Former CBS News president Richard Salant (1961 - 64 and 1966 - 79) explained the major media's role: "Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have." ...and to this very day most Americans haven't noticed they're being brained washed! ~ N. Hooben
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Breitbart's 'possible' death gun shown at United States Senate hearings!
I said, "possible" not "probable"...but the headline did get to you, didn't it!
The other day I cross- posted a video that suggests and/or hints at some foul play in the death of Andrew Breitbart (you can watch the video here). Certainly I was surprised and shocked at Breitbart's sudden death considering his age and I was not aware of any medical problems. Another observation that didn't make much sense to me was the fact that reports came out almost immediately that he died of natural causes with no indication that an autopsy was performed...now how many people are reported of having died of natural causes when they are in their early 40's? Strange isn't it? In any event, maybe it was my imagination running wild but immediately upon learning of his death I thought foul play was involved, especially after having stated at the recent CPAC meeting in Washington, DC that he was about to release some incriminating videos of Barack Husein Obama. Without ever having heard of a sophisticated dart gun my first thoughts were that such an item existed. This thought was amplified when I heard that Andrew was seen walking outside his home shortly prior to his death. As the days passed I tried to put those wild dreams to rest. But as suddenly as I forgot they were reincarnated in the video below. The dart gun scenario does exist! Not only is it an item designed for clandestine use, it was openly discussed at some hearings in front of the United States Senate (I say Senate, because I recognized Senator John Tower from Texas and Senator Barry Goldwater from Arizona...and with those two identified it would put the time frame in the early 60's possibly 1960 or 61.) So before chastising me about my wild-ish dreams check out this video and let your imagination run wild. ~ Norman E. Hooben
The other day I cross- posted a video that suggests and/or hints at some foul play in the death of Andrew Breitbart (you can watch the video here). Certainly I was surprised and shocked at Breitbart's sudden death considering his age and I was not aware of any medical problems. Another observation that didn't make much sense to me was the fact that reports came out almost immediately that he died of natural causes with no indication that an autopsy was performed...now how many people are reported of having died of natural causes when they are in their early 40's? Strange isn't it? In any event, maybe it was my imagination running wild but immediately upon learning of his death I thought foul play was involved, especially after having stated at the recent CPAC meeting in Washington, DC that he was about to release some incriminating videos of Barack Husein Obama. Without ever having heard of a sophisticated dart gun my first thoughts were that such an item existed. This thought was amplified when I heard that Andrew was seen walking outside his home shortly prior to his death. As the days passed I tried to put those wild dreams to rest. But as suddenly as I forgot they were reincarnated in the video below. The dart gun scenario does exist! Not only is it an item designed for clandestine use, it was openly discussed at some hearings in front of the United States Senate (I say Senate, because I recognized Senator John Tower from Texas and Senator Barry Goldwater from Arizona...and with those two identified it would put the time frame in the early 60's possibly 1960 or 61.) So before chastising me about my wild-ish dreams check out this video and let your imagination run wild. ~ Norman E. Hooben
Friday, March 2, 2012
China: 40 years after Nixon... In the overall scheme of things has anything changed?
by Norman E. Hooben
Its been now forty years since President Nixon was given the credit for opening the doors to China. I remember the event quite clearly although at the time I had no idea what the future would bring regarding this new era of diplomacy with an otherwise unknown, or in some sense, a restrictive society. My own feelings at the time was of a country where its own citizens were held hostage by a totalitarian government with a proletariat workforce (Marxism). Though China has taken on some of the idiosyncrasies of capitalism I don't think in the overall scheme of things much has changed. Sure tourism has opened the door for westerners to get a glimpse of the great wall but there's still a wall that separates us ideologically that gives meaning to the phrase, "East is east and west is west and never the two shall meet." So in the commentary that follows my first concern is the use of the word friendship in the title. Are we really friends or are we taken advantage of during these times of complacency in American culture amplified by weak leadership in both the Executive and Legislative branches of government.
While the author attempts to paint a pretty picture of our relationship with China you might want to read some other opinions.
