I'd like one of these...

Norway Bombing...just another day in the global jihad..."A blessed raid in Norway" signed by Abu Suleiman Al-Nasser

On more than one occasion this website blogged that the Muslims are coming (ex. Paul Revere's latest cry, "The Muslims are coming! The Muslims are coming!"  or  When you finish your homework get ready for battle...) and by that I mean, THE MUSLIMS ARE COMING...so what part of that sentence do you not understand?  The recent bombing in Norway is by no means limited to Scandinavia.  And for the very same reasons they bombed the building in Oslo, they'll be somewhere in your neighborhood at some unannounced time.  Then they will brag about it somewhere else...just like this: (source link)

  A blessed raid in Norway 

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

الحمد لله ناصر عباده الموحدين ومذل اهل الشرك والكفر اجمعين والصلاة والسلام على نبينا محمد خاتم النبيين وعلى اله وصحبه اجمعين وبعد:

Allah says in the Quran: (Then fight in God's cause - Thou art held responsible only for thyself - and rouse the believers. It may be that God will restrain the fury of the Unbelievers; for God is the strongest in might and in punishment) 84 Surah Al-Nisa'

So another message had reached the countries of Europe from the Mujahedeen and another proof to the countries of Europe that the Mujahedeen will not stay idle regarding their war against Islam and Moslems.

Today Norway has been targeted to be a lesson and warning for the rest of the countries of Europe and we have already threatened from the Stockholm raid that there will be more operations and we have demanded the countries of Europe to withdraw their forces from the land of Afghanistan and end its war against Islam and Muslims and we repeat our warning again to the countries of Europe and we say to them carry out the demand of the Mujahedeen because what you see is only the beginning and what is coming is more.

Regarding the reasons for targeting Norway they are many; the most important is its participation in the occupation of Afghanistan and offending our noble prophet Muhammed (صلى الله عليه وسلم).

Alhamdulillah who established a firm place in the land for his Muwahid worshipers .. and we Do Dua to Allah to preserve our brothers and Mujahedeen everywhere.

سبحانك اللهم وبحمدك اشهد ان لا اله الا انت استغرك واتوب اليك.

Abu Suleiman Al-Nasser

A supporter of the global Jihad

_______________

Related story below...

Oslo Blast How Many Muslims Live in Oslo from Planck's Constant

An entire block has exploded!Photo Credit: Christian Aglen

An explosion rocked the normally peaceful city of Oslo today. (1) I know the first question you want answered is "How many Muslims live in Oslo?" It's a lot. There are over 44 thousand Muslims in Oslo County out of a total population of 586 thousand.
Here's Norway's Muslim population growth by decade [Source Wikipedia]

Year	Muslims	Percent
1980	1,006	0.02%
1990	19,189	0.45%
2000	56,458	1.30%
2010	98,953	2.03%

The growth rate of Muslims in Norway is astounding when one considers that Norway has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world (160th out of 224 countries; see Fertility Rates of Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries). One doesn't need a slide-rule to calculate that in a few decades Norway will be an Islamic country.
The largest immigrant communities from Muslim countries in Norway are from Pakistan, Iraq and Somalia. But one can easily deduce this information from the rape statistics in Norway. In Oslo alone, these 3 groups comprise 6.29% of the city's population but 20.21% of the rapists. Now if they kept their attacks strictly to their own, most Norwegians wouldn't care, however more than 66% of rape victims are Norwegian white women. (2)
Norwegians may be content to the slow Islamification of their homeland and the epidemic of rapes by their Muslim immigrants and citizens, but I wonder how much they'll take if today's explosion is only the start of things to come.
Am I jumping to conclusions that this attack was done by Muslims? Not such a big leap, but we can eliminate Hungarian midgets as possible suspects.
Breaking News
A tip of the turban to Infidel Bloggers Alliance.

AP, Shooting reported at youth camp outside Oslo

By NILS MYKLEBOST
Police say they are sending anti-terror police to a youth camp outside Oslo after reports of a shooting there following the bomb blast at the government headquarters.
The news site VG reported that a man dressed in a police uniform opened fire at the camp. It says several people were injured.

---

Notes

(1):

The Guardian, Oslo explosion hits government building

Several people have been injured in a large explosion which has damaged government buildings in central Oslo, including the office of the Norwegian prime minster.
A Reuters correspondent said he counted at least eight injured people after the unexplained blast. A photo posted online [see photo above] showed people looking on as smoke rose drifted through the streets. The caption for the picture said "an entire block exploded".
The tangled wreckage of a car was outside one building but the cause of the blast was unknown with police and fire officials refusing to comment.

(2):

Islam in Europe, Norway, Rape and Muslims - A Study

Rapists

According to the report, most rapists are not Norwegian. Forty of the rapists are Norwegians, which is well below their percent in the general city population.

Region	Percent
Norway	36.4%
Europe	10.9%
America	2.7%
Africa	19.1%
Asia	10%
Middle East	20.9%

The 'top' immigrant rapists were Iraqis, Somalis and Pakistanis. These groups are also the top immigrant groups from Muslim countries in Norway.

Country	Total Oslo Population	% of city population	% of rapists
Pakistan	20,036	3.63%	3.6%
Somalia	8,878	1.61%	5.7%
Iraq	5,818	1.05%	10.91%
Morocco	5,431	1%	2%
Iran	4,825	0.87%	2%

And so it begins... The government will now rent that home that went to foreclosure (isn't this what they wanted all along)

As chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, Lenin abolished private ownership of land and began distributing it among the peasants. Banks were nationalized and workers control of factory production was introduced. He also closed down the Constituent Assemby and began banning political parties such as the Cadets, Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries. ~ Spartacus Educational

And what did the peasants do...they began making their rent payments to the government and the United Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) was born.  Then there was a thing called the CRA right here in the United States of America; it allowed the peasants to make home loans from the nasty banks knowing in advance they could never repay the money.  Of course the nasty banks didn't like this thing called the CRA but the 'Lenin' in charge forced them to make the loans with the help of his cadets...this would be Bill 'Lenin' Clinton and ACORN led by community organizers such as Barack Husein Obama.  Then when the loans became due and neither the peasants nor the mother banks (Fannie Mae) had any more money, banks were nationalized and shut down (we should point out that the head of Fannie Mae gave himself a million dollar bonus for making the bright move of losing other people's money...that would be Franklin Raines now living a comfortable life somewhere in the universe).  
Following all this banking and housing mess the workers control of factory production was introduced; unions were given control of production at General Motors. 
And so it begins...  According to today's Wall Street Journal  article "Government Considers Ways to Rent Foreclosed Homes" with the reasoning that the rent will help stabilize the housing market... Huh?  Sounds like an Alinskyism to me...take another look at the Lenin thing at the top of the page and when you figure it out please get back to me.  ~  Norman E. Hooben

Who's your sugar daddy? ~ Unless we come to grips with spending now, there isn't going to be a future. "You do the math!"

What's it all about?  The answer is simple, "...the inexorable and ultimately fatal growth of the welfare state." In other words the jig is up on the Ponzi scheme.  Borrowing the UN's favorite expression, "It's unsustainable."  You do the math! It's simple third-grade addition and subtraction...just what does it take to instill this simplicity into a liberal's brain?  Is it because their brains are too simple and have no reasoning power?  Is there a logic school out there? ~ Storm'n Norm'n

(link)

Uncle Sam, sugar daddy
By MICHAEL A. WALSH

Forget all the numbers being tossed around in Washington -- the millions and billions and trillions of dollars being taxed, borrowed, printed and spent as the country approaches the Aug. 2 debt-ceiling deadline.

Forget the political jockeying for position between a president desperately seeking re-election in 16 months and a Congress equally desperately seeking not to be blamed for spending even more money that we don't have.

Forget the fact that such "entitlements" as Social Security and Medicare -- social-insurance programs that the public long thought to be actuarially sound -- have been exposed as little more than legal Ponzi schemes, paying today's benefits out of tomorrow's borrowed receipts.
Instead, just ask yourself this simple question: When did it become the primary function of the federal government to send millions of Americans checks?
For this, in essence, is what the debt-ceiling fight is all about -- the inexorable and ultimately fatal growth of the welfare state. If you don't believe it, just look at President Obama's veiled threat to withhold Grandma's Social Security benefits if Congress doesn't let him borrow another $2 trillion or so to get himself safely past the 2012 election.
The feds now borrow 43 cents of every dollar they spend. Under Obama, outlays have soared to nearly a quarter of GDP (the historical average is just under 20 percent) -- and once ObamaCare starts to fully kick in around 2014, it will only rise.
Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and debt interest consume -- at the moment -- nearly half of our $3.8 trillion budget.
When Medicare began in 1966, it cost $3 billion; congressional estimates were that, by 1990, it would cost about $12 billion, allowing for inflation. The actual figure turned out to be $107 billion. Today, Medicare's future unfunded obligations total at least $36 trillion. Other estimates run even higher.
When Social Security began in 1935, most workers weren't expected to live past the "retirement age" of 65. The program wasn't supposed to have to pay off, except to widows, orphans and the odd male who somehow staggered to his gold watch.
Today, it's a national retirement program -- for an aging country whose life expectancy is pushing 80. In 1960, five workers supported a retiree; today, there are three, and that number falls to two in 2030. Yet the retirement age has failed to keep pace, slowly rising a couple of months a year for those born after 1938 and topping out at 67 for those born after 1960.

You do the math.

No wonder the trustees of the system themselves -- including three Obama Cabinet officials -- warned in their most recent report on the health of the entitlement system: "Projected long-run program costs for both Medicare and Social Security are not sustainable under currently scheduled financing, and will require legislative corrections if disruptive consequences for beneficiaries and taxpayers are to be avoided."
So even Team Obama realizes these programs must be put on a sound footing (and likely radically restructured) to continue.
Yet the president and the Democrats still refuse to put meaningful spending cuts on the table -- and refuse completely to deal with the entitlement monster. Even though they know the numbers don't work, they're trying to lock in Obama's sky-high spending as the new normal -- and then up the ante.
The debt-ceiling cage match is the culmination of the Democrats' 75-year-long fight to establish a voting bloc of dependents under the false flags of "compassion" and "social justice." It's sapped our strength, created a welfare mentality and, if unchecked, will reduce us to a nation of aging, resentful beggars with eyes cast permanently toward Washington.
The preamble to the Constitution talks about promoting the general welfare, not the welfare state. For the welfare state is incompatible with the rest of the preamble, which concludes: "and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." By definition, dependents are not free.
That's why Republicans must stand firm in their demands for real spending cuts, not accounting tricks and vague promises. If the debt ceiling must be raised this go-around, it should be temporary -- and rolled back as quickly as possible.
Because, unless we come to grips with spending now, there isn't going to be a future.

Mexican Truck Agreement: The EPA Will Pay...You say what? ...that's my tax dollars going for mufflers on Mexican trucks!

This is one of those stories that should get blood to the tepid point (actually I'm just being nice, it should make you stark raving mad as hell as you open the window and yell, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!").   Why its just a news item concerning a US-Mexico trucking agreement...so what's wrong with that?  Well you see the trucking industry in Mexico doesn't have a good safety record...and that's no big deal.  Then there's the matter of factory installed equipment on the trucks...all those environmental gadgets you have on your American truck...well they're not installed on trucks built for the Mexican highways...not a big deal...yet!  This is where you need to go back and read the news from last April (2011).  So the Mexican trucks will be allowed into the US as long as they meet EPA standards...and this will mean all those trucks will have to be upgraded with new catalytic converters and whatever else is needed to pass the pollution tests...and that's no big deal.  See the EPA will pay for all the upgrades...wawawaaiit, wawawait, wait a minute!  You said what?  The EPA will pay for mufflers on Mexican trucks!  The EPA will pay!  That's bull!  When the EPA pays that means you and me...tax money...from your pocket!  Why the hell should the American taxpayer dish out dollars to upgrade Mexican trucks?  I thought we had a budget crisis...I guess Obama needs to waist a few more dollars before he really bankrupts all of us...that's U.S. ~ Norman E. Hooben
For more on this go here: Liquida.com

Related story...

Houston Chronicle EditorialWoe be to officials who allow unsafe Mexican junk trucks in U.S....A single Mexican truck with bad brakes involved in a fatal accident on U.S. roads could lead to a congressional investigation and political finger pointing. Woe be to the officials who allowed that defective truck to enter the country. -- Until now Mexican trucks have been permitted to travel no farther than about 20 miles from the border on the U.S. side...



Landmark US-Mexico trucking agreement resolves 15-year conflict
Source: Christian Science Monitor

After years of wrangling, US and Mexican officials signed an agreement Wednesday that allows trucks from each nation to travel on the other country’s highways – a key provision of NAFTA.





By Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer

Washington

The United States and Mexico on Wednesday signed an agreement aimed at resolving a cross-border trucking dispute. The longstanding disagreement had come to symbolize growing resistance, especially in the US Congress, to free-trade provisions with America’s southern neighbor.

The accord, signed in Mexico City by US and Mexican transportation officials, would end a 15-year-old controversy that on the US side featured fears of unsafe Mexican trucks barreling along US highways, driven by unprofessional Mexican truckers.

On the Mexican side, outrage over the American disregard for a NAFTA provision led to retaliatory tariffs on US goods ranging from pork to consumer care products – which cost the US as much as $2 billion in exports.
The accord was greeted warmly by US trade, farm, and business organizations – but condemned by US trucking organizations, a sign the agreement could face trouble in Congress.

Under the agreement, the US will reinstate a pilot program for Mexican truck certification that was introduced under the Bush administration – and defunded by an angry Congress in 2009. Mexico, in turn, will immediately drop half of the tariffs on about 100 US products, with the rest to be removed when Mexican trucks actually start rolling across the border.
“The agreements signed today are a win for roadway safety and they are a win for trade,” said US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood after signing the documents.
The accord requires all Mexican trucks operating in the US to comply with US safety standards, and it mandates the installation of monitoring devices to track truck usage and compliance with service requirements.
Recognizing the potential for a negative response from Congress, some supporters of Wednesday’s agreement wasted little time with praise and got right on to warnings against attempts to once again sidetrack the resolution.
“We are encouraged there is finally a positive end in sight,” said Bill Reinsch, president of the National Foreign Trade Council in Washington. But he added, “We urge Congress to refrain from any action that would derail the program or fall short of our commitments under NAFTA.”

Some, who oppose any trucking accord allowing Mexican trucks to come north, continue to hammer at safety concerns.
“Opening the border to dangerous trucks at a time of high unemployment and rampant drug violence is a shameful abandonment of the Department of Transportation’s duty to protect American citizens from harm and to spend American tax dollars responsibly,” said Jim Hoffa, general president of the Teamsters, in a statement. He said the accord “endangers American motorists.”
Mexican trucks are already allowed to circulate in the US within 25 miles of the border. The new agreement will allow Mexican trucks to deliver goods into the US and to return goods to Mexico, but it bars the transport of goods between US destinations.
Both sides in the debate over Mexican trucks are latching onto the issue of the day – jobs – to make their case for or against the agreement.
Secretary LaHood said that by “opening the door to long-haul trucking between the US and Mexico … we will create jobs and opportunity for our people and support economic development in both nations.”
Farmers are particularly happy: Mexico is the second-largest purchaser of US pork after Japan, for example, but pork sales to Mexico have sagged in recent years under the retaliatory tariffs.
But the Teamsters’ Mr. Hoffa says the deal will be a job killer. “The so-called pilot program [for certifying Mexican trucks] is a concession to multinational corporations that send jobs to Mexico,” he said. “It lowers wages and robs jobs from hard-working American truck drivers and warehouse workers.”
The opposing arguments reveal the trucking dispute to be a microcosm of the larger debate in the US over trade. How Congress responds may suggest which way the trade winds are blowing.