Thursday, April 2, 2015

Catching Up To Hillary

Source: Brian Kolfage
TREASON: Hillary Caught Red-Handed Teaming Up With Muslim Terrorist Country

Hillary Clinton’s camp, amid accusations ranging from an email scandal to their failure to disclose foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation, is like a giant onion being peeled back by both lawmakers and the public, one layer at a time.
The latest layer concerns Clinton’s teaming with everyone’s favorite mullah-led Islamic regime, Iran. Between 2005 and 2008, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation accepted contributions totaling as much as $80,000 from the Alavi Foundation.
The United States government declared that the Alavi Foundation is an arm of the Iranian government — one with a dark history.
During Clinton’s presidential run in 2008, she also hired a campaign finance director by the name of Hassan Nemazee, a man who in 2010 was convicted of running a Ponzi scheme in which he scammed $292 million in fraudulent loans from CitiBank.
A snippet from a 2009 Forbes article sums up why the Alavi Foundation is not ideal to be linked to if one is vying for the presidency.
“Alavi’s contribution (in 2008) to Clinton came just two days after the Treasury Department also designated Alavi’s partner, the New York-based Assa Corp., as a terrorist entity, and the New York Southern District’s attorney seized and forfeited its assets,” the Forbes piece stated.
Then, it got worse. In 2013, a U.S. District Judge granted summary judgment for the United States’ forfeiture claim of a 36-story Midtown Manhattan office building co-owned by Alavi and Assa Corp. The feds ruled that the building owners were a “front for the Iranian government” and violated a list of serious laws and statutes in conjunction with Bank Melli Iran.
Did we mention that Bank Melli Iran, under executive order, was designated by the United States as a terrorist funding organization in 2007?
Nemazee’s ties with the Clinton’s stretch back into the late 90s, when President Bill Clinton nominated him as the U.S. Ambassador to Argentina, but then retracted the nomination after Forbes published an article highlighting his shady business practices.
Yet, somehow, Nemazee ended up on Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry’s campaign in 2004 and subsequently on Clinton’s campaign in a finance position during her run for nominee in 2008 (H/T WND).
Nemazee has such a large basket of dirty laundry, we lack space to list it all. So why was this man, with strong connections to the terrorist regime of Iran, along with the Alavi Foundation, making contributions and working to advance Clinton’s political ambitions?
It’s our belief that, aside from her growing list of other scandals, these odd connections and contributions need to be immediately explained in a transparent manner if she truly wants a shot at representing the United States.

The following from
Hassan Nemazee (Clinton donor serving 12-year prison sentence for defrauding banks to the
tune of $292 million)
hillary-clinton-sheldon-silver-2000 (1)
Sheldon Silver (New York state assembly speaker recently arrested on federal corruption charges)
Sant Chatwal (Top Hillary bundler who pled guilty to making illegal campaign contributions)
Something you should know...(This is the kind of stuff Obama wants you to believe)
If Video Does Not Load Click Here

This is NOT 1600 but 2015! A Saudi preacher demonstrate from the Quran and by logic why earth does not evolve itself. ENG SUB.Important update: Some of the comments did claim that this Saudi preacher did not mention the Quran when he was explaining why the earth does not revolve. immediately lots of western Islam apologists started to like those comments, not only that but also accusing me of lying and that the subtitles are not true and this whole story has nothing to do with the Quran. Now I am glad to find that The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) did also translate the same video. their translation is quite perfect and it covers the whole video without cutting any parts of it. you can watch it here.
Posted by Kacem El Ghazzali on Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Also a must see ↓

