Monday, April 24, 2017

When the swallows come back to Alabama maybe I'll get my breakfast.

Can you see the osprey?

All Photos by Norman E. Hooben
When the swallows come back to Alabama maybe I'll get my breakfast.
by Norman E. Hooben
I could leave it at that and 99.9% of the readers would probably not get it but the sentence is a play on words combining both the author of a song and its would-be publisher. 

Sometime prior to 1939, songwriter Leon René penned the lyrics to “When the swallows come back to Capistrano” a romantic song I was familiar with in the late 50’s sung by then popular Pat Boone.  René had difficulty getting his song published and it was suggested by Shapiro, Bernstein & Company (a publisher) to change the title to “When the swallows come back to Alabama” since most people did not know where Capistrano was.

René came up with the idea for this song when he was in bed one morning recovering from tuberculosis. His wife had not brought him his morning meal, so he quipped, "Maybe when the swallows come back to Capistrano, I'll get my breakfast."

Eventually Warner Brothers published the song, giving René a much-needed $500 advance. The investment paid off for Warner Brothers, as the song was recorded by many big names and sold very well as sheet music.  In addition to Glenn Miller, the song was also recorded by the Ink Spots, Pat Boone and Elvis Presley.

So when the swallows come back to Capistrano it’s a sure sign of spring and so it is with Osprey… When the Osprey come back to Cape Cod it’s not only a sign of spring and pleasant weather, the tourist and locals alike start piling in to Frosty’s for some fried clams.


Saturday, April 22, 2017

City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health announced a pro-Palestinian Sharia Law advocate will serve as the school's commencement speaker.

The following from: FOX News Insider
Outrageous Sharia Law Advocate to Give Commencement Speech at Taxpayer-Funded University

There's been some controversy after the City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health announced a pro-Palestinian Sharia Law advocate will serve as the school's commencement speaker.

“I am delighted to confirm that Linda Sarsour will indeed speak at our June 1 commencement at the Apollo Theater,” said Barbara Aaron, chief of staff to the school’s dean, Ayman El-Mohandes.

Now, some, including state Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn), are saying that Sarsour’s activism and beliefs make her unfit to serve as speaker at the taxpayer-funded university's commencement.

“She is someone who associates with radical Islamists," Hikind said. "She is someone who has said, clearly, she thinks throwing rocks at cars in Israel is a good thing."

“I mean, it’s just nuts. It makes no sense. It’s crazy to have this woman be the person who’s going to speak to the students,” Hikind added.

Sunday, April 16, 2017

Looney Dianne Feinstein Is At It Again...can you believe this!

Provided by Storm'n Norm'n
Dianne Feinstein Says Trump’s New Policies Are Criminalizing Illegal Aliens
by Joseph Morgan 
Dianne Feinstein recently took to twitter so slam the President saying that Trump’s new immigration policies are criminalizing illegal aliens.
Reacting to Attorney General Jeff Session’s recent pledge to actually begin anew the enforcement our nation’s immigration laws, Feinstein had somewhat of a meltdown. Taking to her twitter account to declare,
“@TheJusticeDept should not shift its limited resources to criminalizing undocumented immigrants.”
Illegal aliens are breaking the law, and it’s a law that Sessions and Trump had nothing to do with writing. So how exactly is Trump criminalizing a criminal act?
That wasn’t the only tweet she sent out though. She went on,
“Make no mistake; this is not about public safety. It’s about pushing a false narrative that all undocumented immigrants are criminals.”
It is Dianne Feinstein and her Democrat colleagues who seem intent on pushing the false narrative, that just because you oppose illegal immigration, and god forbid you actually enforce it if you are in public office, then that somehow makes you a racist, or a xenophobic monster.
As established by federal immigration law, undocumented immigrants are criminals because they are breaking the law. It’s not a false narrative to say that they are criminals because they are criminals.
If anyone were interested in perusing more of Dianne Feinstein’s nonsense on the matter she linked her tweets to another statement she made on the matter:
The Justice Department has limited resources. It’s troubling that Attorney General Sessions is directing the department to shift its resources to criminalizing undocumented immigrants and prosecuting them under felony charges for simply working. California’s agriculture industry, for example, could be devastated under these new policies.
At the same time Attorney General Sessions wants to use more federal resources to prosecute immigrants, the Trump administration has proposed cutting vital Justice Department support for state and local law enforcement by $700 million and eliminating legal assistance for low-income Americans. These are the wrong priorities for our country.
I’m also concerned that Attorney General Sessions is hindering the ability of U.S. attorneys’ offices to focus their resources on the needs of their communities. U.S. attorneys should not be forced to divert their resources from important cases already underway, including financial fraud, cybercrime and sex trafficking.
This is not about improving public safety. This is about furthering a false narrative that all undocumented immigrants are dangerous criminals.
Trump’s policies do no such thing of course. Session comments, while in Nogales, AZ, only served notice that enforcing existing laws, and supporting the federal officers who help in that process was going to be a real focus of Trump’s Justice Department.
In all of her self-righteous rage, Feinstein omitted all the stories about illegal aliens raping and killing Americans. Feinstein’s political correct view of illegal aliens in this country is the only false narrative anyone should be concerned with.

Original Post Here

Team Writer at Western Free Press
Joseph was born and raised in Tucson, AZ. He received a Master's in U.S. history, with an emphasis on American constitutionalism from the UA, with a minor in Aerospace Mechanical Engineering. He took a job right out of college as a financial advisor, then switched career paths to teaching History at Pima Community College, while tutoring mathematics on the side. He has since returned to a financial career. He has a passion for politics and debate, believing that we the people must converse with each other about ideas and become engaged in the political formative process, as opposed to simply reacting to what government does. His ideological emphasis, in which he believes everyone can find common ground, is natural rights philosophy.

Wednesday, April 12, 2017


Turns out Obama was the real Russian stooge
By Rich Lowry

The circumstantial evidence is mounting that the Kremlin succeeded in infiltrating the US government at the highest levels.
How else to explain a newly elected president looking the other way after an act of Russian aggression? Agreeing to a farcically one-sided nuclear deal? Mercilessly mocking the idea that Russia represents our foremost geo-political foe?
Accommodating the illicit nuclear ambitions of a Russian ally? Welcoming a Russian foothold in the Middle East? Refusing to provide arms to a sovereign country invaded by Russia? Diminishing our defenses and pursuing a Moscow-friendly policy of hostility to fossil fuels?

All of these items, of course, refer to things said or done by President Barack Obama.

To take them in order: He re-set with Russia shortly after its clash with Georgia in 2008. He concluded the New START agreement with Moscow that reduced our nuclear forces but not theirs. When candidate Mitt Romney warned about Russia in the 2012 campaign, Obama rejected him as a Cold War relic.
The president then went on to forge an agreement with Russia’s ally Iran to allow it to preserve its nuclear program. During the red-line fiasco, he eagerly grasped a lifeline from Russia at the price of accepting its intervention in Syria. He never budged on giving Ukraine “lethal” weapons to defend itself from Russian attack.
Finally, Obama cut US defense spending and cracked down on fossil fuels — a policy that Russia welcomes, since its economy is dependent on high oil prices.
Put all of this together, and it’s impossible to conclude anything other than that Obama was a Russian stooge — and not out of any nefarious dealings, but out of his own naïveté and weakness.
Obama didn’t expect any rewards when he asked then-Russian President Dimitri Medvedev during a hot mic moment at an international meeting to relay to Vladimir Putin his ability to be more “flexible” after the 2012 election; he was, to put it in terms of the current Russian election controversy, “colluding” with the Russians in the belief it was a good strategy. His “kompromat” was his own foolishness.