Seeds of 1972 blossomed into Sino-US friendship
The article was compiled by Global Times reporter Yu Jincui based on a written interview with Chas Freeman, a retired diplomat who now chairs a global business development firm, Projects International, Inc. He was the principal US interpreter during President Nixon's path-breaking visit to China in 1972. yujincui@globaltimes.com.cn
Its been now forty years since President Nixon was given the credit for opening the doors to China. I remember the event quite clearly although at the time I had no idea what the future would bring regarding this new era of diplomacy with an otherwise unknown, or in some sense, a restrictive society. My own feelings at the time was of a country where its own citizens were held hostage by a totalitarian government with a proletariat workforce (Marxism). Though China has taken on some of the idiosyncrasies of capitalism I don't think in the overall scheme of things much has changed. Sure tourism has opened the door for westerners to get a glimpse of the great wall but there's still a wall that separates us ideologically that gives meaning to the phrase, "East is east and west is west and never the two shall meet." So in the commentary that follows my first concern is the use of the word friendship in the title. Are we really friends or are we taken advantage of during these times of complacency in American culture amplified by weak leadership in both the Executive and Legislative branches of government.
While the author attempts to paint a pretty picture of our relationship with China you might want to read some other opinions.
1. Is China trying to poison Americans and their pets?The following from: Global Times
2. China is the enemy: Their plan to conquer America and the West.
Seeds of 1972 blossomed into Sino-US friendship
This month marks the 40th anniversary of former US President Richard Nixon's icebreaking visit to China.
I had lived in China - in Taiwan - and studied Chinese there, but the Nixon visit in 1972 was my first time on the mainland. One cannot gain much impression of a place when one is limited to official meetings and sightseeing. Still, Beijing and Shanghai then preserved a great deal of the traditional architecture and character that modernization has erased. I had the sense of stepping back in time and into a society that worked at a slower pace than the outside world.
In 1972, China was in the last throes of the Cultural Revolution (1966-76). China was internationally isolated and estranged from both the Soviet Union and the US, both of which it saw as threatening to attack it. China was desperately poor. It sought economic autarky and was not a factor in the global economy. Both Chinese and Americans viewed the Nixon visit to Beijing as a strategic turning point, but neither had any idea how far-reaching its effects would be.
For Americans, who watched the events in Beijing, Hangzhou, and Shanghai on television, the President's visit to China was a voyage of discovery to a land few had known and almost none had seen since the establishment of the People's Republic of China 23 years before. Chinese were told to stay off the streets and keep their peace during the visit. They made no fuss of the visit but were aware that something extraordinary was happening.
The immense prestige of Chairman Mao was invoked to legitimize the strategic reorientation that the visit accomplished. Most but not all Americans and Chinese applauded the statesmanship and vision of their leaders. A few on both sides could not overcome past feelings of enmity and were opposed.
The forces that have made China a respected participant in global governance and a major factor in the global economy were first unleashed in February 1972. Within six years, the very limited Sino-US interaction that the Shanghai Communiqué facilitated led to the process of reform and opening-up that has transformed China, its role in the world, and the world itself.
The Nixon visit showed that China and the US were capable of rising above the major differences we had at the time and cooperating for mutual advantage. February 1972 saw the beginning of a process of rapprochement in which, with much hard work by both sides, the differences between us steadily narrowed.
In the following 40 years, we have developed habits of cooperation to replace the mutual isolation of the past. We have gone from enmity to partnership in almost every field of human endeavor. We have come to respect each other, even as we sometimes differ.
Today, there are still a few serious disputes between the US and China but there is far better mutual understanding, differences are much less, and constructive dialogue takes place between us at all levels. The relationship begun by a few officials on both sides in 1972 has grown to have deep roots in the two peoples.
The past 40 years have brought enormous progress in our relations. There will continue to be incidents, arguments, and twists and turns as we move forward but I see no reason that the next 40 years should not register even more progress.
As the recent visit of Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping to the US illustrates, our leaders now consider it entirely normal to visit and talk to each other. Both Americans and Chinese have come to understand how important it is for our two countries to explore ways to work together to the common advantage. In 1972, we had no relationship at all. Now we are interdependent. Our interactions, non-existent or indirect 40 years ago, are now the most consequential in the world.
We have come a very long way from the hostile relationship of 40 years ago and we should by now have learned not attribute malevolent intent to each other when our only basis for doing so is speculative or a priori reasoning.
I had lived in China - in Taiwan - and studied Chinese there, but the Nixon visit in 1972 was my first time on the mainland. One cannot gain much impression of a place when one is limited to official meetings and sightseeing. Still, Beijing and Shanghai then preserved a great deal of the traditional architecture and character that modernization has erased. I had the sense of stepping back in time and into a society that worked at a slower pace than the outside world.
