Warnigs Galore... When will America take notice? (Sheldon Whitehouse do you have any daughters to offer up to FGM? It's coming your way!)

From Logan's Warning

The UK and US Sharia Push~Video

December 21, 2009

By admin

For years I have been saying to look towards the UK to see what is coming our way in regards to Islam, and the similarities of the Sharia movement can be seen in this video. The good news is that UK Muslim Anjem Choudary states that US Muslims are about 5-10 years behind in this push. Meaning that we still have time to nip this in the bud. Stating that it is not “all” Muslims and then ignoring the problem does not cut it. Below the video are some comments left by US Muslims on this issue.

Asalam ‘Aleikoum wr wb,

Just want to thank the Amir for his post and I as a member of RM agree with it and stand by it inshaAllah.

Abu Shabab

Abu Muhammad
“Fight against the disbelievers collectively as they fight against you collectively, And know that Allah is with the righteous.” (9:36)

Asalamu Alaikum:

As Muslims, we should just continue doing what we are commanded from Qur’an and Sunnah in establishing Allah’s Law and Order and not to worry about what the Kuffar’s-media-liars says against Allah’s Shariah, Islam, Jihad for his cause etc., this is because the Kafir is a cursed creature (2:89), and will continue with their mouths to put out the Light of Islam (61:9) & (9:32). So if you grant a Kafir such as CNN an interview, they will distort your words, mixing the Truth of Islam with their Kafir’s false ideology (3:71). Satan is their ally (16:63), so do not expect a Kafir Media Network saying any good about Islamic principles and fundamentals. Indeed Allah Azza wa Jall is an enemy to these and all other Kafirs (2:98) and may the curse of Allah be upon them.

Wassalam.

Hamzah
Assalamu Aliekum,

I believe it was in “The Truth Hurts” where Shaykh Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid talked about offensive Jihad and stated that if the West were to stop all its aggression, there would be a period of maybe 20 years of peace, and then the West would be invited to Islam and accept Shariah. If they did not, then the Mujahideen would begin war with them.

I did not read the article or watch the video you posted, I admit, but from what I read it seems it’s saying there is no such thing as offensive Jihad.

There is definitely such thing as offensive Jihad, and later in the Hijrah the Prophet (SAW) said “I have been ordered to fight against the people until they testify La Ilaha Ill Allah, Muhammadar Rasooloolah, until they establish Salah, and pay the Zakat”.

So I’m not sure what the article is saying. I don’t know why so many Muslims will only accept that fighting is permitted only when we are severely oppressed, and not so that we may gain leverage over the kuffar. Even in a time of peace with the kuffar, they may still secretly be plotting to attack us. Which is why we must prepare. Some kuffar somewhere will always be hostile towards Islam. I don’t see why we have to be the underdogs.

The enemy is amongst us.

_______________________

Storm'n Norm'n asks, "Shall I remind you again?"

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies in the heart of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear.

The traitor is the plague......" Marcus Tullius Cicero, speech to the Roman Senate.

Obama is the plague...wake up Sheldon Whitehouse!!!

The following from Examiner.com

Sheldon Whitehouse's ingnorant rant: Who is really a member of 'the lunatic fringe'?

December 21, 12:23 AMProvidence Conservative ExaminerDamien Baldino

If you are in Washington, D.C. and talk about the simpleton from Rhode Island, you might automatically think of Patrick Kennedy. However, we can’t forget that Rhode Island has another simpleton in D.C.: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse. In case you think my categorization is merely a partisan shot, it isn’t. While I disagree with other Democratic politicians, I wouldn’t question their intelligence. I would just recognize the fact that we see the issues differently. With Senator Whitehouse, there is a certain shallowness to his thinking, tinged with hyper-partisanship, and a heaping helping of smarminess.

There have been many comments over the years which reinforced my opinion of him, but his latest speech on health care reform illustrates his failings perfectly:

“Voting ‘no’ and hiding from the vote are the same result. Those of us on the floor see it. It was clear the three of them who did not cast their yes votes until all 60 Senate votes had been tallied and it was clear that the result was a foregone conclusion. And why? Why all this discord and discourtesy, all this unprecedented destructive action? All to break the momentum of our new young president.

They are desperate to break this president. They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama. The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist. That is one powerful reason. It is not the only one.”

In Senator Whitehouse’s twisted mind, the health care reform bill is fantastic, and anyone who disagrees is a racist, right-wing militia member who is part of “the lunatic fringe”. Funny, but every poll I’ve seen lately shows that the majority of Americans are highly suspicious of the health care reform bill. Does that mean that more than half of the United States is made up of racist militia members? If that’s the case, then how was Barack Obama elected President with a majority of the vote?

