Sunday, March 7, 2010

The New World Order Is Emerging..."And, by any and all legitimate means, it must be stopped."

Over at the American Spectator Quin Hillyer has an excellent piece (reproduced here for further exposure) that best describes the Obamanation of America.  Many of us on the conservative side of politics could sense this description of Obama long before anyone put it to words but even as these words are popping up everywhere they fail to reach the heart of the problem.  And that is the die-hard Obama voter.  Maybe a few die-hards will show up here (but only if they could comprehend the enormity of thier problem). ~ Norman E. Hooben
Picture collage by N. Hooben

Not the American Way
There is something way off balance in the character of Barack Obama. Something in the realm of zealotry, with a touch of megalomania, and perhaps an authoritarian impulse too. He combines Alinskyite tactics and outlook with an air of self-assumed moral superiority in a way that fails to respect the usual, small 'r' republican limits on American presidents. All presidents, of course, think at some level that they know best about policy choices. But almost none of them (Woodrow Wilson perhaps excepted) were so willing to disdain, in pursuit of such radical policy upheavals, such intense and overwhelming public opinion as has been evident in the current health takeover attempt.
Grandiose plans are one thing. Most presidents fall prey to them. It's another thing entirely, though, to refuse to accept the ordinary republican restraints on implementing grandiosities without public support, and furthermore to do so by A) bending existing rules; B) directly violating multiple personal pledges; C) ignoring constitutional limits; D) directly lying; and E) demanding that other politicians sacrifice their own political careers.
A little humility would be nice. So would a sense that he answers to the public rather than to some self-proclaimed (and self-determined) imperative of history and/or call of destiny. What Obama seems to fail to understand is that his own, overblown self-assurance and self-mythologizing is actually hampering his own goals. One need not stretch too far to observe that one of the factors adding to public opposition to Obamacare is a growing public disquietude about the lack of responsiveness, the authoritarian certitude, and the zealous near-fanaticism of the government that would run the new health-rationing system -- all character traits as embodied by the president himself.
As Obama ignores public opinion while pushing for full-fledged Obamacare in one fell swoop, and as he insists that he knows best and that the public is too ill-informed to know what is good for it, he directly -- as the very symbol of the state -- reminds the public of what they distrust about government in the first place and of why they don't want government interfering in a realm as personal as health care. These feelings are especially fierce because Obama is trying not to change something with which most Americans are dissatisfied, but instead to change (and arguably take away) a system in which some four-fifths of the public remains generally satisfied with their own personal level of care.
For most Americans, Obama doesn't seem to be giving them something they don't have, but instead to be taking away something they already value.
Worse, he and the increasingly unpopular Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are doing it while hectoring the public, insulting (at least by implication) the public by belittling the public's understanding of the issue, and treating opposition as if it is guided by evil motives rather than sincere concerns.
Passage of this health overhaul/takeover under these circumstances would be frightening. The harm it would do the political system would be almost as great as the harm it would cause the health system. The American republic was designed to give a minority a way to slow down major changes buoyed by popular passions. It was not designed to give a minority the power to implement major changes against popular passions.
The Obamites are doing the latter. They are turning American checks and balances on their heads. They are using temporary parliamentary advantages for a permanent power grab. The Obamites are dictating to Americans rather than representing them. Revolutionizing, not just evolving. Ruling, not serving.
And it's not just on health care. They work against public opinion on matters of criminal justice, terrorist treatment, race preferences, bank bailouts and corporate takeovers, overall spending, domestic welfare requirements, fossil fuel development, missile defenses, advocacy of American interests (and pride!) abroad, and on the whole panoply of oft-unstated attitudes that cohere as American exceptionalism.
This is not the way the system is supposed to work. This is not the American government we grew up with. This is not the national ethos that we love.
Yet Obama pushes on, perfectly cognizant of what he's doing, intentionally upending the American Way. This is a form of mania -- megalo- or otherwise. And, by any and all legitimate means, it must be stopped

The Incompetent CIC

You read so much stuff on the Internet it's sometimes too much to remember and sometimes you let a good story get away.  That's what happened with this piece that I ran across last December...I thought it was a pretty good story then, and stumbling across it again I can revive it here.  It does reveal the ineptness of Obama as a Commander-In-Chief.  Of course, many of us knew he was incapable of performing such tasks  simply by the fact that he surrounds himself with such capable people (sic). ~ Norman E. Hooben

OBAMA IGNORES HARD LEARNED LESSONS

By Geoff MetcalfDecember 16, 2009NewsWithViews.com

"There are three kinds of men. Those that learn by reading. Those that learn by observation. And the rest of them who have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.” --Will Rogers

Predator drones have been successful in killing over a dozen al Qaeda and or Taliban honchos. That is a good thing. Drones are working…however, one person reportedly is standing in the way of expanded missile strikes and it is none other than President Obama.
According to NEWSWEEK, five administration officials report “the president has sided with political and diplomatic advisers who argue that widening the scope of the drone attacks would be risky and unwise” (in other words…successful). This is the same kind of counter-intuitive politically correct brain flatulence that set the stage for the Fort Hood disaster.
The RQ-1 Predator drone is the primary unmanned aerial vehicle used for offensive operations in Afghanistan and those nefarious adjoining Pakistani tribal areas. The Predator is both cool and effective. It can fly 400 nautical miles to a target; hang around snooping overhead for 14 hours, then return.
Reportedly, Obama is concerned that firing missiles into urban areas “would greatly increase the risk of civilian casualties.” However, they conveniently ignore the potential collorary that the perceived threat to civilians could actually cause the indigenous populations to refuse to support the drone magnets, and actually deny access to refuges for the bad guys.
The administration is also supposedly hinky drone attacks would draw protests from Pakistan. However, these are the same Pakistani politicians and military leaders who frankly have been more than diffident to solve the problem (whereas drones have been attriting bad guys regularly). To date Pakistani dissent has been quiet about the drone attacks. Most of the drone activity is out in the boondocks and as long as they remain confined to the country's out-of-sight border region no harm/no foul…yet.

Advertisement
I’m confused. To date, Obama has made more aggressive use of drones than Bush did. There were 43 drone attacks between January and October 2009. There were a total of 34 in all of 2008, President Bush’s last full year in office. Drones are doing the job…so why park them? Frankly, given all the flak the administration has taken, it is odd they don’t claim bragging rights for the Predator successes.
The White House has allegedly been overly encouraged by Pakistan's recent military efforts to root out militants along the Afghan border, and it supposedly doesn’t want to risk that cooperation. However, there hasn’t been any Pakistan posturing about the boondocks drones, so why unilaterally eliminate an effective tool without even protestations? Hey, here’s a thought…how about partnering with the Pakistani’s to complement their reported efforts to crack down?
Deja vu! Hell-o? Once upon a time we were engaged in a counter insurgency war in Southeast Asia. It was called Vietnam and even Senator John Kerry was there. Chairborne Foggy Bottom wonks, and spitless politicians decided that Laos and Cambodia were off limits. Despite the stark reality that Viet Cong and NVA soldiers routinely used the 'safe havens' of the border countries to avoid US forces, despite the official policy on avoiding the safe havens, MACV-SOG actually did engage in covert operations in Laos and Cambodia with considerable success while clinging to the fiction of plausible deniability. Both the CIA and Studies and Observation Group have been excoriated for doing outstanding work under insane rules of engagement. Allowing an enemy a safe haven is as dumb as announcing to the enemy when you are leaving.
The internal debate about the drone program reportedly has been going on for nearly a year. A former senior intelligence official says that, within days of his inauguration, Obama and his top aides began talking about actually “expanding the operation from a relatively limited area along the AfPak border to a broader range of targets.” Attaboy!
So is a ‘drone surge’ supported or opposed by the administration? Obama supposedly has not closed the door on wider drone attacks. However, he also hasn’t kicked it open. In what has become classic Obama style, the talking continues ad nauseum.
Gen. Stanley McChrystal told the Senate Armed Services Committee recently, “These programs are expensive, but they are extraordinarily effective and extraordinarily value-added.”
General Petraeus has said the main goal of a counterinsurgency operation is to win over the human terrain – the local population, “the US wants to make use of its best weapons.” And we have…“So all of that … argues against the idea that you would deny yourself those very effective platforms, particularly when it comes to the most senior leaders of organizations that are trying to carry out attacks in our homeland,” said the Central Command chief.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:


So why are they still talking about whether they will or whether they won’t continue to deploy effective killing machines?

When Dally met Harry...or was it When Harry met Sally...naah, I like the former more than the latter.


Saturday, March 6, 2010

Student Visa Fraud ...This is one school they caught. How many more are there?

Source: DebbieSchlussel.com
Learn more about Debbie here...you'll be glad you did.
Lydia Menocal and Ofelia Macia helped 600 illegal aliens get fraudulent student visas. They've been indicted. The students, who enrolled in their Florida Language Institute never showed up for class, and merely enrolled to gain entry into the U.S. and disappear. ICE agents arrested 81 of them and are looking for the rest. Read the indictment and more at debbieschlussel.com

What will you do this week-end? Buy a home-made hovercraft?

Source: Crunch Gear

Build (or just buy) your own flying hovercraft

by Dave Freeman on March 2, 2010

Fancy having your own hovercraft? Want one that’ll take off and fly? Well a New Zealand man designed, built, and flies his very own flying hovercraft. The drawback – you have to launch and land from on the water in order to actually be able to fly.
Now this is a DIY project. The craft was built in the inventors garage from parts taken from other vehicles, including the handlebar from his daughters scooter over a period of ten years. Keep in mind, because the the hovercraft is technically a boat, you won’t even need a pilots license to fly it (at least in New Zealand), but I think I’d still be cautious about using it. There’s nothing in the original video to indicate how much the hovercraft is selling for, but a little research shows that it’s being auctioned off and as of this post, the price is at $26,500. The auction ends on the 13th though, so it could go significantly higher.