Saturday, August 4, 2012

Syria mis-information exposed! Re-printed here because you won't read it in the main stream media.

On April the 18th of this year I made the following statement:
Perhaps you should rethink who's side we should be supporting. Assad is fighting off the friends of Obama and company...they are mostly Sunni Muslims (Muslim Brotherhood etc.) The main stream media and the United Nations are quite proud of their world-wide indoctrination of the 'people'... they have convinced most people that Assad is killing his own people and this is simply not true. It's a religious war of sorts, Muslims against Muslims (Alawis or Alawites against the Sunnis et al Muslims).  The civilized world needs to wake up. ~ Norman E. Hooben (See Re-thinking Assad)
Then on May 12th I posted this:
Syria: Obama & Company Lying To American Public (link)
...and on June 9th this :
Syria: Want to stop the slaughter? Stop Obama! He's backing the carnage! (link)
"...dishing out what the main stream media does not want you to know. Proffessor Michel Chossudovsky, Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization backs up everything I've said and more." ...at the very least watch the video! here
Others bloggers may be on top of this but only a few stand out (Websites that understand the hypocrisy of Islam and the danger Islam presents to America: Planck's Constant, Jihad Watch, Atlas Shrugs, Take Our Country Back, ...actually there are too numerous to count) and what stood out the most today was the headline over at Atlas Shrugs:
Muslim Brotherhood forms army inside Syria
The story comes to us from The Telegraph and is reprinted here (because you won't read it in the main stream media and like Professor Chossudovsky backs up everything I've said and more!):

Muslim Brotherhood establishes militia inside Syria
The Muslim Brotherhood has established its own militia inside Syria as the country's rebels fracture between radical Islamists and their rivals, commanders and gun-runners have told The Daily Telegraph.


Calling itself the "Armed Men of the Muslim Brotherhood", the militia has a presence in Damascus as well as opposition hot spots like Homs and Idlib. One of their organisers, who called himself Abu Hamza, said that he started the movement along with a member of the Syrian National Council (SNC), the opposition alliance.
"We saw there were civilians with weapons inside, so we decided to co-operate with them and put them under one umbrella," he said.
Hossam Abu Habel, whose late father was in Syria's Muslim Brotherhood in the 1950s, said that he raised $40-50,000 (£25,000-£32,000) a month to supply Islamist militias in Homs province with weapons and other aid.
The militias he funded were not affiliated to the Free Syrian Army (FSA), the main rebel movement, added Mr Abu Habel.
"Our mission is to build a civil country but with an Islamic base," he said. "We are trying to raise awareness for Islam and for jihad."
The Syrian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood has been revitalised by the organisation's success in Egypt, where it won both parliamentary and presidential elections.
In the early days of the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad, secular and Islamist rebels were both prepared to fight under the FSA's banner and recognise the SNC as their political masters.
But the FSA, dominated by defectors from the regime's army, has fallen out with the SNC, whose leaders are in exile. It now has its own political front, the Syrian Support Group (SSG). This split has divided the revolution's main international backers, with Saudi Arabia supporting the FSA and Qatar moving closer to the SNC and the Islamist militias.
The divisions are affecting operations on the ground: competing militias co-operate when necessary but otherwise disavow each other. "I would take it as an insult if you described me as FSA," said Abu Bakri, a front line commander of an Islamist militia in Aleppo calling itself the Abu Emara Battalion.
One activist described how he was working with Sunni politicians in Lebanon to buy arms for the FSA with Saudi money.
A member of the FSA command centre, located in neighbouring Turkey, told the Daily Telegraph that they have this week received large consignments of ammunition, machine guns and anti-tank missiles. At one point Saudi Arabia and Qatar were both funding the FSA, with the command centre receiving up to $3 million in cash every month. But the operative said the situation had changed.
"Now we are not working with the Qataris because they made so many mistakes supporting other groups."
But the fracturing of the armed opposition raises the prospect of post-Assad Syria becoming a battleground. "This adds to the fragmentation and tones down the credibility of the opposition," said Louay Sakka, the SSG's Executive Director. "Supporters should go through the proper channel of the Free Syrian Army military council rather than build their own militias."
Amr al-Azm, a Syrian-American academic who was briefly on the SNC, said that Syria risked the same kind of disintegration that was set in motion by Saddam Hussein's downfall in neighbouring Iraq. The West's decision to limit its involvement in the Syrian conflict – and refrain from supplying lethal weapons – had left a gap for the Islamists to fill.
"By playing to your own fears, you are making them come true," said Mr Azm. "By not intervening, you are forcing people to go those who have resources. No one wants to go to al-Qaeda, but if you are down to your last five bullets and someone asks you to say 'Allahu Akbar' (God is greatest) five times, you do it."
____________________________

