For those on the left who like to identify with Alinsky Progressives (if you are unfamiliar with Saul Alinsky you really need to do your homework...I don't have time for it here, but just remember that politicians who use his tactics promise you one thing but deliver just the opposite...in other words, they lie.) their definitive description has been around for some time; a condition in which I refer to as psychological captive. Aldous Huxley is credited with the original verbiage here:
ps: Why did Hillary Clinton promote Yassar Arafat when she was First Lady? Was it that Islamic DNA? Why does Bill Clinton and Barack Husein Obama promote the Muslim Brotherhood (a group determined to destroy western ideology)? Their DNA...Dem Nasty Americans (LOL...if I didn't laugh once in awhile I'd probably be a psychological captive.)
Nicolai Sennels: Psychology: Why Islam
creates monsters ~ Source Jihad Watch
Studying the Muslim mind
"It is perfectly possible for a man to be
out of prison, and yet not free - to be under no physical constraint and yet to
be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the
representatives of the national state, or of some private interest within the
nation, wants him to think, feel and act.
"The nature of psychological
compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the
impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of
mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him the walls of his
prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is
apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective." ~ Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley, 1958 (This fits the description of some of my friends...but they don't know it...they are compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national state, or of some private interest within the nation, wants them to think, feel and act . ~ Norm)
Most, if not all, voters who voted for Obama are psychological captives who
cannot think for themselves and they will never admit this because they are who
they are, psychological captives! (Actually, I said this once before...here) But now I would like to add to that description...I found what I would like to call their DNA connection to Islam...it's in their genes.
In the narrative that follows there are four mental factors that describe why Islam creates monsters; anger, self-confidence, responsibility for oneself and intolerance.
Anger: In Muslim culture, anger is much more accepted, and being able to intimidate people is seen as strength and source of social status.
Self-confidence: Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims. The many hateful and dehumanising verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy. instead, they try to silence the criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or even killing the messenger.
Responsibility for oneself: Muslims are raised to experience their lives as being controlled from the outside. Everything happens "insha' Allah" -- if Allah wills -- and the many religious laws, traditions and powerful male authorities leave little room for individual responsibility. This is the cause for the embarrassing and world-famous Muslim victim mentality, where everybody else is blamed and to be punished for the Muslims' own self-created situation.
Intolerance: Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims. The many hateful and dehumanising verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy.By simply replacing the word Muslim with Progressive or Democrat in all of the above subject areas you would find their mirror image... i.e. Being able to intimidate people is seen as strength and source of social status for Progressives. Progressives are told that they are superior to non-progressives, destined to dominate non-progressives, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-progressives. Anyway, you get the picture but you should know why Islam creates monsters and Nicolai Sennels lays it out for you...read on, it should dispel any false impressions you may have had about Islam...and of course, Progressives! ~ Norman E. Hooben
ps: Why did Hillary Clinton promote Yassar Arafat when she was First Lady? Was it that Islamic DNA? Why does Bill Clinton and Barack Husein Obama promote the Muslim Brotherhood (a group determined to destroy western ideology)? Their DNA...Dem Nasty Americans (LOL...if I didn't laugh once in awhile I'd probably be a psychological captive.)
Collage Courtesy of Storm'n Norm'n |
Psychopathic
people and behaviour are found within all cultures and religions. But one tops
them all -- by many lengths. The daily mass killings, terror, persecutions and
family executions committed by the followers of Islam are nauseating, and the
ingenuity behind the attacks -- always looking for new and more effective ways
of killing and terrorising people -- is astonishing: hijacking jumbo jets and
flying them into skyscrapers, hunting unarmed and innocent people with grenades
and automatic rifles in shopping malls, planting bombs in one's own body, using
model airplanes as drones, attaching large rotating blades to pickup trucks and
using them as human lawn movers, killing family members with acid or fire,
hanging people publicly from cranes in front of cheering crowds, etc. It makes
one ask oneself: what creates such lack of empathy and almost playful and
creative attitude towards murdering perceived enemies?
This is a question for psychologists like me.Studying the Muslim mind
Nobody
is born a mass murderer, a rapist or a violent criminal. So what is it in the
Muslim culture that influence their children in a way that make so relatively
many Muslims harm other people?
As
a psychologist in a Danish youth prison, I had a unique chance to study the
mentality of Muslims. 70 percent of youth offenders in Denmark have a Muslim
background. I was able to compare them with non-Muslim clients from the same
age group with more or less the same social background. I came to the
conclusion that Islam and Muslim culture have certain psychological mechanisms
that harm people's development and increase criminal behaviour.
I
am, of course, aware that Muslims are different, and not all Muslims follow the
Quran's violent and perverted message and their prophet's equally embarrassing
example. But as with all other religions, Islam also influences its followers
and the culture they live in.
One
could talk about two groups of psychological mechanisms, that both singly and
combined increase violent behaviour. One group is mainly connected with
religion, which aims at indoctrinating Islamic values in children as early as
possible and with whatever means necessary, including violence and
intimidation. One can understand a Muslim parent's concern about his
offspring's religious choices, because the sharia orders the death penalty for
their children, should they pick another religion than their parents. The other
group of mechanisms are more cultural and psychological. These cultural
psychological mechanisms are a natural consequence of being influenced by a
religion like Islam and stemming from a 1,400 year old tribal society with very
limited freedom to develop beyond what the religion allows.
