Law Of The Sea Treaty (LOST)

Update 2 August 2010: See also: How much time is there left before we are LOST? ...also Agenda 21, its coming your way! (Don't dismiss this one, IT WILL AFFECT YOU !)

The Worst Treaty In The History Of Mankind

Why?
The number one reason: It is the first time in the history of mankind that a leader of sovereign nation is willing to surrender that sovereignty against the will of it's peoples to a corrupt lesser power which will dictate to the people that which the Assembly decides...and thus removes the voting power of the people.
The Assembly will decide upon which laws they will obey and put themselves above the law of all participating states. The Assembly will exempt themselves from all taxes and yet tax the member states for the privilege of such obscene membership. The Assembly will not be subject to any Legislative or Executive branch of any of the member states...thus making a mockery out of any voting privileges remaining with the people. The landlocked member states will have free and open passage across neighboring states to obtain access to the oceans. The Assembly will have the right of passage anywhere among and over the member states to enforce their laws with complete immunity from all other laws unless they decide to give up that immunity.
The Law Of The Sea Treaty will discourage Capitalism in that the Assembly will charge enormous fees for the privilege of mining the ocean floor (sea bed). Any such entrepreneur willing to attempt such endeavors must share his findings with member states chosen by the Assembly.
Here is an excerpt from "UNCLOS"
United Nations Convention on the Law Of the Sea
SUBSECTION G. LEGAL STATUS, PRIVILEGES AND
IMMUNITIES
Article 176
Legal status
The Authority shall have international legal personality and such legal
capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the
fulfilment of its purposes.
Article 177
Privileges and immunities
To enable the Authority to exercise its functions, it shall enjoy in the
territory of each State Party the privileges and immunities set forth in this
subsection. The privileges and immunities relating to the Enterprise shall be
those set forth in Annex IV, article 13.

Article 178
Immunity from legal process
The Authority, its property and assets, shall enjoy immunity from legal
process except to the extent that the Authority expressly waives this immunity
in a particular case.
Article 179
Immunity from search and any form of seizure
The property and assets of the Authority, wherever located and by
whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, requisition, confiscation,
expropriation or any other form of seizure by executive or legislative action.
Article 180
Exemption from restrictions, regulations, controls and moratoria
The property and assets of the Authority shall be exempt from
restrictions, regulations, controls and moratoria of any nature.
Article 181
Archives and official communications of the Authority
1. The archives of the Authority, wherever located, shall be inviolable.
2. Proprietary data, industrial secrets or similar information and
personnel records shall not be placed in archives which are open to public
inspection.
3. With regard to its official communications, the Authority shall be
accorded by each State Party treatment no less favourable than that accorded
by that State to other international organizations.
Article 182
Privileges and immunities of certain persons connected with the Authority
Representatives of States Parties attending meetings of the Assembly, the
Council or organs of the Assembly or the Council, and the Secretary-General
and staff of the Authority, shall enjoy in the territory of each State Party:
(a) immunity from legal process with respect to acts performed by them
in the exercise of their functions, except to the extent that the State
which they represent or the Authority, as appropriate, expressly
waives this immunity in a particular case;....

Hillary Clinton: Long On Rhetoric, Short On Answers

Will Rogers never met Hillary Clinton.

Don't kill the messenger...

Quotes From the Left

Easily Terrified, Mindless Christian Lemmings "We are, as far as urban public education is concerned, essentially at rock bottom. We are now at a point where we are essentially churning out ignorant teens who are becoming ignorant adults and society as a whole will pay dearly, very soon, and if you think the hordes of easily terrified, mindless fundamentalist evangelical Christian lemmings have been bad for the soul of this country, just wait." - San Francisco columnist Mark Morford, writing for SFGate.com, the Web site of the San Francisco Chronicle and picked up by Kristen Fyfe of MRC's Culture and Media Institute October 24.

In Case You Missed It

Chris Matthews Tells 'Fellow Democrats' What to Think Biased reporting is one thing, but when program hosts start campaigning on the air, it's over the top. Here's how Chris Matthews did it opening the Oct. 29 edition of Hardball: "Good evening, I'm Chris Matthews and welcome to Hardball. The 2008 election, that's the spotlight tonight. Iowa, which starts the whole thing January 3rd, is now a dead heat between Hillary and Obama. Here's what I think Obama should say, starting tomorrow night, at the big MSNBC debate in my hometown of Philly..." Matthews then puts words in Obama's mouth, suggesting that he link Hillary to both "endless war in Iraq" and the "inevitable war with Iran," suggesting that only he could get us out of "the rut of fearful politics and endless war." Matthews then concludes (presumably to get to the "news") -- "So there you have it. It's for you, my fellow Democrats, to decide. If you think Bush would have succeeded with his policies, if they were better executed, then go with Senator Clinton. If you think the Bush policies were wrong, dead wrong, I'm with you." – MRC's CyberAlert Tuesday Oct. 30

Fires Subside But Bush Still Takes Heat

California's wildfires are now under control, but President Bush is still taking the heat. Powerless to resist the liberal compulsion to bash Bush, ABC and CBS evening news broadcasts Oct. 28 quickly left the good news about the fires for graphic reminders of Katrina. With heart-tugging video of victim anguish in New Orleans, one reporter whined that Bush just "flew home from vacation" and "never stopped." There was no mention of the times Bush visited both New Orleans and Mississippi. And as for his recent California trip, thanking firefighters and consoling displaced homeowners, all the nets could manage was "the President came to a burned-out area to press the flesh..." – CyberAlert Monday Oct. 29 and NewsBusters Sunday night Oct. 28

"Worst Notable Quotables" from the past 20 years.

Here are just a few:

"... if everyone on Earth just stopped breathing for an hour, the greenhouse effect would no longer be a problem." – Newsweek Senior Writer Jerry Adler, 12-31-1990.

Evangelical Christians who like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson "are largely poor, uneducated, and easy to command." – Washington Post reporter Michael Weisskopf in a 2-1-1993 news story.

"I hope his [Justice Clarence Thomas's] wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease... He is an absolutely reprehensible person." – USA Today columnist Julianne Malveaux on PBS's To the Contrary 11-4-1994.

"... when the last referendum took place, Saddam Hussein won 99.96 percent of the vote. Of course, it is impossible to say whether that's a true measure of the Iraqi people's feelings." – ABC's David Wright in Baghdad, on World News Tonight, 10-15-2002.

_____________________________

Vet cuts down Illegal Mexican
flag flying above U.S. Flag

________________________
Dead Silence !
When in England at a large conference, Colin Powell was asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury if our plans for Iraq were just an example of empire building by George Bush. He answered by saying, "Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return." It became very quiet in the room.
**************
Then there was a conference in France where a number of international engineers were taking part, including French and American. During a break one of the French engineers came back into the room saying, "Have you heard the latest dumb stunt Bush has done? He has sent an aircraft carrier to Indonesia to help the tsunami victims. What does he intended to do, bomb them?" A Boeing engineer stood up and replied quietly: "Our carriers have three hospitals on board that can treat several hundred people; they are nuclear powered and can supply emergency electrical power to shore facilities; they have three cafeterias with the capacity to feed 5,000 people three meals a day, they can produce several thousand gallons of fresh water from sea water each day, and they carry half a dozen helicopters for use in transporting victims and injured to and from their flight deck.. We have eleven such ships; how many does France have?" Once again, dead silence.
*****************
A U.S. Navy Admiral was attending a naval conference that included Admirals from the U.S., English, Canadian, Australian and French Navies. At a cocktail reception, he found himself standing with a large group of Officers that included personnel from most of those countries. Everyone was chatting away in English as they sipped their drinks but a French admiral suddenly complained that, 'whereas Europeans learn many languages, Americans learn only English.' He then asked, 'Why is it that we always have to speak English in these conferences rather than speaking French?' Without hesitating, the American Admiral replied 'Maybe its because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies and Americans arranged it so you wouldn't have to speak German' You could have heard a pin drop!

What Goes Around Comes Around...History does repeat itself...

That the spirit of revolutionary change, which has long been disturbing the nations of the world, should have passed beyond the sphere of politics and made its influence felt in the cognate sphere of practical economics is not surprising. The elements of the conflict now raging are unmistakable, in the vast expansion of industrial pursuits and the marvellous discoveries of science; in the changed relations between masters and workmen; in the enormous fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the masses; the increased self reliance and closer mutual combination of the working classes; as also, finally, in the prevailing moral degeneracy. The momentous gravity of the state of things now obtaining fills every mind with painful apprehension; wise men are discussing it; practical men are proposing schemes; popular meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all busied with it - actually there is no question which has taken deeper hold on the public mind.

In any case we clearly see, and on this there is general agreement, that some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class: for the ancient working men's guilds were abolished in the last century, and no other protective organization took their place. Public institutions and the laws set aside the ancient religion. Hence, by degrees it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition. The mischief has been increased by rapacious usury, which, although more than once condemned, is nevertheless, under a different guise, but with like injustice, still practiced by covetous and grasping men. To this must be added that the hiring of labor and the conduct of trade are concentrated in the hands of comparatively few; so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slavery itself.

To remedy these wrongs the socialists, working on the poor man's envy of the rich, are striving to do away with private property, and contend that individual possessions should become the common property of all, to be administered by the State or by municipal bodies. They hold that by thus transferring property from private individuals to the community, the present mischievous state of things will be set to rights, inasmuch as each citizen will then get his fair share of whatever there is to enjoy. But their contentions are so clearly powerless to end the controversy that were they carried into effect the working man himself would be among the first to suffer. They are, moreover, emphatically unjust, for they would rob the lawful possessor, distort the functions of the State, and create utter confusion in the community.

It is surely undeniable that, when a man engages in remunerative labor, the impelling reason and motive of his work is to obtain property, and thereafter to hold it as his very own. If one man hires out to another his strength or skill, he does so for the purpose of receiving in return what is necessary for the satisfaction of his needs; he therefore expressly intends to acquire a right full and real, not only to the remuneration, but also to the disposal of such remuneration, just as he pleases. Thus, if he lives sparingly, saves money, and, for greater security, invests his savings in land, the land, in such case, is only his wages under another form; and, consequently, a working man's little estate thus purchased should be as completely at his full disposal as are the wages he receives for his labor. But it is precisely in such power of disposal that ownership obtains, whether the property consist of land or chattels. Socialists, therefore, by endeavoring to transfer the possessions of individuals to the community at large, strike at the interests of every wage-earner, since they would deprive him of the liberty of disposing of his wages, and thereby of all hope and possibility of increasing his resources and of bettering his condition in life. (Circa 1891)

Please go back and read the above passage one more time and think about what is happening today...need I say more!

Always remember this: "You never had a problem until you elected the bum."

It's time to throw the bums out...all of 'em!

The bum you elected was a dummie just like you before he was elected...after he got in office he amassed great knowledge and became a world renown expert on everything from banking to atmospheric science...and all this overnight!

Some of the smartest people were the dumbest Presidents...no need to go into great detail here but remember Jimmy Carter...all kinds of degrees, graduate of the Naval Academy (of course they had a bad rap about cheating), officer aboard nuclear submarines, even knew how to grow peanuts...wow, I'm impressed! He was just voted the worst President in US history ! (Biggest reason...he is a big time socialist.)

__________

Short Note To Hillary Clinton...

Originally posted on townhall.com By Norm
Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:31 PM

(Note: The descriptive dialogue in the following commentary is in no uncertain terms designed to exhibit hatred by the author. As you will note the words, "As you put yourself on display..." clearly identifies with the subject. The subject clearly identifies with hatred.)

The dishonor you spewed onto this nation was evident with every utterance of your outrageous discourse directed at General Petraeus, an honorable man unworthy of your presence…your presence unworthy of the Halls of Congress…your presence unworthy of America. As you put yourself on display as a scheming, deceiving, power hungry Socialist determined to destroy this great nation protected by the likes of General Petraeus and those that preceded him; General Franks…General Eisenhower…General MacArthur...General Marshall …General Pershing… General Grant…General Jackson…General Washington. You Ma’am, are unfit for the cover of protection of even the last thread of their coattails. You Ma’am are the fodder for the traitors from within. You Ma’am, rot the soul of this nation!