Saturday, December 11, 2010
Alabama store owner posts sign saying 'BBQ PORK RESTURANT IS SAFEST NO MUSLIMS INSIDE'
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Electronic Repair Company owner Chuck Biddinger, who put up the sign last week, said he meant the message as a joke. After all, he said, it wasn't even the most offensive one he had ever posted.
That award goes to a sign he posted last May that read "A dog is wiser than a woman - it does not bark at its master," earned heat from domestic violence groups in Alabama.
"The women's groups went ballistic," he told the Daily News when he picked up the phone at his East Lake, Ala., shop.
Biddinger said to pacify them he put a public service announcement urging victims of domestic violence to call a hotline.
But he said this sign, which has garnered national attention, has gotten more positive reaction than negative - and he has no plans to apologize to anyone offended.
"I have gotten a few complaints about it, but for every one complaint about it I've had, 10 people tell me that they like it and support it," he said.
He told local television station ABC 33/40 that while it was meant as a lighthearted joke, it was true.
"Muslims do not eat pork," he told the television station. "It's a known fact that Muslims have tried to commit crimes in this country."
On Friday, Biddinger said he planned to take the sign down sometime soon, but hadn't quite had the time to do it - and was still looking for something equally eye-catching. Signs outside his shop are changed every week, usually with jokes he receives via email chains.
Many of them are not politically correct. But the coverage of this one, he said, has been unbelievable.
"I never thought about that until it got picked up on the Internet and it went totally viral when I put this sign up," he said.
When asked by The News if he understood why this sign might have gotten more attention than other racist or sexist signs he may have posted, he replied, "No, ma'am."
After all, he said, he wasn't worried about people's feelings.
"For the local area, if I offend a few Muslims, there will be a lot of people who support it," he said.
Not to mention, all the coverage of his repair shop from the sign is good for business.
"I believe it's a positive," he said.
People interviewed by ABC 33/40 agreed, laughing at the words on the sign when a reporter showed it to them.
"I think it's hilarious to me that they would feel that way," one man said. "But I'm not offended about it at all."
from the comment section: Sarah001 writes, "...We are in the 21st century where verbal attack on any race religion or sex should be banned. ..."
Wake up Sarah! Want to ban verbal attacks on any race, religion, or sex? Very simple...Ban Muslims! Muslims are the problem and the problem is not going away with political correctness. See also Muslim Problem...yeah, I think so
Friday, December 10, 2010
Video Of POW Pfc Bergdahl
Taliban release new video of captured US soldier.
New footage has been released claiming to show Pfc Bowe Bergdahl being held in Afghanistan. Pfc Bowe Bergdahl from the 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment, the only known captured American serviceman.The US airborne infantryman was taken by the Afghan Taliban in Paktika province on June 30.
According to Col. Tim Marsano with the Idaho National Guard, Bergdahl's family has seen the photos released by a video production group called Manba al-Jihad, which has ties to the Taliban. There is no indication when the photos were taken, but the family confirms the man in the pictures is Bowe Bergdahl.
CNN reports that in a nearly 45-minute video that was also released, Bergdahl is wearing an open-necked, tan shirt and has a large abrasion on his left cheek. He appears clean-shaven, although in earlier videos released to the media, Bergdahl had a beard.
A speaker in the video says the Paktia mujahadeen captured the soldier and that he is in the custody of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and has all Islamic rights.
The IntelCenter, which tracks militant messages on the Internet, said in a statement released on Wednesday that another man in the video is believed to be a Taliban commander who had threatened to kill Bergdahl.
Col. Marsano said that the Bergdahl family's spirits are high despite it being a very difficult year and a half since Bowe was captured.
"They're doing about as well as you could expect in extraordinary difficult circumstances," Col. Tim Marsano told KTVB on the phone. "They've really relied on the support they've gotten from their family, friends, and the community. If you go into the Wood River Valley, throughout the town of Hailey and into Ketchum, you're going to see yellow ribbons, bumper stickers saying 'Bring Bowe Home.'
Marsano said even though they do not know when the photos and video were taken, it does give Bergdahl's family hope that he is still alive.