Wake Up America...the main stream media is trying to brainwash brainwashing you!

The shark decided I wasn't tasty...and he let me go...after I kicked him in the teeth!

Source: Boston Herald
Man attacked by shark really put his foot down‘I kicked its teeth and it let me go’
By O’Ryan Johnson

A Denver man chewed by a great white shark Monday vowed he will take to the waters off Ballston Beach on Cape Cod again — but maybe with a bit more care. “It’s my favorite beach in the world, and I’m sure I’ll be back swimming,” said Christopher Myers, 50, of Denver. “I think I’ll stick a little closer to the shore.” Myers and his 16-year-old son, J.J., were headed to a sandbar 400 yards offshore Monday afternoon, when they decided it was too far and headed back. Just then the shark struck. “It felt like something very heavy had a very hard grip on my leg,” he said. “I didn’t feel pain from the lacerations. I’m not quite sure it pulled me under. Some people said they saw my head go under. I don’t remember that.” Myers said the shark grabbed his left foot, and he kicked with his free right foot at what he believes was the creature’s snout. “I’ve got a lot of lacerations on my right foot where I kicked at it, and I imagine I kicked its teeth and it let me go,” he said. “I imagine it must have been the snout I was kicking.” ...see full story here

Friday, August 3, 2012

Uncle Sam's Last Ride...or is it?

We're going to stand up and holler, "We are mad as hell and we are not going to take it anymore!"

Well are we?  Let's get movin' !

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Email: When is spam not spam? When you get one like this! (luv it!)

From: link removed 
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 12:47 PM
Subject: WHEN I AM GONE!
 
One day a woman's husband died, and on that clear, cold morning, in the warmth of their bedroom, the wife was struck with the pain of learning that sometimes there isn't "any more."

No more hugs, no more special moments to celebrate together, no more phone calls just to chat, no more "just one minute."
Sometimes, what we care about the most gets all used up and goes away, never to return before we can say good-bye, or say "I love you."

So while we have it, it's best we love it, care for it, fix it when it's broken and heal it when it's sick.
This is true for marriage....old cars...children with bad report cards, dogs with bad hips, and aging parents and grandparents. We keep them because they are worth it, because we are worth it.
Some things we keep -- like a best friend who moved away or a sister-in-law after divorce. There are just some things that make us happy, no matter what.
Life is important, like people we know who are special. And so, we keep them close!
Suppose one morning you never wake up, do all your friends know you love them? The important thing is to let every one of your friends know you love them, even if you think they don't love you back. And I do love each of you!!
And just in case I'm gone tomorrow, please vote against that asshole, Obama!!!!

Our position hasn't changed. ...Oh the hypocrisy of the White House***

video
Official White House Picture #2 of 8 Before Obama Changed His Position
Official White House Picture #2 of 8 After Obama Changed His Position
Apparently Obama Refuses To Recognize Israel (see caption below each picture) and the Jews
For you see Obama really loves the Muslims and would rather call Jerusalem, "Al-Quds"
 (see video below)
***This is what Michelle Obama meant by changing history (i.e. Jerusalem changed to Al-Quds...not to mention the takeover of our government by the the Muslim Brotherhood [see headline story below video])
Obama welcomes terrorists at the White House
White House officials held talks with representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood in Washington this week, as the Islamist group threw itself into the fray in Egypt’s presidential election. The meeting on Tuesday with low-level National Security Council staff was part of a series of US efforts to broaden engagement with new and emerging political parties following Egypt’s revolution last year, a US official said.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Rumor has it there will be an assassination attempt...an other incredible news!

