Saturday, December 5, 2015

Loretta Lynch an accessory after the fact !

by Norman E. Hooben
WRVA News Radio 1140…the Jeff Katz show, has a headline that reads, “Attorney General: I'll prosecute anyone who speaks against Islam.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch

Given the fact that Islam is at war with the United States and the entire western world regardless if Barack Obama says otherwise, they (the Islamists) have committed acts of war against America; the most recent, the San Bernardino shootings…aka massacre.  Obama denies that any act of war against western ideology or Christianity exists.  The facts tell us otherwise.  I don’t care who or what you call those who want to destroy us, their message is all the same. They include such names as ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas, and of course the Muslim Brotherhood…the latter who have documented their plans to destroy us in their original charter.  To discuss these facts any further is dead on can deny, deny, and deny until your blue in the face but you cannot change the facts…Islam (forget about radical Islam, its Islam) hates us.  If you do not believe it, I sincerely hope that you’re not the first in your neighborhood to receive Islam’s benchmark punishment…a decapitation!

Now we have an Obama appointee, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, threatening American citizens with prosecution (under what law, I wonder) who speaks against Islam.   Islam is bad, they hate us…but that’s OK with Loretta Lynch.  They can say anything they want to about America, including raising the flag of Islam over the White House (only after killing a bunch of us) …that’s fine with her…no threats of prosecution!

Anyone who does harm to another is called the offender and Islam has certainly displayed this trait back in September of 1991 (aka 911) and more recently in San Bernardino, California where people were slaughtered while attending a Christmas party.  But what if you or anyone was caught comforting or assisting the offender in order to prevent his or her apprehension.  Go no further!  Attorney General Loretta Lynch is attempting to comfort, and in some cases assist, the offenders of the San Bernardino massacre by threatening American citizens with some sort of punishment if they speak bad about the bad people trying to kill us.  Now how weird is that?  Loretta Lynch should be prosecuted…under what law you ask?  Loretta Lynch is an accessory after the fact and should be punished under, “18 U.S. Code § 3”…here, let me spell it out for you: 

18 U.S. Code § 3 - Accessory after the fact

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 99–646, §43, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3601; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3502, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4921; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§330011 (h), 330016(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2145, 2148.)

Muslim Blooper Reel - Volume 1
Liberty and Islam cannot coexist. Free Speech and Islam cannot coexist. Women's Rights and Islam cannot coexist. Human Rights and Islam cannot coexist. Critical Thinking and Islam cannot coexist. Weapons of Mass Destruction and Islam cannot coexist. The future and Islam cannot
Posted by Eric Allen Bell on Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Obama slammed by media for ISIS response and strategy
Even the mainstream media is not happy with Obama...
Posted by Washington Free Beacon on Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Keep those cards and letters coming...
This post has received one those attaboys!

Listen To Judge Jeanine...ya damn sure better not be listening to Obama...he'll get us all killed!