"I do know that the family does take heart in seeing photos of their son alive, whether they're new or old. It does give them hope," said Col. Marsano.
Bergdahl of Hailey, Idaho, has been held by the Taliban since June 30, 2009, when he disappeared in Paktika province in eastern Afghanistan.
These pictures are the first that have been seen of him since April, but it's not clear when they were taken.
Topping the list of countries which have mounted a campaign against Christians are China and Sudan followed by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Burma, Greece, Ethiopia, and Vietnam. (Washington Watch, May 1998). Increasing persecution is also found in Cuba, Laos, and North Korea.
Many Islamic-dominated nations have adopted a fanatical, militant doctrine of persecution against all “infidels.”
The militant Islamic Government of Sudan, for example, is waging a self-described religious war against Christian, non-Muslim, and moderate Muslim persons by using torture, starvation, enslavement, and murder. In Pakistan, the government has declared those that who “insult” Mohammed will be put to death. In Communist Laos more than 250 pastors and Christian workers have been arrested; more than 60 churches and Christian institutions have been shut down; and the government has forced many thousands of believers to sign documents to "renounce" their faith and belief in Christianity.
In Saudi Arabia there is no religious freedom. Apostasy is punishable by death. There are no public worship services for non-Muslims. Anyone who does mission work or converts Muslims faces expulsion, jail, or execution.
In countries near and far, people are being persecuted simply because of their faith. Hundreds of men and women are in prison serving sentences that range from a few months to life. They are not criminals who have robbed or murdered other citizens but Christians who were put on trial for their faith in Christ and found guilty. Christians are beaten, tortured, imprisoned, and murdered by those who are hostile to their faith in Jesus Christ.
Never before in American history have Christians experienced being hated for following Jesus Christ as they are today.
Here in America the persecution of Christians has not yet reached the feverish pitch as in other parts of the world. There is still a Constitution that protects them and allows them to freely practice their faith. But, broiling beneath the surface, the same hatred of God that exists in other parts of the world is festering in all our institutions. Slowly, methodically, and incrementally the anti-God forces are working to remove that Constitutional barrier and replace it with the 10 Planks of Communism.
It is important to recognize that those who are working for the dissolution of our society and breakdown of the family have a spiritual agenda. They are not merely attempting to dismantle the historic cultural values of this nation and move us toward a new world order. They also want to destroy Christianity and Bible-based religion. It is a clear part of their agenda, and they have already moved a long way in that direction.
In America it is called 'secularism' and is becoming visible in all walks of life and in all our institutions. Numerous legislative and legal battles which I'll discuss below attest to the fact that religious warfare is taking place.
Our entertainment industry and the news media sneer at anyone who defends Jesus Christ in public and have been leading a propaganda war of stereotyping Christians into a subordinate class. Their distortions reflect a genuine misunderstanding of who Christians are and what they believe.
Americas' TV news broadcasts ignore conservative and Christian news events, except when coverage makes religious leaders look "cold, intolerant and oppressive," says Washington, D.C.'s Media Research Center.
Though most Americans believe in God and regularly attend religious services, "religion and religious issues are hardly ever mentioned, much less covered, on network television morning, evening and magazine shows," said the center's chairman Brent Bozell. He said that the center has surveyed more than 18,000 nightly news shows broadcast by ABC, CBS, NBC, the Cable News Network and the Public Broadcasting Service, but found only 212 stories that focused on religion. That amounts to 1 percent of coverage although 52 percent of Americans say they attend church and more than 90 percent say that they pray regularly.
Network coverage of abortion and homosexuality "are never done from the religious viewpoint," Bozell said. Instead, "religious figures are regularly portrayed as reactionary roadblocks while their positive influences are rarely covered." Except at Christmastime, when the networks traditionally broadcast "heartwarming" segments in their broadcasts, the news shows usually portray religious groups and their leaders "as cold, intolerant and oppressive," Bozell said. ["TV news broadcasters unfair to Christians, says research center," Christian Crusade, April 1994]
The federal government abridges the free exercise of religion in America by:
Regulating churches and other religious organizations through its tax laws.
