the newspaper then ran down the diversionary rabbit hole of discussing Geithner’s call for Europe’s leaders to ‘shore up’ the Euro and calm global markets by putting their rescue plan into action quickly, undsoweiter. That programme is in jeopardy now because the US Senate has voted 98-0 to prohibit the International Monetary Fund (effectively nowadays a branch of the White House) from pouring good money down debt spiral sink-holes.
• In the French capital, Geithner attempted, as in China, to ‘do a deal’ with the French authorities, and was duly told to back off and shown the door.
So the recipient of Bush Payola bribes, Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the United States Treasury, achieved precisely NOTHING on this trip, except to discover that the three key players (we don’t know what happened in Germany), had seen through him for the duplicitous, dirty, double-dealing wheeler-dealer, sheister and criminal financier that he is.
TO GET HIMSELF OFF THE HOOK, GEITHNER SIGNED OFF ON THE RELEASES
– ONE DAY AFTER OBAMA STOPPED THEM IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY
On Saturday 29th May, the Editor was informed, and obtained immediate confirmation, of the fact that Geithner, signed off on the releases. Having been slapped down in Peking, London and Paris, this increasingly pathetic recipient of Bush’s Payola bribes doubtless sought to exonerate himself and to get himself off the hook by authorising the hijacked and criminally delayed release payouts – knowing that his signature on the relevant documents was meaningless.
• Why was it meaningless?
Because these crooks are playing exactly the same game that was repeatedly played by George W. Bush, Henry M. Paulson, Richard B. Cheney et al. under the preceding corrupt White House – the game called ‘pass the parcel’, i.e. everyone blames everyone else, by rote. That way, nothing ever happens, the ‘Never Pay Syndrome’ is perpetuated, and nobody is ever to blame.
The problem this time round, however, is that in signing off on Saturday 29th May, Timothy Geithner indicated to those not sitting on their brains, that he is even more of a fool than the village idiot he acted out in Peking, London and Paris.
• Because, President Obama has compromised himself and has PERSONALLY intervened to contradict what he had ordered in his official capacity, ON THE ORDERS OF GEORGE H. W. BUSH.
And since the duplicitous little clown Geithner knows this full well, by signing off on the releases precisely ONE DAY AFTER OBAMA HAD PERSONALLY INTERVENED TO STOP THEM, Geithner has signalled that he is a careless deceiver, a desperate liar and a mendacious recipient of Bush Sr.’s bribes who, knowing that his boss had only just intervened PERSONALLY to stop the payouts a day earlier (see below), DEEMED IT ‘SAFE’ TO DO THE OPPOSITE in the knowledge that Barack Obama is the backstop taking orders directly from criminal Godfather Bush Senior.
The problem you face, Mr Geithner, is that we and others have seen right through your desperate and despicable duplicity – so that you, Sir, have nowhere to hide. You were told where to get off in Peking, London and Paris and you have frankly BLOWN IT. You purport to have ‘got the message’ by signing off on 29th May, but in reality you have been exposed, in conformity with Story’s Third Law: ‘Sooner or later, all operations and covers are blown’.
LENINIST MODUS OPERANDI FROM THE BUSH LEXICON
Again, there is a further dimension here. Notwithstanding that Geithner and the other snakes have long since been exposed before the whole world (the Chinese Government reads our reports), Mr Geithner still considered it worth trying to ‘do deals’ when all the relevant foreign parties have seen right through him and have resolved to resist this cesspit of American official corruption.
We are informed by a knowledgeable US source that the rationale behind this behaviour is derived from the Bush lexicon, which incorporates a Leninist technique that can be summarised as follows:
• Leading a target by the nose, enticing the target incessantly (‘bait’) and continuing this process far beyond the bounds of human tolerance, long after no progress has been made – in the firm expectation, born of experience, that eventually the target will crack and will ‘do a deal’.
Of course when the target cracks and makes this crass mistake, he finds that he has been double-crossed, because the Bush lexicon then prescribes that the despised target is at once let down and double-crossed – i.e., that the agreed-upon deal is reneged upon instead. This, by the way, is PURE UNADULTERATED REVOLUTIONARY LENINISM. Study Lenin and you will discover that this is precisely the modus operandi taught by that son of Belial.
So, one highly satisfactory outcome that we can reasonably report is that our exposure of the true factors behind the ‘resignation’ of Admiral Dennis C. Blair contributed to the ABJECT FAILURE AND HUMILIATION of Treasury Secretary Geithner’s latest DESPERATE attempt to get out of the bind he is in by trying, even at this late stage, to subvert and corrupt the key foreign parties pertinent to this crisis, for which Geithner is responsible.
PRESIDENT OBAMA INTERVENES RECKLESSLY IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY
The second proof we now have that the Obama White House is a criminal enterprise arises from a quite extraordinary development that occurred on Thursday 27th May 2010.
• We were informed about this on the following day.
Specifically, it was reported to Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the US lawyer with whom we are in close contact, by the US Gold Badge Signatory. Lindell H. Bonney Sr., chosen by MI6 to interact with all concerned as Paymaster, that on 27th May, Obama PERSONALLY intervened to contradict:
• His own prior signed OFFICIAL authorisation for the financial releases to proceed.
• The requirements of the Lien Holders to the same effect.
• The instructions of the World Court in the same context.
• The requirements of the Basel List which includes fulfillment of the Line Item requiring the sovereign loan to be remitted as ordered, to the securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, of Michael C. Cottrell’s firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
Having by then exhausted all possibilities for double-dealing and duplicity, President Barack Obama committed the fatal mistake of ‘piercing the veil’ of his Presidential authority, by stepping outside the bounds of his office and committing the most grievous offence ultra vires.
The information conveyed to us by Mr Hodges derived from the Gold Badge Signatory confirmed that Obama picked up the phone and GAVE ORDERS IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY for the Bank of America, Richmond et al. to STOP the release payouts, making Mr Obama PERSONALLY LIABLE – ostensibly until the first of June (Tuesday) (although we interpret that date as simply the next stop by the Bushtrain called ‘Never Pay Syndrome’).
PERSONAL LIABILITY OF OBAMA POINTED OUT TO HIM BY HODGES
This, including the PERSONAL LIABILITY OF PRESIDENT OBAMA resulting from his PERSONAL INTERVENTION, is all CONFIRMED in the following letter dated 27th May 2010 to President Obama from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, of Hodges and Associates, Pasadena, California, lawyer for the CMKX SEC scamming victims and for Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. and his corporations Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and Cottrell Securities Limited, London:
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena
CA 91103
Tel: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts, Of Counsel
May 27, 2010
Via Facsimile Only: (202) 456 2461
Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
White House
Washington, DC
In re: World Global Settlements
Dear Mr President
I write to you again this afternoon in furtherance of my previous recent correspondence regarding prompt dissemination of the World Global Settlements.
