Friday, January 1, 2016

When the hell is America going to wake up?

BOMBSHELL: Obama’s Feds BUSTED Funding Terror-Linked Mosque To The Tune Of MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
by Dean James
Dean James III% AMERICA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS –A Kansas City mosque that has deep ties to the Muslim Brotherhood has received close to $3 MILLION in federal grants over the past several years information obtained from a federal spending database reveals.
According to The Daily Caller, the Islamic Center of Greater Kansas City has received $2,739,891 in taxpayer money from the Department of Agriculture. The money largely went to the mosque’s Crescent Clinic to provide services through the Women, Infant and Children nutrition program, known as WIC.
The most recent dispersal of federal funds on record occurred on Oct. 1 in the amount of $327,436.
Provided by Storm'n Norm'n

The mosque is owned by the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), which acts as a financial holding company for Islamic organizations. It offers sharia-compliant financial products to Muslim investors, operates Islamic schools and owns more than 300 other mosques throughout the U.S.
Founded in 1973 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood-backed Muslim Students Association, NAIT’s most controversial connection is to the 2007 and 2008 Holy Land Foundation terror financing cases. Along with other Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations like the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), NAIT was named a co-conspirator in the federal case but was not indicted.
At the Holy Land Foundation trial, evidence was presented that ISNA diverted funds from the accounts it held with NAIT to institutions linked to Hamas and to Mousa Abu Marzook, a senior Hamas leader.
Federal prosecutors introduced evidence in the case that “established that ISNA and NAIT were among those organizations created by the U.S.-Muslim Brotherhood.” Hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of checks drawn from ISNA’s account and deposited in the Holy Land Foundation’s account with NAIT were made payable to “the Palestinian Mujahadeen,” which is the original name for Hamas’ military wing.
While Hamas was designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government in 1997 and is considered the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, the larger Muslim Brotherhood is not itself designated as a terrorist group.
Obama is giving taxpayer money to groups that will potentially be used to fund known terrorist organizations here and overseas.
And as Conservative Tribune points out, even though the Obama administration has refused to list the Muslim Brotherhood itself as a terrorist organization, much of the rest of the world HAS done just that. The British government recently declared that the group’s ideology and tactics “are contrary to our values and have been contrary to our national interests and our national security.”
The NAIT also has a number of other ties to terrorism outside of the Holy Land terror financing case, in that they own a number of mosques and Islamic centers across the country that have featured or harbored controversial imams and individuals who have gone on to commit terrorist acts.
It would be nothing less than criminal if it turns out that our tax dollars have been used to fund terrorist organizations bent on slaughtering Americans and imposing their seventh century way of life on our modern society.
Every American needs to know that Obama is giving taxpayer dollars to Muslim Brotherhood-linked mosques and Islamic centers that have been accused of funding terrorism in the past.

You might also like this- Colorado Company Instantly Regrets Giving 200 Muslims Jobs, They Get NASTY Payback
Similar story from the Independent Sentinel follows:
Obama Gives Millions in Tax Dollars to a Mosque Closely Tied to Terrorism
by S. Noble December 31, 2015

A Kansas-City mosque has received nearly $3 million in federal grants – taxpayer dollars – in just three years. The kicker is that the Islamic Center of Greater Kansas City is tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization.

The money comes from taxpayers and gets laundered through the Department of Agriculture in the form of food stamps and other benefits.

In October alone, the mosque received $327,436 dollars.

The mosque is owned by the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), a financial holding company and Muslim Brotherhood offshoot which is working with various Islamic organizations promoting Sharia law in American. It owns 300 plus mosques and Islamic centers including ISNA and CAIR.

NAIT owns the Boston bombers’ mosque; the mosque attended by Anwar al-Awalaki; the mosque where Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi attended and who eventually flew American Flight 77 into the Pentagon on 9/11; helped the San Bernardino terrorists secure housing; and provided $100,000 to bail out Elton Simpson for lying to the feds about trying to join a Somali terrorist group – Simpson later opened fire on the Garland, Texas cartoon event with his cohort Nadir Soofi.

NAIT, CAIR and ISNA are unindicted co-conspirators as part of The Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial. They are tied to terrorism through the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.

Obama uses the Muslim Brotherhood organizations as advisors but they have been declared terrorists in the Muslim world by the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. A recent report to the British Parliament declared that the Muslim Brotherhood’s ideology and tactics “are contrary to our values and have been contrary to our national interests and our national security.”

The UK is currently looking at the dangers to national security presented by the organizations tied to the Brotherhood.

The UK allowed the report referenced above to be submitted to parliament which was prepared under the direction of Sir John Jenkins and which demonstrates that the “moderate” Brotherhood is not a solution to the problem but the problem itself.

According to FrontPage Magazine: The Jenkins report rejects the “moderate” label so often slapped on the hate group by lazy media hacks. Instead it describes the Brotherhood as a clandestine group organized into a “secretive ‘cell’ structure” seeking to create a “Caliphate under sharia law” using a doctrine that allows “the use of extreme violence in the pursuit of the perfect Islamic society”. That ideology is inspired “Al Qaida and its offshoots”. The most obvious offshoot to employ this Takfiri approach is ISIS.

Sir John concluded on this complex subject that, for the most part, the Muslim Brotherhood prefers non-violent incremental change for the sake of expediency but will resort to terrorism “where gradualism is ineffective.”

Frank Gaffney, head of the Center for Security Policy, extensively documented Muslim Brotherhood subversion efforts, both in the United States and abroad.

Mr. Gaffney has said the Muslim Brotherhood is the most dangerous group promoting the totalitarian and Islamist supremacist doctrine of Sharia. Several Muslim Brotherhood supporters have been identified as key advisers to Mr. Obama, according to Mr. Gaffney.

Egyptian press reports after the ouster of Mr. Morsi have revealed extensive cooperation between the CIA and the Muslim Brotherhood during Mr. Morsi’s presidency. We didn’t need Egypt to tell us, it was obvious.

The benefits we are funneling to this mosque could easily be supporting terrorism indirectly.

Despite the fact that the Muslim world recognizes the danger of these organizations, Mr. Obama has allowed these radical groups to hijack our foreign policy.

In July 2007, seven key leaders of an Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) went on trial for charges that they engaged in money laundering to finance the terror organization Hamas which falls under the umbrella organization, the Muslim Brotherhood.

One of the most significant documents presented into evidence during the trial was a document compiled by a Muslim Brotherhood operative named Mohamed Akram.

Titled, “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”, the 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 like-minded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

The 29 groups being mobilized to destroy America from within can be found on this link.

Conquering the US by jihad was seen as too difficult and instead it was recommended that a stealth (or “soft”) jihad be implemented to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims’ efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.”

It is believed that Eric Holder and Barack Obama scuttled further investigation and charges against these terror-tied mosques and organizations. Holder refused to give up documents not already made public because he said there was a “political” aspect to his job which is not the case. His job was “justice.”

Instead of funding these mosques, shouldn’t we be shutting them down?

Click this link to the Daily Caller to read more about NAIT’s ties to the Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia, and Sunni Wahhabism

In July 2007, seven key leaders of an Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) went on trial for charges that they had: (a) provided "material support and resources" to a foreign terrorist organization (namely Hamas); (b) engaged in money laundering; and (c) breached the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which prohibits transactions that threaten American national security. Along with the seven named defendants, the U.S. government released a list of approximately 300 "unindicted co-conspirators" and "joint venturers." During the course of the HLF trial, many incriminating documents were entered into evidence. Perhaps the most significant of these was "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America," by the Muslim Brotherhood operative Mohamed Akram. Federal investigators found Akram's memo in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search. Elbarasse was a member of the Palestine Committee, which the Muslim Brotherhood had created to support Hamas in the United States.
Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram's 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded "organizations of our friends" that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These "friends" were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims "that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands ... so that ... God's religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions."

Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth (or “soft”) jihad aiming to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims' efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram's document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of one day creating “the global Islamic state.”
In line with this objective, Akram and the Brotherhood resolved to "settle" Islam and the Islamic movement within the United States, so that the Muslim religion could be "enabled within the souls, minds and the lives of the people of the country.” Akram explained that this could be accomplished “through the establishment of firmly-rooted organizations on whose bases civilization, structure and testimony are built.” He urged Muslim leaders to make “a shift from the collision mentality to the absorption mentality,” meaning that they should abandon any tactics involving defiance or confrontation, and seek instead to implant into the larger society a host of seemingly benign Islamic groups with ostensibly unobjectionable motives; once those groups had gained a measure of public acceptance, they would be in a position to more effectively promote societal transformation by the old Communist technique of “boring from within.”

“The heart and the core” of this strategy, said Akram, was contingent upon these groups' ability to develop “a mastery of the art of 'coalitions.'” That is, by working synergistically they could complement, augment, and amplify one another's efforts. Added Akram: “The big challenge that is ahead of us is how to turn these seeds or 'scattered' elements into comprehensive, stable, 'settled' organizations that are connected with our Movement and which fly in our orbit and take orders from our guidance.” The ultimate objective was not only an enlarged Muslim presence, but also implementation of the Brotherhood objectives of transforming pluralistic societies, particularly America, into Islamic states, and sweeping away Western notions of legal equality, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech.

Akram and the Brotherhood understood that in order to succeed in this endeavor, they needed to appeal to different strata of the American population in different ways; that whereas some people could be influenced by messages delivered from a religious perspective, others would be more responsive to messages delivered by educators, or bankers, or political figures, or journalists, etc. Thus, Akram's blueprint for the advancement of the Islamic movement stressed the need to form a coalition of groups coming from the worlds of education; religious proselytization; political activism; audio and video production; print media; banking and finance; the physical sciences; the social sciences; professional and business networking; cultural affairs; the publishing and distribution of books; children and teenagers; women's rights; vocational concerns; and jurisprudence.

By promoting the Islamic movement on such a wide variety of fronts, the Brotherhood and its allies could multiply exponentially their influence. Toward that end, the Akram/Brotherhood “Explanatory Memorandum” named the following 29 groups as the organizations they believed could collaborate effectively to destroy America from within – “if they all march according to one plan”:

·         Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)

·         ISNA Fiqh Committee (now known as the Fiqh Council of North America)
·         Muslim Youth of North America
·         Islamic Medical Association (of North America)
·         Islamic Teaching Center
·         Malaysian Islamic Study Group
·         North American Islamic Trust
·         Islamic Centers Division
·         American Trust Publications
·         Audio-Visual Center
·         Islamic Book Service
·         Islamic Circle of North America
·         Muslim Arab Youth Association
·         Muslim Communities Association
·         Association of Muslim Social Scientists (of North America)
·         Islamic Housing Cooperative
·         Muslim Businessmen Association
·         Islamic Education Department
·         Mercy International Association
·         Baitul Mal Inc.
·         Islamic Information Center (of America)
By setting up these many front groups, the Muslim Brotherhood was emulating the Communist Party tactic of creating interlocking front groups during the Cold War in order to confuse its enemies and make it more difficult to combat
The Most Frightening Thing About a Hillary Clinton Presidency
Rumors of Hillary Clinton's poor physical and mental condition have persisted for years.

Last month, State Department emails obtained by Judicial Watch revealed that Clinton's close personal aide Huma Abedin (who has well-documented ties to the terror group the Muslim Brotherhood) warned colleagues that Clinton's mental stability appeared to be deteriorating:

Abedin advised Clinton aide and frequent companion Monica Hanley that it was “very important” to go over phone calls with Clinton because the former Secretary of State was “often confused...”

The emails, from Abedin’s “” address, also reveal repeated security breaches, with the Secretary’s schedule and movements being sent and received through Abedin’s non-governmental and unsecured Clinton server account...

... The emails document requests for special State Department treatment for a Clinton Foundation associate and Abedin’s mother, a controversial Islamist leader.
This week, on three separate occasions, Clinton seemed to affirm Abedin's cautions, demonstrating significant confusion that raised the eyebrows of the media:

• "Talking Iran, Hillary gets confused about the nuclear option and military option"

• "Hillary Clinton Can’t Remember Her Plan To Deal With the National Debt"

• "Hillary Clinton confuses question on ‘hemp’ with one on a ‘hip replacement’"

So we have a potential president who appears to have obvious and troubling issues with mental acuity.

Furthermore, her most trusted personal aide and proxy, Huma Abedin, is linked -- both directly and through family ties -- to the terrorist group the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Brotherhood, in addition to being a notorious sponsor of Islamic terror worldwide, traces its lineage directly back to Nazi Germany.

So one does not have to be overly paranoid to imagine that Hillary's personal version of Valerie Jarrett, i.e., a senior aide reputed to make many of the decisions in the White House, would be a potential Islamist sympathizer and/or conspirator.

Vote accordingly.

Hat tip: BadBlue News.
Meanwhile...some attribute this to be the number one problem with America ↓
This  is a really dumb person...really, really dumb!
Added January 5, 2016 ↓

Mr. President: Disarm ISIS, not Us.
Today America is at war with ISIS. They attack our soldiers, our homeland and our friends. When our law abiding citizens need to protect our streets and communities most, President Obama chooses this same moment to limit OUR gun rights. This is my response to his unbelievable position. Mr. President: Disarm ISIS, not Us.
Posted by Elbert Lee Guillory on Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Why ban guns when pillows are available?

Crime Blog
Dallas police say man suffocated wife with pillow Monday night to stop her from talking
by Robert Wilonsky

Dallas police say a man has confessed to killing his wife Monday night to “keep her quiet.”
That man — 34-year-old Jonathan Edelen — is now in the Dallas County jail, where he is being held on a $500,000 bond after having been charged with the murder of 28-year-old Ceaira Ford.
Jonathan Edelen
According to an arrest warrant affidavit, police were dispatched on a deceased-person call to the Primrose Oaks apartment complex on Perryton Drive near Kiest Park just before 4 a.m. Wednesday. Dallas Fire-Rescue paramedics were already on the scene. But, according to the affidavit, Ford had been dead for a while: “Rigor mortis had already set in.” At that point police and paramedics believed her death might have been natural or, perhaps, the result of an overdose. A bottle of prescription medication belonging to Ford was found at the scene.
But, police say, Edelen approached an officer at the scene and confessed, telling him, “Put the cuffs on me and take me to jail. I killed my wife.”
Edelen was transported to Dallas police headquarters, where, according to the affidavit, he confessed to murder.
He told a homicide detective he and Ford had been arguing Monday night. Edelen told police he took the television to the patio “to destroy it.” Edelen said “this is the only way she would be quiet,” according to the affidavit. She followed him outside, and he says he put his hand over her mouth — again, to keep her quiet. At that point, police say, she fell over the patio railing and onto a patch of grass. They went back inside, says the affidavit, and kept arguing.
Edelen told police he grabbed a blanket and threw it over Ford, then jumped on top of her. He said he then “grabbed a pillow and placed it over her head,” according to the affidavit, until Ford stopped moving or breathing.
He waited to call police until 3:47 a.m. Wednesday.
According to Dallas police, “Records indicate Dallas Police officers were dispatched to the Perryton address on June 22, 2015.” Why, it’s not clear: “The circumstances are under review,” says the DPD blog. “The investigation is on-going.”

"Before you jump on the emotionally charged bandwagon for gun-control, take a moment to reflect on the real purpose of the Second Amendment"
A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY TO THINK ABOUT.......December 29, 2015 marks the 125th Anniversary of the murder of 297 Sioux Indians at Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine ...Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. These 297 people, in their winter camp, were murdered by federal agents and members of the 7th Cavalry who had come to confiscate their firearms “for their own safety and protection”. The slaughter began after the majority of the Sioux had peacefully turned in their firearms. The Calvary began shooting, and managed to wipe out the entire camp. 200 of the 297 victims were women and children. About 40 members of the 7th Cavalry were killed, but over half of them were victims of fratricide from the Hotchkiss guns of their overzealous comrades-in-arms.
TWENTY members of the 7th Cavalry's death squad, were deemed “National Heroes” and were awarded the Medal of Honor for their acts of [cowardice] heroism.
We hear very little of Wounded Knee today. It is usually not mentioned in our history classes or books. What little that does exist about Wounded Knee is normally a sanitized “Official Government Explanation”. And there are several historically inaccurate depictions of the events leading up to the massacre, which appear in movie scripts and are not the least bit representative of the actual events that took place that day.
Wounded Knee was among the first federally backed gun confiscation attempts in United States history. It ended in the senseless murder of 297 people.
Before you jump on the emotionally charged bandwagon for gun-control, take a moment to reflect on the real purpose of the Second Amendment, the right of the people to take up arms in defense of themselves, their families, and property in the face of invading armies or an oppressive government. The argument that the Second Amendment only applies to hunting and target shooting is asinine. When the United States Constitution was drafted, “hunting” was an everyday chore carried out by men and women to put meat on the table each night, and “target shooting” was an unheard of concept. Musket balls were a precious commodity and were certainly not wasted on “target shooting”. The Second Amendment was written by people who fled oppressive and tyrannical regimes in Europe, and it refers to the right of American citizens to be armed for defensive purposes, should such tyranny arise in the United States.
As time goes forward, the average citizen in the United States continually loses little chunks of personal freedom or “liberty”. Far too many times, unjust gun control bills were passed and signed into law under the guise of “for your safety” or “for protection”. The Patriot Act signed into law by G.W. Bush, was expanded and continues under Barack Obama. It is just one of many examples of American citizens being stripped of their rights and privacy for “safety”. Now, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is on the table, and will, most likely be attacked to facilitate the path for the removal of our firearms, all in the name of “our safety”.
Before any American citizen blindly accepts whatever new firearms legislation that is about to be doled out, they should stop and think about something for just one minute-
Evil does exist in our world. It always has and always will. Throughout history evil people have committed evil acts. In the Bible one of the first stories is that of Cain killing Abel. We can not legislate “evil” into extinction. Good people will abide by the law, and the criminal element will always find a way around it.

Evil exists all around us, but looking back at the historical record of the past 200 years, across the globe, where is “evil” and “malevolence” most often found? In the hands of those with the power, the governments. That greatest human tragedies on record and the largest loss of innocent human life can be attributed to governments. Who do the governments always target? “Scapegoats” and “enemies” within their own borders…but only after they have been disarmed to the point where they are no longer a threat. Ask any Native American, and they will tell you it was inferior technology and lack of arms that contributed to their demise. Ask any Armenian why it was so easy for the Turks to exterminate millions of them, and they will answer “We were disarmed before it happened”. Ask any Jew what Hitler’s first step prior to the mass murders of the Holocaust was- confiscation of firearms from the people.
Wounded Knee is the prime example of why the Second Amendment exists, and why we should vehemently resist any attempts to infringe on our Rights to Bear Arms. Without the Second Amendment we will be totally stripped of any ability to defend ourselves and our families.

Posted by Pastor Greg Locke on Monday, January 4, 2016

Monday, December 28, 2015

The Clintons have no honest followers or supporters

The Clintons have no honest followers else they would have no followers at all.
by Norman E. Hooben
There is an old saying wrongly attributed to Buddha,  that goes like this:
 “Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” 
Regardless of who first came up with the aphorism there are people who publicly display such a mindset.  I say, “Publicly” but with no rationale that makes any common sense whatsoever.  And you don’t have to go very far to meet some of these people…you may be one yourself.  Take for example a die-hard Democrat or die-hard Republican…it’s the party, right or wrong, it’s the party as long as it agrees with your own common sense. 
So if you hold yourself out to be a Democrat or Republican when they make no common sense then you are on display for the world to see but what you don’t see is the stupidity of believing in something that is not true.  How often have you said something to an opposing party member that no matter what facts you presented to validate your claim or statement they refused to believe?  The best that they can do is counter attack with reverse questions…the same question you asked them (i.e., “What good did Clinton do?” they'll throw it back at you with, “What good did Bush do?), or excuses for their party’s candidate; a candidate they claim to know but know little or nothing about neither of the candidate’s motifs nor their background (candidates can preach a good sermon and at the same time be lying about their intents…see: What is an Alinskyism? ). 
The Clintons, both Bill and Hillary, were students of Saul Alinsky, a man who hated America and American ideology.  In fact, he was the subject of Hillary’s college thesis but die-hard Democrats simply ignore this because it agrees with their own common sense and not rational thought which leads me to the subject of this commentary.  The Clintons have no honest followers or supporters.  How could this be?

If they refuse to believe the truth then rational thought makes them liars.  How can you deny the facts that establish the truth and not call that a lie?   And so it is with the content of the following video…these are hard core facts and if you don’t believe them, you are dishonest... especially with yourself. 

Note: Original video taken down...replaced with the following ↓

Then there's Obama...


***WOW WILL BE THE MOST VIRAL VIDEO FOR 2014***Conservatism Is Calling: Share this with everyone you know, Obama is exposed on every lie, with facts and comparisons. Show the world what his liberal voter base is doing to America. If there's one video you share in your life, make it this one. HELP expose their lies so voters can vote responsibly in 2014.JOIN OUR FIGHT--->
Posted by Freedom Daily on Thursday, December 12, 2013