Sheldon Whitehouse’s comments are nothing more than an attempt to bully people into supporting the health care bill. If you support it, you care about Americans. If you oppose it, then it must be because you oppose Barack Obama, and why would someone oppose Barack Obama? Because of his skin color, of course! Concern about the deficit, abortion, fewer health care choices, or other changes are never addressed by people like Sheldon Whitehouse. Instead, those with concerns are shouted down and intimidated by accusing them of racism, in order to silence criticism of a bill he knows is defficient.

Interestingly, Sheldon Whitehouse’s comments came a day after Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson said he would vote for the bill. Does that mean he was a racist until yesterday? Many labor unions oppose the tax on their health benefits. Does that make them Birthers? Howard Dean has encouraged progressive Democrats to oppose the bill. Does that mean he is a member of a right-wing militia? Won’t the Democratic Party be surprised!

_______________

And if this dosen't disturb you consider America no more!

From Right Truth

Hundreds of British schoolgirls facing genital mutilation

It's almost 2010 and who would believe that a Western nation like the UK would have a huge problem with female genital mutilation? Well, that's what happens when you have immigration problems, allow multitudes of Muslims to flow into your country and fail to require them to live by the cultural standards of their new country rather than allowing them to continue barbaric cultural atrocities of their former homeland. Assimilation must be mandatory.

Girls are still at risk this Christmas as 'cutters' are flown in from abroad to perform the illegal procedure.

Hundreds of British schoolgirls are facing the terrifying prospect of female genital mutilation (FGM) over the Christmas holidays as experts warn the practice continues to flourish across the country. Parents typically take their daughters back to their country of origin for FGM during school holidays, but The Independent on Sunday has been told that "cutters" are being flown to the UK to carry out the mutilation at "parties" involving up to 20 girls to save money.

The police face growing criticism for failing to prosecute a single person for carrying out FGM in 25 years; new legislation from 2003 which prohibits taking a girl overseas for FGM has also failed to secure a conviction.

Experts say the lack of convictions, combined with the Government's failure to invest enough money in education and prevention strategies, mean the practice continues to thrive. Knowledge of the health risks and of the legislation remains patchy among practising communities, while beliefs about the supposed benefits for girls remain firm, according to research by the Foundation for Women's Health, Research and Development (Forward).

As a result, specialist doctors and midwives are struggling to cope with increasing numbers of women suffering from long-term health problems, including complications during pregnancy and childbirth. (The Independent)

You should read the entire article. My response is simple. The UK has failed to insist on assimilation of immigrants from the Middle East and as a result they have a mess. The United States and other Western nations should learn an important lesson. The UK can turn this around but it will not be easy. Muslims in the UK have learned that they can get away with almost anything, play the underdog card, cry discrimination, hide behind their religion...

The young girls are paying the price for the UK's timidity.

Make note:

2/3’s of Protestant Pastors Consider Islam ‘dangerous’.

"You have my disgust and disdain forever, you socialist-coddling coward." ...aah, that must be you Senator Nelson

Source: Michelle Malkin.com

Hello Michelle:

I’m a family practice doctor in Nebraska. I sent the following (angry,I admit) letter to Senator Nelson. I urge your readers (from Nebraska and elsewhere) to do likewise, in their own words!

Dear Senator Nelson:

I send this message under “Tort Reform” because the current monstrosity you have pledged your support to says nothing whatsoever about Tort Reform. You have sold the physicians of Nebraska for zilch (zilch for us, but beaucoup federal bucks for you and the liberal partisans in this state). As a family practice physician in Small Town, Nebraska, I was counting on you to be the lone voice of Democratic sanity on this issue, but you sold me out. I will dedicate
every spare minute of my time and every spare dollar I have to defeating you, should you run for re-election. The long hours I spent on my medical education and the long hours I spend treating my patients are nothing but chump change to you and your Democrat colleagues in Washington. I especially can’t wait for your equivocation and milquetoast evasion when your “compromises” on the abortion language in the bill are silently erased or quietly (on-little-legislative-cat’s-feet) eviscerated in the House/Senate give-and-take. Go on: Bet me that you won’t wuss-out on this issue!

I know you won’t give two-seconds to this letter, but I had to write it. I’m a primary care doctor in YOUR state, and you sold me out. I didn’t slog through 4 years of college and 4 years of medical school and 3 years of residency just to have you hand my career and my patient/doctor relationships over to government lifers. Your gutless acquiescence to Obama and Harry Reid and ‘Nanny’ Pelosi will NOT be forgotten.

