123
Thursday, May 26, 2022
The Great Reset: We are at war, I don't want to be at war. Thank God for the 2nd Amendment.
By the way, do not dismiss this video because it may be too long...it's not long enough if you want to remain free.
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Democrat policies have turned this place into a THIRD WORLD COUNTRY
Third World Country?
Sorry, it's Seattle !
Monday, May 23, 2022
Background Noise
Background Noise
This is one of those articles where I
write the title before anything else. Why,
because it's about a bomb, and to use a journalist's terminology a bombshell. Naah, I don't think it would fit in with the mainstream media's description of a bombshell headline. They'll most likely call this a conspiracy
theory and toss it into file 13...that's the trash can for all you non-military
folks.
How many of you have heard of the “Council for a Livable World”? No, I'm not going to wait around for an
answer. But let's see if I can tie this
altogether with some things you may have heard about; things, in this case
would include people as well as the previously mentioned 'bomb'.
The Council for a Livable World can be
described as a lobbying group that would like to dis-arm our military and
support anti-U.S. military legislators.
They're well known for buying off newly elected legislators early in
their careers so they can be called on later when needed. Among the many defense related issues this
group lobbied to eliminate funding for was the "Bunker
Buster"...yeah, you remember that one don't you, AKA the 'Mother of All
Bombs'.
Now I don't know the overall success
rate the Council has had over the years because they were dealing with many
legislators and what they needed was the big guy. Well there was this legislator who was
hanging around Washington for a number of years that finally answered that 'when
needed' call. His son Hunter called him,
"The Big Guy"...Joe Biden.
Now do you understand why Joe Biden
left behind billions of dollars’ worth of military equipment in Afghanistan?
Sunday, May 22, 2022
Osama Bin Laden: He knew, he knew, he really did...he knew exactly how to destroy America.
Bin Laden’s secret plan to destroy America: Make Joe Biden president
AEIdeas
In his new book, The Finish: The Killing of Osama Bin Laden, author Mark Bowden reveals Osama bin Laden’s secret plot to destroy America: Kill Obama and make Joe Biden have to assume the presidency.
Bowden quotes from a letter bin Laden sent to Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, his third in command, in which he calls on al Qaeda to target Obama or Petraeus during their visits to Afghanistan and Pakistan, but urges them not to target Biden — because if Obama were killed, Biden would be thrust into the presidency and “Biden is totally unprepared for that post.”
Bin Laden wrote:
“I asked Sheik Sa’id, Allah have mercy on his soul, to task brother Ilyas to prepare two groups—one in Pakistan and the other in the Bagram area of Afghanistan—with the mission of anticipating and spotting the visits of Obama or Petraeus to Afghanistan or Pakistan to target the aircraft of either one of them… They are not to target visits by U.S. Vice President Biden, Secretary of Defense [Robert] Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff (Chairman) [Michael] Mullen, or the Special Envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan [Richard] Holbrooke. The groups will remain on the lookout for Obama or Petraeus. The reason for concentrating on them is that Obama is the head of infidelity and killing him will automatically make Biden take over the presidency for the remainder of the term, as it is the norm over there. Biden is totally unprepared for that post, which will lead the United States into a crisis” (emphasis added).
Bowden cites this as an example of how sitting in his Abbottabad hideout, bin Laden “had become the crazy officer waving his sword and rallying depleted troops to run headlong into withering fire” on “missions that were wildly unrealistic, even screwy.”
So was this a real al Qaeda plot, or just some bin Laden malarkey? You be the judge.
THE FOOD SHORTAGE...sounds like a plan
Kissinger’s 1974 plan for food control genocide
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.
The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.” The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.”
NSSM 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. It paid special attention to 13 “key countries” in which the United States had a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome, since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.
For example, Nigeria: “Already the most populous country on the continent, with an estimated 55 million people in 1970, Nigeria’s population by the end of this century is projected to number 135 million. This suggests a growing political and strategic role for Nigeria, at least in Africa.” Or Brazil: “Brazil clearly dominated the continent demographically.” The study warned of a “growing power status for Brazil in Latin America and on the world scene over the next 25 years.”
Food as a weapon
There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that “population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline,” even if such measures were adopted.
A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targeted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: “There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID (U.S. Agency for International Development) and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.”
“Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now,” the document continued, adding, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? ... Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?”
Kissinger also predicted a return of famines that could make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary. “Rapid population growth and lagging food production in developing countries, together with the sharp deterioration in the global food situation in 1972 and 1973, have raised serious concerns about the ability of the world to feed itself adequately over the next quarter of a century and beyond,” he reported.
The cause of that coming food deficit was not natural, however, but was a result of western financial policy: “Capital investments for irrigation and infrastructure and the organization requirements for continuous improvements in agricultural yields may be beyond the financial and administrative capacity of many LDCs. For some of the areas under heaviest population pressure, there is little or no prospect for foreign exchange earnings to cover constantly increasingly imports of food.”
“It is questionable,” Kissinger gloated, “whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis.” Consequently, “large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades -- a kind the world thought had been permanently banished,” was foreseeable -- famine, which has indeed come to pass.(Executive Intelligence Review)