Trump's strike on Syria a direct hit on Putin's MidEast power

0:0 When 59 Tomahawk missiles struck Syria before dawn on Friday,...
The cost of Obama’s orientation toward Russia became clearer over the last two weeks. When he pulled up short from enforcing his red line, an agreement with the Russians to remove Bashar al-Assad’s chemical weapons became the fig leaf to cover his retreat.
This deal was obviously deficient, but Obama officials used clever language to give the impression that it had removed all chemical weapons from Syria. Never mind that Assad still used chlorine gas to attack his population — exploiting a grievous loophole — and that evidence piled up that Assad was cheating more broadly.
The Russians eagerly covered for Assad because he’s their client. What was the Obama administration’s excuse? It effectively made itself a liar for the Russians. At the same time Moscow bolstered the Assad regime, we said had to go, smashed the moderate opposition we were trying to create, and sent a destabilizing refugee flow into Europe. This was a moral and strategic disaster.
To be sure, Donald Trump’s statements about Russia over the last year-and-a-half have often been stupid and shameful. But there was always a good chance that Russia’s blatant hostility to our values and interests would make any attempted Trump detente unsustainable. With his secretary of state and UN ambassador hitting Russia hard over the Assad gas attack and Trump’s strike challenging Russia’s position, the administration looks to be adopting a hard-headed attitude without bothering with a doomed re-set first.
Even if Obama eventually got tougher on Russia — imposing sanctions after the Ukraine invasion and sending contingents of US troops to countries near Russia — he never entirely shed his reflex toward accommodation.
No matter what conspiracy theorists might say, there’s nothing to suggest anything untoward about Obama’s relationship with Russia. But based on the record alone, you might have suspicions.

Monday, April 3, 2017

The left is a treasonous movement...or who will win in the long term?

"And there are few signs that Democrats properly understand the dangerous road that the radical left is drawing them toward."
...the countdown is now at 2 1/2
If one were to follow the successes of the Communist Party in America it would soon become obvious that they are the most successful party in terms of their defined goals...especially with goal #15, "Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States." (Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963).  However they have had some competition in recent years by those who would have neither a Democrat Party or a Communist Party.  Its a no-brainer that the Communist Party has taken over the Democrat Party and some would argue a large portion of the Republican Party; it's the Muslim parties that have made inroads...especially with the election of Barack Hussein Obama.  Both the Communists and the Muslims have defined their goals in statements or written declarations that omit any reference to immediacy but instead seek the more successful route of the long term (i.e. The Muslim Brotherhood stated their goals back in the year 1928).  The recent elections of the leadership of the Democrat Party with an openly Marxist and closet (partially opened) Muslim further enhance my point but the rank and file democrats have yet to see the disconnect from our American way of wonders if they'll ever wake up.  Read the following three articles and see if you don't agree. ~ Norman E. Hooben

#1. Perez wins bid to lead Democratic Party
By Jonathan Easley
ATLANTA – Former Labor Secretary Tom Perez has defeated Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) to become the next chairman of the Democratic National Committee in a blow to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and the progressive wing of the party.
Perez won with 235 votes on the second ballot, with 218 votes needed to reach a majority. Ellison topped out at 200 votes in both rounds of balloting.
The win came after Perez failed to clear the threshold for victory by only one vote on the first ballot, dramatically heightening the tension in the room as the campaigns furiously whipped DNC members to join their side.
It was a dramatic day that Democrats hope will set them on the path toward unity. However, lingering divisions from the primary may be hard to overcome.
Former Vice President Joe Biden and other key figures from the Obama administration supported Perez, who backed Hillary Clinton in the primary.
Sanders and many of his allies backed Ellison, the first-ever Muslim elected to Congress and a star on the left. Several Ellison supporters told The Hill this week that they are unsure if they can back Perez.
The race to become the next Democratic Party leader split along establishment-grassroots lines and in many ways mirrored the divisive 2016 presidential primary between Sanders and Clinton.

On Saturday, the mainstream Democrats won out again.

Perez, the 55-year-old son of Dominican immigrants and the first ever Latino to lead the DNC, becomes the partys public face and chief spokesperson in charge of staking out Democratic opposition to President Trump.
“We are united in our love for the Democratic Party,” he said. “The robust discussions that go on in the Democratic Party - we have spirited discussions and then we all lock hands and celebrate our shared interests.”

Prior to serving as President Obama's Labor secretary, Perez was a civil rights attorney in the Justice Department under Attorney General Eric Holder, who endorsed him in the chairmanship race.
He has almost no electoral experience, save for a successful bid for Montgomery County Council and a failed run at Maryland attorney general, in which he was disqualified over a technicality.
“I recognize I have a lot of work to do and I recognize I have a lot of learning to do,” he said.
As chairman of the DNC, Perez inherits a monumental rebuilding project across the country after years of Democratic losses at every level of government.

And he will also have to go about the work of unifying a fractured party.

While Democrats sought to squash the intra-party divisions that linger from the contentious presidential primary, the campaign to be the next DNC chairman became a proxy battle between the rival factions.

Perezs win is a victory for centrist Democrats, many of whom were wary of handing the party over to the Sanders wing. But his election risks infuriating progressives, many of whom wanted to see Ellison, an early supporter of Sanders, installed atop the DNC.

There are still bitter feelings among Sanders supporters who feel the DNC — then led by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) — rigged the primary against Sanders and in favor of Clinton. Wasserman Schultz resigned at the Democratic National Convention after hacked emails posted by WikiLeaks appeared to show DNC staffers working to undermine Sanders.

In a symbolic move meant to reach out to the left, Perez’s first act as chairman was to make Ellison deputy chairman of the DNC.
Perez was encouraged by several top Obama officials to run for DNC chair. Obama on Saturday congratulated Perez on his victory and for making Ellison his deputy.
"I know that Tom Perez will unite us under that banner of opportunity, and lay the groundwork for a new generation of Democratic leadership for this big, bold, inclusive, dynamic America we love so much," Obama said in a statement.
Ellison urged his supporters to overcome their hard feelings and unite.
“If you came here supporting me … I’m asking you to give everything you’ve got to support chairman Perez,” Ellison said. “We don’t have the luxury folks to walk out of this room divided.”
Still, in the immediate aftermath of the election, Ellison’s supporters erupted in a chant of "Party for the people, not big money."
Sanders congratulated Perez on his victory, but said “it is imperative that Tom understands that the same-old, same-old is not working and that we must open the doors of the party to working people and young people in a way that has never been done before.”
The progressive grassroots group Democracy for America released a statement calling Perez’s victory "incredibly disappointing" and "another missed opportunity."

Perezs allies bristle at the notion that he is not a true progressive, citing his work as a civil rights attorney and as Labor secretary.

His victory comes as liberals are still reeling from Trumps upset of Clinton, and Perez takes control of a party out of power at the White House, in both chambers of Congress, and in a majority of statehouses and governor’s mansions across the country.

There are 33 GOP governors, compared to only 21 for Democrats. Since Obama was sworn into office in 2009, Republicans have gained more than 1,000 state legislative seats across the country.

There is urgency for Democrats to turn things around quickly, particularly at the state level, where legislators will redraw district lines in 2020. Democrats blame GOP gerrymandering in 2010 for their inability to make significant gains in the House.

 In Congress, the electoral map is unfavorable for Democrats in 2018. 
While the out-of-power party typically picks up House seats in an off-year election, Democrats are defending 25 seats in the Senate, including 10 in states that Trump won in 2016.

Like all of the candidates running, Perez has vowed to return the DNC to former chairman Howard Deans 50-state strategy, which is still viewed by many in the party as the gold standard. 

Many Democrats blame their losses on a disconnect between the national party in Washington and grassroots liberals across the country and are eager for the new chairman to direct more resources and attention to those on the ground.
#2.  Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer.
A civil war has begun.
This civil war is very different than the last one. There are no cannons or cavalry charges. The left doesn’t want to secede. It wants to rule. Political conflicts become civil wars when one side refuses to accept the existing authority. The left has rejected all forms of authority that it doesn’t control.
The left has rejected the outcome of the last two presidential elections won by Republicans. It has rejected the judicial authority of the Supreme Court when it decisions don’t accord with its agenda. It rejects the legislative authority of Congress when it is not dominated by the left.
It rejected the Constitution so long ago that it hardly bears mentioning. 
It was for total unilateral executive authority under Obama. And now it’s for states unilaterally deciding what laws they will follow. (As long as that involves defying immigration laws under Trump, not following them under Obama.) It was for the sacrosanct authority of the Senate when it held the majority. Then it decried the Senate as an outmoded institution when the Republicans took it over.
It was for Obama defying the orders of Federal judges, no matter how well grounded in existing law, and it is for Federal judges overriding any order by Trump on any grounds whatsoever. It was for Obama penalizing whistleblowers, but now undermining the government from within has become “patriotic”.
There is no form of legal authority that the left accepts as a permanent institution. It only utilizes forms of authority selectively when it controls them. But when government officials refuse the orders of the duly elected government because their allegiance is to an ideology whose agenda is in conflict with the President and Congress, that’s not activism, protest, politics or civil disobedience; it’s treason.
After losing Congress, the left consolidated its authority in the White House. After losing the White House, the left shifted its center of authority to Federal judges and unelected government officials. Each defeat led the radicalized Democrats to relocate from more democratic to less democratic institutions.
This isn’t just hypocrisy. That’s a common political sin. Hypocrites maneuver within the system. The left has no allegiance to the system. It accepts no laws other than those dictated by its ideology.
Democrats have become radicalized by the left. This doesn’t just mean that they pursue all sorts of bad policies. It means that their first and foremost allegiance is to an ideology, not the Constitution, not our country or our system of government. All of those are only to be used as vehicles for their ideology.
That’s why compromise has become impossible.
Our system of government was designed to allow different groups to negotiate their differences. But those differences were supposed to be based around finding shared interests. The most profound of these shared interests was that of a common country based around certain civilizational values. The left has replaced these Founding ideas with radically different notions and principles. It has rejected the primary importance of the country As a result it shares little in the way of interests or values.
Instead it has retreated to cultural urban and suburban enclaves where it has centralized tremendous amounts of power while disregarding the interests and values of most of the country. If it considers them at all, it is convinced that they will shortly disappear to be replaced by compliant immigrants and college indoctrinated leftists who will form a permanent demographic majority for its agenda.
But it couldn’t wait that long because it is animated by the conviction that enforcing its ideas is urgent and inevitable. And so it turned what had been a hidden transition into an open break.
In the hidden transition, its authority figures had hijacked the law and every political office they held to pursue their ideological agenda. The left had used its vast cultural power to manufacture a consensus that was slowly transitioning the country from American values to its values and agendas. The right had proven largely impotent in the face of a program which corrupted and subverted from within.
The left was enormously successful in this regard. It was so successful that it lost all sense of proportion and decided to be open about its views and to launch a political power struggle after losing an election.
The Democrats were no longer being slowly injected with leftist ideology. Instead the left openly took over and demanded allegiance to open borders, identity politics and environmental fanaticism. The exodus of voters wiped out the Democrats across much of what the left deemed flyover country.
The left responded to democratic defeats by retreating deeper into undemocratic institutions, whether it was the bureaucracy or the corporate media, while doubling down on its political radicalism. It is now openly defying the outcome of a national election using a coalition of bureaucrats, corporations, unelected officials, celebrities and reporters that are based out of its cultural and political enclaves.
It has responded to a lost election by constructing sanctuary cities and states thereby turning a cultural and ideological secession into a legal secession. But while secessionists want to be left alone authoritarians want everyone to follow their laws. The left is an authoritarian movement that wants total compliance with its dictates with severe punishments for those who disobey.
The left describes its actions as principled. But more accurately they are ideological. Officials at various levels of government have rejected the authority of the President of the United States, of Congress and of the Constitution because those are at odds with their radical ideology. Judges have cloaked this rejection in law. Mayors and governors are not even pretending that their actions are lawful.
The choices of this civil war are painfully clear.
We can have a system of government based around the Constitution with democratically elected representatives. Or we can have one based on the ideological principles of the left in which all laws and processes, including elections and the Constitution, are fig leaves for enforcing social justice.
But we cannot have both.
Some civil wars happen when a political conflict can’t be resolved at the political level. The really bad ones happen when an irresolvable political conflict combines with an irresolvable cultural conflict.
That is what we have now.
The left has made it clear that it will not accept the lawful authority of our system of government. It will not accept the outcome of elections. It will not accept these things because they are at odds with its ideology and because they represent the will of large portions of the country that they despise.
The question is what comes next.
The last time around growing tensions began to explode in violent confrontations between extremists on both sides. These extremists were lauded by moderates who mainstreamed their views. The first Republican president was elected and rejected. The political tensions led to conflict and then civil war.
The left doesn’t believe in secession. It’s an authoritarian political movement that has lost democratic authority. There is now a political power struggle underway between the democratically elected officials and the undemocratic machinery of government aided by a handful of judges and local elected officials.
What this really means is that there are two competing governments; the legal government and a treasonous anti-government of the left. If this political conflict progresses, agencies and individuals at every level of government will be asked to demonstrate their allegiance to these two competing governments. And that can swiftly and explosively transform into an actual civil war.
There is no sign that the left understands or is troubled by the implications of the conflict it has initiated.  And there are few signs that Democrats properly understand the dangerous road that the radical left is drawing them toward. The left assumes that the winners of a democratic election will back down rather than stand on their authority. It is unprepared for the possibility that democracy won’t die in darkness.
Civil wars end when one side is forced to accept the authority of the other. The left expects everyone to accept its ideological authority. Conservatives expect the left to accept Constitutional authority. The conflict is still political and cultural. It’s being fought in the media and within the government. But if neither side backs down, then it will go beyond words as both sides give contradictory orders.
The left is a treasonous movement. The Democrats became a treasonous organization when they fell under the sway of a movement that rejects our system of government, its laws and its elections. Now their treason is coming to a head. They are engaged in a struggle for power against the government. That’s not protest It’s not activism. The old treason of the sixties has come of age. A civil war has begun.
This is a primal conflict between a totalitarian system and a democratic system. Its outcome will determine whether we will be a free nation or a nation of slaves.
#3. This column was printed in the Cape Cod Times a couple of days ago and written by me (Patricia Stebbins). I am posting it because I believe it is something that needs to be said. Perhaps some 0f you might share it.
Recently, while slogging through pages of wrath from deranged Trump haters, I spotted a different kind of AP article: “In Venezuela short on food, short of hope.” It was heart wrenching; details of “tens of thousands hungry and starving; a murder rate among the highest in the world and its economy so crippled that the average shopper spends 35 hours a month waiting in line. Citizens and students repeatedly gathered in protest with many killed and hundreds of political prisoners held incommunicado in dungeons. Fear of the government accompanies hopelessness as it becomes ever more repressive. Students flee in droves to other countries, believing change will never come. “
But here is the shocking quote; the sentence that hopefully will awaken every reader to reality!
“Yet even as the country becomes increasingly unlivable, the SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT is even more entrenched ..... and a sense of hopelessness has settled over what was once among the richest nations in South America.” The Socialist government! Absorb that, all who daily foam at the mouth with malice toward President Trump! Then begin taking stock of the government and leadership which has brought our own country to the brink of this same fate. Consider the shambles of our economy, health care, educational system and international reputation; note that almost 50% of our citizens are unemployed and dependent upon the rest who support them. Observe that both our former President and she who “they” had chosen to be our President were mentored by and followed Saul Alinsky, a major proponent of socialism; that both the House Progressive and Black Caucuses are predominantly members of the “Democrat Socialists of America.” Note that this former President has not departed with grace and dignity (like his predecessors) but instead camps out in Washington, along with Democrat Congressional leaders and his “Rasputin”, and formed “Organization for Action”, his ‘shadow government.’ The goal, to discredit, stymie, create turmoil and obstruction so as to salvage his “”legacy” - which is to create our America into a socialist state. Stop for a minute to consider that socialism always, always leads to poverty, slavery, loss of all liberties. And hopelessness.
Think about the fact that our kids in high schools and colleges are being brainwashed into believing that socialism is desirable; nationalism is bad, and directed to go out and waste time demonstrating and rioting when they should be learning how to be grownups and prepare for their future.
I worked for and admired JFK and believe he would be outraged to see his Party turn into a bunch of sneaky, mean spirited, whiny socialists, supplemented by multitudes of paid, black clad, crowbar wielding thugs.
Except for most of the east and west coasts, the words of Donald Trump resonated with the anger of middle Americans at how they have been betrayed by their own government. Instead of socialism, Trump promises to keep America as an independent , free and prosperous nation; to “clean out the swamp” that is our present government. He promises to restore our economy, our health care system; cleanse our educational system of its present shortcomings, including Common Core; to rein in governmental agencies that operate mandating onerous regulations; to appoint Supreme Court Justices and a Federal Judicial system that adheres to our Constitution.
He makes job creation a prime goal so that every American can get a good, well paying job, along with strengthening our military which now struggles with lack of equipment, repair parts and operates at a capacity barely that of post-World War II. He believes all Americans are entitled to freedoms of speech, religion and bathroom privacy; closed borders and the right to insist that those who want to come here will be self supporting and willing to accept our laws, Constitution, customs, government and speak or learn our language. Do we REALLY want to be “re-populated” and brought down ourselves to the level of those we are bringing in?? And in spite of all the noise, obstruction and nattering of the politicians and the press, Trump is steadily moving toward reaching that goal.
So think about this and consider what you want for OUR America. And no matter what the Washington, DSA, and United Nations elite crowd want for us it is still OUR country! But we must be prepared to defend our rights and our President; to give Donald Trump the support and help he needs to move forward. We need to demand that the Pelosis, Schumers, McCains, et al, stop obstructing Trump’s progress and note that as the nation learns more and more, they will be remembered as part of the “Swamp” in the next elections. Socialist, Communist and Progressive are all the same thing. So consider, Americans, and choose wisely! It’s either give our President a fair chance or become an American Venezuela!
Patricia Stebbins
East Sandwich, MA


Ponder this...↓

Saturday, March 25, 2017

The GOP Healthcare Bill...all you need to know!

Perhaps Paul Ryan never read the United States Constitution for there is nothing therein that dictates healthcare as a "right" however Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party dictate that it is a "fundamental right" therefor any attempt by Ryan and his Republican cohorts to force healthcare upon the populace makes all of them dictator want-a-bees. 
"Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an underground dictatorship....To restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic and have no place in a republic....The Constitution of this republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom." ~  Dr. Benjamin Rush, signer of the Declaration of Independence
Dare we have such learned men as Benjamin Rush or have they all been left behind in the pages of history books.  Rush's premonition is presently upon us and no one appears to be using the one tool that will prevent this dictatorship from remaining underground and that is the United States Constitution; when all whom have sworn to uphold it, uphold it, that fundamental right called "freedom" will reign...  I'm not finished with this just yet...just cannot think of anything else to say at the moment. ~ Norman E. Hooben

Friday, March 17, 2017

Doesn't this tell us something...


The following video has probably the most important information that every American should be aware of...
On a somewhat personal note it is a summary of everything I've ever said about the subject material by someone more qualified than myself to present it in a meaningful format.  This is not 'junk' as one critic of mine has described most, if not all, of my writings.  It is also the truth that another critic has denied by claiming to have read the Quran but obviously overlooked the quoted passages herein.  Here's Clare Lopez, take the time and listen to every word...especially toward the end of her excellent presentation...I think you will agree that all Americans have a need to know what America's fate will be if Sharia is allowed to advance any further. ~ Norm

Americans have a tendency to forget and that's unfortunate for there are people within our midst that would like to destroy the very fabric of our society by overwhelming us by the using false pretenses to undermine the weak minded.

More stories of interest:


Written on March 19th, 2017 by alpineskino shouts
It is time that liberals paid a price for these attacks and for conservatives to fight back against these bullies on the left By Jeff Crouere The election of Donald […]

SHAMEFUL: Video Fake Liberal Media, Democrats, Coordinated LIE About Trump…Pushed It Out As Truth

Written on March 18th, 2017 by alpineskino shouts
Remember when liberal media and entertainers, Democrat leaders and even Hillary Clinton got on TV and swore Trump never paid taxes? The Democrat Party even ran TV ad stating Trump […]

The West has finally woken up

Written on March 18th, 2017 by alpineskione shout
By Dr. Mordechai Kedar Sometimes it’s a good idea to take a step backwards, look at reality from a distance, and see the larger picture, taking in the whole forest rather than just the individual […]

Islamic Terror at Paris Airport: Terrorist: “I’m here to die in the name of Allah”

Written on March 18th, 2017 by alpineskino shouts
The 39-year-old Islamic Terrorist was killed at Paris’ Orly airport on Saturday after trying to wrestle away a soldier’s weapon had already crossed authorities’ radar for Islamic extremism. Paris police said the […]

Hawaiian Judge Who Block Trump Was Obama’s Classmate; Obama Visited Hawaii At Same Time

Written on March 18th, 2017 by alpineskino shouts
Questions of impropriety are being raised. Judge Watson, who overruled Trump’s travel ban, is a long time friend of former President Obama, and Obama detoured to Hawaii just prior to […]

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

If this story doesn't warm your heart, you don't have one.

Source: mother nature network
Stray dog follows adventure race team for 430 miles
The harrowing story of how the dog finished the race with his adopted companions will melt your heart.
By Bryan Nelson March 6, 2017
A stray dog named Arthur made an amazing trek with his new companions. (Photo: TrendingVideos/YouTube)
The Adventure Racing World Series might be the most fraught and challenging sports event in the world. It usually involves teams of four navigating through a vast wilderness terrain while utilizing adventure skills from a range of disciplines including trekking, adventure running, mountain biking, paddling and climbing.
During the 2014 competition, for the first time ever, an exception was made so that one team could finish the race with five members instead of four. That fifth member? A stray dog, named Arthur by his adopted companions, who decided to follow one team for 430 harrowing miles through the Amazon jungle, according to the Daily Mail. If this story doesn't warm your heart, you don't have one.
Team Peak Performance, hailing from Sweden, happened upon Arthur while sharing a meal in advance of a 20-mile race stage through rough terrain in Ecuador. Mikael Lindnord, one of the team's members, felt sorry for the scruffy, lonely stray, and decided to share a meatball with him. It was an innocent gesture — Lindnord had no intention but to lift the poor pooch's spirits — but it was a gesture that would earn him a friend for life.
As the team got up to continue their race, Arthur tagged along. The team suspected he would eventually turn back around, but Arthur kept following them. He trailed them through muddy jungle, across vast distances of the Amazon river, all the way to the finish line.
The sport of adventure racing is not for the faint of heart — no more for dogs than for humans. During the most harrowing stages of the race, the team tried to shrug off their canine companion over concerns for his safety, but Arthur would have none of it. He was determined to stick with his adopted companions.
For instance, one crucial stage of the race requires the team to kayak along the coast for 36 miles. Understandably, the team was required to leave Arthur behind on the shore. But as they paddled away, Arthur broke free and leaped into the water and began swimming after the team. Realizing that the dog was willing to drown in order to stay with his friends, the team lifted Arthur onto the kayak so the dog could complete the race with them, to sounds of ovation from bystanders watching from the shore.
Arthur's loyalty paid off in the end; Lindnord was able to adopt him and bring him back to his home in Sweden, where the dog is currently living, healthy and happy.
"I almost cried in front of the computer, when receiving the decision from Jordbruksverket (Board of Agriculture) in Sweden!" reported Lindnord when he first heard that his request to adopt Arthur was granted. "I came to Ecuador to win the World Championship. Instead, I got a new friend."

Watch an ESPN video chronicling Arthur's heart-warming story here: