Tuesday, May 19, 2026
IT'S A SCAM the biggest scam in world history
Monday, May 18, 2026
FOCUS ON THIS
Friday, May 15, 2026
Today is Friday, May 15, 2026. Be prepared for tomorrow. Riots sponsored by Neville Roy Singham.
PROTEST WORLDWIDE TOMORROW AGAINST JEWS
- London, UK: Pro-Palestinian marches are expected to continue in central London. Concurrently, a "Unite the Kingdom" rally led by far-right figures is also planned, which has drawn counter-protests.
- Paris, France: The group Urgence Palestine has organized a major demonstration in Paris to mark "liberation and struggle".
- Montreal, Canada: The Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM) has scheduled a protest for Saturday to "reaffirm the fight".
- United States: "Nakba 78" protests are being mobilized by a network of over 400 organizations across major cities, including New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. These events frequently occur near Jewish community centers or synagogues, leading to heightened security.
Recent and Ongoing Context - Surge in Antisemitism: These protests follow a week of significant activity, including a 20,000-person rally against antisemitism held in London on May 10 after a spike in attacks on Jewish residents.
- Safety Warnings: Security organizations have noted a 95% increase in violent online posts targeting Jews recently, often peaking around coordinated global protest days.
- Counter-Activity: Some Jewish and Zionist groups are organizing counter-rallies or "Rapid Response" volunteer efforts to protest what they describe as "anti-Zionist libels" and targeted harassment.
- Forgive me for being suspicious, but I just got off the Interstate highway (Interstate 10 Eastbound somewhere in Mississippi), when this bus pulls up in the rest area. And off the bus comes a large number what we call, military aged males. The line at the restroom was so long that the door was held open and many were anxiously waiting to do their business. While they waited they were holding/using their brand new cellphones (all phones looked identical). Not a single female was anywhere to be seen anywhere around the bus, nor were there any children. So this was not a family outing.
- Hmm, a bus load of military aged men; is it unreasonable to think they might have a sponsor to pay for shiny new yellow bus.
- I know there's a wealthy sponsor out there who likes to instigate riots and such by using military aged men... I believe his name is, Neville Roy Singham.
123
Sunday, May 3, 2026
"Out of this society of free men great leaders have sprung at every crisis in our history."
"Out of this society of free men great leaders have sprung at every crisis in our history. They have resembled each other singularly. In basic qualities of profound morality, courage, common sense, and foresight Lincoln was one with Washington." ~ Senator Robert A. Taft
Saturday, May 2, 2026
Unbelievable!!! TSA allowed potential terrorists to re-board after causing a commotion and harassing the stewardess. Note: This story is from 2009.
source: Cindy Moon
Please read entire story, we should be very, very scared about this!
And to think that Fox News was the only channel that reported this. They may be "politically incorrect", but at least they had the "balls" to report it.
In my opinion, the Muslims are all getting very brave now. Read Tedd Petruna's story below. Can you imagine, our own news media now are so politically correct that they are afraid to report that these were all Muslims?
Unbelievable. Thank God for people like Tedd Petruna.
Tedd Petruna is a diver at the NBL (Neutral Buoyancy Lab) facility at NASA Houston . Tedd happened to be on the AirTran Flight 297, from Atlanta to Houston . Here's his report :
"One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. On Tuesday, the 17th, I returned home. If you read the papers the 18th you may have seen a blurb about where an Air Tran flight was canceled from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone before take- off.. The story was only on Fox News. That was NOT what really happened.
I was seated in 1st class coming home. Eleven Muslim men got on the plane in full Muslim attire. Two of them sat in 1st class and the rest seated themselves throughout the plane, in coach class, all the way to the back. As the plane taxied out to the runway, the stewardesses gave the safety spiel that we are all so familiar with.
At that time, one of the men in 1st class, got on his cell and called one of his companions back in coach. He proceeded to talk on the phone in Arabic very loudly and very, very aggressively. This activity took the 1st stewardess out of action for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones were not permitted at that time. He ignored her as if she were not there. The man, who answered the phone back in the coach section, did the same and this took out the 2nd stewardess. Further back in the plane, at the same time, two younger Muslims, one in the back on the aisle, and one sitting in front of him by the window, began to show footage of a porno video they had taped the night before. They were very loud about it.
The 3rd stewardess informed the two men that they were not to have any electronic devices on at this time. One of the men said "shut up infidel dog!"
The stewardess attempted to take the camcorder and the Muslim began to scream in her face in Arabic. At that exact moment, all eleven of the men got up and started to walk throughout the cabin. I guess that because of the noise, the flight crew must have decided that there was something amiss and changed the plane's directions to head back to the terminal.
The commotion and noise was reaching a feverish pitch, and at this point I had had enough! I got up and started towards the back of 1st class when I heard a voice behind me from another Texan twice my size, say, "I got your back." Then I grabbed the man, who had been on the cell phone, by the arm and said, "You WILL sit down in your seat or you WILL be thrown from this plane!" As I "led" him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed him back to his seat. I then grabbed the 2nd man and said, "You WILL do the same!"
He protested loudly, but my adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to go also. Just as I escorted him forward, the plane stopped, the doors opened and three TSA agents and four police officers entered the cabin. Myself and my new Texas friend were told to cease and desist for they had the situation under control.
I was quite happy to oblige, actually. There was still some sort of commotion in the back, but within moments, all eleven Muslim men were escorted off the plane. The TSA agents then had their luggage unloaded. We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happened.
Then suddenly, the door opened again and in walked all eleven Muslim men! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic, (the only way I can describe it) and they were reseated. The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw the men, she was having NONE of it! Since I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agents that there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with the Muslim men. The agent told her that they had searched the men and were going through their luggage with a fine tooth comb. However, nothing had been found and that the men were allowed to proceed on to Houston .
The captain and co-captain came out of the cockpit and told the agent, "We and our crew will not fly this plane!" After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. Five minutes later, the cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on. Again, this was where I had had enough! I got up and asked the TSA agent, "What the hell is going on?
I was told to take my seat. The airlines and TSA were sorry for the delay and we would be home shortly. I said, "I'm getting off this plane". The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off. Now I'm really mad! I said, "I am a grown man who bought this ticket, whose time is mine, with a family at home, and I am going through that door, or I'm going through that door with you under my arm, but I AM going through that door!"
And then I heard a voice behind me say, "So am I!" Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same thing. Within two minutes, I was walking off that plane where I was met by more TSA agents, who asked me to write a statement about the incident. I had five hours to kill at this point waiting for the next flight to Houston , so why the hell not give them my statement. Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it was canceled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6 PM , but I finally got there at 12:30 AM . If you don't believe this, look up the date and then Flight 297 from Atlanta to Houston .
If this wasn't a terrorism dry run, I don't know what is. The terrorists wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it. I'm telling this to you because I want you to know. The threat IS real. I saw it with my own eyes."
Tedd Petruna
Bottom line: Don't board airplane ✈️ with suspicious-looking folks !
Follow up story:
AirTran e-mail stirs up Internet firestorm
The FAA is investigating an incident aboard an AirTran flight from Atlanta to Houston that touched off a firestorm of e-mails.
AirTran Flight 297 was delayed on November 17 after a passenger refused to turn off his cell phone.
An e-mail sent out by Houstonian Tedd Petruna, who was on the flight, said that wasn t the whole story. Petruna's e-mail said there were 11 Muslims traveling together on the plane and two of them ignored flight attendants' orders to turn off their cell phones. He said they shouted at the flight attendants, and he and another passenger had to intervene.
Petruna said the 11 Muslims were removed from the plane, but allowed back on after they were searched. That angered the crew and many passengers, according to Petruna.His e-mailsaid the crew left the plane and so did some of the passengers.
According to the e-mail, Petruna and other passengers believed they witnessed a dry run for a terrorist attack.
Petruna said he couldn t talk to 11 News on camera, but Chaplain Keith Robinson, who was also on the flight, did talk with us
Wednesday, April 29, 2026
Monday, April 27, 2026
When a friend* is a friend? When he slams 60 Minutes back into the stoneage where they belong.
WHEN 'JOURNALISM' IS USED AS A WEAPON by Ken Bhirdo
The O'Donnell interview is a stark example of why there have been 3 assassination attempts on President Trump. Norah O'Donnell just gave us the pettiness of CBS News’ 60 Minutes and yet another disgusting look at what the institution of journalism has become.
There is a difference between tough journalism and uncalled for cruelty. CBS News correspondent Norah O'Donnell crossed that line Sunday night and it happened less than 24 hours after Cole Allen stormed the White House Correspondents' Dinner with a shotgun, a handgun, and a couple of knives.
President Trump had just been exposed to what appears to be the third attempt on his life. He sat down with O'Donnell on 60 Minutes, a program which long ago lost its reputation as a serious, consequential place to see real journalism. The premise of this interview was seemingly to discuss security failures and the shooter's motives. What he got instead was a journalist who couldn't resist the moment to attempt to humiliate him on national television.
O'Donnell read aloud from Cole Allen's alleged manifesto: "I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes." Then she asked Trump: "What's your reaction to that?"
It’s hard to fathom such a thing happening, but it has become all too typical for this one President. A sitting president, hours after an assassination attempt, was forced to sit on camera and deny being a pedophile and a rapist, words pulled from the document written by the sick mind of the man who just tried to kill him and his entire cabinet. Words he had heard from the very people like the one interviewing Trump.
This was not journalism. This was theater. Ugly, planned and calculated theater. O'Donnell made a conscious decision to read those specific words on air. The manifesto reportedly contained a great deal of content with political grievances, references to attending "No Kings" rallies, detailed tactical planning. Trump himself noted in the interview that O'Donnell didn't read the parts about the shooter's radicalization or the "No Kings" rallies that may have influenced him. She extracted the most inflammatory, most personally degrading sentence she could find.
Trump, in his typical combative style snapped: "I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you're horrible people." Say what you will about the president's tone he wasn't wrong about the intent. O'Donnell's snarky follow-up question, "Oh, do you think he was referring to you?" confirmed it. She wasn't informing viewers about a manifesto. She was trying to bait and shame Trump into defending himself against the words of the man who tried to kill him.
Ask yourself this question: Would this have happened to Barack Obama or Joe Biden? Imagine a gunman had tried to assassinate President Obama. Imagine the shooter left behind a manifesto containing vile, false personal accusations. Would any major network journalist have read those accusations aloud to Obama's face and then asked, "what's your reaction?"
The answer is obvious and would be a resounding no. The outrage would have been instant and career-ending. It would have been called dehumanizing, and an unconscionable abuse of journalism.
The standard that protects every other president, every other public figure, apparently does not extend to Trump.
This interview came in the immediate aftermath of a violent event. Journalists were in that very hotel. Members of the media were among those who fled or crouched below tables when gunshots were heard. You might expect some sort of reflection about the violent climate created by the very people who were feeling the same fear felt by the President, his family, and those in his administration. Do they not recognize it was their rhetoric that fed Cole Allen’s anger? And he was using the very lies and hyperbole they themselves have used to characterize Trump? Amid all this, CBS chose to amplify the words used by them and the would-be assassin on the most-watched news program in America.
This hateful behavior began in 2015 and this interview is the just the end product of all those years of coverage in which the norms of decency vanish when the subject is Donald Trump. Does O’Donnell think she did something brave by reading those lines to a president’s face? It wasn’t brave, it was shameful. Serious questions deserve to be asked about the attempted attack at the Correspondents' Dinner including Secret Service failures, the shooter's radicalization, and whether the political climate is contributing to violence. Those are the questions a serious journalist would have led with and discussed.
Instead, they once again fueled more dissention, more divisiveness and more hatred. Good job, CBS.
*The author, Ken Bhirdo, is a friend of mine.
Thursday, April 23, 2026
Wednesday, April 22, 2026
SPLC indicted!!! Best news we heard all day!
"Our most valuable assets are not on the ground."
![]() |
| A United States Air Force illustration of a hypothetical Soviet Armed Forces space weapon |
Monday, April 20, 2026
THE POPE IS SETTING A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT
General Mike Flynn
The photo below was taken at a prominent Catholic Church in Florida today. This type of information warfare against “MAGA”, against President Trump, is just beginning. It is dangerous, it is very political, it is fifth generational, and most definitely, it is spiritual warfare.
There are approximately 1.4B Catholics worldwide. The largest Christian denomination in the world. Fact is, without the Catholic vote, one cannot be President of The United States of America.
This Pope is consciously choosing political sides. He is emerging as a woke globalist instead of a humble servant of Jesus Christ representing the Church of Peter.
The Pope should represent humility and courage in the face of the evil that walks the earth.
Does he truly see President Donald J. Trump as evil?
I think not.
I believe he is moving at a speed directed by his masters (not God). The Pope, as a man, needs to be reminded that humility in the face of God is courage. Courage without humility in the face of man is dangerous.
It is shocking how many Catholics are upset at Trump currently. It shows the unhealthy allegiance that they hold for any man, including the Pope.
In Revelation 19:10, we are told not to worship even an angel, but only God, so certainly we should not worship a man, even the Pope.
In Acts 10:25, Peter (the first Pope) says that he is just a man and not to worship him but to worship only God.
In Jeremiah 17:5 says that we are cursed if we trust in man or in our strength.
With access to greater knowledge, all of us see a darker underbelly of our international political systems and the depravity of humanity (truly).
So what? Thrust yourselves into the word of God instead of focusing on the word of man. I know that is the challenge of a lifetime, but for some individuals and even for a few nations, it could save lives.
Why? Because all men say dumb things at times. It may be purposeful for a circumstance or it may just be ignorance. If our hope and trust remains in Jesus, that allows us to walk through these uncertain times unphased.
If it isn’t clear enough yet, it will become even more clear in the months ahead.
Saturday, April 18, 2026
NATO: It sounds like they're singing the Chief Joseph song, "I will fight no more forever."
No matter—Ronald Reagan rightly saw the importance of solidarity with a NATO member and a long-time American ally. So he gave Britain a veritable blank check for American aid.
Currently, America has not asked NATO members to help bomb Iran—even though Europe, not the U.S., was in range of Iranian ballistic missiles, and soon perhaps nuclear-tipped ones as well.
Europeans are far more vulnerable to Iranian-inspired Islamic terrorism. They are more reliant on foreign oil from the Middle East, some of it passing through the Strait of Hormuz.
All the U.S. had initially asked for was basing support in disarming a common Western enemy that, for nearly half a century, has slaughtered American diplomats and soldiers and tried to kill a U.S. president and secretary of state.
But most NATO members could not even offer tacit help. Some damned the U.S. effort as either illegal or unnecessary.
The American public watched the British waffle for days over permitting Americans to use their Diego Garcia base.
The Spanish banned American use of their NATO bases and airspace.
The Italians refused a request from American bombers to land and refuel at a Sicilian NATO base.
Many NATO heads of state rebuked the U.S. to their domestic audiences while, in typical two-faced fashion, publicly offering empty verbal support for the U.S. effort.
The NATO response to an Iranian missile aimed at fellow NATO member Turkey was anemic.
Even worse was the pathetic British reaction to another Iranian missile launch at a British base at Akrotiri, Cyprus.
Yet a successful American effort in neutering a theocratic Iran was clearly of benefit to Europe. So is preventing the international waters of the Strait of Hormuz from becoming a toll booth run by the Iranian mullahs.
Such passivity was in sharp contrast to the five-year-long Ukraine War on the borders of Europe.
Ukraine was not in NATO.
Ukrainian politicos and ambassadors had sometimes played an intrusive, partisan role in the 2016, 2020, and 2024 American presidential elections.
Nonetheless, there were urgent European requests for the U.S. to honor the spirit of NATO solidarity and to get across the Atlantic as quickly as possible to protect the territorial integrity of Europe.
Yet continental Europe is not intrinsically weak. The combined population of the European Union and European NATO members is around 450 million—a population more than 100 million greater than that of the U.S.
These same European nations enjoy an aggregate annual GDP of more than $22 trillion, 10 times the size of the Russian economy.
European diffidence comes on top of the perennial American effort to harangue NATO members to honor their 2 percent of GDP defense commitments—especially in the case of deadbeat Spain and Canada, who for years welched on their pledges.
Trump’s harangues were not what was undermining NATO.
Instead, he ripped off a happy-face scab and exposed a festering wound of increasingly anti-American hypocrisy beneath.
If you wanted to wreck the alliance, there would be no better way than to follow the duplicitous examples of Western European NATO members.
"It's very hard to fully grasp what we just went through." - Artemis II Commander Reid Wiseman
NEW: Artemis II Commander Reid Wiseman reflects on being MOVED to tears by the Christian cross after returning to Earth from the historic expedition:
"When I got back on the... on the ship — I'm not really a religious person — but there was just no other avenue for me to explain anything or to experience anything."
"So I asked for the chaplain on the Navy ship to just come visit us for a minute, and when that man walked in, I'd never met him before in my life. But I saw the cross on his collar, and I just broke down in tears."
"It's very hard to fully grasp what we just went through."
Friday, April 17, 2026
What are your principles worth to you?
Certainly one of my most cherished books but as I get closer to the end of the road downsizing becomes a major preoccupation trying to decide who gets what. So this one went to a friend who I'm sure will keep it in his library and learn from it...or even quote from it so others can appreciate the unbiasness of an honorable man; Clarence Thomas, my favorite judge at the Supreme Court of the United States.~ Norman E Hooben
![]() |
"I ain't never votin' fo' another Democrat long as I can drawbreath." ~ From the book, 'My Grandfather's Son' by Clarence Thomas. Quote is from Thomas's mother. |
Thursday, April 9, 2026
Blood Brothers
We spent nine years of our childhood dreaming of our future and playing like we were American Indians because we enjoyed their connection to nature and their fellow humans. To become bonded to the American Indian, one would make a small cut on the arm closest to the heart while the Indian did likewise. Then the two would tie their bleeding arms together and swear their allegiance to one another for life.
Paul always said he was part Indian and wanted to perform such a ritual between us. And we did! Two 12-year-old boys cutting their arms with a crude jack knife and tying arms with a ragged cloth; we were now bonded for life.
Today I got a call from Avie; Paul has gone to the Great Reservation in the sky…I will say no more forever. *


