Watch this Video and read my Text. I tell you what The Judge cannot say on the air!Click here to share the video❎ EXPOSED "REFUJIHADI" BARRY HUSSEIN ( ADMINS PLEASE RE POST.. FRIEND PLEASE POST IN YOUR GROUPS)Read his plan and STOP HIM before he destroys America.❎ REFUJIHADI BARRY HAS A PLAN.. AND WILL NEVER LET A GOOD CRISIS GO TO WASTE Click here to share: Hussein "Barry" Barack Obama, speaking in the Philippines on Wednesday, took shots at politicians back home who are trying to close America's borders to refugees."When candidates say we shouldn't admit three-year-old orphans, that's political posturing," Obama said at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit in Manila —He added, delivering another jab: "These are the same folks often times that say they're so tough that just talking to (Russian President Vladimir) Putin or staring down ISIL (ISIS) or using some additional rhetoric will solve the problem — and they're scared of widows and three-year-old orphans."HEY HUSSEIN YOU FREAKING ASSHOLE DO THESE JIHADIS WHO COME TO AMERICA LOOK LIKE FREAKING 3 YEAR OLD ORPHANS ??They come into America .This is his plan.... ➡ He wants the "Refugees" in America so they can create chaos and mayhem.➡ Their "endgame plan" prognosticates that this chaos will result in Patriots retaliating.➡ This will bring out the Black Lives matter and the Illegal Aliens gangs who will then retaliate against the America Patriot groups.➡ The result of all this will be urban anarchy with the apathetic Americans which are the vast bulk of the country begging the Government to do something.➡ The Obama Cabal will then call for peace and invoke extraordinary powers to "protect America"➡ These powers will include "unrestricted searches and seizures" Banning the ownership of weapons. Confiscation of guns from Law abiding Americans under the ruse that it is "equal justice" and for our own safety.➡Then they will call emergency meetings of the Congress and demand removal of the 2nd Amendment from the Constitution so that they can enforce "peace and harmony"➡ ➡ ➡ ➡ AND then the End game plan will have been completed successfully.➡ After removing the Second Amendment, all things are possible to take down America and convert it to a Islamo/Afrocentric/Socialist Empire where you and I will be serfs.❎ ITS PART OF THE OBAMA CABAL PLAN.. President Obama needs to veto a House bill aimed at temporarily halting a resettlement program for Syrian and Iraqi refugees.Calling the legislation,"untenable," a statement from the Obama Administration said the House legislation would not increase national security but would "create significant delays and obstacles in the fulfillment of a vital program that satisfies both humanitarian and national security objectives."The House is planning to vote on the bill Thursday and the bill is expected to pass.It would ban new Syrian and Iraqi refugees from entering the country unless federal intelligence and Homeland Security officials certify the entrants don't pose a security risk.The bill was drafted in response to the Paris terrorist attacks last week, which were carried out by at least one person who entered Greece posing as a refugee.AND the End game plan will have been completed successfully. After removing the Second Amendment, all things are possible to take down America and convert it to a Islamo/Afrocentric/Socialist Empire where you and I will be serfs.❎❎❎It is the Hegelian Dialectic of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis."Top DownBottomInside out!!"The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic and hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created by step one: A change which would have been impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two."BACK TO THE ORIGINAL STORY...President Obama would veto a House bill aimed at temporarily halting a resettlement program for Syrian and Iraqi refugees, the administration announced Wednesday.Calling the legislation,"untenable," a statement from the Obama Administration said the House legislation would not increase national security but would "create significant delays and obstacles in the fulfillment of a vital program that satisfies both humanitarian and national security objectives."The House is planning to vote on the bill Thursday and the billPASSED.It would ban new Syrian and Iraqi refugees from entering the country unless federal intelligence and Homeland Security officials certify the entrants don't pose a security risk.The bill was drafted in response to the Paris terrorist attacks last week, which were carried out by at least one person who entered Greece posing as a refugee.In the statement, the Obama Administration argued the bill would "divert resources" from existing vetting programs, which are "evolving" and "improving."❎ REFUJIHADI BARRY HAS A PLAN.. AND WILL NEVER LET A GOOD CRISIS GO TO WASTE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>VETO AND REMOVE OBAMA.. OR WE ARE RISK OF LOSING AMERICA.SO HOW DO WE TAKE HIM OUT ??ASK THE EGYPTIANS.. THEY DID IT RECENTLY..NOW ONLY A PEOPLE'S REVOLUTION SUPPORTED BY THE NCO'S IN THE MILITARY... CAN REMOVE HIM...The top brass have all been forcibly retired and replaced by Obama Lackeys!ONLY WE CAN STOP HIM...
Posted by John Gaultier on Sunday, November 22, 2015

Friday, December 4, 2015

Have you ever wondered what other countries think of America under Obama?

ISIS threaten the US, Belgium and France before making an example of a captured soldier in the middle of the street.

Thursday, December 3, 2015

Most Americans have no idea...let me repeat that, "MOST AMERICANS HAVE NO IDEA!!!"

