Friday, November 25, 2016

Most Americans have not caught on yet...but when they do, "WATCH OUT !!!"

Most Americans have not caught on yet...but when they do, "WATCH OUT !!!"
by Norman E. Hooben
It's been a long row to hoe since Obama has occupied the White House and many Americans are as complacent (I think 'ignorant' is a better word...not in the negative sense but unknowledgeable none the less) as can be.  This has not only been reflected in his election for a second term but also in the recent election where over sixty-million Americans voted for Hillary Clinton...the chosen one to put the final nail in the coffin of American independence.  We can go back further in time and prove ignorance was rampant with the American electorate when such names has John Murtha (he's dead now!), Ted Kennedy (he's dead too!), John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Bill de Blasio, Rahm Emanuel, Keith Ellison, and a slew of other like-minded Alinskyites came on the scene and were actually elected by people who thought they were doing the right thing by voting for the big "D" that followed their names.  But oh how ignorance is bliss when all the while the people were getting the short end of the stick. 
Let's take a brief time out here and explain why it is the above names are mentioned.  I'll be very brief!  All of these names are associated with Globalism, The New World Order, Socialism, Climate Change, and whatever it is that will subject the people to their every whim.  And they've been doing this for a long, long time.  I'll end my brief with three quotes:
1.  "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." ~ President Woodrow Wilson
2.  "There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international ... network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." ~ Professor Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University
3.  "You see, if you amount to anything in Washington these days, it is because you have been plucked or handpicked from an Ivy League school -- Harvard, Yale, Kennedy School of Government -- you've shown an aptitude to be a good Ivy League type, and so you're plucked so-to-speak, and you are assigned success. You are assigned a certain role in government somewhere, and then your success is monitored and tracked, and you go where the pluckers and the handpickers can put you." ~ Rush Limbaugh
So if you haven't figured it out that it's the network of like-minded people that are intentionally trying to destroy this  Republic let me bring in Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama told us from the get-go that he would "fundamentally change America" (I guess many of the voters didn't get this message), he also added, "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set.  We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." Many have misinterpreted this to mean something other than what it says.  Obama has intentionally downsized our military to pre- WWII levels, he has fired or relieved more generals, admirals, colonels, and senior NCO's than all previous presidents combined. (And for what reason? I know, you don't like being called, "Ignorant." but if you haven't figured it out by yourself, your the biggest ignoramus this side of hades.) Besides the obvious race baiting and intentional division of formerly adhesive groups, Obama has favored Islam over anything relating to Judeo-Christian beliefs favored by our Founding Fathers.  He has released  dangerous Muslim terrorists captured on the battlefield to have them return to the field of battle to kill more Americans...and if you didn't know this, what the hell are you doing going to a voting booth!  Obviously I'm dragging this on more than most are willing to read so let me cut to the chase.  Obama presents a clear and present danger to all of us, ignorant or knowledgeable, the civilian national security force are being gathered as we speak.  He's encouraging such hate groups as Black Live Matter..some of whom he has been supplying weapons long before we've known them as BLM (Watch YouTube video and see what Communist Card Carrier said: And he is increasing the numbers of military aged male refugees that have sworn to kill all non-believers of Islam...and he'll use whatever means necessary to bring into this country the most evil of all evil peoples of this planet, secretly negotiated by the evil John F. Kerry. See the following story. 

Secretary of State John Kerry has secretly negotiated a deal to take illegal aliens from terrorist countries off the hands of Australia, which doesn’t want them.
(See my interpretation below. ~ Storm'n Norm'n)
Obama fast-tracks plan to take Muslim migrants rejected by Australia
Congressmen demand answers on 'secretly negotiated treaty'

The chairmen of the House and Senate judiciary committees are demanding the Obama administration provide details of a secret resettlement deal in which the U.S. has agreed to take up to 1,800 mostly Muslim asylum seekers who have been rejected by Australia as illegal aliens.

Congress only learned of the deal through media reports two weeks ago and, according to a
Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa
letter sent to administration officials by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., the deal is not only a matter of grave national security concern, but it could be illegal.

That’s because it amounts to an international treaty that Secretary of State John Kerry negotiated without consulting or notifying Congress according to Article II, Section II of the U.S. Constitution, according to the letter, sent by the two lawmakers Nov. 22 to Kerry and DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson.
Grassley is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Goodlatte chairs the same committee in the House.