And in other news...
Former SNL Comedian Rob Schneider says “We Are Sliding Very Fast Towards Fascism”
It’s hard to believe that a: former: SNL cast member would have: a semi-conservative worldview, but that’s exactly what comedian Rob Schneider espoused in a: recent interview.:
(PHILADELPHIA: CBS): — Chris Stigall spoke with comedian Rob Schneider on Talk Radio 1210 WPHT about the struggle comedians face in today’s current political environment.
Schneider struck on ominous tone when discussing the path he sees the country on.
“Democracies don’t end well. We are sliding very fast towards fascism. It’s an ugly kind of thing. There’s this kind of mob mentality that we have to be careful of,” he said.
He believes comedians are pressured toward one side of the political spectrum.
“There’s a polarization that’s happening…I do think you look can look at government and go, ‘Wow, it is out of control now,’ and if you do criticize or tend to be not directly along a liberal stand, you can get murdered,” Schneider commented.
Schneider was very critical of the President’s handling of the economy and he feels certain policies are impacting businesses.
“There’s not one segment of business under the Obama administration that hasn’t been hurt…he attacks for-profit schools, which is totally an elitist thing from a guy that went to Harvard. I think for free, by the way,” Schneider said.
He was also critical of the media for being overly influenced by the government and not standing up for the American people.
“We don’t really have freedom of the press. It’s owned by about eight different companies, and it doesn’t really express or help the average American,” Schneider stated.
There is no question that Democrats and the Obama Administration have worked to: create both class conflict, and race conflict. Both of these elements are rooted in fascism, and Marxism so Schneider is right on in his assessment. It would be: nice if more Hollywood types opened their eyes and used their voices to speak truth about what’s happening to our great country.:
The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.” ~ Author Unknown

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Union Dues ...Do they help or hinder?

Note: There has been no evidence that minimum wage laws help the economy or the individuals who think it helps themselves.  The expense of forcing a minimum wage upon employers adds to the cost of goods and services does one and/or two things, it makes everything else more expensive or the employer goes out of business... or both!  Remember also, you cannot have a minimum without having a maximum but you won't hear the protestors complaining about not making too much money...only if the money is not theirs! ~ Norman E. Hooben
Storm'n Norm'n
The following cross-posted from Doug Ross Journal
FOR THE LITTLE PEOPLE: SEIU stands to make a mere $34 million a month unionizing fast food workers
By Labor Union Report
To the SEIU, the millions spent on unionizing fast-food workers may make the SEIU billions in union dues.

In the Spring of 2010, the Service Employees International Union’s ambitious plan to unionize fast-food workers was exposed.
Although the SEIU’s plan changed slightly from the orginal draft, the basic premise of tying the union’s campaign to unionize fast-food workers to a “living wage campaign” has not changed all that much.
However, it wasn’t until November 2012, that the SEIU launched the first of several fast-food “strikes” (most of the so-called strikers are not actual employees but paid-SEIU protesters) and its “Fight for $15 (and a union)” campaign commenced.
Since then, the SEIU has spent tens of millions—an astounding $38 million was spent in 2013 alone, according to Worker Center Watch—on its campaign to unionize fast-food workers.
The SEIU has engaged in one of the largest and most aggressive industry-wide corporate campaigns in the history of U.S. unions.
It has staged protests, engaged other liberal groups in a public smear campaign against the industry giant, McDonalds, and is helping workers file charges against fast-food chains with agencies like OSHA and the National Labor Relations Board.
As the millions of dollars in dues money the SEIU is spending on its campaign is staggering, one must wonder what the potential payoff might be to the SEIU.
Given the amount of fast-food employees in the United States, that is fairly easy to calculate.
In 2013, there were 3,653,168 fast food restaurant employees in the U.S., according to one source.
Unions survive on the payment of union dues. The SEIU’s minimum union dues (for workers making between $5,000 and $16,000 per year) are $27 per month.
If the SEIU’s efforts pay off and the union succeeds in unionizing even one third (1,217,723) of the nation’s fast-food workers, the SEIU stands to rake in up to $34,336,521 per month.
That’s $412,038,252 every year in dues alone–or over $1.2 billion over the course of a three-year contract.
For a part-time fast-food worker making $9 per hour, that part-time worker would work three hours every month just to pay union dues. [Again, those are the minimum dues, according to the SEIU’s own constitution.]
In addition, with the high turnover rate in the fast-food industry, for every new worker hired, the SEIU would also receive initiation fees.
Now, if it prevails, that is one super-sized payday for the SEIU.