Tuesday, October 25, 2011

The Right To Rape ...Is that a natural right? Only if there is a right to practice Islam.

So we have a guy in the White House who says we are not at war with Islam yet he is sympathetic to their cause...  Will the right to rape be included in his next Executive Order?
The following from: Blogger's Base
Is there a right to rape? Only if there is a right to practice Islam. In the first post in this series on the right to practice Islam, we established the fact that aggressively attacking disbelievers is a "religious obligation" binding on Muslims as fard al-kifaya, This post will establish the fact that taking, enslaving and raping captives is a permitted & approved practice of Islam. 
Sheik Taj Aldin al Hilali, The Chief Cleric of Sydney, Australia's largest mosque, ignited a firestorm of criticisim following a recent sermon in which he described women appearing publicly without head scarves as "uncovered meat."  Full Story Continues Here
See Also...
Muslim rape wave in Sweden (link)

See Also...
Pakistan: Rape as a Tool for Conversion to Islam
For Zubaida Bibi, a Christian woman working in a garment factory in the Korangi Industrial Area of Karachi, Pakistan, the workday on October 12 at Crescent Enterprises probably began like most. Her job as a custodian helped make it possible for her to care for her children. But before her shift was over, a Muslim worker at the factory attempted to rape her, and then slit her throat, leaving four orphans without a mother to care for them. And the case of Zubaida Bibi is far from unique: In Pakistan, the phenomena of Islamic men raping Christian women is becoming more common. ... continues here


Anonymous said...

This is complete ignorant bullshit, rape is committed by men AND women of ALL faiths. It only becomes religious when the person who did the raping turns out to be Muslim. Your ignorant beliefs and your spread of those beliefs is why the US is looked down on by so many other countries.

Storm'n Norm'n said...

Looks as though we have a guilty ignoramus commenting...

First of all I did not make the statement...Sheik Taj Aldin al Hilali did:

Sheik Taj Aldin al Hilali, The Chief Cleric of Sydney, Australia's largest mosque, ignited a firestorm of criticism following a recent sermon in which he described women appearing publicly without head scarves as "uncovered meat."

al Hilali said, "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside... without cover, and the cats come to eat it...whose fault is it, the cat's or the uncovered meat's?"

Australians angered at the cleric's sermon say he appears to be condoning rape with the statements by implying the woman is at fault if she is sexually assaulted. Al Hilali said he's "shocked" by the reaction to his sermon in a statement on Thursday. He claimed his sermon dealt with Islamic religious teachings on modesty and not going to extremes in enticing men. "This does not condone rape! I condemn rape."

While the cleric denies he is blaming rape on the victim, his words seem to give lie to his protestations of being misunderstood. "The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred," he's quoted as saying in reference to the headdress worn by some Muslim women while in public places.

Outspoken Australian Prime Minister John Howard calls the remarks "appalling and reprehensible." He was joined in his condemnation of the cleric by civil libertarians, other Muslim leaders, and high-ranking politicians. Pru Goward, Sex Discrimination Commissioner for Australia, called upon Muslims to force al Hilali out of his position. "It is time the Islamic community did more than say they were horrified. I think it is time he left."

Read more: http://blogcritics.org/culture/article/muslim-clerics-uncovered-meat-remarks-spark/#ixzz1gSSHV144

Second your first line "...rape is committed by men AND women of ALL faiths..." has no place in the argument. The subject/topic is: Muslims blame the woman for rape committed by a man based solely on how the woman is dressed which only goes to support that Muslim men have little or no self-control when confronted by women immodest dress.

Read some of the comments here:
(I didn't write the quran some rapist did)

Allah implicitly allows sexual exploitation of captive women. Right hands possess
4:24. Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allâh ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you seek (them in marriage) with Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage) from your property, desiring chastity, not committing illegal sexual intercourse, so with those of whom you have enjoyed sexual relations, give them their Mahr as prescribed; but if after a Mahr is prescribed, you agree mutually (to give more), there is no sin on you. Surely, Allâh is Ever All­Knowing, All­Wise.

Married women are off limits unless you own them (captives and slaves). Other instances of the expression include: 4:3, 52, 36, 16:71, 23:5-6, 24:31, 30:28, 33:50, 70:29-30, How would Muslims captivate women? Allah has the answer for us.

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.