This is the disturbing reality of the world we live in now. This is what has come to Europe and what will come to...
Posted by I Still Don't Like Obama on Sunday, November 22, 2015

What They Haven't Told You about Climate Change

Please click on the link below
What They Haven't Told You about Climate Change
The only constant... is change.
That's true about life. And it's true about the climate. The climate has been constantly changing since the earth was formed 4.6 billion years ago.
For example, in just the past 2000 years, we have seen the Roman Warm Period, when it was warmer than today...Then came the cooler Dark Ages... Followed by the Medieval Warm period, when it was at least as warm as today... Then we had the Little Ice Age -- that drove the Vikings out of Greenland. And, most recently, a gradual 300-year warming to the present day. That's a lot of changes. And, of course, not one of them was caused by humans.
During the past 400,000 years there have been four major periods of glaciation -- meaning that vast sheets of ice covered a good part of the globe -- interrupted by brief interglacial periods. We are in one of those periods right now. This is all part of the Pleistocene Ice Age which began in earnest two and a half million years ago. It's still going on, which means that we are still living in an ice age. That's the reason there's so much ice at the poles. Thirty million years ago the earth had no ice on it at all.
So, then, what about carbon dioxide, the great villain of the Global Warming alarmists? Where does that fit in to this picture? Not as neatly as you might think.
Temperatures and carbon dioxide levels do not show a strong correlation. In fact, over very long time spans -- periods of hundreds of millions of years -- they are often completely out of sync with each other.
Over and over again, within virtually any time frame, we find the climate changing -- for reasons we do not fully understand. But we do know there are many more factors in play than simply the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere -- factors such as the shape and size of the earth's elliptical orbit around the sun, activity from the sun, and the amount of wobble or tilt in the earth's axis, among many others. Even the relatively short 300-year period from the peak of the Little Ice Age to the present has not been steady. The latest trend has been a warming one, but it began nearly a century before there were significant carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels. And, there has been no significant warming trend in the 21st century. Contrary to media headlines, the trend over the past couple of decades has been essentially flat.
Meanwhile human-caused CO2 emissions are higher than ever. About 25 percent of all the CO2 emissions from human sources have occurred during this period of no net warming.
So, what are we in for next? Will the temperature resume an upward trend? Will it remain flat for a lengthy period? Or, will it begin to drop? No one knows. Not even the biggest, fastest computers.
All the information I've presented -- the increases, decreases and plateaus in temperature over the ages and into the last centuries -- is available to anyone who wants to seek it out. Yet to state these simple facts is to risk being called a "climate change denier." Not only is that absurd, it's mean-spirited. It's absurd because no one, not even the most fervent skeptic, denies that the climate is changing. And it's mean-spirited because to call someone a climate change denier is to intentionally link them to people who deny the Holocaust. So, maybe it's time to stop the name-calling.
Predicting the climate, one of the most complex systems on earth with thousands of inputs, many of which we don't understand, isn't an exact science, or anything close to it. Maybe it's just a tad arrogant to suggest that we can predict the weather or the climate or just about anything 60 years from now.
The science is not "settled." The debate is not over. The climate is always changing. It always has. And it always will.
I'm Patrick Moore, Co-Founder of Greenpeace, for Prager University.

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

The Obama-Clinton Success Story ~ They've done it by "claiming that their opponents are the fascists."

 Barack Obama, The Quintessential Liberal Fascist
Original post from: Western Civilization 2009

"They fear that the development and building of People's (community) Organizations is the building of a vast power group which may fall prey to a fascistic demagogue who will seize leadership and control and turn an organization into a Frankenstein's monster against democracy."
- Saul Alinsky responding to his critics, Reveille for Radicals; p. 199

When Saul Alinsky began building his community-organization movement in 1930s Chicago, observers were watching Alinsky with one eye, while with the other eye observing the building of communist and fascist movements in Europe. It wasn't hard then to see in Alinsky's programs at home, elements of the people's revolution from Russia, as well as some of the same "in your face" tactics being employed by Hitler's Brownshirts.
What Alinsky's critics saw was the burgeoning of a national movement, the carefully manipulated construction of people's organizations, which all had two elements in common: (1) a collectivist creed, which denied the existence of personal responsibility; and (2) an amoral dogma, in which all means were justified by an imaginary utopian end.
While most modern Americans remember well Hitler's Holocaust and the Cold War waged by a solid U.S.S.R., many of these same Americans have swallowed some false history regarding the movements that spawned such widespread, horrendous results. In what may be regarded as the most triumphant propaganda victory of our time, fascism has been scrubbed of all its Marxist roots, while communism has been scrubbed of its millions of callous murders.