I can't make this stuff up...but I would like to make a comment about the Penn State-Sandusky story.  If one reads the entire story including the ClimateGate link one wonders why Penn State continues to exist as a viable institution of higher learning.  The policies that existed in that school and the cover-ups that followed should be reason enough to close the doors forever!  Who in their right mind would want to brag about their alma mater knowing what we know now...sick place! ~ Norman E. Hooben

From Mediaite.com
Tennessee State Rep. E-Mailed Constituents Rumor That Obama May Stage Assassination Attempt
Tennessee Republican Kelly Keisling forwarded an e-mail from a conservative blogger to his constituents which alleged that President Obama would attempt to stage an assassination attempt on his life in an effort to keep the 2012 presidential election from happening... Full story continues here

From WestWord.com
Magical homicides: How Mexico lies about murders
In Mexico, you get to be a criminal as soon as the Mexican government kills you. Until that moment, most people who knew you had no idea you were a bad person. I will explain. This will take a little patience, but when you get through the numbers, you will be an expert on how to lie about murders.  ... Full story continues here

From American Thinker
The Climategate and Jerry Sandusky Scandals: A Common Thread
America, it's time to meet your newest top-secret government employee: a professional cover-up artist with a radical agenda.
Graham Spanier is the former Penn State University president who was fired during the Jerry Sandusky investigation for failing to properly investigate Sandusky when the pedophilia allegations first surfaced.  ...this sickening story continues here

From Huffington Post
Obama Descendant Of African Slave, According To Genealogy Research
The ancestry website Ancestry.com revealed an interesting new wrinkle Monday into President Barack Obama's roots, announcing that he is a descendant of the first African documented slave. The connection comes from the lineage of his Caucasian mother from Kansas.  Obama's ancestor, John Punch, came to Virginia sometime before 1640 as a slave. ...See (unbelieveable) video and read the rest of this insane story here   After reading this crap I don't have much respect for Ancestry.com ~ Norm

Monday, July 30, 2012

Why don't we read headlines like this?

by Norman E. Hooben
“And you will know the truth, and that truth will set you free.”…except for America where the lie currently dominates and freedom is one step away from Armageddon.   The biblical quote may have some validity when the truth is told but when all you are exposed to, day after day, is lie after lie then Goebbels quote is more cogent (“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” ~ Joseph Goebbels) 

And so it goes for Syria…and Libya and Egypt etc., etc.  Americans and possibly the entire western world are being lied to by their own media and elected officials day after day…and for what?  Well for one thing Americans are too na├»ve and/or complacent to figure out when the power struggle to control their minds has been won over by the very people who had won them over.  Obviously there are exceptions to that rule; else I would not be here trying to explain the mess.
Let’s start with the guy who likes to misdirect the American mindset the most, Barack Obama.  Some of you may recall the statement Mr. Obama made regarding the attack on Libya, “…operations in Libya "only cost us a billion dollars" and no US troops were killed or injured.”  To the fickle American audience attending and/or watching the late night television show starring Jay Leno, Obama has intentionally re-directed the attention away from the slaughter of “…some 60,000 Libyan civilians”.  So Obama has spent a billion taxpayer dollars to supply our so-called allies of the NATO alliance with the airpower to murder 60,000 civilians and you’re OK with that?  Muammar al-Gaddafi killed only 12, 653 people to attain and maintain his power house.  How many more people must Obama have killed to maintain his residence in the White House?  By the way, Obama did not get Osama bin-Laden.  Before you go off on a tangent, two words, “Prove it!”  Obama himself cannot prove it; he destroyed all the evidence.  Osama bin-Laden was murdered by Omar Sheikh and that was verified by Benazir Bhutto before she was assassinated.  Obama made up the fake raid using his Pakistani connections to make it appear real and to use the faux-capture for political gain with the ignorant amongst us…don’t laugh, it could be you!

Now most of us (55% as of Sept 2011) know the main stream media (MSM) cannot be trusted but yet a huge percentage of those distrusting souls still vote for the politicians supported by the MSM.  It’s like they cannot disconnect between the media and politics.  So even though they do not trust the media they still trust their politicians…and that should be classified as insane!  So what has the MSM been reporting on regarding the recent mess in Syria?  Ask just about any American what’s happening and they’ll tell you that Assad is killing his own people.  Oh?  And where did they learn that?  Why haven’t we learned about the atrocities committed by the other side…Obama’s side!  Damn those fickle Americans they’re playing into Obama’s hand leading us right into more conflicts and aiding the Muslim Brotherhood along with the Sunnis with the hope of wiping out the Alawites.  But you won’t read about it in the MSM!

Why don’t we read more headlines like this? 

 The lies of those unable to destroy the Syrian strength
By Ghaleb KANDIL
Syria was never the center of the universe as much as it is today. All around the world, hundreds of pieces of information and thousands of reports, rumors, fabricated pictures and made up news are emerging via media networks that are shedding light on contradictory positions and statements of senior Western officials. At this level, the Russian government is finding itself forced to issue quasi daily statements to deny many rumors and clarify the falsification affecting the positions of its officials.
Firstly, the American empire is doing its best to push the bitter cup away from it, i.e. the recognition of its defeat in the face of the Syrian state. Indeed, it is aware of what this recognition will generate in terms of the total collapse that will affect the governments collaborating with it in the region, and the repercussions whose prices will be paid by those involved in the global war it is leading against the Syrian national state and against a resisting liberation leader who defied American arrogance back when the whole world was under its control. Today, this leader’s status is similar to that of Fidel Castro in the fifties and sixties of last century. Despite the opportunity offered by Russia to the US to indirectly recognize the defeat, the American empire deployed all its efforts to sustain the violence on the ground, and exploited the Syrian state’s cooperation with Annan’s initiative to obstruct its effects via the Gulf and Turkish governments, Al-Qaeda, and other formations linked to that alliance such as the Lebanese Future Movement.
Secondly, the Western propaganda machine is spreading a massive amount of lies in regard to the Syrian situation, with the main goal of generating a climate that would compensate for the state of impotence endured by the Americans and all the NATO member states, in light of the regional and international balances and equations that are providing Syria with immunity. The first lie is the promotion of a settlement allowing President Bashar al-Assad to step down. At this level, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov exposed the rumor surrounding the existence of Russian-American negotiations over what is dubbed by the West “Syria in the post Al-Assad stage.” In reality, the American planners among others know that president Bashar al-Assad enjoys wide support in the ranks of the Syrian people and that this support has increased in light of the crisis sweeping the country, as well as its repercussions which are making the Syrians feel as though they and their country are being subjected to a foreign attack led by the Americans against the state. Hence, according to his people, President Bashar al-Assad is the head of the national state, the advocator of a pan-Arab resistance project and the symbol of Syrian nationalism and the resistance option in the face of the foreign attack which features a global alliance aiming at destroying the Syrian strength and at strengthening the gangs of mercenaries, intelligence agents and extremists. The inhabitants of the Syrian countryside have discovered that the latter could not be farther from the slogans of freedom and dignity, and that they have started to introduce foreign murderers by the hundreds, professional intelligence elements and extremist groups whose presence and role had always been rejected by Syrian society.

Thirdly, the second lie being promoted by the American propaganda is related to the claim that what is happening in Syria might slide towards civil war. The Western propaganda at this level was launched in the form of warnings against the threat of civil war, at a time when all the Western, Turkish and Gulf efforts have been pushing in that direction since the beginning of the incidents, through repeated attempts to depict the events as being a sectarian conflict and the adoption by the West and its agents in the region of the MB group and the gangs of takfir to which they offered all possible financial, military and media facilitations and assistance. The Syrian people on the other hand proved to be immune against these attempts, while the Syrian national state was able to maintain a wide base of popular support, to embrace its army and its national choices and engage in a battle to defend the country and the unity of the people alongside Syrian political and religious leaders.
Fourthly, the third lie was the claim that the conflict between the Syrian state and the terrorist gangs was revolving in a vicious circle and that it would be impossible to settle this confrontation.  Full story continues here: http://www.voltairenet.org/The-lies-of-those-unable-to

Then there are the lies about Libya.  How many Americans read this headline?

Biggest success? NATO proud of Libya op which killed thousands
­The price of success
­Speaking on March 31, Bishop Giovanni Innocenzo Martinelli, Apostolic Vicar of Tripoli, reported that “the so-called humanitarian air raids have taken the lives of dozens of civilians in various areas of Tripoli.” The senior cleric went on to say “in the district of Buslim, a building collapsed because of the bombing, killing 40 people,” as cited by Agenzia Fedes, the information service of the Pontifical Mission Societies.
However, despite the decision to turn a blind eye to the casualty figures, one of the few instances the alliance could not deny culpability in was a June 19 NATO missile strike that resulted in the deaths of nine civilians.
Attacks of this nature were happening on a daily basis throughout the intense bombing campaign.
Speaking in September, the health minister in the new Libyan government estimated that at least 30,000 people had been killed and 50,000 wounded during the first six months of the war. Some, however, have estimated that the real figure could be much higher. 
Writing back in September, Thomas C. Mountain, an independent journalist currently living in Africa who was a member of the 1st US Peace Delegation to Libya in 1987, estimated that NATO had dropped over 30,000 bombs on Libya, with an average of "two civilians killed in each attack.” Thus, Mountain has estimated that some 60,000 Libyan civilians had been killed by NATO air strikes alone by the end of August.
Shortly thereafter, when rebel forces began the siege of Sirte, Moussa Ibrahim, a spokesman for the now-deceased Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, told Reuters via telephone on September 19 that "in the last 17 days, more than 2,000 residents of the city of Sirte were killed in NATO air strikes."
As of today, some 26,000 NATO sorties and 9,600 strike missions have been conducted by NATO, with an average of four bombs used per attack.  

­A country in ruins

­Though it may never be known just how many died in “the most successful operation in NATO history,” the alliance has shown little interest in rebuilding a nation that has in many ways been wrecked by its seven-month military campaign.

According to Palestinian human rights activist Shawan Jabarin, “The military operation damaged everything in Libya, not just Gaddafi and his regime, but the society [as well].”

Former MI5 agent Annie Machon went further, telling RT that NATO’s intervention had plunged Libya back into the Stone Age. ...
Full story can be read here: http://www.rt.com/news/nato-libya-operation-success-999/

Related:

Bonus Video...in case you forgot or just never knew.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

The Cross Walk...the walk with a surprise ending

The Cross Walk Image courtesy of I Should Be Laughing

 
Just a Closer Walk with Thee
I am weak, but Thou art strong;
Jesus, keep me from all wrong;
I’ll be satisfied as long
As I walk, let me walk close to Thee.

Just a closer walk with Thee,
Grant it, Jesus, is my plea,
Daily walking close to Thee,
Let it be, dear Lord, let it be.

Through this world of toil and snares,
If I falter, Lord, who cares?
Who with me my burden shares?
None but Thee, dear Lord, none but Thee.

Just a closer walk with Thee,
Grant it, Jesus, is my plea,
Daily walking close to Thee,
Let it be, dear Lord, let it be.

When my feeble life is o’er,
Time for me will be no more;
Guide me gently, safely o’er
To Thy kingdom shore, to Thy shore.

Just a closer walk with Thee,
Grant it, Jesus, is my plea,
Daily walking close to Thee,
Let it be, dear Lord, let it be.

Obama 'definitely a fraud'...and so is his birth certificate!

Obama birth record 'definitely fraudulent,' Sheriff Joe Arpaio says
July 17, 2012: Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio announces in Phoenix that President Obama's birth certificate, as presented by the White House in April 2011, is a forgery based on an investigation by the Sheriff's office. (AP)

Investigators for an Arizona sheriff's volunteer posse have declared that President Barack Obama's birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.
Members of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's posse said in March that there was probable cause that Obama's long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April 2011 was a computer-generated forgery.
Now, Arpaio says investigators are positive it's fraudulent.
Mike Zullo, the posse's chief investigator, said numeric codes on certain parts of the birth certificate indicate that those parts weren't filled out, yet those sections asking for the race of Obama's father and his field of work or study were completed.
Zullo said investigators previously didn't know the meaning of codes but that the codes were explained by a 95-year-old former state worker who signed the president's birth certificate.
Zullo said a news reporter who has helped out in the probe let investigators listen in on an interview he concluded of the former state worker.
The Obama campaign declined to comment on Arpaio's allegations.
The Arizona Democratic Party says in a statement that Arpaio's investigation is intended to draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crimes cases that the sheriff's office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period.
So-called "birthers" maintain Obama is ineligible to be president because, they contend, he was born in Kenya.
Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama's citizenship.
Obama released a copy of his long-form birth certificate in an attempt to quell citizenship questions.
Courts have rebuffed lawsuits over the issue.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/17/obama-birth-record-definitely-fraudulent-sheriff-joe-arpaio-says/?intcmp=obnetwork#ixzz21zeIbHUl

Bonus Video...a must see! You're freedom is at stake gone!

"The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report"

The Dick Act of 1902

Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, June 28, 1902. Congressional Record, House, pages 7706-7713 and 321-353, 7594-7595. Also known as the Dick Act of 1902, written by Representative Dick, passed by Congress on June 30, 1902.

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: "The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it."

"This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power."

The Honorable William Gordon
Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917


"Be it enacted that the militia shall consist of every able-bodied male citizen, respective of States, Territories, and the District of Columbia and every able-bodied male of foreign birth who has declared his intention to become a citizen, who is more than 18 and less than 45 years of age, shall be divided into three classes; the organized militia, to be known as The National Guard of the State, Territory or District of Columbia, or by such other designations by the laws of the respective States or Territories, as may be given by the laws of the respective States or Territories, the national voluntary reserve as provided in this act, and the remainder to be known as the reserve militia."

The Militia Act and the revised Militia Act (the Dick Act), make it quite clear that all men between the ages of 18 and 45 are the (unorganized) militia with an absolute right to keep and bear Arms under the Article II of the Bill of Rights, of whatever type; automatic or semi-automatic, regardless of size, magazine capacity, barrel length or caliber/gauge in any quantity they may deem necessary along with any amount of ammunition they may determine from time to time.

"The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Report", of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States Senate Judiciary Committee; Ninety-seventh Congress, second session, February 1982. Orrin Hatch, Chairman.
"That the National Guard is not the "Militia" referred to in the Second Amendment is even clearer today. Congress has organized the National Guard under its power to "raise and support armies", and not its power to "Provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia." This Congress chose to do so in the interest of organizing reserve military units which were not limited in deployment by the strictures of our power over Constitutional militia, which can be called forth only "to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection, and repel invasions." The modern National Guard was specifically intended to avoid status as the Constitutional militia, a distinction recognized by Title 10 United States Code 311 (a)."

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commenter and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner."

The Second Amendment right to keep and bear Arms, therefore, is a right of the individual citizen to privately possess and carry in a peaceful manner firearms and similar arms. Such an individual rights interpretation is in full accord with the history of the right to keep and bear arms previously discussed...It accurately reflects the majority of proposals that lead up to the Bill of Rights itself.

NOW, THEREFORE, all existing or future so-called "gun and/or ammunition laws", of whatever name or form under "color of law", whether Federal, Federal Agency, Pseudo Federal Agency, State, County or Municipal that infringes, abridges or restricts in any manner, the God given, unalienable, indefeasible, Constitutional right of Citizens to keep and bear Arms peaceably, openly or concealed, for their defense of life, liberty, and property are prima facie violations of Article 1, Sec. 9, Part 3; Article 6, Part 2; and Amendments I, II, IV, IX, and X of the Constitution for the United States of America; Article 2; Sec. 1, Sec. 2, Sec. 4, Sec. 5, Sec. 27, and Sec. 29 of the Constitution for the State of Arkansas; and the Dick Act of 1902, and are NO LAW, ab initio, ultra vires, of no force and effect, incumbent upon no one to obey or any court to enforce
.
__________________