You probably don't remember this headline:
State Department Refuses to Address Report on Internal Discussion About Custody of ‘Blind Sheikh’
The U.S. State Department is refusing to answer questions about internal discussions on Egypt’s demands to release the so-called “Blind Sheikh,” the radical Islamist cleric who Egypt’s new leader wants turned over to his country’s custody.After a report by TheBlaze citing a source close to the Obama Administration saying there have been conversations within the State Department about whether to consider a change in custody of Omar Abdel Rahman, aka the “Blind Sheikh,” a group of Congressional leaders released a copy of a letter sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder calling it “extremely disconcerting” that his release might be considered.Rahman is serving a life sentence in a U.S. prison after being convicted following the World Trade Center attack in 1993 on charges of plotting a campaign of assassinations and bombings. Egypt’s newly elected President Mohammed Morsi, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, has publicly promised to work for Rahman’s release.After initially deferring inquiries to the Justice Department, today State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland officially denied plans to release Rahman. ...blah, blah, blah...read the full story here
Because most of you get your news from the main stream media you wouldn't have a clue what was going on elsewhere. What do I mean by this?
The news about a potential release of the blind Muslim cleric who masterminded the first World Trade Center attack was obviously (and intentionally) leaked to soften Obama's future plans that, if successful, would have guaranteed his re-election. But he didn't plan on a former Navy Seal willing to fight back. So now we have a bombshell bit of news that should guarantee that Obama will never get re-elected...I said, "should guarantee", but because the main stream media won't report this, his chances for re-election will not be affected much. The following story comes to us from The Western Center For Journalism. ~ Norman E. Hooben
see additional video at bottom of this page
Then there's this story out of Las Vegas
Las Vegas Review-Journal Destroys Obama
In one of the most blistering denunciations
of Barack Obama ever penned, the Las Vegas Review Journal published an editorial
today that excoriated Obama not only for his ineptitude in the Benghazi attack,
but also his duplicity afterward and the cooperation of a supine press:
The Obama administration sat by doing nothing for seven hours that night,
ignoring calls to dispatch help from our bases in Italy, less than two hours
away. It has spent the past seven weeks stretching the story out, engaging in
misdirection and deception involving supposed indigenous outrage over an
obscure anti-Muslim video, confident that with the aid of a docile press corps
this infamous climax to four years of misguided foreign policy can be swept
under the rug, at least until after Tuesday's election … The official
explanation for why Obama administration officials watched the attack unfold
for seven hours, refusing repeated requests to send the air support and relief
forces that sat less than two hours away in Italy? Silence.
The RJ also charged Obama with impotence as he flew off to Las Vegas
instead of dealing with the attack.
Prompt and strong action from the White House on Sept. 11 might have saved
American lives, as well as America's reputation as a nation not to be messed
with. Weakness and dithering and flying to Las Vegas the next day for celebrity
fund-raising parties are somehow better?
The RJ pulled no punches about the Obama Administration‘s efforts to
destroy our economy and accused Obama of continually flat-out lying to the
American people.
This administration is an embarrassment on foreign policy and incompetent
at best on the economy - though a more careful analysis shows what can only be
a perverse and willful attempt to destroy our prosperity. Back in January 2008,
Barack Obama told the editorial board of the San Francisco Chronicle that under
his cap-and-trade plan, "If somebody wants to build a coal-fired power
plant, they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them." He added,
"Under my plan ... electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." It
was also in 2008 that Mr. Obama's future Energy Secretary, Steven Chu, famously
said it would be necessary to "figure out how to boost the price of
gasoline to the levels in Europe" - $9 a gallon.
Yet the president now claims he's in favor of oil development and
pipelines, taking credit for increased oil production on private lands where
he's powerless to block it, after he halted the Keystone XL Pipeline and
oversaw a 50 percent reduction in oil leases on public lands.
These behaviors go far beyond
"spin." They amount to a pack of lies.
The RJ concluded:
To return to office a narcissistic amateur who seeks to ride this nation's
economy and international esteem to oblivion, like Slim Pickens riding the
nuclear bomb to its target at the end of the movie "Dr. Strangelove,"
would be disastrous. Candidate Obama said if he couldn't fix the economy in four
years, his would be a one-term presidency.
Mitt Romney is moral, capable and responsible man. Just this once, it's
time to hold Barack Obama to his word. Maybe we can all do something about
that, come Tuesday.
The fiery wrath of proud Americans is back.
Time to charge Obama for murder...but we have a bunch of sissies in Congress.