This post-WWII propaganda coup undeniably set the stage for the early Alinsky critics' most feared eventuality, that the massive organizations could be shrewdly adopted by a fascist demagogue, someone who could "seize leadership and control" and turn them into a "Frankenstein's monster against democracy."

But perhaps the most cunning propaganda feat in history has been undertaken for the past 8 years. As Jonah Goldberg expertly expounds in his book, Liberal Fascism, American left-wing ideologues have managed to dissociate themselves from all the horrors of fascism with a "brilliant rhetorical maneuver." They've done it by "claiming that their opponents are the fascists."

Alinsky himself employed this method, quite deviously. Alinsky biographer, Sanford D. Horwitt provides an anecdote using precisely this diabolical tactic to deceive the people. From Horwitt's Let Them Call Me Rebel:
" the spring of 1972, at Tulane University...students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest of a scheduled speech by George H. W. Bush, then U.S. representative to the United Nations - a speech likely to include a defense of the Nixon administration's Vietnam War policies. The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush's address. That's the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative - and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school. He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, ‘The KKK supports Bush.' And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results."
In what may eventually prove to be a devious rhetorical feat of monstrous proportions, while the left has been indulging and fostering the "Bush Is Hitler" meme, they may have just put a genuine ideological fascist heir in the White House.

There is inherent danger in making scurrilous comparisons (as were perpetrated unceasingly against George W. Bush), but there seem to be some very worrisome signs in the rise of Barack Obama that we Americans would be foolish to ignore.

Obama, the Closer

As I put forth last year in "Obama, the Closer", Barack Obama, did not start his movement; Alinsky did.  (See also: What is an Alinskyism? )
Nor did Obama amass the organizations that propelled him. As detailed by Heidi J. Swarts, in her book, Organizing Urban America, the movement begun by Saul Alinsky in the 1930s has morphed into thousands of secular and faith-based leftist political organizations. ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) has perhaps the highest public profile, is most reputed for radicalism, and is the organization with which Barack Obama was first aligned. But ACORN is the mere tip of a veritable iceberg of Alinsky-styled community organizations that sweep across the entire United States and make up the backbone of faith-based progressive movements as well.

These euphemistically called "community" organizations have next to nothing to do with improving the communities and everything to do with politics, primarily strong-arming government money to advance their political aims. Prior to Reagan's election, these groups worked independently for the most part, each seeking to effect local change towards leftist ends.

But with Reagan's victory, ACORN founding member Wade Rathke sent out a memo (published by Swarts; Organizing Urban America; p. 29) that would reverberate all the way to Barack Obama's moment. ACORN had been behaving as a sort of "Lone Ranger of the Left" for too long, wrote Rathke. Ronald Reagan had formed a coalition among the middle-class that threatened to bring greater prosperity without left-wing Statists calling the shots. Rathke put out the call to the ACORN troops to stop antagonizing those who would be allies, especially unions and church organizations, once shunned by ACORN as too placid for the real fight for power. For the next 25 years, the community organization network built, proliferated and formed a solid, nation-wide base of political strength, purely according to Alinsky's original vision, and all just waiting for the right candidate to tap into it and lead it.

When folks from all corners of America proclaimed, seemingly with one voice, Barack is the "One we've been waiting for," they were speaking out of the vast Alinsky-originated network.

Neither did Barack Obama invent the political "ideology of change," nor design its carefully crafted propaganda. While media folks talked of the tingles up their legs and the brilliant rhetoric of Barack Obama, they were heralding the speaker only, not the creator of the movement and its slogans. That would have been Saul Alinsky, the man who took fascism and cunningly made it appear to casual observers every bit as American as apple pie.

Barack Obama is merely the movement's closer, the quintessential liberal fascist with a teleprompter.

