by Dean James
A Kansas City mosque that has deep ties to the Muslim Brotherhood has received close to $3 MILLION in federal grants over the past several years information obtained from a federal spending database reveals.
According to The Daily Caller, the Islamic Center of Greater Kansas City has received $2,739,891 in taxpayer money from the Department of Agriculture. The money largely went to the mosque’s Crescent Clinic to provide services through the Women, Infant and Children nutrition program, known as WIC.
The most recent dispersal of federal funds on record occurred on Oct. 1 in the amount of $327,436.
The mosque is owned by the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), which acts as a financial holding company for Islamic organizations. It offers sharia-compliant financial products to Muslim investors, operates Islamic schools and owns more than 300 other mosques throughout the U.S.
Founded in 1973 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood-backed Muslim Students Association, NAIT’s most controversial connection is to the 2007 and 2008 Holy Land Foundation terror financing cases. Along with other Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations like the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), NAIT was named a co-conspirator in the federal case but was not indicted.
At the Holy Land Foundation trial, evidence was presented that ISNA diverted funds from the accounts it held with NAIT to institutions linked to Hamas and to Mousa Abu Marzook, a senior Hamas leader.
Federal prosecutors introduced evidence in the case that “established that ISNA and NAIT were among those organizations created by the U.S.-Muslim Brotherhood.” Hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of checks drawn from ISNA’s account and deposited in the Holy Land Foundation’s account with NAIT were made payable to “the Palestinian Mujahadeen,” which is the original name for Hamas’ military wing.
While Hamas was designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government in 1997 and is considered the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, the larger Muslim Brotherhood is not itself designated as a terrorist group.
Obama is giving taxpayer money to groups that will potentially be used to fund known terrorist organizations here and overseas.
And as Conservative Tribune points out, even though the Obama administration has refused to list the Muslim Brotherhood itself as a terrorist organization, much of the rest of the world HAS done just that. The British government recently declared that the group’s ideology and tactics “are contrary to our values and have been contrary to our national interests and our national security.”
The NAIT also has a number of other ties to terrorism outside of the Holy Land terror financing case, in that they own a number of mosques and Islamic centers across the country that have featured or harbored controversial imams and individuals who have gone on to commit terrorist acts.
It would be nothing less than criminal if it turns out that our tax dollars have been used to fund terrorist organizations bent on slaughtering Americans and imposing their seventh century way of life on our modern society.
Every American needs to know that Obama is giving taxpayer dollars to Muslim Brotherhood-linked mosques and Islamic centers that have been accused of funding terrorism in the past.
You might also like this- Colorado Company Instantly Regrets Giving 200 Muslims Jobs, They Get NASTY Payback
by S. Noble December 31, 2015
_________________________________
Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram's 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded "organizations of our friends" that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These "friends" were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims "that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands ... so that ... God's religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions."
Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth (or “soft”) jihad aiming to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims' efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram's document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of one day creating “the global Islamic state.”
In line with this objective, Akram and the Brotherhood resolved to "settle" Islam and the Islamic movement within the United States, so that the Muslim religion could be "enabled within the souls, minds and the lives of the people of the country.” Akram explained that this could be accomplished “through the establishment of firmly-rooted organizations on whose bases civilization, structure and testimony are built.” He urged Muslim leaders to make “a shift from the collision mentality to the absorption mentality,” meaning that they should abandon any tactics involving defiance or confrontation, and seek instead to implant into the larger society a host of seemingly benign Islamic groups with ostensibly unobjectionable motives; once those groups had gained a measure of public acceptance, they would be in a position to more effectively promote societal transformation by the old Communist technique of “boring from within.”
“The heart and the core” of this strategy, said Akram, was contingent upon these groups' ability to develop “a mastery of the art of 'coalitions.'” That is, by working synergistically they could complement, augment, and amplify one another's efforts. Added Akram: “The big challenge that is ahead of us is how to turn these seeds or 'scattered' elements into comprehensive, stable, 'settled' organizations that are connected with our Movement and which fly in our orbit and take orders from our guidance.” The ultimate objective was not only an enlarged Muslim presence, but also implementation of the Brotherhood objectives of transforming pluralistic societies, particularly America, into Islamic states, and sweeping away Western notions of legal equality, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech.
