Friday, May 20, 2011

Will somebody tell Neil Cavuto who the real scum bag is?

Although not depicted here (I guess Neil was too ashamed to post today's video [actually Thursday, May 19th] where he slams Netanyahu for slamming Obama), Neil Cavuto of FOX News was all but enraged over Prime Minister Netanyahu slamming Obama...three cheers for Netanyahu!  It appears that Cavuti is following in the footsteps of Bill O'Reilly also of FOX News, where O'Reilly shows way too much respect for Obama the worst piece of crap that ever sat in the White House.  When will the news media paint the real picture of this anti-American, Hamas loving, Muslim sympathizer?  Can't they see that Obama is destroying our country?  Obama has taken sides with the enemy of the West...that's right, the entire western ideology in favor of a one world government dominated by Muslims...figure it out Cavuto (you too O'Reilly!) I had Obama figured out from day one...what's wrong with you guys?  ~ Norman E. Hooben
ps: The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas have but one goal....check it out in the commentary below!

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in front of President Obama and the media, explicitly rejected the president's call for a Palestinian state based on the pre-1967 borders.
Sitting beside Obama following a private Oval Office meeting, the visiting prime minister said Friday that he values the president's efforts to advance the peace process and intends to work with him. But he said the president's call for Israel to pull back to the borders that existed before the Six-Day War is not tenable.
"We can't go back to those indefensible lines. ... I discussed this with the president," Netanyahu said.
The meeting marked an especially tense moment for the two heads of state. The U.S.-Israeli relationship has endured several tests since Obama took office, and the president's endorsement of a key Palestinian statehood demand in his major address on Middle East policy Thursday was no exception.
Netanyahu on Friday echoed concerns of other Israelis that a full return to the 1967 borders could leave Israel vulnerable and would not result in a lasting peace.
"We both agree that a peace based on illusions will crash against the rocks of Middle Eastern reality. ... For there to be peace, the Palestinians will have to accept some basic realities -- the first is that while Israel is prepared to make generous compromises for peace it cannot go back to the 1967 lines, because these lines are indefensible" Netanyahu said. He said the two leaders still agree on the "overall direction" for peace in the region.
Obama, speaking to reporters, did not mention his border demand but stood by his Middle East speech. Obama said Friday that differences remain between the United States and Israel over the Middle East peace process, but that their relationship is "sound and will continue" and differences will be worked out "between friends."
Showing some common ground, both leaders stressed that Hamas, a U.S.-designated terror group which recently announced a unity agreement with Fatah, is not a reliable partner in peace talks.
The U.S. had previously endorsed the concept of a Palestinian state, but not the demand for permanent pre-1967 borders, with mutually agreed land swaps.
The immediate concern among pro-Israel lawmakers and advocates was that Obama's policy shift will give Palestinians a new starting point in negotiations, rather than something to work toward over the course of talks.
Josh Block, former spokesman for The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, told that Obama "repeats the error" made when his White House pressed the Israelis on settlement construction, granting the Palestinians more leverage in talks.
The talks have since stalled and Obama's Middle East envoy has resigned. Block said Obama's new position will not help matters.
"This strategic error is manifold, and undermines, not advances, the prospects for peace talks," he said in an email.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney acknowledged the position does create a starting point for talks, but claimed the two sides would still have plenty to negotiate when it comes to land swaps and security arrangements.
Obama is set to address the AIPAC conference on Sunday. Other Jewish advocacy groups said Obama's position merely puts the U.S. on record in support of a plan that had a good chance of being the basis for a compromise anyway.
"There will be the naysayers who can find something to protest from this address, including what is widely accepted wisdom -- that a final resolution will ultimately be based on 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps," The National Jewish Democratic Council said.
Despite the shift, the president sought to assure that the United States' commitment to Israeli security is "unshakable."
He said Thursday and Friday that Israel's right to defend itself will remain paramount, and suggested the recent unity agreement between Fatah and Hamas, which the U.S. deems a terrorist group, is problematic for negotiations. Though Israel occupied East Jerusalem, along with the West Bank and Gaza Strip, in the 1967 Six-Day War, Obama said Thursday that the "future of Jerusalem" remains to be worked out, as does the fate of Palestinian refugees.
He also publicly rejected attempts by the Palestinians to gain recognition for their own state before the United Nations. "Symbolic actions to isolate Israel at the United Nations in September won't create an independent state," Obama said.
Netanyahu is laying down demands of his own. He said in a speech to his parliament before traveling to Washington that he's opposed to talks with the new Palestinian alliance which includes Hamas. He also urged the Palestinians to drop their claim to East Jerusalem.

