Friday, March 28, 2025

NPR National Propaganda Radio


We spent half a billion dollars a year for stations like @NPR and @PBS to bury the truth, call half the country illiterate Nazis, have drag queens on tell kids to shimmy and shake and tell Americans that there are at least 3 genders. To summarize, CEO’s of NPR & PBS 2 biased women who went after Pres Trump with unwarranted verbal attacks & smears, employ 87 Dems 0 GOP. Promote transgender people to influence little children to shimmy & shake. Today, they just didn’t remember or their opinions simply evolved.\ Trump Gunner: Taxpayer dollars should not fund propaganda that insults half the nation, pushes radical ideologies, and distorts reality. NPR and PBS have abandoned objective journalism in favor of leftist activism. It's time to cut the funding and let them survive on their own if they want to push this nonsense! Media needs to be independent and not funded by the government. That's a pretty simple rule to live by. If they can't support themselves by attracting listeners or viewers and advertisers then they'll go under. Pretty basic stuff here. The News Variable Show of Whatfinger News, with Mal Antoni hosting... All controversial statements by Mr. Antoni are his own opinions. If you don't like them, don't watch. If you are one of those nut cases who watch just to complain, get a life or stick to fake news. We have no time for your BS. America needs patriots that just say it like it is. If you don't like it, too damn bad. Mr. Antoni is now the main editor over at Whatfinger News, the greatest aggregate news site out there - with more news and commentary daily than the next 7 competitors combined. Experience it once and you're hooked https://www.whatfinger.com/ ------

DISCLAIMER: This show contains opinions of the host and guests and is meant for education and/or entertainment purposes only. News Variable provides information and the sources where it was obtained. Viewer discretion is advised.

Elon Musk and the DOGE Team. Feds Spent Roughly $1 Billion To Conduct Survey That Could’ve Been Done For $10,000

 

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

BREAKING: Venezuelan President Maduro has Now Turned In State Evidence Against The Biden Administration.



BREAKING: Venezuelan President Just Publicly Surrendered to President Trump! Maduro Has Now Turned In State Evidence Against The Biden Admin & ls Releasing PROOF That Biden Asked The Venezuelan Government TO SHIP Tren de Aragua Drug Gangs Into The US.  

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Joe Biden, no jail time...yet! U.S. Representative Nancy Mace, "It will blow your effing mind."




 

SO GOD MADE TRUMP

 

Monday, March 24, 2025

Trump’s Mineral Revolution

Storm'n Norm'n 

Age of Trump 

Trump’s Mineral Revolution Secures Our National Sovereignty

by Ronald Beaty | Mar 23, 2025

In a world where nations wield resources as weapons, President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order on “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production,” signed March 20, 2025, stands as a clarion call to restore America’s industrial might. This isn’t just policy — it’s a declaration of independence from the shackles of foreign dependency and bureaucratic paralysis. For too long, the United States has ceded its mineral supremacy to adversaries like China, watching helplessly as Beijing’s grip on rare earths, lithium, and cobalt strangles our economic and national security. Trump’s EO, rooted in conservative principles of self-reliance, deregulation, and economic vigor, is a masterstroke to reclaim what is rightfully ours: the ability to fuel our future from our own soil.

This is not blind nostalgia for smokestacks but a forward-looking stand for sovereignty.

The stakes could not be higher. America’s vast mineral wealth — lithium in Nevada, uranium in Utah, copper in Arizona — lies dormant beneath a web of federal red tape, a legacy of progressive overreach that has kneecapped our miners and enriched our rivals. China controls 60-70 percent of global rare earth production and over 80 percent of their processing, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, while we import 100 percent of our rare earth oxides. This isn’t just an economic embarrassment; it’s a strategic vulnerability. Every F-35 jet, every Tesla battery, every wind turbine relies on minerals we don’t produce at scale.

Trump’s EO rightly frames this as a national security crisis, invoking the Defense Production Act and a prior “National Energy Emergency” (EO 14156, January 20, 2025) to slash regulatory barriers and unleash private enterprise.

At its core, this order embodies the conservative ethos: government as a facilitator, not a dictator, of prosperity. It mandates agencies to identify and approve mining projects within 10 days, prioritizes federal lands for mineral extraction, and mobilizes capital through innovative mechanisms like the Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and Defense Department leases. This isn’t reckless — it’s resolute. The EO’s timelines are tight because freedom delayed is freedom denied. When the Bureau of Land Management takes seven years to permit a mine, as it did with Nevada’s Thacker Pass lithium project (still pending in 2025), we lose jobs to Beijing and sovereignty to bureaucrats. Trump’s order cuts that Gordian knot, proving that limited government can still act with purpose.
Consider the economic stakes. The mineral sector could be America’s next great frontier, a modern echo of the steel and oil booms that built our industrial backbone. The American Mining Association estimates that domestic critical mineral production could generate 50,000-100,000 jobs, mostly in the heartland. In states like Wyoming and Montana, where unemployment lingers from coal’s decline, this EO offers a lifeline. Onshoring battery and magnet production could slash EV costs, boosting firms like Rivian while cutting reliance on Chinese supply chains.

Critics, predictably, will cry environmental apocalypse. They’ll conjure images of scarred landscapes and poisoned rivers, ignoring that modern mining, from heap leaching to tailings management, has evolved since the 1970s. The EO doesn’t gut safeguards; it streamlines them, demanding Congress clarify the Mining Act of 1872 — a law so outdated it predates the light bulb. This is a mandate to strike a balance: stewardship of natural resources doesn’t mean locking resources away but using them wisely for human benefit.

Besides, the real ecological threat isn’t American mines — it’s China’s, where lax standards devastate ecosystems while we wring our hands. If we don’t mine here, we outsource the damage there, a hypocrisy no one should accept.
The EO’s genius lies in its fusion of public power and private dynamism. By waiving cumbersome DPA requirements and delegating authority to Defense and the DFC, Trump turbocharges investment without ballooning the deficit. Picture this: private firms leasing DoD land in Nevada to build refineries, backed by SBA loans and Export-Import Bank offtake deals. Government clears the path, entrepreneurs pave it. The proposed DFC mineral fund, paired with Defense’s Industrial Base Analysis, could rival China’s state-backed juggernauts, proving that free markets, not socialism, win resource wars.

Obstacles to Extracting Minerals

Yet, Americans must temper their enthusiasm with realism. This EO isn’t a magic wand. Our mineral processing lags — zero rare earth refineries operate stateside, per the Department of Energy — and rebuilding could take a decade. China’s cost advantage (20-30 percent cheaper, per industry analysts) means U.S. miners need tariffs or subsidies to compete, tools the EO sidesteps.

Legal challenges loom, too; environmentalists will sue under NEPA, as they did with Minnesota’s Twin Metals (blocked 2023-2025), testing the order’s mettle. And rural communities near mines may balk, fearing water shortages or cultural disruption — a reminder that liberty includes local voices.

These hurdles don’t diminish the EO’s vision; they refine it. Success will require complementary steps: tax credits for processing plants, vocational programs to train miners (only 13 U.S. universities offer mining degrees, per the Society for Mining Engineers), and trade policies to level the playing field. Congress, too, must act on the Mining Act, a task Trump’s team should press with the same urgency as border security. With Republicans holding the House and Senate in 2025, this could pass by year’s end, cementing the EO’s foundation.
The broader implications are profound. For decades, we’ve let globalists hollow out our industries, trading self-sufficiency for cheap imports. Trump’s EO reverses that surrender, echoing Reagan’s call to stand tall. It’s a middle finger to the Davos crowd who’d rather we beg Beijing than dig in Boise. And it’s a strategic coup: uranium independence bolsters our nuclear edge, rare earths secure our tech primacy, and copper fuels our grid. In a multipolar world, where China and Russia hoard resources, this EO positions America to lead, not follow.


This is not blind nostalgia for smokestacks but a forward-looking stand for sovereignty. Yes, execution matters — agencies must deliver, investors must step up, and greens must be reasoned with, not steamrolled. But the alternative is grim: a nation beholden to Xi Jinping’s whims, our factories idled, our defenses exposed. The EO’s flaws — tight timelines, processing gaps — are fixable. The American people should back this effort at mineral independence with the same resolve that built this nation. If we don’t, someone else will. And they won’t wave our flag.

Sunday, March 23, 2025

So you want to buy some gold do you?


 

Don't ask me why I said what I said...but when Levin mentioned Gramsci I...

 The best of Life, Liberty, and Levin.

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds


Until we get rid of the cancer that eats away at our Republic, there will be conflicts amongst us; aka, "There will be wars and rumors of war." 

Barack Obama is the carcinogen that damages the DNA of America and is spread widely within the Democratic Party.  Rather than saying that Obama is a follower of Gramsci, Marx, Engel or others, it would be more correct to say he is the ultimate follower of Columbia University which is the institutional summation of Communist thought in today's America. Whether we dwell on FDR's "The Forgotten Man" or Obama’s "From The Bottom Up", these are appeasing words coming from the men who never forgot themselves and governed from the top down.

"I think we have to rebuild healthy mediating institutions, worker organizations, civic associations, religious associations, trade groups, both in the real world and the virtual world, and they need to be adapted to how we live today. And they have to operate from the bottom up, and we have to find ways of bringing people from different backgrounds together in these groups, so we can all develop better habits of listening to each other, and debating each other, and making group decisions together for the common good." ~ Barack Hussien Obama 

~ Storm'n Norm'n