As I have previously stated, I represent some 50,000 shareholders who are to be paid a settlement which consist mainly of monies collected from banks, brokerages, hedge fund corporations, market makers, the Depository Trust Corporation/Federal Reserve, and various billionaire ‘naked-shorter’ individuals, as well as some monies due from the SEC for damages. I have also been involved in the representation of other payees awaiting this distribution and have, in such capacity, been in direct communication with the UK Royal Monarch. (Note from Norm: Ref naked-shorter individuals above: See this video for explanation Hedge Funds and the Global Economic Meltdown (Part 2) )
I am currently advised and understand the following:
• A portion of the World Global Settlement funds have been collected and are presently held in the custody of the Bank of America in Richmond, VA.
• Said funds are sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of the Paymaster who has now spent more than eight weeks over the past three months, in Richmond, for the purpose of concluding these transfers.
• The Paymaster authority has, at the direction of the Pentagon, London, et al., been present in the Bank in Richmond every day this week to complete the transfers.
• This morning he was advised by “both sides” that each desired this matter to be concluded as soon as possible and that he should be available to enter the bank to consummate the transfers.
• AS OF 6:00 P, EDT, THE PAYMASTER AUTHORITY PERSONALLY ADVISED ME THAT YOU PERSONALLY, MR PRESIDENT, WANTED AND HAD DIRECTED THAT THESE FUNDS BE HELD THROUGHOUT THE COMING HOLIDAY WEEKEND.
• I have previously been advised that you had given specific written authorization of these transfers and confirmed the same verbally just this week.
Mr President, I sincerely hope that my information is incorrect; because, as I am certain you are aware, your personal involvement in delaying this distribution is an ultra vires action which exposes you to personal liability for the sums involved and for accruing interest thereon. I would certainly not want to see you personally involved in the future dénouement of this matter.
As I have previously advised in my communications to you, only your direct intervention will be efficacious in bringing this matter to conclusion.
Mr President, I implore you to facilitate conclusion of this matter forthwith. There is simply no legal basis for any further delay. Please act consonantly with your previous statements and promises.
I would very much appreciate your written confirmation that you will do so immediately; accordingly, I will withhold public distribution of this correspondence until 8:00 pm EDT today.
Sincerely,
Hodges and Associates
[Signed]: A. Clifton Hodges
ACH.gm
Cc: Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II
Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Clients
BY ACTING ULTRA VIRES, OBAMA HAS EXPOSED AND CRUCIFIED HIMSELF
This is a new paradigm, and totally new dimension. Why?
Because in stepping outside the bounds of his office, Mr Hussein Barack Obama thereby MADE HIMSELF PERSONALLY LIABLE inter alia for the billions of dollars to be earned as interest over the long weekend ending on Monday 31st May. Under inter alia the legal principle that ‘the money you make by illegally exploiting my money is my money’, Mr Obama became personally responsible for disgorging the funds illegally earned over (at least) the four-day period mentioned.
Stepping outside the bounds of his office (A FACT confirmed by the key Gold Badge Signatory and given the lawyer’s imprimatur) also made Barack Obama vulnerable to ARREST IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY and to being handcuffed and hauled out of the White House cesspit for incarceration pending indictment IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY.
This is an entirely NEW development. ‘Piercing the veil’ of official authority is an established legal principle, and Obama has been arrogant, stupid and thoughtless enough to consider that the risks he took when acting ultra vires were ‘worth taking’.
Considering that this corrupt President considers it appropriate to order a reprimand for the agent who divulged the fact that Admiral Dennis C. Blair ‘resigned’ because he had been in favour of the lawful settlement releases and because he had the necessary documented bribery goods on the Jesuit Biden, and on Geithner and Emanuel, instead of having the receivers of the corrupt Payola bribes handed over to the competent authorities and subjected to whatever procedures would apply in these circumstances, it is hardly surprising, we suppose, that this play-acting, shallow, arrogant impostor considered the risk of a PERSONAL intervention one worth taking.
Of course, while intervening in his PERSONAL capacity, Obama would have deceived the parties at the other end of the telephone into believing that he was acting in his OFFICIAL capacity. But he could hardly do that, because he had already signed off OFFICIALLY to order the payment releases.
• So he found himself boxed into his own deception hell and took the risk anyway.
• Note: On Saturday 29th May, Mr Hodges elaborated in response to the Editor's request for legal elucidation of the ultra vires concept, as follows. You will find his observations enlightening:
'The real point of the sword is that Obama was acting in an ultra vires capacity.
This is a legal concept which in constitutional law means acting outside the various powers that are constitutionally authorized. To go outside those constitutional powers is to act ultra vires; for example, although the Court did not use the term, in striking down a Federal law in United States v. Lopez on the grounds that it exceeded the Constitutional authority of Congress, the US Supreme Court effectively declared the law to be ultra vires.
In this case, the President acted personally in response to a request from the Shrubs through Geithner who called him from Paris and demanded that Obama delay distribution until after the Holiday. This in no way is a Presidential directive; this is a personal response to an outside request. This act was in contravention of prior national/international agreements and in no way affected dollars belonging to the United States'.
GEITHNER TELEPHONED OBAMA FROM PARIS AND ASKED HIM TO DELAY THE RELEASES
As you can see, Mr Hodges states that Geithner telephoned the President to ask him to delay the releases until after the Holiday. AND YET, on Saturday 29th May, Timothy Geithner signed off on the releases, having previously asked the President to stall and block them. President B. Obama then intervened IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY, having previously OFFICIALLY approved and sanctioned the releases both verbally and in writing. In other words, these deceivers are tripping themselves up and are being exposed even as they do so.
They are a despicable, low cabal of conniving, lying losers, bending with every angry telephone call from the Bush Crime Syndicate, switching from one dialectical stance to the opposite, from one moment to the next, living in their own chaotic, self-inflicted hell.
And the reason they respond in panic to every angry telephone call from the Bush Crime Syndicate may be that both characters are being blackmailed and have been threatened with liquidation.
THAT OBAMA TAKES INSTRUCTIONS FROM BUSH SR.
IS NOW WIDELY ACKNOWLEDGED WHERE IT MATTERS
Now in this context, it has been authoritatively conveyed to us that it is now, finally, OPENLY UNDERSTOOD in circles that matter that Barack Obama TAKES HIS INSTRUCTIONS FROM GEORGE H. W. BUSH, the Godfather of Godfathers, the visible head of the serpent, the dirty dog who is holding the whole world to ransom and whom the cowardly, weak, pathetic, corrupt American authorities cannot bring themselves to ‘put out of business’.
We can yet again speculate as to why this is, but the likeliest generic answer is one that we have mentioned before – namely, that a professional criminal specialises in compromising his targets, so that (he thinks) they cannot move.
But the blackmailee is in fact usually in a stronger position than the blackmailer: because if the blackmailee exposes the blackmailer, the blackmailer has no further weapons in his locker.
However in an overall context of illegal financial transactions, the blackmailee is caught, because he has been engaged in illicit financial transactions, tax evasion and other criminal activities such as wire fraud (20 years): so the vast army of the criminally compromised have opted to keep their heads down and hope they don’t get picked up in the ongoing purge (triggered to some extent by these exposures).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, there are still uncompromised cadres within the US structures who can perfectly well perform the long overdue and absolutely necessary neutralisation of the Bush Crime Family (because it isn’t just Senior who needs to be neutralised).
GEORGE W. BUSH IS MOANING AND WINGEING
THAT HE AND HIS TEXAS BUDDIES ARE ALL BROKE
On a related Bushnote, we have it on impeccable TEXAS authority that:
• The Bush Crime Family and Bush Sr. are now being cut out of the releases. (This information is periodically reversed, with us being told that these crooks are to be paid off. But the latest version of this dialectic is as stated here).
• George W. Bush is complaining and whining and wingeing that he hasn’t got enough money even to maintain his ranch at Crawford, and that all his formerly rich Texas buddies are out of funds and in various stages of financial bust and bankruptcy. One wonders what on earth happened, then, to all the money that Bush and Clinton sucked from suckers who fell headlong for their hypocritically criminal demands for cash for the suffering Haitians after the United States contrived a ‘natural event’ in order to gain access to Haiti’s oil and mineral resources and to control the Haitian Central Bank for illicit trading purposes via the Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund.
SOME CENTRAL BANKS THAT WE THINK ARE INVOLVED
IN FINANCIAL CORRUPTION WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE
Incidentally, here is an incomplete list of other central banks that we have reason to believe have been involved in corrupt financial operations with the US authorities:
Banco de la Republica, Colombia
Banco do Brasil
Bank of Uganda
Canco Central de la Republica Argentina
Central Bank of Kenya
National Bank of Hungary
Nepal Rastra Bank
Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
HODGES’ HAND-DELIVERED LETTER TO BUCKINGHAM PALACE DATED 26TH MAY 2010
On 26th May 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, of Hodges and Associates, Pasadena, California, lawyer for CMKX SEC scamming victims and for Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. and for his two corporations Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and Cottrell Securities Limited, London, wrote as follows to the most senior official at Buckingham Palace, London SW1. This letter was followed by a further letter to Buckingham Palace dated 28th May 2010 which is of EXCEPTIONAL IMPORTANCE: see below.
[The name of the identified top official has been redacted by the Editor]:
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena
CA 91103
Tel: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts, Of Counsel
The Rt. Hon. [NAME REDACTED] CVO, OBE
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA
May 26, 2010
Hand Delivered
Re: U.S. Dollar Refunding Project
Dear Honorable [NAME REDACTED]:
I most recently wrote to you on May 21, 2010 to transmit copies of three letters which I had recently sent to President Obama relating to the matters referenced in papers delivered to the Palace under cover of my letter dated April 28, 2010. I write to you again in furtherance to that subject on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.
As I similarly gave notice to President Barack Obama, I am currently advised and understand the following:
• A portion of the World Global Settlement funds have been collected and are presently held in the custody of the Bank of America in Richmond, VA.
• Said funds are sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of the Paymaster who has now spent more than eight weeks over the past three months, in Richmond, Virginia, for the purpose of concluding these transfers.
• The Paymaster authority has, at the direction of the Pentagon, London, et. al., recently returned to Richmond to consummate the transfers, and has been advised each day this week that the funds will be able to be transferred to the BASEL - identified trustees.
• Mr. Leon Panetta is currently present at the Bank of America, but continues to delay the ability of the Paymaster authority, and his access to effect transfer of the World Global Settlement funds.
• It clearly appears at this time that Mr. Panetta and/or others are diligently working to delay payout of these funds; it also seems self-evident that this will continue absent outside intervention.
As I have previously indicated, I am persuaded by these facts, that only the direct intervention of the Royal Monarchal Power will be efficacious in bringing this matter to conclusion.
I request, kind sir, your assistance in bringing this matter to the attention of Her Majesty and others as appropriate. Any further delay will not only exacerbate the conditions under which we all must operate, but will certainly serve to encourage those seeking even further delay.
This is a matter which it seems will only be concluded at such time as the Royal Monarchal Power either demands it, or utilizes the power which has been granted to effect closure through direct means. I apologize in advance for having to involve your once more in this situation; however, circumstances dictate that direct intervention is now a necessity.
Thank you very kindly in advance for your help; it is truly appreciated by many, and will indeed have a very significant impact on the future financial health of the world.
Sincerely,
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
[Signed] A. CLIFTON HODGES
ACH/gm
Enclosures
Cc: Michael C. Cottrell
Christopher Story
HODGES’ HAND-DELIVERED LETTER TO BUCKINGHAM PALACE DATED 28TH MAY 2010
On 28th May 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, of Hodges and Associates, Pasadena, California, the lawyer for CMKX SEC scamming victims and for Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. and for his two corporations Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and Cottrell Securities Limited, London, wrote as follows to the most senior official at Buckingham Palace, London SW1.
[The name of the identified top official has been redacted by the Editor]:
This letter is of EXCEPTIONAL IMPORTANCE: IT TELLS YOU THE MAGNITUDE OF THE CRISIS:
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena
CA 91103
Tel: (626) 564-9797
Fax: (626) 564-9111
A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts, Of Counsel
The Rt. Hon. [NAME REDACTED] CVO, OBE
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA
May 28, 2010
Hand Delivered
MOST URGENT
Re: U.S. Dollar Refunding Project
Dear Honorable [NAME REDACTED]:
I most recently wrote to you on May 26, 2010 to solicit the assistance of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II in securing the release of funds being held in the U.S. which are required for implementation of the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project. I write to you again in furtherance to that subject, on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.
As of the afternoon of May 28, 2010, I am currently advised and understand the following:
• World Global Settlement funds have been collected and remain in the custody of the Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia.
• Said funds are sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of the Paymaster who has now spent more than eight weeks over the past three months, in Richmond, for the purpose of concluding these transfers in accord with the BASEL agenda.