Limiting religious liberty in the area of public and private education.
Forbidding non-denominational prayer in public schools and at educational ceremonies.
Excluding the Bible from school classrooms and from other school property.
Refusing to permit the religious displays on public property, such as Christmas and Chanukah.
Possibly the most sinister battlefield in the war on Christianity takes place in the classroom. The Ten Commandments have been prohibited on school bulletin boards and most forms of prayer have been declared unconstitutional in the nation's schools, even that which is student initiated.
Atheists and others who hate God despises Christians who help others come to a saving knowledge of Christ. They are determined to battle those who would help immature Christians -- particularly Christian children -- grow in their relationship with Jesus Christ.
Increasingly, our children are discriminated against for trying to present their Christian convictions in school.
In 1997 U.S. District Court Judge Ira DeMent struck down a law that required schools to allow voluntary student-initiated prayers at school events, saying it created excessive state entanglement in religion. He ordered the end to school-sponsored religious activities, such as prayers during morning announcements and at school events even though it isn't forced on students.
A high school student in Florida was suspended for handing out religious literature before and after - but not during - school hours. Two high school students in Texas were told by their principal they could not wear rosaries. The Principal claimed that they were symbols of gang activity, even though the boys were not involved in any gang.
In 2002, music teachers in Michigan, Maryland, and Virginia didn't allow students to perform traditional carols like "Silent Night" and "The First Noel" during Chrismas. A New Jersey public school banned the Charles Dickens play, "A Christmas Carol" because of its spiritual overtones and message of redemption.
Jjudge Roy Moore in Gadsden, Alabama, was ordered to stop conducting prayers in his courtroom and displaying the Ten Commandments. That led Alabama Gov. Fob James, a supporter of prayer in public schools, to vow to use state troopers, if necessary, to allow Moore to continue the prayers.
Confessed child rapist James Arnett's sentence was overturned by an Ohio appeals court. The reason: the judge in his case quoted from Matthew 18:5-6 during sentencing.
The Public Square
The trend in the public forum is to replace the word "Christmas" with "Season's Gretings" or "Happy Holidays."
In March 1998, The ACLU put pressure on the small town of Republic, Missouri to remove a fish symbol from its official logo, calling it a "secret sign of Christianity."
In April 1998, Rev. Patrick Mahoney was arrested for praying on the steps of the Supreme Court.
Tourists visiting Washington D.C. in 1997 were ordered by the police to stop praying in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol.
In 2003, the National Park Service removed 30 year-old plaques inscribed with Bible verses at Grand Canyon following complaints from the American Civil Liberties Union.
The anti-Christian bias is a reality in many companies today -- as you will discover if you refuse to work on Sundays, if you question "shading the truth" in presentations, or if you stubbornly hold to your Christian standards.
A Christian employee of Hewlet Packard was fired for posting Bible verses condemning homosexual behavior on his desk in response to posters displayed during a company campaign to promote a diverse work force. (WorldNetDaily)
Even though Krispy Kreme promises to give students a free doughnut for each "A" on their report cards, a store in Schereville, Indiana refused to reward the Kamp children for A's received in Bible classes. ["Chain Won't Give a Doughnut for an 'A' in Bible", Wendy Cloyd, Assistant Editor, CitizenLink]
See also: America's Godly Heritage
See also: America's Godly Heritage
Thursday, December 9, 2010
FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN
Confession links Russia to U.S. embassy attack
Suspect tells authorities Russian army major ordered bomb placement
Editor's Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95 per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the complete reports.
Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
The bomb detonated but caused no damage near the embassy in the attack in September.
Georgia's Interior Ministry apprehended six Georgians who are internally displaced persons from the Georgian breakaway province of Abkhazia. Two other perpetrators remain at large, believed to have escaped to Gali in Abkhazia following the bombing.
The majority of the population in the Abkhazian region of Gali are Georgian. Due to ethnic cleansing that has taken place over the years in Abkhazia, the once majority of Georgians in that breakaway province have been relegated primarily to Abkhazia's southwestern region of Gali.