Alinsky's Ideology of Change: The Third Way

Goldberg fastidiously notes the comparison between Alinsky's "in your face" rules for radicals, studied and perfected by Barack Obama, and shows them to have profoundly fascist roots:
"...there's no disputing that vast swaths of his (Alinsky's) writings are indistinguishable from the fascist rhetoric of the 1920s and 1930s...His worldview is distinctly fascistic. Life is defined by war, contests of power, the imposition of will. Moreover, Alinsky shares with the fascists and pragmatists of yore a bedrock hostility to dogma. All he believes in are the desired ends of the movement, which he regards as the source of life's meaning...But what comes through most is his unbridled love of power. Power is a good in its own right for Alinsky. Ours ‘is a world not of angels but of angles,' he proclaims in Rules for Radicals, ‘where men speak of moral principles but act on power principles."
Saul Alinsky was the man who transformed politics in America into all-out war mode. Alinsky's tenth rule of the ethics of means: "You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments." All's fair in love and war, and politics, to Alinsky, was war.
"A People's (community) Organization is not a philanthropic plaything or a social service's ameliorative gesture. It is a deep, hard-driving force, striking and cutting at the very roots of all the evils which beset the people. It thinks and acts in terms of social surgery and not cosmetic cover-ups.

A People's Organization is dedicated to an eternal war. A war is not an intellectual debate, and in the war against social evils there are no rules of fair play."
Saul Alinsky; Reveille for Radicals; p. 133   
Alinsky includes an entire section in Rules for Radicals on "The Ideology of Change." The watchword of the Obama campaign was "change." Just as Hitler mobilized the masses with a calculatingly undefined demand for "change," so did Alinsky disciple, Barack Obama.

"Everything must be different!" or "Alles muss anders sein!," Hitler's own campaign slogan, morphed into "Unite for Change," and the Obama transition team's Even the idea of a vast "movement" was borrowed from Hitler. As Goldberg states, Hitler used the phrase, "the Movement," more than 200 times in Mein Kampf.          
The word ‘movement' itself is instructive. Movement, unlike progress, doesn't imply a fixed destination. Rather, it takes it as a given that any change is better.
(Goldberg; Liberal Fascism; p. 176)
Perhaps the most intoxicating allure to the fascist demagogue and his movement for undefined change is its diabolical conciliatory flavor. Barack Obama continually, throughout his campaign and even now, portrays himself as the Third Way between the cantankerous factions that have polarized America for the past 80 years, since liberal fascism took root as the Progressive Movement.

Obama claimed that Bush was too much the ideologue, that his policies were driven by the Christian right, involved "false choices" between all-out war on the one hand and diplomacy on the other, between the welfare state and cold-hearted, do-nothing conservatism, between absolute sovereignty and cowardly submission to the global community, between doing all and doing nothing. And if any of this gibberish were a true reflection of our political disagreements, Obama would be somewhat correct. But as any sentient person knows, this radical presentation of Obama's is absolutely false. That gets lost, though, in the leader's conciliatory tone.

What must not get lost, however, is the very real fact that this Third Way movement for change is as fascist as anything we have ever seen in the USA. As Alinsky described his own "Ideology of Change," the lure is in the claim that the leader has no ideology that would confine his outlook to hard choices between what is moral or immoral, that there are no boundaries set by either religion or politics, that everything can change and the only thing that matters is one's end intention to do something good.

As Hitler, before Alinsky, proclaimed, "Our program is to govern," not delve into theory and dogma. This is in itself very appealing, especially to an electorate sick of the contentiousness of the past decade. This undefined "ideology of change" for the sake of change, for some action that will break through the roadblocks of polarization, has tremendous allure.

But Goldberg bursts that bubble:
The ‘middle way' sounds moderate and un-radical. Its appeal is that it sounds unideological and freethinking. But philosophically the Third Way is not mere difference splitting; it is utopian and authoritarian. Its utopian aspect becomes manifest in its antagonism to the idea that politics is about trade-offs. The Third Wayer says that there are no false choices -‘I refuse to accept that X should come at the expense of Y.' The Third Way holds that we can have capitalism and socialism, individual liberty and absolute unity. Fascist movements are implicitly utopian because they - like communist and heretical Christian movements -- assume that with just the right arrangement of policies, all contradictions can be rectified.
(Goldberg; Liberal Fascism; p. 130)
Of course, thinking people -- when they are indeed thinking -- know this is an utterly false promise. Life will never be made perfect because all human beings are imperfect.
Unity, the Diabolical Lure

What of this longed-for unity then? Barack Obama proclaimed he was leading a movement of people "united for change." What is the appeal of unity?

