What happens to all that stuff thrown into the ocean?

First they take it to where you won't see it anymore...

Then...

Something primal is awakening in Denmark. Will it wake up the Americans?

Source
DENMARK: Copenhagen Police hemorrhaging from having to deal with rampant Muslim crime
Muslim gang crime is draining the resources of the Danish police, so much so, that there virtually is no manpower available to help native Danish citizens when they call.
Islam vs Europe (h/t Susan K) Muslim gangs are rampant in Copenhagen with several shootings every week. The Muslim ghettos in West Copenhagen are also experiencing an epidemic of arson attacks. They may soon have to call out the army and the National Guard to keep the peace.

Police say, ”As it is right now, we do not come when you call for us,” says Morten Rasmussen, who is among officers who answer the phone at the police 112 (911)-central in Copenhagen. Many of the conversations with citizens end up with the police having to explain why no police patrol patrol can be sent to assist a citizen who is calling.  He tells about the lack of few patrols on the street, and that far too many people do not get help when needed. Morten Rasmussen find that the strong focus on the gang war in Copenhagen draws resources from solving ‘ordinary’ crime.

“The police, of course, take care of the big cases, such as stabbings, shootings and riots. But concerning everything else, there is basically no police,” says Morten Rasmussen.” 65% of Danes confirm this problem with police response today. Michael Hviid Jacobsen, gang expert and professor at Aalborg University says, “There have never been more gang members on the streets than now. Police last month has jailed 60 gang members. ”‘The recruitment of new immigrant gang members right now is higher than the number of gang members we manage to put in jail.

You can not punish themselves out of this problem alone. Gang crime is here to stay. “The view is shared by Police Inspector Michael Ash, head of the National Police Research Centre.  GOV “The Jackal Manifesto” started an extended discussion about Hells Angels in Denmark and the role they have assumed as the spearhead of armed ethnic Danish resistance to immigrant violence.

Even in Denmark — which is relatively free of the PC pathology — the mainstream media and polite society recoil in horror from the thought of a biker club targeting immigrant gangs for reprisals. In order to maintain the pristine purity of their ideological posture, they are forced to avert their eyes from what has caused the Hells Angels’ reaction, and from the failure of the civil authorities to address the urgent issue of violent, lawless, unassimilated Muslim immigrants.  But ordinary Danes are not so ready to follow the elite sheep up the ramp into the abattoir.  Something primal is awakening in Denmark.

How To Destroy America In Seven Easy Steps

Special thanks to Doug Ross Journal
My 7-Step Plan to Destroy America

Roll over and die or get out the surgical instruments... Obama secretly negotiating away U.S. sovereignty

At some point the American people are going to wake up and when they do it will be too late.  Too late! Its already too late!  The why and how we gave up without a fight will be buried with us...and Obama has the shovel to do it.  How many times have you read or heard expressions like, "Lock and load.", "Wake up America.", "Write to you Congressman.", "Make this message go viral!" or "Send this message to everyone you know." ???  Have any of those slogans worked out for you?  Has anything changed?  No!  It keeps on getting worse, day in and day out.  So when stories come out about losing our sovereignty its just another story...and most likely 75% of the people have no clue what the word sovereignty means.  Even if we changed the line to read, "losing our freedom" nothing gets done about it.  So it doesn't matter what the rhetoric is, "you're losing your sovereignty" or "your losing your freedom" the grave's hole gets deeper and deeper.
Now suppose we preceded all news items with a line that included, "You're going to lose your life."  Would that stimulate a response?  Would you start to defend yourself?  The way things are going you will probably do nothing while Obama fulfills the promise of Nikita Khrushchev, "We will bury you!"  Its true, America is about to lose her life...and you're doing nothing!  The only way to save her is to cut out the cancer and the malignancy goes by the name of Barack Obama (along with some other viruses, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, etc) ...and if the surgical procedure is not completed prior to 2016 Obama will have finished with his shovel.  So what's it going to be America?  Roll over and die or get out the surgical instruments...
~ Norman E. Hooben

Source
Obama secretly negotiating away U.S. sovereignty

2-pronged assault on economy, consumer rights, domestic law
by Aaron Klein

Consumer protections and the use of domestic law in the U.S. may drastically change as President Obama forges ahead with two secretive international deals that impact major aspects of the economy, privacy and beyond.
Wednesday, Obama defended a proposed mega free-trade zone between the world’s two largest economies, the United States and the European Union.
“I have fought my entire political career, and as president, to strengthen consumer protections. I have no intention of signing legislation that would weaken those protections,” Obama said during a visit to the EU headquarters in Brussels.
Obama was responding to criticism of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP, which the U.S. has been negotiated with the EU since last July.
Besides creating the world’s biggest free-trade zone, the TTIP will also bring about closer cooperation between EU and U.S. regulatory bodies while more closely integrating the two economies.
One leak about the TTIP revealed a proposed “Regulatory Cooperation Council” that would evaluate existing regulations in the U.S. and EU and recommend future rules while coordinating a response to the current regulations.
Writing in the left-leaning the Nation magazine, foreign policy analyst Andrew Erwin said the TTIP was less about reducing tariffs and “more about weakening the power of average citizens to defend themselves against corporate labor and environmental abuses.”
Erwin took particular issue with a section in the TTIP called the Investor-State Dispute Settlement, which stipulates foreign corporations can sue the government utilizing a special international tribunal instead of the country’s own domestic system that uses U.S. law.
“The tribunals are not accountable to any national public or democratically elected body,” wrote Erwin.
Last December, a coalition of more than 200 environmentalists, labor unions and consumer advocacy organizations drafted a letter asking for the Investor-State Dispute Settlement section to be dropped.
The New York Times, meanwhile, reported earlier this week that some American companies “are concerned that protections for investors will not be part of a deal.”
While Obama is negotiating the TTIP largely in secret, talks continue to forge ahead with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP. The expansive plan is a proposed free-trade agreement between the U.S., Australia, Brunei, Chile, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam.
The agreement would create new guidelines for everything from food safety to fracking, financial markets, medical prices, copyright rules and Internet freedom.
On Tuesday, the leaders of Canada and Japan reportedly met on the sidelines of a nuclear summit at the Hague to discuss the TPP.
The TPP negotiations have been criticized by politicians and advocacy groups alike for their secrecy. The few aspects of the partnership leaked to the public indicate an expansive agenda with highly limited congressional oversight.
A New York Times opinion piece previously called the deal the “most significant international commercial agreement since the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995.”
Last October, the White House website released a joint statement with the other proposed TPP signatories affirming “our countries are on track to complete the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations.”
“Ministers and negotiators have made significant progress in recent months on all the legal texts and annexes on access to our respective goods, services, investment, financial services, government procurement, and temporary entry markets,” the White House said.
The statement did not divulge details of the partnership other than to suggest a final TPP agreement “must reflect our common vision to establish a comprehensive, next-generation model for addressing both new and traditional trade and investment issues, supporting the creation and retention of jobs and promoting economic development in our countries.”

Secrecy

In February, the Open the Government organization sent a letter to Obama blasting the lack of transparency surrounding the TPP talks, stating the negotiations have been “conducted in unprecedented secrecy.”

“Despite the fact the deal may significantly affect the way we live our lives by limiting our public protections, there has been no public access to even the most fundamental draft agreement texts and other documents,” read the letter.
The missive was signed by advocacy groups such as OpenTheGovernment.org, Project On Government Oversight, ARTICLE 19 and the Global Campaign for Freedom of Expression and Information.
The groups warned issues being secretly negotiated include “patent and copyright, land use, food and product standards, natural resources, professional licensing, government procurement, financial practices, healthcare, energy, telecommunications, and other service sector regulations.”

Lack of oversight

Normally free-trade agreements must be authorized by a majority of the House and Senate, usually in lengthy proceedings.

However, the White House is seeking what is known as “trade promotion authority” which would fast track approval of the TPP by requiring Congress to vote on the likely lengthy trade agreement within 90 days and without any amendments.
The authority also allows Obama to sign the agreement before Congress even has a chance to vote on it, with lawmakers getting only a quick post-facto vote.
A number of lawmakers have been speaking out about the secret TPP talks.
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., recently proposed legislation requiring the White House to disclose all TPP documents to members of Congress.
“The majority of Congress is being kept in the dark as to the substance of the TPP negotiations, while representatives of U.S. corporations – like Halliburton, Chevron, PHRMA, Comcast, and the Motion Picture Association of America – are being consulted and made privy to details of the agreement,” said Wyden.

However, Obama has so far refused to give Congress a copy of the draft agreement.

Regulates food, Internet, medicine, commerce

The TPP is “more than just a trade deal,” wrote Lori Wallach and Ben Beachy of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch in a New York Times op-ed last June.

“Only 5 of its 29 chapters cover traditional trade matters, like tariffs or quotas. The others impose parameters on nontrade policies. Existing and future American laws must be altered to conform with these terms, or trade sanctions can be imposed against American exports.”

Wallach and Beachy spotlighted several leaks in the proposed TPP text, including one that would regulate the price of medicine.
“Pharmaceutical companies, which are among those enjoying access to negotiators as ‘advisers,’ have long lobbied against government efforts to keep the cost of medicines down. Under the agreement, these companies could challenge such measures by claiming that they undermined their new rights granted by the deal.”

Amnesty International USA warned draft TPP provisions related to patents for pharmaceuticals “risk stifling the development and production of generic medicines, by strengthening and deepening monopoly protections.”

Another leak revealed the TPP would grant more incentives to relocate domestic manufacturing offshore, Wallach and Beachy related.
Jim Hightower, a progressive activist, wrote the TPP incorporates elements similar to the Stop Online Piracy Act.
Hightower wrote the deal would “transform Internet service providers into a private, Big Brother police force, empowered to monitor our ‘user activity,’ arbitrarily take down our content and cut off our access to the Internet.”

Indeed, Internet freedom advocacy groups have been protesting the TPP, taking specific issue with leaked proposals that would enact strict intellectual property restraints that would effectively change U.S. copyright law.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation argued the TPP would “restrict the ability of Congress to engage in domestic law reform to meet the evolving IP needs of American citizens and the innovative technology sector.”
In a petition signed by more than 30 Internet freedom organizations, the group warned the TPP would “rewrite global rules on intellectual property enforcement.”

With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott.

"...it’s time for blacks to stand up"

Source
Milwaukee Sheriff: Liberal Policies Have Destroyed Black Families

Sheriff David Clarke

Sheriff David Clarke, the chief law enforcement officer in Milwaukee, has made a name for himself for being an outspoken advocate of conservative principles.
He’s gone after liberal gun-grabbers in Washington, warning that he would refuse to participate in any attempt to disarm the citizenry, and even went so far as to say that there would be a Second American Revolution should there be any attempt by the feds to confiscate arms.
As an African-American man, he’s now going after liberals for their social and economic policies, which have hurt black families for decades. In particular, their racial approach to discipline in public education like what we’re seeing out of Holder’s DOJ is sending young black students the wrong message.
He wrote a brilliant op-ed in the Washington Times, arguing that it’s time for blacks to stand up and refuse to let Uncle Sam raise their kids, which is exactly what liberals are trying to do with their big-government programs.  He writes:

The latest attempt by liberals to help black people is underway in our K-12 urban public schools.
These do-gooders are now defining down socially acceptable behavior for black students in school. Bad behavior is being excused and attempts to hold black kids accountable by enforcing codes of conduct are called racist.
Having a sense of discipline has always been considered a virtue, a redeeming quality, but now its roots are claimed to lie in racism.

This is exactly what Eric Holder is doing through race-based punishments in school. He’s literally threatening to sue schools who don’t punish black and white kids the same amount, even if the two races don’t break the rules at the same rates.

It’s a philosophical trend that’s becoming mainstream among liberal educators. Clarke continues:

The white superintendent of the Madison public schools believes that “we need to address head-on our racial bias and the assumptions we make of students who are in the classroom.”
Really? Where I come from, bad behavior has always been unacceptable and is codified not by race but by societal norms to keep chaos from reigning.

For Clarke, bad behavior is the result of poor parenting, and this has been perpetuated by liberals attempting to make the government take over the parenting role.

What these race provocateurs do not want to admit is the reason we are seeing more disruptive behavior in schools is because of poor and ineffective parenting, manifested by liberal policies.
There is a government program today for everything in the black community that used to be the responsibility of the individual, such as parenting. Because of this system, many parents have abdicated what is their most important responsibility and turned it over to the government.
Uncle Sam is now raising their kids.
We take kids out of the home with early childhood education programs, and the government feeds them breakfast, lunch and dinner, and provides after-school programs.
Who needs parents in the black community anymore?

These white liberal policies have destroyed black culture and the black family, which was once a foundation of the entire black community, according to Clarke.

White liberal social policies have become the new racism in America.
According to liberal orthodoxy, no one is accountable anymore — except for conservatives, of course. Conservatives get blamed for all the failed liberal initiatives that were designed to help black folks.
Notice how Republican Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin received the dreaded R-word clubbing by the left when he pointed out in his 50-year review report how the failed anti-poverty initiatives started by liberals to help blacks have instead made their lives worse.
Every attempt liberals have made to help black people, with their reliance on government-centered public-policy ideas, has worsened their lot in life.

The family structure, once a foundation of the black community pre-1960, is in shambles. More black children grow up without a stable father in their lives as black men have been estranged from their children and emasculated by welfare policies.
On top of that, more black people are living in poverty than ever before, our kids are chained to failing urban schools and more young black men are unemployed and in jail and prison. Liberal public policies and ideology have fostered this. [...]
Liberals call their ideology compassionate. I call it hateful.

He concludes:

You would have to absolutely loathe black people to want to keep them mired in generational poverty and ignorance, living in ghettos with high unemployment, with their kids shackled to failing K-12 urban school systems and crime-ridden neighborhoods just to secure a permanent voting majority and to hang onto political power.
This is borderline sociopathic behavior.
Black people are survivors. We have survived slavery, Jim Crow laws and other forms of discrimination. We can overcome the burden of liberal policies if they just leave us alone to get out of this predicament by ourselves.
I find it insulting that liberals view us in such an infantile manner, implying that we cannot make it without their help.
Once we free our minds of this debilitating government dependency and liberals get their boot off our necks, we can begin to rebuild our community.

Wow. Sheriff Clarke just hit the nail on the head. Liberal social policies from the New Deal to the Great Society to Obamacare are hitting black communities the hardest. The problems that plague the black community can be traced back to all the attempts by liberals to “help” them.
We hope to see more black patriots like Sheriff Clarke, Tim Scott, Allen West, Ben Carson, and others who have had enough of liberals treating blacks as pawns in order to keep themselves in power while destroying their communities through their policies.

_____________________________

See also...

 

1.  History of the Democratic Party's violence and anti black civil rights White supremacists worked club in hand with Democrats for decades

 

2.  They all look alike in their robes but underneath they're all Democrats

_____________________________

Bonus Video