In 1972, China was in the last throes of the Cultural Revolution (1966-76). China was internationally isolated and estranged from both the Soviet Union and the US, both of which it saw as threatening to attack it. China was desperately poor. It sought economic autarky and was not a factor in the global economy. Both Chinese and Americans viewed the Nixon visit to Beijing as a strategic turning point, but neither had any idea how far-reaching its effects would be.
For Americans, who watched the events in Beijing, Hangzhou, and Shanghai on television, the President's visit to China was a voyage of discovery to a land few had known and almost none had seen since the establishment of the People's Republic of China 23 years before. Chinese were told to stay off the streets and keep their peace during the visit. They made no fuss of the visit but were aware that something extraordinary was happening.
The immense prestige of Chairman Mao was invoked to legitimize the strategic reorientation that the visit accomplished. Most but not all Americans and Chinese applauded the statesmanship and vision of their leaders. A few on both sides could not overcome past feelings of enmity and were opposed.
The forces that have made China a respected participant in global governance and a major factor in the global economy were first unleashed in February 1972. Within six years, the very limited Sino-US interaction that the Shanghai Communiqué facilitated led to the process of reform and opening-up that has transformed China, its role in the world, and the world itself.
The Nixon visit showed that China and the US were capable of rising above the major differences we had at the time and cooperating for mutual advantage. February 1972 saw the beginning of a process of rapprochement in which, with much hard work by both sides, the differences between us steadily narrowed.
In the following 40 years, we have developed habits of cooperation to replace the mutual isolation of the past. We have gone from enmity to partnership in almost every field of human endeavor. We have come to respect each other, even as we sometimes differ.
Today, there are still a few serious disputes between the US and China but there is far better mutual understanding, differences are much less, and constructive dialogue takes place between us at all levels. The relationship begun by a few officials on both sides in 1972 has grown to have deep roots in the two peoples.
The past 40 years have brought enormous progress in our relations. There will continue to be incidents, arguments, and twists and turns as we move forward but I see no reason that the next 40 years should not register even more progress.
As the recent visit of Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping to the US illustrates, our leaders now consider it entirely normal to visit and talk to each other. Both Americans and Chinese have come to understand how important it is for our two countries to explore ways to work together to the common advantage. In 1972, we had no relationship at all. Now we are interdependent. Our interactions, non-existent or indirect 40 years ago, are now the most consequential in the world.
We have come a very long way from the hostile relationship of 40 years ago and we should by now have learned not attribute malevolent intent to each other when our only basis for doing so is speculative or a priori reasoning.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
The death of Andrew Breitbart...don't rule out murder.
Now some pundits will jump at the suggestion that foul play was involved with the death of Andrew Breitbart or maybe they'll dismiss it as totally insane. Not me however, it was the very first thought that came to mind... and why would I even think such? Back during the elections of 2008 I was personally targeted with two separate threats...one on the Internet and the other via a late night phone call...and yes, I did report the call to the police. ~ Norman E. Hooben
Video from YouTube click here to read contrasting comments.
Video from YouTube click here to read contrasting comments.
Conclusion: There is probable cause that Obama's birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.
I'm certain beyond a reasonable doubt that Barack Husein Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. I've felt this way from the beginning even if in the beginning it was only a hunch. Obama, from the very start of any suspicion, acted like he was trying to hide something. In fact, it wasn't even an act. As time moved on he literally spent millions of dollars in attempts to keep the legal beagles at bay. Any normal, sane, prudent, or whatever kind of person who was innocent would have produced the birth certificate without any further ado. What was he trying to hide? Well that's a dumb question...any normal, sane, prudent, and honest person knows the guy is a fraud. Everything about him is a fraud. He comes from a questionable background and or no background at all...as in Columbia University, no one ever saw him. And how come his visas and/or passports mysteriously disappeared...we do know he visited Pakistan but on what passport did he travel... In any event, the following description with accompanied videos should be more than enough to present to any court in the land reasonable grounds that Obama is guilty of a crime.
Albeit Obama is guilty as sin the problem is agravated by the judicial system that is embedded with judges that have the same mindset as Obama... and not only that, we have a congress (both the senate and the house) that is embedded with left-wing anti-american legislators. This will be a tough row to hoe... I wish you luck Sheriff Arpaio. ~ Norman E. Hooben
From World Net Daily
Sheriff Joe: 'Probable cause' Obama certificate a fraud
Team wants investigation elevated to criminal-forgery probe – person of interest ID'd
PHOENIX – An investigative “Cold Case Posse” launched six months ago by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County – has concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.
The investigative team has asked Arpaio, who is at a news conference in Phoenix live-streamed by WND TV that began at 3 p.m. Eastern time, to elevate the investigation to a criminal probe that will make available the resources of his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.
The posse says it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama’s birth certificate.
Arapaio, known for his strict enforcement of immigration laws, commissioned the investigative team after local citizens presented him with a petition expressing concern that Obama might not be eligible for Arizona’s presidential ballot.
In addition to the live-streaming, WND is making available to the public a report distributed to media today by Arpaio’s investigators.
GET A FREE COPY OF THE ARPAIO REPORT THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED TO PRESS TODAY
The posse, comprised of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, has interviewed dozens of witnesses and examined hundreds of documents. It also has taken numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.
Mike Zullo, Arpaio’s lead investigator, said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.
“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.
The investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.
The investigation was launched after 250 members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, presented a signed petition to Arpaio in August 2011 asking him to undertake the investigation.
The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was used to place Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.
Arpaio believes a congressional investigation might be warranted and has asked that any information relevant to the investigation held by other law enforcement agencies be forwarded to his office.
The Cold Case Posse advised Arpaio that they believe forgers committed two crimes. First, they say it appears the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.
“A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery,” Arpaio said.
Among the evidence released at the press conference are five videos – which can be seen at the end of this article – to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.
The videos consist of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document. They display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.
The investigators contend the videos illustrate their conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan is enhanced by Optical Character Recognition, OCR, and optimized.
Additionally, the posse says, the videos demonstrate that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar’s name stamp and the registrar’s date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.
“That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself,” Zullo said, emphasizing that if the registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.
The investigators also chronicled a series of allegedly inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding any original birth records held by the Hawaii Department of Health.
“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”
Arpaio emphasized that the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm and electronic records to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.
The sheriff said the president should also authorize Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, to provide corroboration for the records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.
“Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted,” Zullo said.
“In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States.”
In addition, investigators say they have developed credible evidence that President Obama’s Selective Service card was a forgery, based on an examination of the postal date stamp on the document. Also, records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama’s birth.
Videos connected to the investigation:
1. Introduction – Regular Scan:
2. Layers, Stamp & Noise
3. OCR Theory
4. Optimization
5. Conclusion
6. Selective Service
probable cause
noun Law.reasonable ground for a belief, as, in a criminal case, that the accused was guilty of the crime, or, in a civil case, that grounds for the action existed: used especially as a defense to an action for malicious prosecution.
Albeit Obama is guilty as sin the problem is agravated by the judicial system that is embedded with judges that have the same mindset as Obama... and not only that, we have a congress (both the senate and the house) that is embedded with left-wing anti-american legislators. This will be a tough row to hoe... I wish you luck Sheriff Arpaio. ~ Norman E. Hooben
From World Net Daily
Sheriff Joe: 'Probable cause' Obama certificate a fraud
Team wants investigation elevated to criminal-forgery probe – person of interest ID'd
PHOENIX – An investigative “Cold Case Posse” launched six months ago by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County – has concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.
The investigative team has asked Arpaio, who is at a news conference in Phoenix live-streamed by WND TV that began at 3 p.m. Eastern time, to elevate the investigation to a criminal probe that will make available the resources of his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.
The posse says it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama’s birth certificate.
Arapaio, known for his strict enforcement of immigration laws, commissioned the investigative team after local citizens presented him with a petition expressing concern that Obama might not be eligible for Arizona’s presidential ballot.
In addition to the live-streaming, WND is making available to the public a report distributed to media today by Arpaio’s investigators.
GET A FREE COPY OF THE ARPAIO REPORT THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED TO PRESS TODAY
The posse, comprised of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, has interviewed dozens of witnesses and examined hundreds of documents. It also has taken numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.
Mike Zullo, Arpaio’s lead investigator, said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.
“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.
The investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.
The investigation was launched after 250 members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, presented a signed petition to Arpaio in August 2011 asking him to undertake the investigation.
The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was used to place Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.
Arpaio believes a congressional investigation might be warranted and has asked that any information relevant to the investigation held by other law enforcement agencies be forwarded to his office.
The Cold Case Posse advised Arpaio that they believe forgers committed two crimes. First, they say it appears the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.
“A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery,” Arpaio said.
Among the evidence released at the press conference are five videos – which can be seen at the end of this article – to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.
The videos consist of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document. They display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.
The investigators contend the videos illustrate their conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan is enhanced by Optical Character Recognition, OCR, and optimized.
Additionally, the posse says, the videos demonstrate that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar’s name stamp and the registrar’s date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.
“That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself,” Zullo said, emphasizing that if the registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.
The investigators also chronicled a series of allegedly inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding any original birth records held by the Hawaii Department of Health.
“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”
Arpaio emphasized that the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm and electronic records to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.
The sheriff said the president should also authorize Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, to provide corroboration for the records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.
“Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted,” Zullo said.
“In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States.”
In addition, investigators say they have developed credible evidence that President Obama’s Selective Service card was a forgery, based on an examination of the postal date stamp on the document. Also, records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama’s birth.
Videos connected to the investigation:
1. Introduction – Regular Scan:
2. Layers, Stamp & Noise
3. OCR Theory
4. Optimization
5. Conclusion
6. Selective Service
The worst of all living creatures...careful now, that could mean you!
And the consensus is….
Islam is by far the poorest excuse for what the western world would describe as a religion of peace. Take for example the following:
In the Qur'an, Jews are those who "earned your anger" & Christians are those who "went astray". We are described as the "worst of living creatures". They recite Surah Al-Fatiha seventeen times each day, reminding Allah why he should burn us.
The statement comes to me in an email describing a United Nations censorship resolution concerning Islamophobia… (Quick note: according to the likes of Barack Hussein Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton we should have no fear of Islam nor are we at war with Islam…even though Islam has declared war on us…just thought you should see an example of oxymoron(s) in real life). When we think of religion we tend to think of a philosophy of life that promotes goodness, kindness, honesty, love, and all those attributes that assure us of passage into the next world if we keep to the prescribed tenets. Westerners, I believe, would not consider hate as an attribute with good intentions. Yet Islam appears to promote hate as a way of life against all those who do not follow Allah. When you hear some Muslim cleric being interviewed regarding these matters they will invariably come up with some excuse about improper translation from the Quran. So we look at just one of these Arabic writings and obtain the generally accepted translation and the consensus is: deny the truth (Allah), and you burn in hell…you are the worst of all creatures. No thanks, Allah, I’ll take my chances with an all forgiving Lord and Savior who does not think I’m the worst of all creatures. ~ Norman E. Hooben
The following from Islam Awakened
Arabic Source and Roman Transliteration
| |||
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ وَالْمُشْرِكِينَ فِي نَارِ جَهَنَّمَ خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ هُمْ شَرُّ الْبَرِيَّةِ
| |||
Inna allatheena kafaroo min ahli alkitabi waalmushrikeena fee nari jahannama khalideena feeha ola-ika hum sharru albariyyati
| |||
Generally Accepted Translations of the Meaning
| |||
Verily, those who [despite all evidence] are bent on denying the truth - [be they] from among the followers of earlier revelation or from among those who ascribe divinity to aught beside God - will find themselves in the fire of hell, therein to abide: they are the worst of all creatures.
| |||
Lo! those who disbelieve, among the People of the Scripture and the idolaters, will abide in fire of hell. They are the worst of created beings.
| |||
Surely those who disbelieve from among the followers of the Book and the polytheists shall be in the fire of hell, abiding therein; they are the worst of men.
| |||
Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Truly, those who were ungrateful among the People of the Book and the ones who are polytheists will be in the fire of hell, ones who will dwell in it forever. Those are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Those of the deniers of truth among the People of the Book and the polytheists will dwell forever in Hell-fire. They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Those People of the Book who disbelieve as well as the associators will remain in Hell fire; those are the worst creatures.
| |||
The unbelievers among Ahl AL-Kitab and the idolaters are indeed the eternal dwellers of Hell; they are the worst among Allah's intellectual beings-
| |||
Those who rejected from the people of the Scripture and those who set up partners are in the fires of Hell abiding therein, those are the worst of creation.
| |||
Those who disbelieve among the People of the Book and the idolaters will have the Fire of Hell, there to remain. They are the worst of creation.
| |||
Verily those who disbelieve from among the people of the Book and the associaters shall be cast into the Hell-fire, as abiders therein. These! they are the worst of the creation.
| |||
That truly those who disbelieved from the Book's people and the sharers/takers of partners (with God are) in Hell's fire immortally/eternally in it, those, they are the creation's worst.