The modern liberal fascist seeks that state between mother and child which exists early on before the child seeks his own independence, before mother must set herself at odds with him. It is the perfectly secure state of childhood where all is lovely and peaceful and nurturing, but cannot continue indefinitely if the child is to be prepared to face a world of difficulty and hard choices. Nevertheless, the yearning continues. It is this primordial yearning which sets itself in the crosshairs of the fascist demagogue.

But in adult life, this type of unity is anything but desirable, anything but virtuous. As Goldberg states, however, "elevation of unity as the highest social value is a core tenet of fascism and all leftist ideologies."

The allure of this mystical unity is so great that its demand to sacrifice reason and thought on the false altar of infantile security is seemingly lost to many. But as Goldberg also reminds us, "unity is, at best, morally neutral and often a source of irrationality and groupthink."
Rampaging mobs are unified. The Mafia is unified. Marauding barbarians bent on rape and pillage are unified. Meanwhile, civilized people have disagreements, and small-d democrats have arguments. Classical liberalism is based on this fundamental insight, which is why fascism was always anti-liberal.

Liberalism rejected the idea that unity is more valuable than individuality. For fascists and other leftists, meaning and authenticity are found in collective enterprises - of class, nation, or race - and the state is there to enforce that meaning on everyone without the hindrance of debate.
(Goldberg; Liberal Fascism; p. 172)
Just as the healthy relationship between parent and developing child demands friction, so does the healthy relationship between truly liberal citizens. Unity is the siren song of tyranny, not the call to genuine progress.
Fascism: The Two Birds with One Stone Approach

I think of Obama's liberal fascism as a cancer that attempts to kill the two birds of American exceptionalism with one stone. It is a diabolically appealing Third Way that in the end, if allowed to triumph completely, kills both individual liberty and Judeo/Christian religion with its single stone.

And, indeed this was the precise goal of Adolph Hitler. Unlike the outspoken hatred of private property and religion espoused by communists under Lenin and Stalin, Hitler preferred the more moderate-seeming incremental takeover of private enterprise in the interest of the "common good," and the slow-death of Judeo/Christian religion by chipping away at it and replacing the people's dependence upon God gradually with reliance on the state (Hitler).

[Note: Hitler's Holocaust was based on the Progressive Eugenics principles set forth by Social Darwinist scientists and social engineers of the 1920s, widely accepted both in Europe and in the United States. Religion was not at the core of the Holocaust; race was. However, Hitler's other chief aim was to destroy the Judeo/Christian religions, which he believed had ruined the Germanic race's world predominance.]

Of course, as the German people were duped into giving Hitler totalitarian powers to work his magic "change," he took off the kid gloves and accelerated the program.

In the end, however slow the process, however seemingly benign the growth of the state may seem, liberal fascism has the same result of all tyrannies before it: hell on earth for most and a self-indulgent feast for the Statists in power.

As Barack Obama speaks, thinking Americans ought to hear the echoes of past fascist demagogues and remember. Remember.

When Barack Obama promises "collective redemption" through his profligate spending programs and vast overtures to a new world order built on love for our fellow man, we ought to shudder not swoon.

We ought to remember that healthy global relationships are built upon respect, not all-encompassing love, and that redemption for one's soul is a commodity the state is not empowered to offer.

As Pope Benedict XVI has so presciently warned:
Wherever politics tries to be redemptive, it is promising too much. Where it wishes to do the work of God, it becomes, not divine, but demonic.
Be not fooled, America. The movement, which appears most benign is instead the most malignant growth ever seen on our soil. It's a cancer that will kill, and however slowly it grows or however nice it may look on the surface, doesn't change a thing.

Common Core... What you should know, you don't know!


Tuesday, December 1, 2015

America... Do I have to plead with you to get you to do it? Please sign the petition, your country is at stake!