Russia gained effective control over Abkhazia following its invasion of Georgia in August 2008 and the defeat of the U.S. trained and equipped Georgian armed forces.
The U.S. State Department has sent investigators to Georgia where a meeting is scheduled with Georgian investigators.
Georgian Interior Ministry officials say that the alleged bombers have made videotaped confessions and claim that Russian Maj. Yevgeniy Borisov was behind the bombing of the U.S. embassy and a series of other bombings in Tbilisi that followed in the ensuing months.
Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND.
For the complete report and full immediate access to Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, subscribe now.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
2. Muslims Desecrates Hundreds of Bibles Annually
3. Muslim Urinate, Spit On Then Burn Bible
4. Muslims Burn Bibles and Destroy Crosses
5. Muslims Attack Catholic Church
6. Muslim Attempts to Blow up a Military Recruitment Center
7. Muslim Rips Off Taxpayers
8. Muslims Attack Hindus in India
9. Muslims attack Christian community in Punjab
10. Muslim Attacks Fort Hood Soldiers
11. Muslim Schools Teach Six-Year Olds How To Hack Off Thieves Hands
12. Muslims Attempt To Kill The Pope
13. Muslims Plot To Poison American Food
...and the list could continue until its TNTC (Too Numerous To Count). If you're reading this and you are an American do you think we have a Muslim problem in America? Well whatever your answer is it doesn't matter for whether you think so or not we have a very serious Muslim problem in America starting with the Muslim sympathizer in the White House... Remember, Muslims want to take over the world and with their friend running the show in Washington they may succeed sooner than you think. Alah Akubar! Wake the hell up!
ps: And don't forget that its Muslims that want to blow-up your Coke and Big Mac (Click here)
Full Story at Cape Cod Today ...however the comments are more interesting ↓.
Blog posts and comments are entirely the thoughts and ideas of the people who write them and in no way represent the views of CapeCodToday.com, eCape, Inc., or its employees or owners.
This is no ordinary vessel.
"RawFaith is a 118 foot long, three masted, three hundred ton (without cannons) tall ship. Her design is based on the 16th century English race built galleons which are more stable and faster than their counterparts, the Spanish galleons (which are the stereotypical tall ships with high castles/decks). Although she was christened and launched in 2003, the structure and materials used to build RawFaith allow her to maintain the magic and charm of the bygone era of the pirates.
RawFaith was designed and built by Captain George McKay to be wheelchair accessible, setting RawFaith apart from other tall ships today. Her broad flat decks and wide open interior make it easy for a full participation sailing adventure. Through free sailing adventures, the Captain hopes to bring the rustic and romantic life at sea within the reach of those in wheelchairs.
The inspiration for RawFaith is found in the Captain's oldest child, Elizabeth, who has spent most of her life in a wheelchair due to Marfan Syndrome...."
What you posted was McKay's description. The reality of the situation is that this is a cobbled together "ship" that was built without regard to any established building method. It has no steerage. In it's first year or so it was dismasted in benign conditions. It's no better built than the pirate ship at your local mini-golf.
McKay set of with just one other crew for Bermuda in winter in the North Atlantic in a ship that cannot make 5 knots on a broad reach.
This has been a disaster in the making since her launch years ago
There are no other "ships of this type." Raw Faith is a uniquely ugly, crude and historically inaccurate caricature of a galleon, pieced together from pallet wood and barrels of tar. Several times, now, the ungainly thing has had to be rescued in relatively benign conditions,usually because of mechanical failures & structural inadequacy. It's a disaster waiting to happen.
Monday, December 6, 2010
Source: Gerry Charlotte Phelps
Needed Most - An Explosion of Christianity
There is. In fact, it is more urgent than our present danger. In fact, we cannot solve this problem without it. So it is of the greatest urgency.
First, Governments caused this problem. They are the ones doing the most borrowing, spending money they do not have, mortgaging the future incomes of their citizens. These governments have long been slipping out of control of their populations. In Europe, the votes of ordinary citizens no long matter. The EU rules without them. In the U.S., government spending has long been out of control.
Second, these weakened democracies will not change for the better until their peoples change. We were warned long ago about this. Ben Franklin warned that the new American republic could not "be kept" without "a religious and moral people." Why not? Because democracies cannot work without morality. Even democracies with a constitution. They become more and more corrupt. And morality comes almost entirely from religion.
Why? Morals must be absolute in order to work. If not, then everyone can decide for themselves what is right and wrong, good and bad. That is chaos.
Governments cannot decide for us what is right and wrong. Unless that conviction comes from inside people, there can never be enough policemen to make us do what is right in the government's eyes. "Law and Order" stops working. For "law and order" to work, morals must come from inside people.
Only religion has the authority to say "this is right and that is wrong." We grant such authority only to ourselves and to God. And only religion is able to plant standards of right and wrong within people so strongly that they will obey those standards even when no one is looking. (After all, God sees and knows everything we do. Religious people believe that, and are more likely to behave accordingly.)
Dictatorships can exist without religion. But in dictatorships, while the ruling class prospers, most of the people are poor. Only in democracies can most of the people prosper, or even be free. And democracies cannot survive without religion. So without religion, the world would be poor and enslaved - a condition that suddenly is a possibility for the West.
If we are to have any hope of survival as a free people, or even as countries where most people are prosperous then, we must become again a "religious and moral people."
It is not too late to become Christian countries again. But it is getting harder every year. If it is ever going to happen, we have to get started. Now. It is even more urgent than fixing the economy. More urgent than the people taking back their governments. We can't wait any longer to build up "a religious and moral people."
Rothschild Dynasty Slams Obama; Calls for Centrist Movement in U.S. December 6, 2010
By Michael Collins PiperAmerican Free Press
Issue # 49 & 50, December 6 & 13, 2010
An influential member of the international Rothschild banking dynasty—often called “the family that rules the world”—has lent her support to the theme that Barack Obama must be removed from the White House and that America needs a grand “centrist” coalition to save the nation.
That a key Rothschild network figure endorsed this concept—which is being relentlessly promoted in the pages of The New York Times and The Washington Post—underscores recent exclusive reports appearing in AMERICAN FREE PRESS detailing a high-level scheme to foist a phony new “centrist” third party on Americans.
In 2008, lifelong Democrat Lynn Forester de Rothschild endorsed GOP presidential candidate John McCain after the Democratic Party rejected de Rothschild’s first choice, Hillary Clinton.
The American-born Lady Rothschild— chief executive of E.L. Rothschild, a key Rothschild holding company—is the wife of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild. She was first introduced to her husband in Scotland in 1998 by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger during a meeting of Bilderberg—the global planning group dominated by the Rothschilds, assisted by their American lieutenants, the Rockefellers.
Endorsing McCain, Mrs. Rothschild proclaimed Obama too “ideological”—that is, too “liberal”—an interesting assertion coming from a stalwart Democrat. Now Mrs. Rothschild is once again aiming her guns at Obama, echoing the very rhetoric about the need to adopt “centrist” policies prevalent in all of the recent propaganda in the elite press that AFP—alone among the independent media—has been scrutinizing.
She expressed her “centrist” concerns on the Internet’s Daily Beast on Feb. 28, 2010, but few noticed it at the time. It’s no coincidence this was the forum she used to vent her attack: the Daily Beast is merging with the Rothschild-connected Washington Post Company’s Newsweek magazine, recently transferred to the control of Zionist billionaire Sidney Harman, who—like the Rothschild dynasty—is a major patron of Israel.
In her commentary, Mrs. Rothschild declared: “After watching President Obama in office for more than a year, it is clear to me that . . . we already knew what kind of president he would become. . . . Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama candidacy was his claim of being a centrist.”
Mrs. Rothschild wrote: Sure, [Obama] made promises during the campaign that pleased moderates. . . . They were specific, sensible promises—ones that enabled him to mislead the electorate about his real plans for America. . . .At the time, it was obvious that a candidate who won the primary because of the left would be beholden to the left, no matter what promises he made to get elected. . . . In The Audacity of Hope, he criticized Bill Clinton for giving too much respect to Ronald Reagan. He asked the Democratic Leadership Council, the centrist Democratic group, to remove his name from their lists. So if he wasn’t going to be a centrist Democrat in the tradition of Bill Clinton, what did Barack Obama want from his presidency, should he be elected? He told us from the beginning. It was a stunning agenda, but it seemed innocuous, even inspiring, during the campaign . . . . Obama declared he was running “not just to hold an office, but to gather with you to transform a nation.” Suddenly now everyone is worried he is trying to transform America. . . . His is an effort to make a bigger, more intrusive and more costly government. His hope is, and has always been, to turn the country into a nation that looks more like a European social democracy. He ignores that the roots of our strength have always been small government and a dynamic private sector, fostered by both Democrats and Republicans. His cynical use of centrist language as a tool to get elected does not change the fact of his true objectives. Our central problem is that the combination of his grandiloquence and the September 2008 financial crisis led to his election. Now, the only way to stop him in the next three years is through voter pressure on Congress. One course is to follow Massachusetts and just elect any Republican. But both parties lack courageous leaders who will fight for the values and policies of the middle.
While it certainly confuses many people (particularly self-styled “patriots” and “conservatives”) that Mrs. Rothschild (and like-minded associates in the mass media) call the Clintons “moderates,” that has, in fact, been a continuing premise in the media, especially of recent date, as if the stage is being set for a return of “Bill and Hill” in the form of a “centrist” challenge to Obama.
However, note that Mrs. Rothschild denounced not just Obama but “both parties.” Her rhetoric precisely reflects ongoing high-level calls in the media monopoly for a “centrist” rebellion against both “the left” and “the right”:
We need a movement of the militant middle; millions of voters who support the sensible policies from both parties. This would give Democrats political cover to stand up to Obama, Pelosi and Reid; and Republicans the backbone to acknowledge that the country must progress in order to be strong.
Here is what’s happening: Recognizing growing widespread disgust with both major parties, the elite big money forces seem to be laying the groundwork to usher in a new “centrist” party—a “controlled opposition” under their domination—to block the rise of any genuine populist third party challenging their power. The war-profiteering plutocratic elites want to be assured that—in the face of growing opposition from Americans on both the “left” and the “right”—budgetbusting internationalist policies promoting U.S. military adventurism in the Middle East and across the globe—in the name of what is now being touted as American “national greatness”—will be preserved.
In fact, the “national greatness” concept is just a patriotic-sounding cover name for what many call the New World Order.
Note, too, that although both “liberal Democrats” and “conservative Republicans” have done big money’s bidding for a century, a new “centrist” force—orchestrated by the major media (owned by the financial aristocracy)—would shatter the existing traditional local, state and federal political machines of the major parties which are closely tied to their own respective constituencies (small business, farmers, public employees, minorities, factory workers, etc). Divorced from grassroots demands, the new “centrist” mechanism would answer only to the major media controllers who conjured up the “centrist” party in the first place.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
The number of people who have fallen to the dangers of climate change. Would you believe zero? ...and yet the lefties are still trying to ram it down our throats
“Fifteen hundred years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was flat,” and now the same people (like Obama’s Science czar John Holdren) who warned us forty years ago about “global cooling” are now the biggest global warming alarmists. (Note from Norm: And I've been warning you for years that the politics of climate change is an invention of the United Nations and has nothing to do with the weather but rather the coffers at the UN. Why do people forget this when they go to the voting booth? You should not care whether the candidate has a D or an R after their name...if they support any faction of the UN they should not hold elective office. Period!)Source: Human Events
Now in case you haven’t heard, the Earth’s temperature is rising and is getting hotter (faster than Barney Frank getting a full body cavity search) and only these leaders, most of them governing countries with failing economies myriad in mind boggling debt, can save it.
Sadly it seems, the election of the first black president indeed did not bring forth “the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal” —Barack Obama June 2008.
The future of the planet is in peril and only the U.N. can save us from this clear and present danger.
To be clear, Muslim Jihadists have killed about 60,000 innocent men women and children since September 11th and over 28,000 people have been murdered by Mexican drug gangs since 2006.