Read more:

“Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader.
The Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way.
Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope. Allahu akbar!”
The MUSLIM Brotherhood’s goal is to turn the world into an Islamist empire. The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in Egypt in 1928, is a revolutionary fundamentalist movement to restore the caliphate and strict shariah (Islamist) law in Muslim lands and, ultimately, the world. Today, it has chapters in 80 countries. “It is in the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” ~ Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna ~ Source
Hamas Principles
The principles of the Hamas are stated in their Covenant or Charter, given in full below. Following are highlights.
"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it." (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).
"The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Muslim generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up. "
"There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors."
"After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying."
The charter is a rather classical Islamist document, applied to the local issues. It declares that Jihad (in the sense of armed battle) is the only solution. It cites the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a ludicrous anti-Semitic forgery.
The "Zionists" and the freemasons and others are blamed for what Hamas and radical Islamists see as the major calamities of the world, especially the French Revolution.
One of the most ominous aspects of the Charter however, is this Hadith:
Moreover, if the links have been distant from each other and if obstacles, placed by those who are the lackeys of Zionism in the way of the fighters obstructed the continuation of the struggle, the Islamic Resistance Movement aspires to the realisation of Allah's promise, no matter how long that should take. The Prophet, Allah bless him and grant him salvation, has said:
"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Muslim).
The implication is clear: Allah promised that the Jews will be murdered, and the Hamas "aspires to the realisation of Allah's promise, no matter how long that should take."

Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood

Some observers deny the relation between the Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. However, the Charter states:
The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine. Muslim Brotherhood Movement is a universal organization which constitutes the largest Islamic movement in modern times. It is characterised by its deep understanding, accurate comprehension and its complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgement, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult and conversion to Islam.
Moreover, the Charter quotes Hassan Al-Banna, a Nazi sympathizer who founded the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. There is no doubt that the Hamas views itself as a part of the Muslim Brotherhood and an ideological heir of al Banna. The Muslim Brotherhood spawned a number of radical Islamist movements including Al-Qaeda.

Current Hamas Positions

Some analysts insist that the Hamas is becoming more pragmatic in its ideology following assumption of a political role. The evidence for this is view is conflicting, and it is beclouded by the practice of dissemblance that was copied from Al-Banna and Sayyed Qutb. Recent statements by leaders include the following:
  • Imam Yousif al-Zahar of Hamas said in his sermon at the Katib Wilayat mosque in Gaza that "Jews are a people who cannot be trusted. They have been traitors to all agreements. Go back to history. Their fate is their vanishing." Ref IHT 1 April 08
  • Sheik Yunus al-Astal, a Hamas legislator and imam, in a column in the weekly newspaper Al Risalah in 2008 discussed a Koranic verse suggesting that "suffering by fire is the Jews' destiny in this world and the next." Astal concluded "Therefore we are sure that the Holocaust is still to come upon the Jews.Ref IHT 1 April 08
  • "We will not rest until we destroy the Zionist entity" stated Hamas leader Fathi Hammad in Gaza on Friday January 2nd 2009 - ref -- BBC 2 January 09
  • In a sermon aired on Hamas' Al-Aqsa television, cleric Yunis Al Astal stated, "Today, Rome is the capital of the Catholics, or the Crusader capital, which has declared its hostility to Islam, and has planted the brothers of apes and pigs in Palestine in order to prevent the reawakening of Islam.
"I believe that our children, or our grandchildren, will inherit our jihad and our sacrifices, and, Allah willing, the commanders of the conquest will come from among them"
He maintained that Rome would become, ""an advanced post for the Islamic conquests, which will spread though Europe in its entirety, and then will turn to the two Americas, even Eastern Europe." Ref- Fox 14 Apr. 2008
Other statements are more moderate in tone, but Hamas has repeatedly refused international community demands to recognize the right of Israel to exist, abrogate its charter and abide by the previous commitments of the Palestinian Authority ~ Source

Note to Obama, Hamas, Egypt, Syria, Saudia Arabia, Palistine, etc. "This Land Is Mine"


Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Texas Fred vs Indiana Sheriff...Texas Fred wins every time!

Some would say he is a little outspoken...I would say we should all echo his words.  In his commentary regarding a news item out of Crown Point, Indiana, Texas Fred gets right to the point...and if you can't comprehend what he's saying he even posts a picture of the point!  If you've never heard of Texas Fred (hard to believe that you haven't) let me introduce him to you here:
Now if we don't get involved in what's going on around us (As depicted in the video, Texas Fred sets a good example.) pretty soon we will be prisoners in our own country for surely the Crown Point story is just one small faction of an ever increasing tyrannical oligarchy grabbing power away from we the people...the Constitution of the United States of America, you are either for it or against it...there is no in between!
And as a strict Constutionalist as I am, I am also an advocate of severe punishment for those who would abrogate our freedoms.  The punishment for Sheriff Don Hartman Sr. should be swift and meaningful so as to serve as a reminder to any of his potential followers.  As an elected official, Sheriff hartman undoubtedly took an oath to uphold both the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Indiana.  Article 1, Section 1 of the Indiana Constitution states the the following:
WE DECLARE, That all people are created equal; that they
   are endowed by their CREATOR with certain inalienable rights; that
   among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that all
   power is inherent in the People; and that all free governments are,
   and of right ought to be, founded on their authority, and instituted
   for their peace, safety, and well-being. For the advancement of these
   ends, the People have, at all times, an indefeasible right to alter
   and reform their government.
The People have, at all times, an indefeasible right to alter and reform their government.  Therefor, this is the time to publicly strip Sheriff Hartman of the badge and take away all pay and allowances to include any retirement benefits for he is unworthy of the people's trust and a nuisance to a freedom loving society.  ~  Norman E. Hooben

The following from Texas Fred

IN Sheriff: If We Need to Conduct RANDOM HOUSE to HOUSE Searches We Will
Posted on by TexasFred
IN Sheriff: If We Need to Conduct RANDOM HOUSE to HOUSE Searches We Will
CROWN POINT, Ind. – According to Newton County Sheriff, Don Hartman Sr., random house to house searches are now possible and could be helpful following the Barnes v. STATE of INDIANA Supreme Court ruling issued on May 12th, 2011. When asked three separate times due to the astounding callousness as it relates to trampling the inherent natural rights of Americans, he emphatically indicated that he would use random house to house checks, adding he felt people will welcome random searches if it means capturing a criminal.
Speaking under the condition of anonymity, a local city Police Chief with 30 years experience in law enforcement directly contradicted the Newton County Sheriff’s blatant disregard for privacy & liberty, stating that as an American first, such an action is unconscionable and that his allegiance is to the Indiana and federal Constitutions respectively. However, he also concurred that the ruling does now allow for police to randomly search homes should a department be under order by state or federal officials or under a department’s own accord.
At this time we are still awaiting comments from several state offices.
However, the spokesperson for the INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL took umbrage at what he referred to as “large” assumptions regarding police power and at this time has no comment. He did however indicate that should the INDIANA Attorney General, Greg Zoeller feel it necessary to make a statement, that this reporter would be included in the distribution of the release.
Source(s): Indiana Supreme Court Ruling, BARNES vs. STATE of INDIANA No. 82S05-1007-CR-343 • Telephone call to Newton County Indiana – Sheriff’s Department, May 16th, 2011
Full Story Here:
IN Sheriff: If We Need to Conduct RANDOM HOUSE to HOUSE Searches We Will
I am VERY Pro Law Enforcement, everyone that knows me, everyone that reads my blog or belongs to the United States Gun Owners Association or The Thin Blue Line KNOWS, I am a law abiding American gun owner and I support our Law Enforcement officers, that said, you come to MY house and demand that I allow you to enter MY house so that YOU can conduct a *RANDOM* search, and have NO warrant, you’d better have a SWAT Team backing you up.
I believe in firing a warning shot, shoot the 1st SOB through the door and let that be a warning to the rest of them that I AM intent on protecting MY domain from ALL enemies, foreign AND domestic.
I hope this Indiana Sheriff is the 1st one to try it, him personally. Dumb bastard.
I don’t believe this would ever happen in Texas, but if it did, I *may NOT* have the legal right to resist, but I damned sure have the *moral obligation* to do so… Thank God for Hi-Cap mags, 230gr +P Bonded ammo and XD-45 Tacticals!
I can’t help but believe that rulings like this seen in Indiana are going to be a trend in some areas as the Obama regime, particularly Eric Holder, attempt to disarm and pacify the American people in their effort to turn the USA into some version of Socialist heaven.
I can’t speak for everyone, but as for me, OVER MY DEAD BODY!

This just in...related news!

Monday, May 16, 2011

The Overthrow Of The U.S.'s coming sooner than you think!

Those of you who have been following that which I've been preaching for the last several years should find it no surprise that others are recognizing the problem. ~ Norman E. Hooben

The following from Politics Alabama

I know, this title is a bit provocative, but from a Constitutional perspective it might just be true.

When we broke away from England way back when, we announced our intentions via the Declaration of Independence. Let's look at a short excerpt from that document.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Clearly, the Founders viewed the purpose of the government to secure and protect the rights of its citizens. But notice that one phrase, "deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." I highlight this, because our current government does not enjoy the consent of US citizens. It's not even close. In fact, only 23% of US citizens believe our government operates with our consent.
Most voters nationwide continue to feel disconnected from their government and overwhelmingly believe that Congress puts party politics ahead of its constituents' concerns.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Voters shows that only 23% believe the federal government today has the consent of the governed. Sixty percent (60%) do not think this is the case, while another 17% are undecided.

Did you catch that? A full 60% think our government is operating without our consent, while only 23% believe otherwise.

Let's return to the declaration, shall we?

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

Personally, I think we're far past the point when we should have taken action "to alter or to abolish" our government, as most elected officials govern for their own benefit and view ordinary citizens with disdain.

What do YOU think?

The exact wording of the question on the poll is as follows:

The Declaration of Independence says that governments derive their authority from the consent of the governed. Does the federal government today have the consent of the governed?

How would YOU answer it?