An Open Letter to the Leadership of the U.S. Congress
by Act For America Action Center
No Syrian Refugees to the U.S.
Senator Mitch McConnell
Majority Leader
U.S. Senate
Senator Harry Reid
Minority Leader
U.S. Senate
Representative Paul D. Ryan
U.S. House of Representatives
Representative Nancy Pelosi
Minority Leader
U.S. House of Representatives

Dear Majority Leader McConnell, Minority Leader Reid, Speaker Ryan, and Minority Leader Pelosi:
We are strongly opposed to the Administration’s plans to admit at least 10,000 Syrian refugees during the current fiscal year, and to increase the number of refugees accepted by the U.S. to at least 100,000 next year.
These tens of thousands of refugees are having a devastating impact across Europe and worldwide. The areas holding these refugees have seen an increase in rape, theft, gang activity, intimidation, and organized crime. The German media is now reporting that thousands of these refugees have disappeared and are now in Germany – unaccounted for.
Many of the “refugees” are neither Syrian nor refugees. Many do not even speak Arabic, cannot tell you where they came from in Syria, and have no official documents. They make up their own names and there is no way to accurately vet them. They are Afghans fleeing the Taliban; Eritreans fleeing their own repressive government; and many more hail from Iraq, Pakistan, and sub-Saharan Africa.
Top U.S. law enforcement and security officials have cautioned Congress on the terror risks linked to the Syrian refugees. Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has acknowledged that background checks are not flawless and that “there is no risk-free process” to vet these individuals.
The chaos overseas is but a foreshadowing of what will take place in our nation, if our government is foolish enough to follow suit.
In addition, there are serious financial implications connected with allowing the refugees to enter the United States. Resettlement for one Middle Eastern refugee costs the American taxpayers an estimated $64,370 over the first 5 years, 12 times the UN estimate for caring for one refugee in a neighboring Middle Eastern country. Further, 91 percent of Middle Eastern refugees receive food stamps and 68 percent receive cash assistance.
Allowing any Syrian refugees entry to the U.S. at this time is unacceptable to us. We remind you that the federal government has no greater mission than to provide for the common defense of our Republic and its citizens. We are a compassionate nation, but our elected leaders must protect and serve those they were elected to represent before extending an open hand to the rest of the world.
Our nation is neither equipped nor prepared to handle these refugees and we are strongly opposed to any policies allowing them into our communities.
We will be watching to see how you will address this issue during the coming days and we will hold our elected officials accountable for their actions.
Sincerely, { Note: Please click here to sign this petition.  Thank you. }

Attention All Office Seekers...if you don't know this, you ought not to be running.

SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARECopy and paste, send emails, share video.Immediate action request to:Mitch McConnell -...
Posted by Travis Vilas on Sunday, November 29, 2015
Immediate action request to:
Mitch McConnell - Senate Majority Leader
Frank J. Larkin - Sergeant at Arms United States Senate
Paul Ryan - Speaker of the House
Paul D. Irving - Sergeant at Arms United States House of Representatives

I call for the immediate arrest of President Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Sortero aka Barry Obama aka Barack Hussein Sortero for the crime of treason.

For repeatedly subverting the constitution of United States of America.

For aiding and abetting our enemies, by giving aid, comfort, material and financial support. For signing into law measures which were not legally passed by congress. For illegally selling weapons of war in Libya to Syrian terrorists now known as ISIS aka ISIL. For engaging in an illegal war in Libya, against the war powers act, and without the authorization of the United States Congress. For implementing rules of engagement for the US Military designed to allow enemies of the United States to continue operations against the US and it’s allies.

For felony fraud by providing fraudulent documents concerning his eligibility to hold the office of president. For providing a forged Hawaiian birth certificate. For fraud committed against the Social Security Administration by using a social security number that does not belong to him. For identity theft against one Harrison J. Brunnel (now deceased) whose social security number Obama has been fraudulently using. For blatant fraud in misstating the scope, cost, and details of the Affordable Health Care and Patient Protection Act. If in fact Mr. Obama is a natural born US citizen, for fraud committed against Columbia University for enrolling and attending as a foreign student.

For blatantly violating federal law by allowing and insisting upon the admittance of individuals belonging to organizations who have declared the US as an enemy, access into the United States.

For illegally suppressing and sealing records of cabinet and judicial appointees.

For failure to instruct the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute the theft of and/or misappropriation of five billion dollars from the US treasury under former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. For failure to prosecute former Secretary Clinton for trafficking in classified information

For illegally using the IRS to suppress organizations whose views oppose his.

For illegally using the EPA to suppress free market commerce under the unproven belief of man made global warming.

For granting exemptions to the Affordable Health Care and Patient Protection Act to campaign contributors.

For illegally suspending the enforcement of federal laws on immigration. For illegally implementing de facto amnesty for illegal aliens via executive order. For releasing criminal illegal aliens back into the population of the United States.