Thank you, Ben, for forcing doctors like me to earn less than the repairmen who fix our appliances. Case in point: We recently had our dishwasher fixed. The repairman who came to our house charged $65 just to come and ‘diagnose’ the problem, then charged another $180 to ‘fix’ the problem. You and your fellow lawmakers have fixed MY going rate (Medicare) at $35 per-visit. Thank you for securing such a ‘lucrative’ rate for me! Thank you so much for making me–someone with 8 years of education!–make less than a mechanic or appliance repair technichian. And thanks especially for falling in line with Obama and the rest of the Democrats to make such a socialist system permanent.

You have my disgust and disdain forever, you socialist-coddling coward.

Sincerely,
Becky F. Hollibaugh, D.O.
Warren Memorial Hospital
Ziimmerman Clinic
Friend, NE 68359

***

Dr. Hollibaugh adds in an e-mail update in response to left-wing critics:

Thank you so much for making it more widely available.

…To those who would accuse me of greed: I don’t make as much as you think I do. I give every one of my patients the very best care I can offer, regardless of their ability to pay. And I do NOT begrudge my mechanic or my appliance repairmen their salaries. Not one bit. I gladly pay them what I owe them. What you leftist idiots don’t understand is this: I am forced to accept $35 for an office visit by a medicaid or medicare patient. I. Can’t. Afford. It. On that enforced wage, I can’t pay my nurses. I can’t pay my billing secretaries. I can’t pay my receptionist. I. Can’t. Survive. On. Obamacare. Get it?! I. Can’t. Pay. My. Nurses. On. Ben. Nelson. Wages. Get it? I hope so. You think I’m greedy? I went to medical school as a former nurse at age 36. I have over $180,000 dollars in student loans. I. Can’t. Survive. On. Obamacare. I hope this helps. I don’t make as much as you might think. And most
of what I earn goes to repaying my student loans. I love my little family medicine clinic in Friend. I love being a doctor in rural Nebraska. I love my patients and I love rural family medicine. But Ben Nelson sold me out. Thanks again for letting me vent. I’m not greedy. I don’t envy the wages of my blue-collar friends. But I can’t survive or pay my employees on Uncle Sam’s reimbursement rate for my services.

Major Event To Take Place In The Middle East

"There is a tipping point...We have yet to reach that point, and it is anyone’s guess when we will." ...pretty soon me thinks!

Click on picture to enlarge.

FDA's STORMTROOPERS

By Attorney Jonathan Emord
December 21, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Over a year ago, the FDA adopted a 1,000 plus page final rule on Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs), mandating process controls from source to finished product for dietary supplements. It did so presumably to protect the American public from adulterated products but it is imposed on every company, not just those that cause harm. The rules impose substantial new compliance requirements and costs on every company in the industry. Under this new prior restraint, a product is deemed adulterated as a matter of law if a company fails to keep “adequate” records or to follow procedures in a manner that FDA deems “appropriate.” Some would consider it ironic that the major trade association for the dietary supplement industry, the Natural Products Association, first proposed the GMP rule to FDA. Others, including me, find nothing unusual about this because major players in virtually every maturing market favor imposition of “public interest” regulation to increase costs of entry and business for smaller competitors, thus driving them out of business and securing the larger firms’ market shares.

The GMP rules are particularly wicked because they give virtually unbridled discretion to FDA agents in determining the adequacy of compliance measures and any measure deemed inadequate is defined as an act of adulteration as a matter of law. The Final Rule does include a chilling admission that FDA enforcement of it will cull from the industry a quarter or more of all companies now in business, will exact a disproportionate penalty on small companies, will increase unemployment, will limit entry into the dietary supplement market, and will increase the costs of supplements. At the same time, because the dietary supplement market is already characterized by remarkable safety, it will yield no provable improvement in public safety.

Over a year ago my firm issued a notice to clients warning of the imminent implementation of the draconian rule. That notice included a doctored photo from the 1930s of stormtroopers invading Paris marching under the Arc de Triumph. It was entitled, “Here Come the Stormtroopers” and raised several eyebrows, including ones at the FDA. Through the magic of digital imaging, we had the Nazi soldiers images modified to include FDA tags on their shirts and standards bearing not the Nazi emblem but that of the FDA. The picture produced the effect we desired, alerting clients to a threat of abuse of power. We wanted to awaken an industry preoccupied with surviving a recession to the very real peril we saw coming from FDA enforcement of the new rules. Many in the industry presumed that if their products were safe to consume their government would not destroy them so long as they agreed to correct errors that were technical in nature. We advised to the contrary. We were right.

The proof is now in the offing. Within the last three months, the FDA has unleashed its agents across the United States, visiting company after company. Our phones ring daily with stories of new FDA investigations. The agency is conducting more inspections of dietary supplement companies than ever before in the same time span.

Advertisement

In 18th Century England, the right of a person to be safe in his person and effects against unreasonable search and seizure first arose in British law. At that time, radical Whigs who engaged in comments critical of the Crown and majority party (i.e., seditious libel) heard thereafter the unfriendly knock of the constable who would enter a house or place of business and ransack it, combing over the premises for any possible evidence of illegality. Upon finding that evidence, the party responsible would be arrested and tried.

General warrants, as they were called, were issued without probable cause of illegality and without proof of any imminent threat to the public safety. At a time when the rights of men were discussed seriously in the Age of Enlightenment, while the theories of individual rights against the state from John Locke, Cato (the nom de plume of Thomas Gordon and John Trenchard), Algernon Sidney, and Edmund Burke among many others circulated, the environment was ripe for taking down tyranny, and change came. In famous English cases that received applause in the American colonies the General Warrants were condemned, and the law came to respect the rights of citizens to be secure in their papers and effects against unreasonable search and seizure.

That basic right has been lost to the regulatory state. Under contemporary law, regulators enjoy great power to “investigate” without probable cause of illegality. Moreover, regulators can obtain warrants without notice to the regulatee, enabling them to seize and remove all manner of products, confidential papers, and materials on the strength of a mere affidavit alleging that there is, e.g., “adulteration.” Because mere record keeping omissions or mistakes under the GMP Final Rule constitute adulteration by operation of law, it is a simple affair for an investigator to execute an affidavit of a finding of adulteration, triggering a warrant ex parte (without notice to the regulatee) from a federal court.

With such extraordinary power at their disposal, rendering them no different from those who executed General Warrants against our forebears, FDA investigators can easily intimidate and humble regulatees. Uppermost in the mind of the regulatee is that if the investigator chooses to he or she can invariably find something arguably remiss, declare it proof of non-compliance, and endanger the future business of the company. It is often the case that a party investigated will turn over all manner of information, even beyond what is legally required of them, to satisfy FDA investigators.

Those investigator then return to their offices and comb over the materials for any potential basis for a law violation, alerting other government agencies federal and state if they find matters that might also offend those other agencies’ regulations. When violations are found (and invariably if an agent wants to find a violation he or she will), the agency may then refer the matter for civil and criminal prosecution to the United States Attorney. Prosecutions occur even when there is no evidence of any harm to the public. Indeed, the product may be health enhancing, but labeled improperly or made without requisite record proof of compliance with the GMPs, yet those technical infractions may be translated into a civil or criminal law violation carrying with it draconinan penalties and even jail time.

The effective return of General Warrants through the regulatory agencies is a remarkable devolution in the history of liberty, one sadly among many. The scope of liberty available to Americans is shrinking day by day. We are increasingly becoming wards of an ever expanding state. With each new law and new agency mandate comes a greater intrusion into our affairs and a constriction of our free choices. There is a tipping point at which those intrusions will cause such hardship and such interference with the rights of a once free people that those people will demand in overwhelming numbers that the rights violation stop. We have yet to reach that tipping point, and it is anyone’s guess when we will.

© 2009 Jonathan W. Emord - All Rights Reserved

Jonathan W. Emord is an attorney who practices constitutional and administrative law before the federal courts and agencies. Congressman Ron Paul calls Jonathan “a hero of the health freedom revolution.” He has defeated the FDA in federal court a remarkable six times, four times on First Amendment grounds. He is the author of The Rise of Tyranny.

Home

David Rothschild regrets that Global Governance is proving very hard to activate at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen

Source: Disclose TV
Note from Norm: This is more proof that Global Warming is just an excuse for one world government. If they succeed then war is inevitable!

If video does not load click here.

David Rothschild regrets Global Governance tough to activate in Copenhagen\
"Simon Linnett, Executive Vice-Chairman of Rothschild, has called for a new international body, the World Environment Agency, to regulate carbon trading.

In a recently published paper, Trading Emissions, for the Social Market Foundation, Mr Linnett argues that the International problem of climate change demands an international solution.

Unless governments cede some of their sovereignty to a new world body, he says, a global carbon trading scheme cannot be enforced and regulated."

David Rothschild regrets that Global Governance is proving very hard to activate at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen.