Monday, March 3, 2014

Lt. Vance, Have you ever listened to yourself? History is full of guys like you...

Messager to Lt. Vance and all those appointed or elected over him:
 “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” ~ Justice Robert H. Jackson of the Supreme Court 1943

Let that sink in. By saying that the Bill of Rights withdrew certain subjects from vicissitudes of political controversy and placed them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, he meant that the rights protected by the Bill of Rights could not be legislated upon, and it did not matter that the entire nation clamored for laws infringing upon a certain right, they simply could not do so.

Un peu plus de recul...↓ A little more perspective ↓
"The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."



"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive."
Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787)


"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American...[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.


"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety
Lt. Vance take a lesson from Officer Dale

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — A group of gun enthusiasts took to Grand Rapids streets Sunday openly carrying guns.
“We are law-abiding people that are just looking out for ourselves,” march organizer Tom Lambert said.
The march to support open carry in Grand Rapids followed Johann Deffert’s lawsuit against the city and the Grand Rapids Police Department.
Deffert alleges his right to openly carry a gun was violated when he was ordered to the ground at gunpoint and his weapon was taken on March 3, 2013. In the federal lawsuit, he claims that he was walking along a public sidewalk near a church openly carrying a handgun in a holster at his hip when officers confronted and then detained him for about 10 minutes before he was released.
Michigan law does not prohibit open carry.
“We believe very strongly that he was detained unlawfully. We want to march and protest and say that was wrong,” Lambert said.
Lambert is a gun rights activist who has also been attending the Grand Rapids City Commission meetings while carrying openly – something Mayor George Heartwell disapproves of.
“Hopefully we clear up confusion on all levels. Hopefully we make sure that GRPD makes sure and understands what is OK and what is not OK ,” Lambert said.
The march started at Fuller Park and ended on Lakeside Drive, near where Deffert was detained.
A march to support Johann Deffert, who claims he was illegally detained and his gun was illegally taken from him by Grand Rapids police officers. (March 2, 2014)Deffert’s lawsuit says the incident constituted a violation of his First, Second, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The suit also claims the city failed to properly train the officers on Michigan gun laws.
Deffert is suing for a $100,000 judgment and another $500,000 for punitive damages, as well as attorney fees.
Dashcam video of Deffert’s detainment via YouTube:
Sometimes it takes awhile for the message to sink in...
They always regret it years later...


Anonymous said...

Gun evidence planted in Nancy Lanza's house. Look at this gun-range target behind Adam Lanza's basement sofa. It is stamped "FBI USE."

Police (or FBI) also planted an NRA book and a forged NRA certificate with "Nancy Lanza" printed on it. NRA announced they have no record of Nancy OR Adam Lanza ever joining NRA.

Here's Obama and Scarlett Lewis (mother of Jesse Lewis, who didn't really "die").

Sandy Hook was a Gun Grab hoax. The people who faked the "historic" Newtown "shooting" belong in PRISON.

Adam Lanza didn't exist.

AR15 WASN'T used. The Police faked the whole thing.

The Sandy Hook "parents" are ACTORS and Gun Grab diplomats (like Veronique Pozner, aka Haller) pushing UN Agenda 21 to disarm the USA.

This is TREASON.

Plus, CT just yanked LT VANCE (Sandy Hoax spokesman) from his job and reassigned him to the TRAFFIC division, because they don't want him to be giving another press conference when an attorney approaches the podium and hands LT Vance subpoena papers forcing him to appear in court and give testimony under oath about SANDY HOAX.

Storm'n Norm'n said...

Thanks Anonymous...I appreciate all the photos but rather than comment on each and/or all, I will reserve judgement because I have an uneasyness about Anonymous signatories...suffice it to say that I'm very leery of what happened at Sandy Hook...America was hood-winked I'm sure (or should that be Hook-winked)