For repeatedly attempting to infringe upon the 2nd amendment rights of US citizens to keep and bear arms.

For repeatedly attempting to infringe upon the 1st amendment rights of freedom of speech and freedom of religion of of US citizens.

For violating the Constitution by gathering personal information of US citizens without a warrant.

For violating nearly every condition in his oath of office.

I also call for the immediate removal of all cabinet, bureaucratic and judicial appointees made by President Obama, and that all policies, proclamations and judicial decisions made by said appointees be nullified.

This is but a short list of legal offenses committed by the sitting President and is by no means a complete account. Many more violations and crimes are sure to come to light once thoroughly and honestly investigated. His moral offenses also call into question his ability to hold the office of President and Commander in Chief.

Every single elected and appointed official, whether city, county, state or federal who has taken an oath of office, is bound by his or her oath of office to protect and the defend the constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Any and all officials who have failed to take action for the above offenses are in direct violation of their oaths of office.

Monday, November 30, 2015

Are you ready for this? "It's ridiculous to be living in a country where we can put dogs to sleep but not people."

Katie Hopkins
Celebrity endorses 'euthanasia vans' because there are 'too many old people'
by Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(Natural News) British television personality and former The Apprentice contestant Katie Hopkins is well on her way into senior hood, a stage of life that she recently told Radio Times means a person is ripe for termination. Old people, she says, should be put to sleep much like animals at the kennel because they're too much of a drain on society, in her view, suggesting "euthanasia vans" as the solution.

When asked what she would do "if Katie Hopkins ruled the world," the now-divorced shock columnist -- Hopkins' former husband left her, prompting her to apply for The Apprentice -- told Michael Buerk that she would start by stamping out the elderly. There's too many of them and it annoys her, apparently, so the best way to deal with this problem would be to send out crews of senior-killers to deliver euthanasia door-to-door.

"We just have far too many old people," the disgruntled feminist told Buerk. "It's ridiculous to be living in a country where we can put dogs to sleep but not people."

Killing the elderly before their time can even be glamorous, Hopkins suggests. It doesn't have to be done in a dimly-lit hospital room with grandma strapped down to a table and forcibly injected. Cutesy little vans filled with euthanasia workers can drive around town and deliver termination pills to seniors' front doors, Hopkins says.

"Euthanasia vans -- just like ice-cream vans -- that would come to your home," is how she described it, in her own words. "It would all be perfectly charming. They might even have a nice little tune they'd play. I mean this genuinely. I'm super-keen on euthanasia vans. We need to accept that just because medical advances mean we can live longer, it's not necessarily the right thing to do."

Hopkins: people with dementia are 'blocking beds,' and there's no point to their lives

Hopkins' off-color comments weren't made completely out of the blue. Great Britain has been wrestling with whether or not to allow assisted suicide for some time now, an idea that's repeatedly been shot down by the Parliament.  But Hopkins is tired of all this concern for human life and wants to see all those gray-hairs six feet under as quickly as possible.

This wouldn't be the first time that Hopkins has shown such disdain for the more vulnerable members of society.  A recent "tweet" she posted to Twitter openly mocked dementia patients and their propensity towards forgetting things, writing:

"Babe I'm here again, I'm here again, where have you been. Babe I'm back again. I'm back again.  Where have you been? Take That Dementia style."

And just like how she views the elderly, Hopkins is of the persuasion that dementia patients are pointlessly taking up space in hospitals and care facilities, and should be put to sleep. The Mirror Online reported on a related Hopkins tweet that stated, "dementia sufferers should not be blocking beds." It proceeded to question the point of their lives.

It's inevitable that Hopkins will someday become one of the many senior citizens in British society that she so despises. And based on the continued regression of health throughout the West, she's also got a pretty good chance of developing dementia at some point in the future.

Both of these factors make Hopkins' distasteful comments rather harrowing for her own survival -- who, but the most gracious among us, would repay such a vile woman with kindness in her old age? Considering Hopkins isn't married and loves to run her mouth off at every chance possible about the merits of euthanasia, it's difficult to see how she'll even make it into her sunset years.

Stay updated with unfiltered news about euthanasia at

Sources for this article include: