Answer: If we had any 'MEN' in Congress he would!
(See evidence below.)
US Obama Has Knowingly Supported Al Qaeda for Years (editing mine Storm'n Norm'n)
Not long ago I posted the following:
Perhaps you
should rethink whose side we should be supporting. Assad is fighting off the friends of Obama and company...they are
mostly Sunni Muslims (Muslim Brotherhood etc.) The main stream media and the United
Nations are quite proud of their world-wide indoctrination of the 'people'...
they have convinced most people that Assad is killing his own people and this
is simply not true. It's a religious war of sorts, Muslims against Muslims
(Alawis or Alawites against the Sunnis and et al Muslims). The civilized world needs to wake up. Read the full
article from the American Thinker here.
You don’t hear the main stream media reporting these
facts to the American people. Even the United
States Congress is misled! Both Harry
Reid and John Boehner are intentionally avoiding the fact that Obama and
Company are supporting terrorists in order to protect the usurper-in-chief. To do otherwise would mean that Boehner would
have to start impeachment proceedings and the overwhelming evidence supporting
Obama’s guilt would no doubt leave Reid in a compromising position. The following two stories should be enough to
re-enforce my assertions. ~ Norman E.
Hooben
1. Land Destroyer Report
US Recognizes Unelected Terrorists as Syrian "Representatives"
US admits Al Qaeda "amongst" Syrian rebels,
recognizes them as the "legitimate representative of the Syrian
people."
December 12, 2012 (LD) - As expected, after a long pause of feigned
"consideration," the US has recognized the militants it has been arming,
funding, aiding logistically and supporting diplomatically since
as early as 2007, as the "legitimate representatives of the Syrian people,"
with the added caveat, "in opposition to the Assad regime." The Wall
Street Journal would report that US President Barack Obama's announcement
actually read:
"The Syrian National Coalition for Revolutionary and
Opposition Forces is reflective and representative enough of the Syrian
population that we consider them the legitimate representative of the Syrian
people in opposition to the Assad regime."
The bizarre, uncertain
wording sends a message of both uncertainty and resounding illegitimacy,
indicating that the US itself recognizes the true nature of the so-called
"Syrian" opposition is apparent to an increasing number of people both in public
office and across the public, and that a certain degree of rhetorical distance
must be kept.
The overt, extremist nature of the militants operating in
Syria has become increasingly difficult for the West to paper over. Torrents of
videos and confirmed reports documenting militant atrocities, including several
involving the
machine
gunning of bound prisoners, and a particularly gruesome video of a child
handed a sword by militants to hack off the heads of bound men wearing civilian
clothing, has confirmed the worst fears expressed by geopolitical analysts and
foreign governments around the world - that the Syrian opposition
is in fact Al Qaeda.
So damning is the evidence,
that President Obama was forced to finally acknowledge this, stating:
There is a small element of those who oppose the Assad
regime that are affiliated with al Qaeda in Iraq…and we are going to make clear
to distinguish between those elements of the opposition.
The Wall
Street Journal, in their article, "
U.S.
Recognizes Syria's Main Rebel Group," would also report:
The Obama administration on Tuesday for the first time
released intelligence directly tying a powerful Syrian rebel group to commanders
of al Qaeda in Iraq. U.S. officials formally sanctioned the Syrian militia,
called Jabhat al-Nusra—freezing any assets it may have in the U.S. and barring
Americans from doing business with it—because of fears it is gaining
disproportionate power among the rebel groups seeking to overthrow Mr. Assad.
Despite this announcement, such sanctions are symbolic and
selectively enforced. Also on such lists was the
Mujahedeen
e-Khalq (MEK), and currently the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which
officially merged with Al Qaeda in 2007, according to the US Army's West Point
Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) report, "
Al-Qa'ida's
Foreign Fighters in Iraq." Yet in 2011, NATO had armed, funded, and provided
air support for LIFG during the premeditated overthrow of the Libyan
government.
US Has Knowingly Supported Al Qaeda for Years
Based in Benghazi,
elements
of LIFG were behind the attack on a US consulate and the death of US
Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. They are also confirmed to be sending
fighters and weapons through NATO-member Turkey where they stage before engaging
in combat operations inside Syria.
In November 2011, the Telegraph in
their article, "
Leading
Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group," would mention LIFG
by name when they reported:
Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council
and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, "met with Free
Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey," said a military
official working with Mr Belhadj. "Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan
president) sent him there."
Another Telegraph article, "
Libya’s
new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels," would admit:
Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya's new
authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency
against President Bashar al-Assad's regime, The Daily Telegraph has
learned.
At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included
Turkish officials, the Syrians requested "assistance" from the Libyan
representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.
"There is something being planned to send weapons and even
Libyan fighters to Syria," said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of
anonymity. "There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you
will see."
Later that month,
some
600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin
combat operations
and
have been flooding into the country ever since.
Clearly they are not
"secretly" organizing hundreds of fighters under the nose of the
US
consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and "sneaking" through NATO member states into
Syria. They are doing with NATO-backing, with NATO
admittedly
providing support for militants along Turkey's border with Syria, utilizing
the very same
regional
Al Qaeda networks identified by the US military during the US occupation of
Iraq - which also explains where Jabhat al-Nusra is coming from.
Further undermining US claims that they have identified and are
attempting to separate from the "opposition," sectarian extremists, are
admissions made as early as 2007 that US foreign policy explicitly sought to
utilize these very sectarian extremists to violently overthrow the Syrian
government. Indeed, in 2007, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh
published an article titled, "
The
Redirection" for the New Yorker, within which US, Saudi, and Lebanese
officials described their conspiracy.
In the report it specifically
stated:
"To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the
Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the
Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s
government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to
weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has
also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A
by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups
that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and
sympathetic to Al Qaeda." -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
Hersh's report would
continue by stating:
"the Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would
provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir
Assad, of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad
government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations." -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
The link between extremist
groups and Saudi funding was also mentioned in the report, and reflects evidence
presented by
the
West Point CTC indicating that the majority of fighters and funding behind
the sectarian violence in Iraq, came from Saudi Arabia. Hersh's report
specifically states:
"...[Saudi Arabia's] Bandar and other Saudis have
assured the White House that “they will keep a very close eye on the religious
fundamentalists. Their message to us was ‘We’ve created this movement, and we
can control it.’ It’s not that we don’t want the Salafis to throw bombs; it’s
who they throw them at—Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the
Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran.” -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
The report reads like a
prophecy, fulfilled verbatim during the events of the last 2 years.
The
Wall Street Journal report openly states that the Syrian conflict is turning
into a proxy war with Iran, just as was planned in 2007. The feigned ignorance,
surprise and attempts to mitigate terror groups the US purposefully created in
the first place, is merely for public consumption. Bands of sectarian extremists
destroying Syria was the stated plan for years, a plan now coming into
fruition.
Wall Street Journal Admits Syria's Minorities are Fighting
for Lives - SNC Leader Admits He Seeks an "Islamic State"
And even
as US President Obama attempts to assure the public and the international
community that the West is sorting out the extremists, the Wall Street Journal
admits that militias are forming across Syria - assembled by Syria's large
minorities to protect themselves from what is clearly a sectarian assault - not
a pro-democracy movement. In describing the militias, the
Wall
Street Journal reports:
Many come from Syria's religious minorities, mostly the
Shiite offshoot Alawite sect to which the president's family belongs, as well
Christians and Druze, who increasingly see themselves in a battle against a
mainly Sunni rebel insurgency.
Of course, the Wall Street Journal
attempts to portray the militias as mercenaries in the service of Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad, despite admitting the sectarian nature of the
opposition and admitting that Al Qaeda is confirmed to be operating inside of
Syria.
The
sectarian
nature of the bloodbath the US was engineering in 2007 was also mentioned in
Seymour Hersh's "The Redirection." Foreshadowing was given by a former CIA
officer based in Lebanon who stated:
"Robert Baer, a former longtime C.I.A. agent in Lebanon,
has been a severe critic of Hezbollah and has warned of its links to
Iranian-sponsored terrorism. But now, he told me, “we’ve got Sunni Arabs
preparing for cataclysmic conflict, and we will need somebody to protect the
Christians in Lebanon. It used to be the French and the United States who would
do it, and now it’s going to be Nasrallah and the Shiites" -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
Clearly, the Christians in
Syria would also need protection.
And while the US attempts to reassure
the world that the brood of terrorists it is cultivating and has now officially
recognized as the "representatives of the Syrian people" is "pro-democratic" in
nature, the very leader
the
US recently handpicked in Doha, Qatar to lead the new opposition coalition,
Moaz al-Khatib, has admitted
in
an Al Jazeera interview that he seeks to establish an "Islamic state" across
currently secular Syria.
Modeled after the increasingly despotic Muslim
Brotherhood regime led by Mohammed Morsi, who is currently
hiring
rape gangs to help disperse protesters opposed to his expanding
dictatorship, al-Khatib's vision of Syria's future is one even many Syrian
Sunnis reject.
To declare this violent minority, augmented by foreign
terrorists couching the establishment of a brutal faux-theocracy behind the
paper-thin veneer of "democracy," as the "representatives of the Syrian people"
is not a "a big step"
as
President Obama declared. Instead, it is a step as illegitimate and morally
bankrupt as it is desperate. It is a stumble forward - and one that threatens to
trip up anyone within arms reach of America as it takes it.
2.
Land Destroyer Report
US-Backed Syrian Opposition Demands Support for Al Qaeda
US-handpicked opposition leader, Moaz al-Khatib
wants US to reconsider terror listing for Al Qaeda's
al-Nusra front.
December 13, 2012 (LD) - As part of the US' charade
in
declaring support and recognition of the so-called "Syrian" opposition, it
added one of the more extreme groups that make up the militant front operating
inside Syria to a
list of sanctioned terrorist organizations. The idea was to have a scapegoat
to pin atrocities on while the West armed, funded, and provided military support
for the rest of the extremist groups ravaging Syria.
The ploy quickly fell apart
however, when the US' own handpicked opposition leader, Moaz
al-Khatib spoke out in protest. Reuters
quoted al-Khatib as saying:
"The decision to consider a party
that is fighting the regime as a terrorist party needs to be reviewed.
We might disagree with some parties and their ideas
and their political and ideological vision. But we affirm that all the guns of
the rebels are aimed at overthrowing the tyrannical criminal
regime."
Al-Khatib himself openly declares his intentions of establishing an "Islamic state"
upon the ashes of the currently secular Syria, and has ties with the extremist
Muslim Brotherhood. He was also a representative of Western big oil interests,
in particular Royal Dutch Shell. Al-Khatib had worked at the al-Furat
Petroleum Company for six years,
according to the
BBC,
which is partnered
with Shell Oil. Al-Khatib is also said to have lobbied for Shell in Syria
between 2003-2004, and has likewise taught classes in both Europe and the United
States, this according to his biography
featured on his own
website.
The implications of the US-backed "opposition coalition" in
Syria clearly collaborating with and acting in support of the terrorist Jabhat
al-Nusra front, identifies it as providing material support or resources to a
designated foreign terrorist organization, as per
USC
§ 2339B which reads:
"Whoever knowingly provides material
support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or
conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned
for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have
knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as
defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in
terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism
(as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act,
Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989)."
Clearly, at
the very least, the US cannot "recognize" such a group as the "representatives"
of the Syrian people, nor can it support them in any manner, financial,
militarily, or politically. To do so would implicate the US government itself as
in violation of its own anti-terror laws.
The so-called "Syrian" opposition has been an increasing
embarrassment to the Western interests that have maliciously arrayed them
against the Syrian people, as far
back as 2007. And while NATO is willfully utilizing Al Qaeda's own regional
networks to
flood terrorists into Syria, to have the leaders of their own contrived
opposition front openly demand that Al Qaeda be given support and recognition
gives the world's public insight into the depths of illegitimacy from which the
West is operating in pursuit of regime change in Syria.
ELBRIDGE, N.Y., —BibleStudySpace.Com is a Christian social network with a purpose, to create awareness of the Christian persecution around the world. The silent holocaust of Christian martyrs taking place is not reported by Fox, CNN, NBC and the other secular news networks. The war on Christianity in America is ignored by both Republicans and Democrats. For more than two years Obama did not fill the post of religious freedom ambassador, that works against religious persecution across the world. Obama filled it only after heavy pressure from the public and Congress. Suppose that there was a country where Muslims were being massacred every month, would the Obama Administration and media remain silent on a Muslim holocaust?