The rejected aliens come from terror-infested countries including
Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Vir.
Iran, Iraq, Somalia, Sudan and Afghanistan.

Nearly 2,500 of them were interdicted off the coast of Australia in 2013 in accordance with that country’s policy of not accepting any of the wave of “refugees” streaming out of the Middle East. Unlike Europe, Australia effectively said “no” to the United Nations’ plan to open up Western democracies for millions of refugees fleeing not only the Syrian civil war but conflicts in Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan and even countries like Pakistan that are not at war. Germany alone has accepted 1.5 million Muslim refugees and subjected itself to thousands of sexual assaults on its women and girls.
But migrants who tried to get to Australia did not find a welcome mat. They were rescued by the Australian coast guard from their unsafe vessels and taken to off-shore camps on the Islands of Papua New Guinea and Nauru, where they have remained ever since. The United Nations stepped in and is looking for countries that will take the asylum seekers.
The U.N. found a taker in the Obama administration. Kerry confirmed he had reached a deal to take an undetermined number of the 2,465 aliens for permanent resettlement in the United States. Goodlatte and Grassley said they have since found out that up to 1,800 of the boat people could end up being distributed to U.S. cities and towns. But very little information has been released about the aliens or how many will end up in which American cities.
“This situation is concerning for many reasons,” the letter states. “First, your department s negotiated an international agreement regarding refugees without consulting or notifying Congress. Such information was not disclosed to Congress during the annual refugee consultation that occurred on September 13, 2016, even though your staff confirmed that the agreement had, at the time, been negotiated ‘for months.’ Second, the agreement and the number of refugees to be resettled has been deemed by your departments as classified, thus the American people are left in the dark as to the rationale for this agreement. Third, the individuals who will be resettled are coming from countries of national security concern. In fact, two of the countries are officially designated by the State Department to be State Sponsors of Terrorism. Finally, it begs the question why Australia and other countries refuse to admit these individuals, what other countries are doing to help alleviate the situation, what kind of precedent this sets for future refugees interdicted at sea by Australian forces and prevented from entering Australia, and how a similar situation will be prevented in the future.”
They came from the following countries:

Sri Lanka
No details have been released as to how many from each country would be considered for resettlement in the U.S., what cities or states they would be sent to, the breakdown of men, women and children, or the state of their health. The U.S. sent teams to begin screening the aliens almost immediately after the deal was brokered by Kerry, according to the letter.

Congress emboldened by Trump victory?

Refugee watchdog Ann Corcoran, who blogs at the website Refugee Resettlement Watch, said the letter is a good sign that perhaps Donald Trump’s victory has emboldened Congress to take a harder line against the refugee program, although even a “hard line” in the U.S. will be nowhere near the stance taken by Australia.
“There are many important concerns in this letter, but one issue in particular caught my eye — the idea of setting a precedent which is something I’ve been hammering for years,” Corcoran writes.
Deals like this are going on elsewhere in the refugee program, she said, where the U.S. agrees to accept migrants who have been rejected as illegals by other, more wary countries.
U.S. has been accepting illegal African migrants from Malta for years
For instance, the U.S. has for years been admitting Libyans and Somalis who arrive on the Mediterranean island of Malta.
“Surely these people are undocumented with only their personal stories to rely on,” Corcoran says. “But we have been transforming them into refugees and placing them in your American towns ever since the Bush Administration.”
“These are Europe’s illegal aliens and not our concern,” she added. “Just as this new batch is Australia’s problem.”
“Congress and the new president can quickly plug this hole, and we must stop these foolish ‘deals’ wherever they are occurring.”
Of course, a “deal” implies that the United States will get something in exchange.
“But what we get is never clear,” Corcoran said.
My interpretation:
I keep asking the question, "Where are all the women and children?" And the only answer I can come up with is, "They're all back in Jihadi land waiting for their war heroes to come home."
By the way...Has anybody seen this? ↓


Fat Hubie said...

There are no women and children. The jihadis can't get a date!

Anonymous said...

All those Jihadi's and not a goat in sight. Gonna be a long lonely jihad for those gents