The Most Frightening Thing About a Hillary Clinton Presidency
Last month, State Department emails obtained by Judicial Watch revealed that Clinton's close personal aide Huma Abedin (who has well-documented ties to the terror group the Muslim Brotherhood) warned colleagues that Clinton's mental stability appeared to be deteriorating:
The most recent dispersal of federal funds on record occurred on Oct. 1 in the amount of $327,436.
 |
| Provided by Storm'n Norm'n |
Founded in 1973 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood-backed Muslim Students Association, NAIT’s most controversial connection is to the 2007 and 2008 Holy Land Foundation terror financing cases. Along with other Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations like the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), NAIT was named a co-conspirator in the federal case but was not indicted.
At the Holy Land Foundation trial, evidence was presented that ISNA diverted funds from the accounts it held with NAIT to institutions linked to Hamas and to Mousa Abu Marzook, a senior Hamas leader.
Federal prosecutors introduced evidence in the case that “established that ISNA and NAIT were among those organizations created by the U.S.-Muslim Brotherhood.” Hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of checks drawn from ISNA’s account and deposited in the Holy Land Foundation’s account with NAIT were made payable to “the Palestinian Mujahadeen,” which is the original name for Hamas’ military wing.
While Hamas was designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government in 1997 and is considered the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, the larger Muslim Brotherhood is not itself designated as a terrorist group.
Obama is giving taxpayer money to groups that will potentially be used to fund known terrorist organizations here and overseas.
And as Conservative Tribune points out, even though the Obama administration has refused to list the Muslim Brotherhood itself as a terrorist organization, much of the rest of the world HAS done just that. The British government recently declared that the group’s ideology and tactics “are contrary to our values and have been contrary to our national interests and our national security.”
The NAIT also has a number of other ties to terrorism outside of the Holy Land terror financing case, in that they own a number of mosques and Islamic centers across the country that have featured or harbored controversial imams and individuals who have gone on to commit terrorist acts.
It would be nothing less than criminal if it turns out that our tax dollars have been used to fund terrorist organizations bent on slaughtering Americans and imposing their seventh century way of life on our modern society.
Every American needs to know that Obama is giving taxpayer dollars to Muslim Brotherhood-linked mosques and Islamic centers that have been accused of funding terrorism in the past.
__________________________________________
Similar story from the Independent Sentinel follows:
1
Obama Gives Millions in Tax Dollars to a Mosque Closely Tied to Terrorismby S. Noble December 31, 2015
A Kansas-City mosque has
received nearly $3 million in federal grants – taxpayer dollars – in just three
years. The kicker is that the Islamic Center of Greater Kansas City is tied to
the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization.
The money comes from taxpayers
and gets laundered through the Department of Agriculture in the form of food
stamps and other benefits.
In October alone, the
mosque received $327,436 dollars.
The mosque is owned by the
North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), a financial holding company and Muslim
Brotherhood offshoot which is working with various Islamic organizations
promoting Sharia law in American. It owns 300 plus mosques and Islamic centers
including ISNA and CAIR.
NAIT owns the Boston
bombers’ mosque; the mosque attended by Anwar al-Awalaki; the mosque where
Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi attended and who eventually flew American
Flight 77 into the Pentagon on 9/11; helped the San Bernardino terrorists
secure housing; and provided $100,000 to bail out Elton Simpson for lying to
the feds about trying to join a Somali terrorist group – Simpson later opened
fire on the Garland, Texas cartoon event with his cohort Nadir Soofi.
NAIT, CAIR and ISNA
are unindicted co-conspirators as part of The Holy Land Foundation
terrorism trial. They are tied to terrorism through the Muslim Brotherhood and
Hamas.
Obama uses the Muslim
Brotherhood organizations as advisors but they have been declared terrorists in
the Muslim world by the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. A recent report to the
British Parliament declared that the Muslim Brotherhood’s ideology and tactics
“are contrary to our values and have been contrary to our national interests
and our national security.”
The UK is currently
looking at the dangers to national security presented by the organizations tied
to the Brotherhood.
The UK allowed the report referenced above to be submitted to
parliament which was prepared under the direction of Sir John Jenkins and
which demonstrates that the “moderate” Brotherhood is not a solution to the
problem but the problem itself.
According to FrontPage Magazine: The
Jenkins report rejects the “moderate” label so often slapped on the hate group
by lazy media hacks. Instead it describes the Brotherhood as a clandestine
group organized into a “secretive ‘cell’ structure” seeking to create a
“Caliphate under sharia law” using a doctrine that allows “the use of extreme
violence in the pursuit of the perfect Islamic society”. That ideology is
inspired “Al Qaida and its offshoots”. The most obvious offshoot to employ this
Takfiri approach is ISIS.
Sir John concluded on this
complex subject that, for the most part, the Muslim Brotherhood prefers non-violent
incremental change for the sake of expediency but will resort to terrorism
“where gradualism is ineffective.”
Frank Gaffney, head of the
Center for Security Policy, extensively documented Muslim Brotherhood
subversion efforts, both in the United States and abroad.
Mr. Gaffney has said the
Muslim Brotherhood is the most dangerous group promoting the totalitarian and
Islamist supremacist doctrine of Sharia. Several Muslim Brotherhood supporters
have been identified as key advisers to Mr. Obama, according to Mr. Gaffney.
Egyptian press reports
after the ouster of Mr. Morsi have revealed extensive cooperation between the
CIA and the Muslim Brotherhood during Mr. Morsi’s presidency. We didn’t need
Egypt to tell us, it was obvious.
The benefits we are
funneling to this mosque could easily be supporting terrorism indirectly.
Despite the fact that the
Muslim world recognizes the danger of these organizations, Mr. Obama has
allowed these radical groups to hijack our foreign policy.
In July 2007, seven key
leaders of an Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and
Development (HLF) went on trial for charges that they engaged in money
laundering to finance the terror organization Hamas which falls under the
umbrella organization, the Muslim Brotherhood.
One of the most significant
documents presented into evidence during the trial was a document compiled by a
Muslim Brotherhood operative named Mohamed Akram.
Titled, “An Explanatory
Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”, the
18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 like-minded “organizations of
our friends” that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions
and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by
Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims “that
their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying
the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by
their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all
other religions.”
The 29 groups being
mobilized to destroy America from within can be found on this link.
(or see THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD'S "GENERAL STRATEGIC GOAL" FOR NORTH AMERICA reposted below ↓)
Conquering the US by jihad
was seen as too difficult and instead it was recommended that a
stealth (or “soft”) jihad be implemented to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over
every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as
working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims’
efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.”
It is believed that Eric
Holder and Barack Obama scuttled further investigation and charges against these terror-tied mosques
and organizations. Holder refused to give up documents not already
made public because he said there was a “political” aspect to his job which is
not the case. His job was “justice.”
Instead of funding these
mosques, shouldn’t we be shutting them down?
Click this link to the Daily Caller to
read more about NAIT’s ties to the Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia, and Sunni
Wahhabism
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD'S
"GENERAL STRATEGIC GOAL" FOR NORTH AMERICA
In July 2007, seven
key leaders of an Islamic charity known as the Holy Land
Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) went on trial for charges that
they had: (a) provided "material support and resources" to a foreign
terrorist organization (namely Hamas);
(b) engaged in money laundering; and (c) breached the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act, which prohibits transactions that threaten American
national security. Along with the seven named defendants, the U.S.
government released a list of approximately 300
"unindicted co-conspirators" and "joint venturers."
During the course of the HLF trial, many incriminating documents were entered
into evidence. Perhaps the most significant of these was "An Explanatory
Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,"
by the Muslim
Brotherhood operative Mohamed Akram. Federal investigators found
Akram's memo in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar
Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search. Elbarasse
was a member of the Palestine Committee, which the Muslim Brotherhood had
created to support Hamas in the United States.Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram's 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded "organizations of our friends" that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These "friends" were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims "that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands ... so that ... God's religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions."
Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth (or “soft”) jihad aiming to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims' efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram's document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of one day creating “the global Islamic state.”
In line with this objective, Akram and the Brotherhood resolved to "settle" Islam and the Islamic movement within the United States, so that the Muslim religion could be "enabled within the souls, minds and the lives of the people of the country.” Akram explained that this could be accomplished “through the establishment of firmly-rooted organizations on whose bases civilization, structure and testimony are built.” He urged Muslim leaders to make “a shift from the collision mentality to the absorption mentality,” meaning that they should abandon any tactics involving defiance or confrontation, and seek instead to implant into the larger society a host of seemingly benign Islamic groups with ostensibly unobjectionable motives; once those groups had gained a measure of public acceptance, they would be in a position to more effectively promote societal transformation by the old Communist technique of “boring from within.”
“The heart and the core” of this strategy, said Akram, was contingent upon these groups' ability to develop “a mastery of the art of 'coalitions.'” That is, by working synergistically they could complement, augment, and amplify one another's efforts. Added Akram: “The big challenge that is ahead of us is how to turn these seeds or 'scattered' elements into comprehensive, stable, 'settled' organizations that are connected with our Movement and which fly in our orbit and take orders from our guidance.” The ultimate objective was not only an enlarged Muslim presence, but also implementation of the Brotherhood objectives of transforming pluralistic societies, particularly America, into Islamic states, and sweeping away Western notions of legal equality, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech.
Akram and the
Brotherhood understood that in order to succeed in this endeavor, they needed
to appeal to different strata of the American population in different ways;
that whereas some people could be influenced by messages delivered from a
religious perspective, others would be more responsive to messages delivered by
educators, or bankers, or political figures, or journalists, etc. Thus, Akram's
blueprint for the advancement of the Islamic movement stressed the need to form
a coalition of groups coming from the worlds of education; religious proselytization;
political activism; audio and video production; print media; banking and
finance; the physical sciences; the social sciences; professional and business
networking; cultural affairs; the publishing and distribution of books;
children and teenagers; women's rights; vocational concerns; and jurisprudence.
By promoting the Islamic movement on such a wide variety of fronts, the Brotherhood and its allies could multiply exponentially their influence. Toward that end, the Akram/Brotherhood “Explanatory Memorandum” named the following 29 groups as the organizations they believed could collaborate effectively to destroy America from within – “if they all march according to one plan”:
By promoting the Islamic movement on such a wide variety of fronts, the Brotherhood and its allies could multiply exponentially their influence. Toward that end, the Akram/Brotherhood “Explanatory Memorandum” named the following 29 groups as the organizations they believed could collaborate effectively to destroy America from within – “if they all march according to one plan”:
·
Islamic
Society of North America (ISNA)
·
ISNA Fiqh
Committee (now known as the Fiqh
Council of North America)
·
Islamic
Medical Association (of North America)
·
Association
of Muslim Social Scientists (of North America)
·
Occupied
Land Fund (later known as the Holy Land
Foundation for Relief and Development)
·
Islamic
Information Center (of America)
By setting up these many front groups, the Muslim Brotherhood was emulating the Communist
Party tactic of creating interlocking front groups during the Cold War in order
to confuse its enemies and make it more difficult to combat
________________________________________The Most Frightening Thing About a Hillary Clinton Presidency
Rumors of Hillary Clinton's poor physical and mental condition have persisted for years.
Last month, State Department emails obtained by Judicial Watch revealed that Clinton's close personal aide Huma Abedin (who has well-documented ties to the terror group the Muslim Brotherhood) warned colleagues that Clinton's mental stability appeared to be deteriorating:Abedin advised Clinton aide and frequent companion Monica Hanley that it was “very important” to go over phone calls with Clinton because the former Secretary of State was “often confused...”
The emails, from Abedin’s “Huma@clintonemail.com” address, also reveal repeated security breaches, with the Secretary’s schedule and movements being sent and received through Abedin’s non-governmental and unsecured Clinton server account...
... The emails document requests for special State Department treatment for a Clinton Foundation associate and Abedin’s mother, a controversial Islamist leader.
This week, on three separate occasions, Clinton seemed to affirm Abedin's cautions, demonstrating significant confusion that raised the eyebrows of the media:
So we have a potential president who appears to have obvious and troubling issues with mental acuity.
Furthermore, her most trusted personal aide and proxy, Huma Abedin, is linked -- both directly and through family ties -- to the terrorist group the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Brotherhood, in addition to being a notorious sponsor of Islamic terror worldwide, traces its lineage directly back to Nazi Germany.
So one does not have to be overly paranoid to imagine that Hillary's personal version of Valerie Jarrett, i.e., a senior aide reputed to make many of the decisions in the White House, would be a potential Islamist sympathizer and/or conspirator.
Vote accordingly.
Hat tip: BadBlue News.
___________________________________________________
Meanwhile...some attribute this to be the number one problem with America ↓
 |
| This is a really dumb person...really, really dumb! |
_______________________________________________________
Added January 5, 2016 ↓
Mr. President: Disarm ISIS, not Us.
Today America is at war with ISIS. They attack our soldiers, our homeland and our friends. When our law abiding citizens need to protect our streets and communities most, President Obama chooses this same moment to limit OUR gun rights. This is my response to his unbelievable position. Mr. President: Disarm ISIS, not Us.
Posted by Elbert Lee Guillory on Tuesday, January 5, 2016