| |||
The People of the Book who are kafir and the idolaters will be in the Fire of Hell, remaining in it timelessly, for ever. They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Surely those who disbelieve (after the Clear Evidence has come to them) –from among the People of the Book and from among the polytheists– will be in the fire of Hell (a seed of which they bear in their hearts), abiding therein. They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Indeed the faithless from among the People of the Book and the polytheists will be in the fire of hell, to remain in it [forever]. It is they who are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Verily, those who disbelieve from among the people of the Scripture and (from among) those who associate gods with God shall be consigned to the Fire of Gehenna. Therein they shall abide. It is they who are the worst of all creatures.
| |||
Verily, those who disbelieve amongst the people of the Book and the idolaters shall be in the fire of hell, to dwell therein for aye; they are wretched creatures!
| |||
Surely (the ones) who have disbelieved among the population of the Book (Or: family of the Book; i.e., the Jews and Christians) and the associators (Those who associate others with Allah) will be in the Fire of Hell, eternally (abiding) therein; those are they who are the most evil beings (Literally: Initiated creatures).
| |||
The disbelievers among the People of the Book and the pagans will dwell forever in hell; they are the worst of all creatures.
| |||
Surely those who disbelieved from among the People of the Book and the polytheists will be in the fire of Jahannam , in which they will be living forever. Those are the worst of all human beings.
| |||
Verily, those who are bent on denying the Truth, be they among the People of the Scripture or the idol worshipers under any guise, will abide in Hell. They (who see the Truth and then deny it) are the worst of all created beings.
| |||
Those who reject (truth), among the (Jewish and Christian) People of the Book and among the polytheists, will be in the Fire of the Hell, to live in there (for ever)&mdash They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Surely those who disbelieve from among the people of the Book and the Pagans shall be in fire of hell, to dwell therein forever. They are the worst of all creatures.
| |||
Dr. Munir Munshey
|
Whoever denies among the people of the book and the polytheists, would be in the fire of hell, and would stay there forever. Such are the worst of the creation.
| ||
Indeed those who disbelieve from among the People of the Book and the polytheists (all) will be (abiding) in the Fire of Hell. They are its permanent dwellers. It is they who are the worst of the Creation.
| |||
Controversial, deprecated, or status undetermined works
| |||
Those of old religions (who have seen the clear proof and knowingly have refused it), as well as the idol worshipers, have bought the Hell Fire for themselves and are the worse people.
| |||
Faridul Haque
|
Indeed all disbelievers, the People of the Book(s) and the polytheists, are in the fire of hell – they will remain in it for ever; it is they who are the worst among the creation.
| ||
Hasan Al-Fatih Qaribullah
|
The unbelievers among the People of the Book and the idolaters shall be for ever in the Fire of Gehenna (Hell). They are the worst of all creatures.
| ||
Those who disbelieve from among the People of the Book and the idolaters will be in the Fire of hell, abiding therein. They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Muhammad Ahmed - Samira
|
Surely the unbelievers among the people of the Book and the idolaters, will abide in the fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
| ||
Verily, those who disbelieve from among the People of the Book and the idolaters, will be in the Fire of Hell, abiding therein. They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Those who disbelieved among the people of the scripture, and the idol worshipers, have incurred the fire of Gehenna forever. They are the worst creatures.
| |||
Dr. Kamal Omar
|
Verily, those who have disbelieved out of Ahl-ul-Kitab and Al-Mushrikun: (they shall enter) in the Fire of Hell (as) dwellers therein. Those people: they are evil among the creations.
| ||
Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islam, the Quran and Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him)) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikoon will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Those who disbelieved – be they from among the People of the Book or among those who associated others with Allah in His Divinity– shall be in the Fire, and will abide in it. They are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Non-Muslim and/or Orientalist works
| |||
The unbelievers of the People of the Book and the idolaters shall be in the Fire of Gehenna, therein dwelling forever; those are the worst of creatures.
| |||
Verily, those who disbelieve amongst the people of the Book and the idolaters shall be in the fire of hell, to dwell therein for aye; they are wretched creatures!
| |||
Verily those who believe not, among those who have received the scriptures, and among the idolaters, shall be cast into the fire of hell, to remain therein for ever. These are the worst of creatures.
| |||
But the unbelievers among the people of the Book, and among the Polytheists, shall go into the fire of Gehenna to abide therein for aye. Of all creatures are they the worst!
| |||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)