Classical brainwashing methods in the upbringing
Brainwashing
people into believing or doing things against their own human nature -- such as
hating or even killing innocents they do not even know -- is traditionally done
by combining two things: pain and repetition. The conscious infliction of
psychological and physical suffering breaks down the person's resistance to the
constantly repeated message.
Totalitarian
regimes use this method to reform political dissidents. Armies in less
civilized countries use it to create ruthless soldiers, and religious sects all
over the world use it to fanaticize their followers.
During
numerous sessions with more than a hundred Muslim clients, I found that
violence and repetition of religious messages are prevalent in Muslim families.
Muslim
culture simply does not have the same degree of understanding of human development
as in civilized societies, and physical pain and threats are therefore often
the preferred tool to raise children. This is why so many Muslim girls grow up
to accept violence in their marriage, and why Muslim boys grow up to learn that
violence is acceptable. And it is the main reason why nine out of ten children
removed from their parents by authorities in Copenhagen are from immigrant
families. The Muslim tradition of using pain and intimidation as part of
disciplining children are also widely used in Muslim schools -- also in the
West.
Combined
with countless repetitions of Quranic verses in Islamic schools and families,
all this makes it very difficult for children to defend themselves against
being indoctrinated to follow the Quran, even if it is against secular laws,
logic, and the most basic understanding of compassion.
And
as we know from so many psychological studies, whatever a child is strongly
influenced by at that age takes an enormous personal effort to change later in
life. It is no wonder that Muslims in general, in spite of Islam's inhumane
nature and obvious inability to equip its followers with humor, compassion and
other attractive qualities, are stronger in their faith than any other
religious group.
Four enabling psychological factors
Not
only does a traditional Islamic upbringing resemble classical brainwashing
methods, but also, the culture it generates cultivates four psychological
characteristics that further enable and increase violent behaviour.
These four mental factors are anger, self-confidence,
responsibility for oneself and intolerance.
When
it comes to anger, Western societies widely agree that it is a sign of
weakness. Uncontrolled explosions of this unpleasant feeling are maybe the
fastest way of losing face, especially in Northern countries, and though angry
people may be feared, they are never respected. In Muslim culture, anger is
much more accepted, and being able to intimidate people is seen as strength and
source of social status. We even see ethnic Muslim groups or countries proudly
declare whole days of anger, and use expressions such as "holy anger"
-- a term that seems contradictory in peaceful cultures.
In
Western societies, the ability to handle criticism constructively if it is
justified, and with a shrug if it is misguided, is seen as an expression of
self-confidence and authenticity. As everyone has noticed, this is not the case
among Muslims. Here criticism, no matter how true, is seen as an attack on
one's honor, and it is expected that the honor is restored by using whatever
means necessary to silence the opponent. Muslims almost never attempt to
counter criticism with logical arguments; instead, they try to silence the
criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or
even killing the messenger.
The
third psychological factor concerns responsibility for oneself, and here the
psychological phenomenon "locus of control" plays a major role.
People raised by Western standards generally have an inner locus of control,
meaning that they experience their lives as governed by inner factors, such as
one's own choices, world view, ways of handling emotions and situations, etc.
Muslims are raised to experience their lives as being controlled from the
outside. Everything happens "insha' Allah" -- if Allah wills -- and
the many religious laws, traditions and powerful male authorities leave little
room for individual responsibility. This is the cause for the embarrassing and
world-famous Muslim victim mentality, where everybody else is blamed and to be
punished for the Muslims' own self-created situation.
Finally,
the fourth psychological factor making Muslims vulnerable to the violent
message in the Quran concerns tolerance. While Western societies in general
define a good person as being open and tolerant, Muslims are told that they are
superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance
themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims. The many hateful and
dehumanising verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely
resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people
in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy. Killing
another person is easier if you hate him and do not perceive him as fully
human.
Why Islam creates monsters
The
cultural and psychological cocktail of anger, low self-esteem, victim
mentality, a willingness to be blindly guided by outer authorities, and an
aggressive and discriminatory view toward non-Muslims, forced upon Muslims
through pain, intimidation and mind-numbing repetitions of the Quran's almost
countless verses promoting hate and violence against non-Muslims, is the reason
why Islam creates monsters.
The psychological problem within Islam
The
problem with Islam and Muslim culture is that there are so many psychological
factors pushing its followers towards a violent attitude against non-Muslims
that a general violent clash is -- at least from a psychological perspective --
inevitable. With such strong pressure and such strong emotions within such a
large group of people -- all pitched against us -- we are facing the perfect
storm, and I see no possibilities of turning it around. For people to change,
they have to want it, to be allowed to change, and to be able to change -- and
only a tiny minority of Muslims have such lucky conditions.
Far
too many people underestimate the power of psychology embedded in religion and
culture. As we have already seen, no army of social workers, generous welfare
states, sweet-talking politicians, politically correct journalists or
democracy-promoting soldiers can stop these enormous forces. Sensible laws on
immigration and Islamisation in our own countries can limit the amount of
suffering, but based on my education and professional experience as a
psychologist for Muslims, I estimate that we will not be able to deflect or
avoid this many-sided, aggressive movement against our culture.
I
do believe that we, as a democratic and educated society can become focused and
organised concerning the preservation of our values and constitutions, can win
this ongoing conflict started by the often inbred followers of sharia. The big
question is how much of our dignity, our civil rights, and our blood, money and
tears will we lose in the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment