"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." ~ United States Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell HolmesYou won't find the above quote in the news story below; it serves to remind you that eugenics is not just a Russian practice in that it is one of the underlying agendas of the American progressives. Perhaps many of today's generation have forgotten one of the movement's most notable members, Margaret Sanger.
1932 -- Plan for Peace by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all "dysgenic stocks" including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.Sanger's ideology lingers in the mindsets of today's progressives however, they have learned to cover up their ideology by distractions and what is now sometimes called Alinskyisms. Probably the most notable progressives to be identified with eugenics is Jimmy Carter and Henry Kissinger. Others, although they will vehemently deny such claims, are Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Cass Sunstein, and Barack Obama to name a few. I guess the point of all this is, "Don't mess with the eugenics people or you'll end up missing." ~ Norman E. Hooben
See also: The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics
Russian activist disappears after exposing vaccination plans for Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
Source: English RussianAlexander Goncharov, a Russian activist who has been exposing the globalists eugenics program and in particular a vaccination program set to begin in 2011 has disappeared after recently receiving a serious threat to his life.
He has been missing since the night of October 30th, 2010, at approximately 22:00 hours when he was last seen leaving his office at the Russian Benevolent Society and did not return home as expected.
Alexander Goncharov had sworn an oath to disseminate as much information as possible about the globalists eugenics program to medical professionals and the public. He had uncovered a plan to sterilize women through vaccination programs in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. [Note from Norm: See also A Vaccine Against Pregnancy? ]
The same day threats were made on his life Alexander had asked for protection from paratrooper friends, but unfortunately it seems he did not get this additional security on time, as he disappeared that very night.
Below is the last statement of Alexander Goncharov made on 22nd October, 2010.
I, Alexander Goncharov, President of the Russian Benevolent Society, received information from honest doctors who do not wish to take part in KILLING their own people, about preparations for the mass DESTRUCTION OF OUR CHILDREN in the guise of a “new vaccination” scheduled for early 2011.
I cannot confirm or deny this information or vouch for the credibility of it, but I ask everyone to check it for themselves. “Someone” found out that I had this information and I was first offered a bribe for non-disclosure and secondly threatened with death if I continued disseminating information about the upcoming KILLING of our children. I rejected their “proposal” and will never accept the deliberate destruction of my own people – I have a holy duty to the motherland, in accordance with the Constitution of Russia and knowing the power of the enemies of our people, I have sworn to disseminate information about the impending MURDER OF ALL OUR CHILDREN IN RUSSIA and I will circulate this information by all possible means.
I specifically appeal to the staff of the Ministry and FEDERAL SECURITY SERVICE, to listen to my calls and read my correspondence – THEY WANT TO KILL YOUR CHILDREN. Therefore, you have a choice: either to help the survival of your people or procure small coffins for your own grandchildren.
THE FOLLOWING WILL TAKE YOU TWO MINUTES TO READ AND SAVE THE LIVES OF YOUR CHILDREN.
Vaccinations are of two types.
1. Vaccination is intended for girls 12 to 20.
The vaccination will be introduced in the guise of ostensibly preventing breast cancer or cancer.
- It is a similar vaccination to the one used to sterilize girls in Mexico, Nicaragua and Iraq.
EFFECT ON THE BODY.
- causes miscarriages at 3-4 months of pregnancy. In addition to direct effects, the inoculation has great mental impact because many miscarriages in late pregnancy would create panic and fear of becoming pregnant.
2. Vaccination is designed for women over 45 years.
CONTENT.
Immunoglobulin and GMO preparations.
EFFECT ON THE BODY.
- Sudden sexual arousal, increases immunity for 2-5 years but then declining sharply until immunity is zero, i.e. the inability to fight any infection.
Chairman of CBR
22.10.2010
_________
Sources
http://newspark.net.ua/politics/poslednee-zayavlenie-predsedatelya-rbo-a-goncharova-rasprostranite-po-vsem-vozmozhnym-istochnikam/
http://via-midgard.info/news/6294-poslednee-zayavlenie-predsedatelya-rbo-agoncharova.html
Related reading + video... "The Real Story Behind Bill Gates And “Death Panels"________________________
An important read...posted earlier on September 15, 2010
Problems Facing The United States...and nobody is facing reality
When former president George Herbert Walker Bush (Bush 41) so arrogantly stated,
These politic elite are encouraged by numerous others that want to destroy America's Capitalistic structure in favor of Socialism where only the elite have all the capital. People like Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Cass Sunstein, John Holdren, and John Brennan to name a few, are all some sort of Leftist, Marxist ideologues that want to control not just the United States, but the entire world...a new world order under the United Nations. Before I go off on a rant about the UN, let me say this, "Guys like Brzenski, Brennan, and Sunstein (maybe all of them) want not only to control the people but the population...population as in numbers! Brzenski himself has stated, "Its easier to kill a million people than to control a million people" Then there was that top secret document referred to as project 2000 that dealt with controlling the population... And who was that architect? Why that was Henry Kissinger!" Most of us should know that these politic elite are not just democrats (although most of them are democrats) and republicans. They are selected over time for their political views and take the D or R after their name in order to win elections. Some are never elected but rather appointed. Take Henry Kissinger. Did he not work for both a Democrat and a Republican president? He sure did! How about the current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates? A Bush-Obama kind of guy...how sweet it is!
Back to the UN. Maybe I should just leave it as a question for you to ponder, "Can anyone tell me just one worthwhile thing the UN has accomplished since their beginning?" Just one.
Now for all you who hated George Herbert Walker Bush and voted for Bill Clinton did you realize that you got exactly what President Bush wanted. It was Bush 41 that tried to get NAFTA passed but somehow just couldn't come up with enough votes. Why? Even though the Democrats during the Bush Administration wanted NAFTA, they wanted it under their own guy, Bill Clinton. No sooner than when Mr. Bill gets into office, bingo!, NAFTA is a matter of law. Now what good did NAFTA do for the country. C'mon now, you voted for the guy so you should know the answer. Did it create jobs? Sure did! Jobs, jobs, and more jobs...in Canada, Mexico, and China plus maybe a few other places but not here in the U. S. of A.
So when George Herbert Walker Bush says, "When we are successful and we will be...". Who do you suppose the we is in that statement? I'll give you a hint, its not you and me. Another hint. Why do you suppose President George Hebert Walker Bush and President William Jefferson Clinton became best of buddies immediately after leaving office? Thats because the D and the R after their names blended into we...and we will!
Bush was also famous for another we quote, "If the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts."
Well the we people in Washington have not changed (you wanted change you got more of the we) and the policies remain the same... Why just today I got an email referencing yet another of the we people, Hillary Rodham Clinton pushing the new world order for a new globalization (check that link out...read it and weep while you watch the videos) in front of the Council On Foreign Relations (Woe! watch out for those people, they run the country...check it out on one of those videos).
Meanwhile I started out with the idea that I was going to comment on the article below but somehow I think you can make the connection especially that part about NAFTA losing American jobs. ~ Norman E. Hooben
ps: Many people ask, "What can we do to solve our country's problems?" Sometimes it is necessary for a country to make a decision whereas if they don't either the country or the decision will be insignificant. If Barack Husein Obama is allowed to remain in office we may not have a country to worry about...he should be removed before his first term is up...there are provisions for doing this...we the people just got to do it!
most Americans were not paying attention. The ignorance with which the voting public concerns itself with whatever it is politicians talk about is probably the most alarming issue of our time. For some reason when statements such as that above are made no-one sees the treasonous nature of the verbiage. And treasonous it is, unless you are a Bill Clinton who would argue the meaning of the word is. Clinton....he's another New World Order guy. In his speeches he would encourage all Americans to have a "world view" and then he would go on and quote Bush's NWO and others seeking the same demise. George Bush (Bush 43) would rename the NWO, "Security and Prosperity" and went so far as to sign a treaty with Canada and Mexico which was not approved by the United States Senate or the American people. Secret agreements abound with those in power. When is the last time a candidate ran a campaign promoting a G20 or G8 Summit meeting. But that's what they do as soon as they're in office. They may have ran on "It's the economy stupid." or "Social Security", "Jobs", "Health Care" and even "Bring home the bacon issues and/or entitlements". But all this is fodder to feed and confuse the citizens into thinking that the politicians are looking out for them.“This is an historic moment...we have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order— a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN’s founders.” (emphasis mine [on second thoughts, it was emphasized by George Herbert Walker Bush] ~ NEH)
These politic elite are encouraged by numerous others that want to destroy America's Capitalistic structure in favor of Socialism where only the elite have all the capital. People like Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Cass Sunstein, John Holdren, and John Brennan to name a few, are all some sort of Leftist, Marxist ideologues that want to control not just the United States, but the entire world...a new world order under the United Nations. Before I go off on a rant about the UN, let me say this, "Guys like Brzenski, Brennan, and Sunstein (maybe all of them) want not only to control the people but the population...population as in numbers! Brzenski himself has stated, "Its easier to kill a million people than to control a million people" Then there was that top secret document referred to as project 2000 that dealt with controlling the population... And who was that architect? Why that was Henry Kissinger!" Most of us should know that these politic elite are not just democrats (although most of them are democrats) and republicans. They are selected over time for their political views and take the D or R after their name in order to win elections. Some are never elected but rather appointed. Take Henry Kissinger. Did he not work for both a Democrat and a Republican president? He sure did! How about the current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates? A Bush-Obama kind of guy...how sweet it is!
Back to the UN. Maybe I should just leave it as a question for you to ponder, "Can anyone tell me just one worthwhile thing the UN has accomplished since their beginning?" Just one.
Now for all you who hated George Herbert Walker Bush and voted for Bill Clinton did you realize that you got exactly what President Bush wanted. It was Bush 41 that tried to get NAFTA passed but somehow just couldn't come up with enough votes. Why? Even though the Democrats during the Bush Administration wanted NAFTA, they wanted it under their own guy, Bill Clinton. No sooner than when Mr. Bill gets into office, bingo!, NAFTA is a matter of law. Now what good did NAFTA do for the country. C'mon now, you voted for the guy so you should know the answer. Did it create jobs? Sure did! Jobs, jobs, and more jobs...in Canada, Mexico, and China plus maybe a few other places but not here in the U. S. of A.
So when George Herbert Walker Bush says, "When we are successful and we will be...". Who do you suppose the we is in that statement? I'll give you a hint, its not you and me. Another hint. Why do you suppose President George Hebert Walker Bush and President William Jefferson Clinton became best of buddies immediately after leaving office? Thats because the D and the R after their names blended into we...and we will!
Bush was also famous for another we quote, "If the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts."
Well the we people in Washington have not changed (you wanted change you got more of the we) and the policies remain the same... Why just today I got an email referencing yet another of the we people, Hillary Rodham Clinton pushing the new world order for a new globalization (check that link out...read it and weep while you watch the videos) in front of the Council On Foreign Relations (Woe! watch out for those people, they run the country...check it out on one of those videos).
Meanwhile I started out with the idea that I was going to comment on the article below but somehow I think you can make the connection especially that part about NAFTA losing American jobs. ~ Norman E. Hooben
ps: Many people ask, "What can we do to solve our country's problems?" Sometimes it is necessary for a country to make a decision whereas if they don't either the country or the decision will be insignificant. If Barack Husein Obama is allowed to remain in office we may not have a country to worry about...he should be removed before his first term is up...there are provisions for doing this...we the people just got to do it!
_______________________________
The following from: EIC Economy In Crisis
Major Economic Problems Facing the United States
by Thomas Heffner on September 14, 2010 - 10:21am
The United States is facing economic disaster on a scale few nations have ever experienced. Most people are unaware of the easily observable signs of this emerging crisis. While we persist in our superpower mentality, we have quietly become a second-class country in many respects.
We no longer produce what we need to sustain ourselves, we import much more than we export, and we are selling off our assets and taking on massive debts to sustain a standard of living we can no longer afford. Not only was this not the way we became a superpower but it is a sure way to lose this status.
Foreign countries are using the funds earned through our trade deficits to buy many of our strategic companies. Over the past 10 years, foreign interests have purchased an unprecedented $8 Trillion worth of US assets.
The game plan of our international competitors is to render us completely dependent on foreign production, innovation, and financing. In losing domestic self-sufficiency, national security and leverage in foreign affairs will suffer greatly.
We are failing even to acknowledge predatory foreign trade practices undermining US industry. Instead we encourage US manufacturers to design, engineer, and produce in third world markets like Mexico and China.
Reversing the Trend: Some Suggestions for Action
What common-sense steps should we take to reverse the trend? First we should take direct action to reverse our out-of-control trade deficits. While our regulatory and tax systems have unnecessarily raised domestic business costs, the fundamental cause of the present crisis is three decades of extremely detrimental US trade and globalization policies.
Second, we must carefully manage access to our markets. We should not naively rest on the faith that other countries will hold themselves to our standards in areas such as the environment, labor, and competition policy. These standards affect the cost of production. If other countries fail to adhere to these standards, they gain an unfair cost advantage.
Access to our markets must be therefore conditioned on a strategic analysis of our own national needs first and foremost. As things stand, we have handed our sovereign rights to our domestic markets to international bodies like the World Trade Organization and are committed to disastrous “one-way free trade” agreements such as NAFTA and CAFTA. We are in a dramatically different position from emerging low-wage markets. They have everything to gain, and we have everything to lose. Our policies should carefully protect our wealth and resources rather than simply provide the lowest consumer cost regardless of the impact on our industries and our workers.
Finally, promoting open markets and economic growth abroad will not alone rebalance America’s trade accounts and domestic industrial collapse. Our industries have been so disarmed and dismantled that we now lack the knowledge, capacity, and investment capital to facilitate self-sustaining production. Dramatic new direction is required.
Related... Will Globalists Trigger Yet Another World War ← very informative read
We no longer produce what we need to sustain ourselves, we import much more than we export, and we are selling off our assets and taking on massive debts to sustain a standard of living we can no longer afford. Not only was this not the way we became a superpower but it is a sure way to lose this status.
Foreign countries are using the funds earned through our trade deficits to buy many of our strategic companies. Over the past 10 years, foreign interests have purchased an unprecedented $8 Trillion worth of US assets.
The game plan of our international competitors is to render us completely dependent on foreign production, innovation, and financing. In losing domestic self-sufficiency, national security and leverage in foreign affairs will suffer greatly.
We are failing even to acknowledge predatory foreign trade practices undermining US industry. Instead we encourage US manufacturers to design, engineer, and produce in third world markets like Mexico and China.
Reversing the Trend: Some Suggestions for Action
What common-sense steps should we take to reverse the trend? First we should take direct action to reverse our out-of-control trade deficits. While our regulatory and tax systems have unnecessarily raised domestic business costs, the fundamental cause of the present crisis is three decades of extremely detrimental US trade and globalization policies.
Second, we must carefully manage access to our markets. We should not naively rest on the faith that other countries will hold themselves to our standards in areas such as the environment, labor, and competition policy. These standards affect the cost of production. If other countries fail to adhere to these standards, they gain an unfair cost advantage.
Access to our markets must be therefore conditioned on a strategic analysis of our own national needs first and foremost. As things stand, we have handed our sovereign rights to our domestic markets to international bodies like the World Trade Organization and are committed to disastrous “one-way free trade” agreements such as NAFTA and CAFTA. We are in a dramatically different position from emerging low-wage markets. They have everything to gain, and we have everything to lose. Our policies should carefully protect our wealth and resources rather than simply provide the lowest consumer cost regardless of the impact on our industries and our workers.
Finally, promoting open markets and economic growth abroad will not alone rebalance America’s trade accounts and domestic industrial collapse. Our industries have been so disarmed and dismantled that we now lack the knowledge, capacity, and investment capital to facilitate self-sustaining production. Dramatic new direction is required.
Related... Will Globalists Trigger Yet Another World War ← very informative read
No comments:
Post a Comment