tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-417280974690508119.post6772361267857032040..comments2024-03-22T22:11:31.936-05:00Comments on Storm'n Norm'n: What Goes Around Comes Around...History does repeat itself...Storm'n Norm'nhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10513268787691532681noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-417280974690508119.post-76655704699171065932018-12-29T20:42:53.763-06:002018-12-29T20:42:53.763-06:00Correction: ~ Ref: Mr. Clinton has also stated tha...Correction: ~ Ref: Mr. Clinton has also stated that he has had the privilege of examining their secret documents and that for the most part believes in their goals; world domination! <br />That should read:"Professor Quigley has also stated that he has had the privilege of examining their secret documents and that for the most part believes in their goals; world domination!"Storm'n Norm'nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10513268787691532681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-417280974690508119.post-86630873467238508932008-06-05T07:05:00.000-05:002008-06-05T07:05:00.000-05:00This is a Test...testing response time for moderat...This is a Test...testing response time for moderation message to arrive at my email address.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-417280974690508119.post-78700384460729220232007-11-04T22:42:00.000-06:002007-11-04T22:42:00.000-06:00Gary...thanks for your comments.As for the Clinton...Gary...thanks for your comments.<BR/>As for the Clintons, I have studied them at length over the years and feel as if I know them better than anyone...that has never met them. I say this with some eruditeness and have predicted with certain accuracy the outcome of their rise to power. <BR/>I stated to some students from Ireland at an event at Stonehill College (Massachusetts) in the early nineties, "Bill Clinton is the beginning of the downfall of America." The students,obviously surprised as they believed that the then President was "...good for Ireland." Little did they know that Mr. Clinton is a Globalist-Socialist and will do or say anything to further his Brave New World. Not that I would claim credit for it, but I believe I was the first to declare that the Clintons have no higher authority to answer to, which puts them in the Godless-Humanist assemblage.<BR/>If you do the research you will find that Mr. Clinton was an admirer of Professor Caroll Quigley, Cecil Rhodes,and Alfred Milner, et al, who were part and parcel to setting up the Rhodes secret Round Table society. This society, although secret, has let it's ideology known. Mr. Clinton has also stated that he has had the privilege of examing their secret documents and that for the most part believes in their goals; world domination!<BR/>As for Mr. Clinton's CGI (Clinton Global Inititive), it is just a front for One World Order. With the billions of dollars he brags about raising for developing countries he has very little to show for his efforts. The last deception of the truth was displayed at a recent TV interview... a pair of reading glasses for a few people in Africa who have trouble reading. I would think that a few billion dollars would buy a liitle something more substantial. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton makes quite a few trips to Switzerland...more than most skiiers...where, it is said, he visits several banks. The rumor is that he, along with George Soros et al, may weaken the American dollar when Hillary enters the White House to make way for the introduction of the Amero.<BR/>All this and more can be expected if Hillary's new address is 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.Storm'n Norm'nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10513268787691532681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-417280974690508119.post-24782702042543680462007-11-04T19:08:00.000-06:002007-11-04T19:08:00.000-06:00Hillary's Defense of her Gaffe It's been a bad wee...Hillary's Defense of her Gaffe <BR/><BR/>It's been a bad week for Hillary Clinton. Seemingly on her way to a Democratic coronation as the nominee for president, she had a horrible debate with her comments about giving driver licenses to illegal aliens in New York. ("I am for it and against it."- or something like that), as well as her weak response to a question as to whether she would agree to the release of documents pertaining to her actions as First Lady. Well she and her defenders have been quick to mount a great defense. First, it was the fault of the media (Tim Russert) for directing hard questions only to her, a woman. Then, it was the fault of her competitors-all men-who have ganged up on a woman. Neither of these arguments holds any water whatsoever.<BR/><BR/>Let me address the first complaint about Tim Russert. Mr Russert is a liberal Democrat. To his credit, he usually tries to be fair and ask relevant questions, unlike most of his colleagues. As Senator from New York, it was entirely relevant to ask Senator Clinton her opinion of the decision by New York State Attoney General, Elliot Spitzer to give driver licenses to illegal aliens. When she tried to answer the question in her usual evasive manner that would offend no one, she was called on it and Russert, appropriately, asked a follow up question to pin down her position. It should be added that may be the first time any member of the media has ever tried to pin her down with a hard question. <BR/><BR/>Does Mrs Clinton want to see licenses given to illegal aliens? Of course she does. She doesn't want to offend the Hispanic lobby-not that all Hispanics favor such a move. Also consider this: If Clinton goes up against Giuliani in the general election, she is going to need all the votes she can get to carry New York. Make no mistake. A US state driver license is the main form of picture ID in our country. With that piece of ID, other doors open up-including voter registration, where many states including California, are prohibited from checking a voter's citizenship or even ID at the polls.<BR/><BR/>Yesterday, Clinton appeared at her alma mater, Wellesley University, where she made a pointed reference to the "Boy's Club"-meaning her male colleagues in the debates- a brazen move to gain sympathy as a woman being ganged up on by the "Boys". It sparked loud applause. Indeed, aside from the fact that Obama, Edwards and Dodd jumped on her during the debate, Obama has now criticized her for wanting to be treated in a preferential manner. His criticism is appropriate. Here is why.<BR/><BR/>Mrs Clinton is running for President- Commander-in Chief of the Armed Forces. In fact, she is the front-runner by a wide margin. It is she who would take us into war. It is she who we expect to stand up to Iran, North Korea and world-wide Islamic terror. If she cannot stand up to this kind of give and take from her male competitors for the nomination, then how can we expect her to be the strong kind of leader that we need in these troubled times? As Obama said, she cannot say, "Don't pick on me." and expect to be considered a serious candidate for president. As front-runner, she should expect to be attacked by the others.<BR/><BR/>To me, this is further evidence that Clinton would be annihilated in a debate with any of the Republican front-runners. Behind all the glitter, spin and propaganda about her, she is a dishonest charlatan who cannot be truthful about where she really wants to take this country (into socialism). Her shifty lies and evasions should be obvious to anyone watching her on TV or in person. No wonder many Republicans want her to win the nomination.<BR/><BR/>gary fouse<BR/>fousesquawkGary Fousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17014739065121483409noreply@blogger.com