• I became aware on May 27, 2010 that President Barack Obama had personally intervened in the scheduled May 27 release of funds, and had instructed that the funds be held until after the U.S. Memorial Day Holiday.
• As any further delay in disbursement of these funds will engender considerable harm to many, and is without any legal basis, I wrote to President Obama putting him on notice and soliciting his cooperation. [A copy of that letter is attached]. [EDITOR: SEE ABOVE].
• My letter to President Obama was distributed to all parties dealing with the World Global Settlement funds, to both political parties in Washington, D.C., to the Democratic Caucus and its counsel, to the Black Caucus and its counsel, and to President Obama’s priest.
• The letter was also submitted to the British Royal Monarchal Power through your good offices; Mr. L.H. Bonney, Sr. has also verified that a copy of the letter was submitted to, and received by, Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II through MI-5 and MI-6.
• Counsel for the Black Caucus immediately recognized that a criminal offense had been committed; he advised that he would directly inform the President by reading the letter to him on Air Force One today, as well as advise the President of his personal responsibility, over the four day weekend, for costs in the “Billions of USD”. Said counsel also stated that “if release [of the funds] was not taken care of today – they [the Black Caucus] would wash their hands of him [President Obama]”.
• Vice President Biden was also informed of the May 27, 2010 letter, provided with a copy, and discussed the veracity of President Obama taking direction from former President G.H.W. Bush; he indicated that President Obama’s citizenship status was being used as very effective leverage against the President.
• Vice President Biden also admitted that he was personally compromised, and [was] therefore unqualified to succeed President Obama in the event that the President’s tenure is successfully attacked.
• It now appears that it is only a matter of time before formal process is instituted to remove President Obama from office; however the “Succession List” has now been severely compromised by the failure to complete distribution of the subject funds.
• I was advised at noon time this date that the on-site Paymaster authority, Mr. L.H. Bonney, Sr, had confirmed at Bank of America that no communication had been received from President Obama regarding authorization for release of the Settlement funds; accordingly, he was returning to Ohio.
• Prior to Mr. Bonney’s departure he further advised that all collected funds were in a “locked-down” mode, and that all else is now in written form for further use in resolving the issue of final distribution of these Settlement funds.
As I have previously indicated, I am persuaded by these facts, that only the direct intervention of the Royal Monarchal Power will be efficacious in bringing this matter to conclusion.
To secure release of these Settlement funds, it is now imperative that the Royal Monarchal Power exercise that power, as a U.S. Treasury lien-holder, to effectuate timely resolution. Any further delay will not only jeopardize the severely stressed world financial condition, but will certainly serve to encourage those seeking even further delay.
This is a matter which now clearly seems can only be concluded at such time as the Royal Monarchal Power utilizes the power which has been granted, to effect closure through direct means. I apologize in advance for having to involve you further in this situation; however, circumstances dictate that direct intervention is now an imperative.
Thank you very kindly in advance for your help; it is truly appreciated by many, and will indeed have a very significant impact on the future financial health of the world.
Sincerely,
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
[Signed] A. CLIFTON HODGES
ACH/gm
Enclosures
Cc: Michael C. Cottrell
Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Christopher Story
SUMMARY OF RECENT DESPERATE ATTEMPTS BY THE CRIMS TO DIVERT THE FUNDS
We have listed some of the recent operations by the official US kleptocracy to prevent the lawful distribution of the hijacked releases, but these bear repetition in view of further attempts by Wanta to pervert the course of justice and to contrive, on behalf of his master Mr George H. W. Bush, to capture some portion of the payouts.
The most conspicuous recent criminal operations under this heading have included:
• The Wanta ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception ploy which we exposed comprehensively in September 2009 and subsequently, the purpose of which was to procure the illegal transfer of funds via Wanta’s signature into the hands of a fake, non-existent virtual ‘Central Bank of Snake Hill’ but in reality into the hands of Bush’s money-laundering Carlyle Group via the French Embassy originally under Levitte, now Sarkozy’s intelligence adviser, who was formerly French Ambassador to Washington – Sarkozy’s half brother ‘Oliver’ being a senior executive with Carlyle Group.
Notwithstanding our absolutely definitive exposure of this crude deception, Wanta’s arrogance is such that he continued shovelling this claptrap out via the Internet for ignorant parties, including a discredited hired female hack, to pick up and run with. That operation has been so badly bashed, that it should by now be terminated (although an extraordinary feature of these snakes is that they never seem to understand that they’ve been trampled on). As for the ‘in-your-face’ display of gross arrogance associated with the ‘snake’ in ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ and the graphic display of a serpent on the decaying ‘Snake Hill’ websites, we attribute these aberrations to the propensity for these snakes to be blinded by their own lies, cunning and arrogance.
• The insertion of the Mafioso Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as false ‘Secretary’ on the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau screen displayed for Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.. We BLEW THAT OPERATION, causing immense ripples right the way up the food chain, resulting inter alia in the Gold Badge Signatory having to be equipped with bodyguards 24/7.
• The attempt by the criminal former US Vice President and top CIA criminal operative Richard B. Cheney to foist false gold certificates on Bank of America, Atlanta, in order to try to siphon $2.0 trillion from the release money – an attempt that resulted in this odious operative being physically manhandled out of the bank’s premises. Cheney was accompanied by Carlyle Group executives.
• The attempt almost immediately afterwards by the Pearce character in Paris and his Dallas side-kick who was in touch with us, spying on us on behalf of Bush Sr. for two and a half years, to pull a similar operation in Paris over the subsequent weekend (22-23 May 2010) – the object here being to steal a similar sum of money from the release funds. The final outcome for these perpetrators is believed to have been horizontalisation, but this has not been confirmed.
• The sudden appearance at the Gold Badge Signatory’s side last week of the dark character Leon Panetta, the Director of Central Intelligence (CIA) [see Mr Hodges' letter to the Palace]. This was initially reported to us as a positive development, but the Editor warned that Panetta’s task would more probably be to frustrate the releases: which is what happened. Panetta was at the bank on 25th May. Immediately afterwards, he flew to Bulgaria and then had dinner with the Bulgarian Prime Minister, Boyko Borisov, on the evening of 26th May. Also attending the dinner were the Bulgarian Interior Minister and the Directors of three Bulgarian intelligence agencies.
We are now advised that Panetta has been ‘neutralised’ in this context. Specifically, Leon Panetta was ‘taken out of the picture’ on 27th May, following receipt of the Hodges letter to Buckingham Palace dated 26th May 2010: in other words, Mr Hodges' request for outside intervention appears to have been acted upon. However Panetta's departure on his visit to Bulgaria, which had been arranged in September 2009, was the practical reason for him being 'taken out of the picture'.
With Panetta no longer able to interfere, Obama resorted to his reckless PERSONAL intervention on Friday 28th May, contradicting his earlier written and verbal assurances as stated above.
• Finally, and any sane person wouldn’t believe this: but since we are dealing with a snakepit, you need to! We have previously reported that Wanta recently resurrected the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus that we reported, and the text of which can be accessed in our Archive (June 2007 et seq.). We also reported that the Editor sat in the Courthouse in Alexandria throughout proceedings on 19th October 2007, along with Mr Wanta, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and Colonel Dana Wilcox, plus of course representatives of the Reserve Bank of Richmond, who had filed a petition to the Court for the Writ of Mandamus to be dismissed.
We further reported that when finally called to the witness stand, Wanta waved his arms around like a jackass and made an absolute fool of himself: on purpose. Because by now he thought he had secured a kind of ‘agreement’ with his evil pal Richard B. Cheney and his boss Bushsnake Senior, and Bushsnake Junior, so that by his reckoning the legal process that he had triggered (prepared by his odious CIA lawyer Thomas Henry, a.k.a. ‘Mr Nasty’) was redundant. After the hearing, Wanta was full of beans, joshing and joking, as he thought he had pulled this one off.
However quite recently, his options having closed tight shut, Wanta revived the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. We responded by publishing the ACTUAL TEXT OF THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS which has been displayed in our Archive for the past THREE YEARS. Self-evidently, when publishing a legal document, the text is shown precisely as presented to the Court.
We pointed out that there were suspicions that Wanta had represented ‘facts’ that diverged from the precise text of the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, and that in such an event he may have been seeking to distort the ‘truth’ as presented to the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria: in which case either the text of the Petition was incorrect, implying that he perjured himself before the Court, or else he was now distorting the facts as presented to the Court which represents a felony against the Court (not a problem for this serial felon).
On 28th May 2010 we were authoritatively advised of the following facts:
• It appeared that Wanta had indeed represented to authority certain facts at variance with the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.
• This matter was then subjected to a FORMAL OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION (we are not sure by which authority) and the outcome of the investigation was that Wanta’s attempt at self-justification and to ‘validate’ the release of settlement funds by this means was found to be spurious. As a result, the attempt to divert funds via this mechanism therefore failed (2).
We hate to be too cynical, but it is likely that the investigation looked into this matter in order to see whether there was any merit in using this route to procure illegal extraction of release funds.
You will of course also recall that the dual-named Lee or Leo Wanta and his CIA lawyer Steven Goodwin scammed the Editor out of his loan of $35,000 plus interest by preparing and submitting for signature false loan documents, a felony involving FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT, for which, on conviction, both perpetrators can be jailed.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
FOR THE ATTENTION OF MR LINDELL H. BONNEY, SR.: THE PREMEDITATED SCAMMING
BY LEO WANTA AND RICHMOND-BASED STEVEN GOODWIN OF THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE
This matter is highly pertinent for the relevant US authorities, INCLUDING THE GOLD BADGE SIGNATORY, MR LINDELL H. BONNEY, SR., given that if ANY funds are distributed to Wanta, a felon who cannot own a bank account (although he reportedly has an account with the US Treasury) they will be engaged in the criminal diversion of funds into the hands of a fraudster engaged in Fraud in the Inducement who has scammed this Editor of his loan funds, and who, with his co-conspirator, the RICHMOND-based Steven Goodwin, deliberately and knowingly perpetrated this scam against the Editor of this service. The relevant documents are reproduced again herewith, excerpted from our report cdated 27th April 2009:
WANTA-GOODWIN FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT AGAINST THE EDITOR UNDER DURESS
The loan documents proffered by Richmond-based CIA lawyer Steven Goodwin for the Editor's meeting with Wanta on 10th June 2005, 'arranging' for the Editor to provide Wanta with a personal loan of $35,000 repayable at 7% annual compound interest two years later, were FRAUDULENT, involving FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT of the Editor by Wanta and Goodwin UNDER DURESS.
This was a carefully premeditated scam, in which Steven Goodwin collaborated with Wanta to deceive the Editor of this service, who duly provided the $35,000 loan which Wanta has stolen.
Some of the Editor's funds were/are still held illegally by Steven Goodwin, after he finally made the necessary restitution and fee payments to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections on 21st July 2005, which 'bought' the truncating of Wanta's probation in Wisconsin by five years and two weeks.
The documents were/are as follows:
PROMISSORY NOTE
US DOLLARS 35,000.00
JUNE 19TH, 2005
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, promises to pay to the order of Christopher Story, the sum of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 US Dollars with interest at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum thereon, the principal being payable, without offset, at [address] World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom, or at such other place as the holder may designate in writing with payments to begin 365 days from date of this Note and due in full 730 days thereafter.
The payment of the principal balance of this Note may be prepaid in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, without penalty.
This Note may be accelerated upon the death of any maker or at the option of the holder so that all remaining principal and accrued interest shall be payable upon the later of 30 days after the date of any maker’s or Guarantor’s death or 15 days after the holder provides written notice to the maker at its principal place of business that the holder is exercising his right to accelerate the amounts due hereunder. In the event of default in the payment of any amount due under this Note, the holder may declare the entire unpaid balance, principal and interest, to be immediately due and payable and thereafter may exercise any remedies provided by applicable law.
The holder of this Note shall have the right to enforce any one or more available remedies in whole or in part, successively or concurrently.
The maker of this Note waives presentment, protest, and notice of dishonour; agrees that an extension or extensions of the time of payment of this Note, or any installment or part thereof, may be made before, at or after maturity by agreement with anyone or more of the parties to this Note without notice to and without releasing the liability of the other party under this Note regardless of which parties are notified of the extension or extensions; waives the benefit of all exemptions as to the debt evidence of this Note and any right which it may have to require the holder to proceed against any person; and agrees to pay all the expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, in collecting this Note, or any installment or part thereof, which is not paid when due.
[Signed]: Lee E. Wanta.
Address of Notice [added in Wanta’s handwriting]:
C/o Goodwin Sutton & DuVal, Plc.
Old City Hall, Ste No. 350
1001 East Broad Street
Richmond, VA, USA (23219).
Separately the Editor was handed by Wanta the text of an ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SIGNING BY GOODWIN WHEN THE FUNDS WERE SUPPLIED, as follows:
ESCROW AGREEMENT
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
Date: 14th July, 2005
TO: Steven D. Goodwin, Trustee for the benefit of Ambassador Leo* E. Wanta [*NOT: Lee E. Wanta]:
The undersigned maker, Christopher Story, does hereby acknowledge that he is placing certain funds in the amount of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($35,000) into Escrow with Steven D. Goodwin, a discreet and professional attorney-at-law, for the sole and exclusive purpose as stated herein and under the following terms:
1. Said funds shall be used to pay the amount of $30,551.97 to satisfy the court ordered obligations in Wisconsin Case No. 92CF683.
2. Any and all remaining amounts shall be distributed only as directed by Ambassador Leo E. Wanta, to be used for the benefit of, and at the direction of, Ambassador Wanta.
The parties herein acknowledge that the funds paid to, and held in Escrow by, Steven D. Goodwin, under this Agreement are the same funds referenced in a Note in the amount of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($35,000) made by Ambassador Leo E. Wanta for the benefit of Christopher Story.
[Signed]: Christopher Story, maker [SEAL]
I, the undersigned Trustee, agree to receive, hold and distribute the funds referenced herein upon the terms and conditions stated above.
[Signed]: Steven D. Goodwin, Trustee [SEAL].
FEATURES OF THE FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT SCAM
AGAINST THE EDITOR PERPETRATED BY WANTA AND GOODWIN
These documents represent Fraud in the Inducement because:
(1): The Promissory Note has to reference the Escrow Agreement and vice versa. In neither case does this occur. Specifically:
(2): The Promissory Note does not reference the Escrow Agreement.
(3): The Escrow Agreement does NOT reference the Promissory Note. It references ‘a Note’, which could be ANY NOTE. The reference has to be specific, which is not the case.
(4): The Promissory note dated 9th June 2005 is signed by Lee E. Wanta.
(5): The Escrow Agreement references an ‘Ambassador Leo E. Wanta’ making no reference to ‘Lee E. Wanta’. This operative uses two names for obfuscation purposes [DUPLICATION, DIALECTICAL METHODOLOGY: see our repeated reminders that this is the standard modus operandi].
(6): This divergence of names for Wanta widens the fraudulent separation of the Promissory Note from the Escrow Agreement.
(7): Mr Wanta is NOT an Ambassador. To be styled Ambassador, it is necessary to be supported by official credentials issued by the US State Department and renewed by each successive American Administration, confirming that the United States (in this case) recognises that the said individual concerned is an accredited Ambassador. In the case of Mr Wanta’s supposed Ambassadorship for Somalia to Switzerland and Canada, the same criteria apply. Each successive Government of the countries concerned must provide the necessary consent and official acknowledgement of such a person’s status and acceptance as Ambassador. Wanta cannot show such credentials, because this felon’s claims to be an Ambassador are fraudulent and part of his disintegrating cover.
In the United States, there is a convention that a former Ambassador can continue to be addressed as Ambassador. However Mr Wanta styles himself ‘Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary', Lee Emil Wanta, The Principality of Snake Hill, representing fraudulently that he is the Ambassdaor for the non-existent, cirtual and farudulent 'Principality', which is FRAUD.
And as indicated above, when Mr Henry was asked to provide the necessary credentials in respect of Wanta’s spurious (fake) Principality of Snake Hill Ambassadorship to the United States, he was of course unable to comply and was himself therefore exposed as an egregious liar and a fraudster for that reason, and because he stated that he was acting for Leo/Lee Wanta and representatives from 'The Principality of Snake Hill', which does not exist.
Mr Steven D. Goodwin likewise fraudulently referenced a spurious ‘Ambassador Leo E. Wanta’ in the Escrow Agreement, thereby exposing himself as a liar and a perpetrator of fraud, as well.
(8): Steven D Goodwin is therefore NOT ‘a discreet and professional attorney-at-law’ but rather a fellow-fraudster with Mr Leo E. Wanta, a.k.a. Lee E. Wanta. Both engaged in gross FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT under duress of this Editor, who was not accompanied by a lawyer. Goodwin should be disciplined, debarred and appropriately dealt with both by his profession and by the authorities.
(9): As for Wanta, this case provides further irrefutable PROOF that Wanta is a serial, unrepentant, continuing felon. His felonious status has NOT been altered and he is NOT therefore in a position to own a bank account.
(10): Any funds remitted to Leo E. Wanta or Lee E. Wanta, who handles stolen funds and has STOLEN this Editor’s loan funds plus interest through this inducement fraud, will be at risk. Any party engaged in effecting such a remittance to Wanta, however styled, knowing this background, may place themselves in a situation demanding investigation involving the conveyance of funds belonmging to others into or via the hands of this serial criminal and convicted felon.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Notes and References:
(1): Our exposure of the real reasons why Admiral Dennis C. Blair was fired by President Obama, which resulted in the furious White House reaction that simply confirmed the accuracy of our report, demonstrating that the White House doesn't uphold the Ruile of Law but rather actively undermines it, were contained in the following passages from our report dated 25th May:
THE REAL REASONS BEHIND THE ‘RESIGNATION’ OF ADMIRAL DENNIS C. BLAIR
On Friday 21st May 2010, Admiral Dennis C. Blair, the Director of National Intelligence, announced his resignation from the top US intelligence post. He gave no reason for his sudden departure in a public statement that he circulated to the 16 US intelligence agencies that he oversaw, and neither did he express thanks to President Barack Obama for the opportunity to serve under him.
In order to obfuscate the real reason for Blair’s de facto dismissal – Obama asked him to resign, or said he would accept his resignation – the White House and the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) have since been engaged in an operation to pull the wool over the eyes of the ‘mainstream’ media and the ‘Fifth Estate’ (the ‘Internet community’).
Specifically, to take the most mischievous report on this subject first:
• The Office of Naval Intelligence diversionary source labelled ‘By Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers’, item headed ‘Top US Spy Chief Quits After Obama Orders 2 Americans Assassinated’, consists of disinformation and lies. On about half a dozen previous occasions we have specifically identified the authors of this diversionary source as:
(1): Commander J. Forrest Sharpe, of Light in the Darkness Publications, based in Vienna, VA, Sharpe is ‘active duty submarine service fleet’, i.e. an Office of Naval Intelligence operative.
(2): D. L. O’Huallachain, of Irish extraction, who inter alia covers for the Vatican.
These reports typically begin with the ignorant fantasy: ‘Rumors circulating in the Kremlin today…’, notwithstanding that, as the veteran Editor of Soviet Analyst, your correspondent can reconfirm that the Kremlin ‘doesn’t DO rumours’. Even though we have repeatedly exposed this deception, certain US websites specialising in maximising the potential for confusion persist in deceiving the public by disseminating the disinformation perpetrated by this malicious 'redirection' source.
• NOTE: As a direct result of THIS exposure, the fake 'Sorcha Faal' device appears to have been dropped and replaced by a slick new presentation, also sourced anonymously, and from Virginia. It's the SAME OPERATION, promoting the SAME DIVERSIONARY HATRED AND LIES.
All ANONYMOUS reports are suspect: and because they are not provenanced, can and should never be relied upon. Sorcha Faal is a fabrication. Anyone recycling the diversionary claptrap spewed out by this US Intelligence Power 'redirection' source, is being grossly irresponsible.
• On 21st May, The New York Times published a piece by Mark Mazzetti which entered the fray by starting with the following diversionary lead-in: ‘An already strained relationship between the White House and the departing spymaster Dennis C. Blair erupted earlier this year over Mr Blair’s efforts to cement close intelligence ties to France and broker a pledge between the nations not to spy on each other, American Government officials said Friday’.
Although there WAS a French dimension to what happened (see below), this ‘line’, as presented, was clearly diversionary because, as we have repeatedly explained, France fronts for Germany under the ‘indissoluble’ bilateral Franco-German Treaty of the Elysée dated January 1963; and since the ‘Black’ criminal cadres inside the US Intelligence Power ‘work with’ the long-range pan-German Fifth Column that has attempted to ‘take down’ the United States in accordance with the Nazi slogan ‘We will build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, there was never any need to ‘cement relations’ with French intelligence or to formalise a closer relationship.
In other words, this ‘line’ invented by the White House/CIA disinformation apparat deliberately turned the ‘actualité’ upside down, to bamboozle the readers of The New York Times and the domestic and international communities generally,
Interestingly, The New York Times’ elaboration included the following sentence: ‘Officials said the dust-up was not the proximate cause of President Obama’s decision to remove Mr [sic] Blair, who announced his resignation on Thursday, from the job as Director of National Intelligence’.
Quite right, it wasn’t.
On the contrary, the factors underlying Admiral Blair’s ‘resignation’ were as follows:
• Admiral Dennis C. Blair had been pressing for months for the release of the hijacked funds blocked by President Barack Obama.
• Admiral Dennis C. Blair ‘asked’ President Obama to release the hijacked funds forthwith, and Obama REFUSED. Obama then demanded Blair’s resignation, which was accepted.
• Admiral Dennis C. Blair had acquired COPY CHECKS proving that, as we alone reported, Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Geithner, and Rahm Emanuel, the White House Chief of Staff, were and are receiving weekly and monthly bribery payments from the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate, in exchange for their ‘solidarity’ in blocking the releases.
All of which, of course, PROVES that President Obama has been operating as George H. W. Bush’s corrupt poodle, carrying out his instructions to continue the sabotage and blocking of the payouts. Which is precisely what he did at 2:36 p.m. EDT on Thursday 20th May.
(2): Text of the Wanta Petition for a Writ of Mandamus as submitted to the court and published by this service [see archive] on 24th June 2007 and 5th July 2007:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Case Number: 1:2007cv00609 – TSE – BRP
Filed: 20th June 2007
Petitioner: Lee E. Wanta
Respondents: Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Robert M. Kimmitt, James R. Wilkinson, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Richmond
Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause: 28: 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury demanded by: None
Note: This case cannot be sealed until Ambassador Leo E. Wanta has been paid the $4.5 trillion of his Settlement diverted and exploited illegally since June 2006.
The Court has, most unusually, given the Respondents TWO MONTHS to respond.
SIR LEO WANTA’S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS (1)
The text of the Ambassador’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus follows:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Civil Action no.: 1-07 CV 609
LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA (Individually and as sole and exclusive shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., a Commonwealth of Virginia registered corporation)
Petitioner
v.
HENRY M. PAULSON, JR.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and
ROBERT M. KIMMITT
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and
JAMES R. WILKINSON
CHIEF OF STAFF
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
DIRECTOR AND/OR MANAGER OF OPERATIONS,
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
Respondents
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
AND OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF
A. PARTIES:
1. LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner
2. Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent
3. Robert M. Kimmitt
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent
4. James R. Wilkinson
Chief of Staff
United States Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20220: Respondent
5. Michael Chertoff
Secretary of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C.: respondent
6. Alberto R. Gonzales
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001: Respondent
7. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
701 East Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219: Respondent
B. JURISDICTION:
1. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause of action pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1361 (mandamus), Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1331, and Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1332.
C. VENUE:
2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 87, Section 1391, and Title 28 United States Code Chapter 87, Section 1396.
D. STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
3. Mandamus is regarded as an extraordinary writ reserved for special situations. Among its ordinary preconditions are that the agency or official have acted (or failed to act) in disregard of a clear legal duty and that there be no adequate conventional means for review. In re Bluewater Network & Ocean Advocates, 234 F.3d 1305, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Telecomm. Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 78 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Mandamus will be granted if the Petitioner shows “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”, see In re United States, 10 F.3d 229 at 931, 933 (2d Cir. 1993).
4. Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments.
Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and entities, prevent Petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use, transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing authorities.
5. Upon best information and belief the organizations, entities, departments and individuals that prevent and/or restrict Petitioner’s lawful access to said money and securities include but are not necessarily limited to the following:
• Secretary of the Treasury;
• Attorney General of the United States of America;
• Bank of America;
• J.P. Morgan Chase;
• CITIBANK/CITIGROUP/NYC including but not limited to Mr Charles O. Prince, CITIGROUP Chief Executive Officer;
• Goldman Sachs et al including but not limited to past and present management and executive officers and members of the Board of Directors;
• United States Department of the Treasury including but not limited to Secretary
Paulson, Deputy Secretary Kimmitt and other known and/or unknown parties working
directly or under contract with the United States Department of the Treasury;
• Secretary Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and other known and/or
unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States
Department of Homeland Security;
• One or more known and/or unknown “compliance officers” that act directly and/or
under contract with private bank and/or security brokerage firms to observe
rules and regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury and/or other
USG investigative and reporting entities;
• Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia.
6. Upon best information and belief Respondent acts and/or failures to act constitute a
violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank
Privacy Act and other non-specified banking regulations.
7. Reasonable action has been taken by Petitioner to obtain an explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not permitting Petitioner to have access to the foreign transferred private business financial assets referenced herein. Despite written notice and request for a response the named parties avoid their legal obligations. In furtherance of this Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioner directs this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been collectively marked as Exhibits A attached hereto (2) and all of which documents, letters and Memorandum are incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this Petition.
8. The material, substantive and immediate financial loss to the Petitioner resulting from loss of financial benefit can not adequately be addressed in conventional judicial proceedings. In one more instances parties in position of knowledge, that can confirm the representations regarding interference in private business dealings, between Petitioner and third parties, have been placed at risk of physical harm by individuals representing to be fiduciaries of one or more of the Respondents. Additionally, the acts and actions of the Respondents prevent immediate payment of Federal taxes in the amount of $1.575 Trillion dollars into the United States Treasury.
E. BACKGROUND:
9. On or about April 15, 2003 the Honorable Gerald Bruce Lee, in Case Number 02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion for the referenced numbered case. As part of the Order and Memorandum of the Court (in the referenced case) the Court stated that the Plaintiff (in the referenced case) should pursue liquidation of corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law (3).
10. Petitioner initiated contact with numerous third parties, including United States elected, nominated, appointed and career employees plus foreign countries, for the purpose of recovering financial assets.
11. Upon best information and belief in December 2005 and January 2006, Secretary Snow (Secretary of the Treasury at the time) and Chairman Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time) traveled to the People’s Republic of China. The Chinese required confirmation of Petitioner’s signature to facilitate cooperation of the Chinese in completing the transfer of financial assets referenced herein.
Upon best information and belief Snow/Greenspan determined that Chinese officials had the ability and willingness to cooperate with petitioner in the recovery and transfer of substantial financial assets that had been in the care, custody and control of the Chinese for an extended period of time.
12. Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (attorneys) were used to complete the preparation and administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “settlement documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the settlement documents:
• Petitioner Wanta identified in this petition.
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno).
• National Security Agency (NSA).
• Department of Homeland Security.
• Director of National Intelligence.
• United States State Department.
• United States Department of the Treasury.
• United States Department of Defense.
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of the President and Vice President.
• C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.).
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol agreements.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this petition.
The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the settlement documents prepared by the above mentioned attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value. The portion attributable and payable to the petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars.
13. In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.
14. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond. The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury. At or about the time of the unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson and to facilitate protest of right of ownership under the “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary client account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs.
15. The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the United States Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Republic of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of the Petitioner. Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers. In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.
16. Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States Department of Defense. These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.
17. Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg. The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action filed in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.
18. The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. Said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settled documents.
19. Petitioner individually and as sole and exclusive controlling shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. certifies as follows:
• The Petitioner has personally had conversations with one or more officials at the United States Department of the Treasury and said officials confirm the sequence of events concerning inward remittance of subject funds from the People’s Republic of China and inter-bank transfers within the United States.
• Petitioner confirms that he has personal knowledge about the “Claims and Background” set out in this Petition and verifies upon penalty of perjury that the same are true and correct.
• Petitioner has fully and completely reviewed the content of this petition and certifies by sworn affidavit attached hereto that the “Statement of Claim and Background” are true and correct.
• Upon best information and belief “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner. The individual and/or conspiratorial acts amount to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act, the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. and applicable international and national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further the mentioned Respondents’ acting individually and/or “acting in concert” violate Petitioner’s rights under the provisions of H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties.
Reasonable action has been taken by the Petitioner in an attempt to obtain explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not allowing the “Rule of Law” and permitting access by Petitioner to the financial accounts referenced herein. Despite continued written notice and request for a response the named parties continue to avoid their legal obligations and continue to commit covert and/or overt acts in furtherance of their knowing and purposeful violation of the statutory references mentioned hereinabove. In furtherance of this petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioners direct this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been marked as Exhibits A, B and C (4) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this petition.
F. CONCLUSION:
21. The “Statement of Claim and Background” demonstrate “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”.
G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
1. Emergency consideration of this Petition with an expedited response time for Respondents to respond to this Petition and an expedited time for the Court to hear the merits of this matter.
2. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper to protect the Constitutionally protected rights of the Petitioner.
Executed on this 18th day of June 2007.
[Signed]
LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA _Pro_Se
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner
Telephone: 814 455 9218
Telefax: 202 330 5116
AFFIDAVIT
The undersigned, being fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and being fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties), hereby make the following statements concerning the petition for Writ of Mandamus being filed on my behalf, by my counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia:
1. I am more than twenty-one years of age and I am a citizen of the United States of America.
2. For an extended period of time I am functioning as a representative, investigator, contract employee and/or facilitator of one or more assignments that were either executed and/or performed at the direction and/or under the supervision of one or more persons and/or agencies that were accountable to the Executive Offices of the United States Government
3. During most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations to the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the patriated funds to be paid to the United States Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources.
4. I have read the entirety of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus prepared by my attorneys. I confirm that I have personally directed communications with the banks, security firms, the United States Department of the Treasury (including one or more individual parties associated with the Treasury that are named as Respondents) and other entities mentioned in the Petition.
5. I have personally confirmed that the financial assets sent by the People’s Republic of China were received by Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia and that upon best information and belief the subject financial assets were “tagged” in my name and transmittal instructions by the People’s Republic of China directed that the same be paid to me without offset or delay.
6. I have been personally advised by agents and/or contract regulation compliance workers, that are accountable to the United States Department of the Treasury, that release of funds sent by the People’s Republic of China for payment to me is being restricted and/or blocked by one or more parties.
7. The exact party and/or parties that are restricting and/or blocking payment of financial assets to my designated accounts is not known absolutely.
8. Upon best information and belief the United States Department of the Treasury has the power and authority to direct release of the funds for my unrestricted use.
9. Despite continued demand for release of financial assets (that were transmitted by the People’s Republic of China) for payment to me personally the demands are ignored and are not rebuked by any responsive communication.
10. I have been personally informed by parties, that have the authority to release the block on funds leveraged against recipient banking accounts established in my name, that directives have been received from known and unknown parties that have the effect of negating my ability to have free and unrestricted access to financial assets that are “tagged” solely and exclusively in my name.
IN WITNESS HEREOF I am causing the above set forth affidavit to be notarized and sworn with full recognition of the penalty of perjury this 11th day of June 2007.
[Signed]
Lee E. Wanta, Leo E. Wanta and
Ambassador Leo E. Wanta
County of [omitted here]
State of [omitted here]
On this 11th day of June 2007 the above named individual, being personally known to me, appeared before me and after being first duly sworn signed the above Affidavit.
My commission expires January 5, 2009.
[Notary signature and seal].
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++: COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..
LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:
LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:
Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:
THEFT BY DECEPTION:
• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.
• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.
• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., 'Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary', Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.
U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:
• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.
U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.
Source: World Reports
No comments:
Post a Comment