And zero, the number of people who have fallen to the ever looming dangers of climate change. That number is low ( more like nonexistent) but according to Al Bore, an obsequious International media and the environmental Left, there is a huge “global debt,” “environmental justice” must be served and the planet is in danger (and they have the made up fact to prove it.)
“Climategate” divulged global warming for the wealth redistributing scandal that it is, and Ottmar Edenhofer just put the final nail in the echo fascists’ climate coffin.
In a recent interview with Germany's NZZ Online, Ottmar Edenhofer, a dedicated global warmist and a United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) official tells the truth about climate change:
“But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy.”
There are few things more shameful then International elitists putting American tax money where their bureaucratic mouths are.
And that is exactly what is happening here in Cancun Mexico.
Climate change is a hoax, and I would not have an opinion on the matter if America was not footing the United Nations’ bills at about 25 percent.
America, literally, cannot afford to pay credence to these spread the wealth around, smart-car-socialist, who if they had their way, would enact policies that would ultimately result in higher taxes, lost jobs and less freedom.
To quote Agent K: “Fifteen hundred years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was flat,” and now the same people (like Obama’s Science czar John Holdren) who warned us forty years ago about “global cooling” are now the biggest global warming alarmists.
NEWS FLASH: The debate is over and America is BROKE. There is nothing left to redistribute.
With debt past our eyeballs, a still sagging economy and unemployment at a daunting 9.8 percent, our tax dollars can no longer be used to subsidize the "moral" crusades of these hot air heroes.It is beyond sad to hear and see some of the world’s most affluent and influential scientists and leaders lamenting about “wealthy nation sacrificing so that poorer nations can prosper” (at the American taxpayers’ expense). The level of hot air hypocrisy is inconceivable.
Lessons From the Mayor and the Imam
The article in the Jakarta Globe triggered one of my Google Alerts. Like many articles that involve Islam, it contains some outrageous statements which must be refuted. The author is off to a great start with two big lies in the last sentence of the first paragraph
Muslims are part of America
Equality includes gender; women are not enslaved in our culture, whereas in Islam, 2:223. Your wives are a tilth for you, [...]; 4:34. Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allâh has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means.[...] Women are chattle: fields to be plowed & planted.
Women are deficient in intelligence; the testimony of two women is required to equal that of one man. 2:282. [...] And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her.[...] But Christians are not qualified to testify: Reliance of the Traveller o24.2[...]" (e) is religious (O: meaning upright (o24.4) (A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says, "Let those of rectitude among you testify" (Koran 65:2), and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as goes without saying);"[...]
America cherishes our republican form of government in which the people are sovereign. Islam is theocratic and holds that only Allah has the right to rule; it rejects man made laws.
Islam is not attacking the West
Has Islam ever attacked anyone? How did India, Yemen, Egypt & Spain become Islamic? They were conquered. Those conquests were performed by Muslims who were motivated by the doctrines of Islam: imperatives recorded in the Qur'an and exemplified by the hadith. Those curseworthy doctrines are reflected in Islamic law. Al-Shafi'i gave it the utmost clarity. "The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims' interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse."
America fist experienced Islamic aggression when she gained independence from England: the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping. Tripoli's Ambassador explained why.
attack on AmericaWhere did it happen? New York City & Washington D.C. were in America when I last examined a globe; did they flee to Canada?
by IslamWhat were the 'Magnificent 19'? Were they Catholics or Baptists? How many of them were Buddhists? And what was it they said while slitting throats? "Allahu Akhbar!" If they were not Muslims obeying Allah and emulating Moe, why did they act in his name??
Islam itself is the attackerWhat a silly notion. Islam is a set of doctrines which dictate a predatory way of life, it is nothing without Muslims. Believers perpetrated that attack because of what they believe: Islam. Allah said "fight them". Moe said that he was "ordered to fight". Moe waged 86 raids & ghazwats. Why did the Barbary Pirates attack us? Get a clue.
they represent IslamIslam is represented by its founder, who said "I have been made victorious with terror." Salafists emulate Moe. Al-Qaeda is salafist. Allah said that he would "cast terror" [8:12]. Allah said that he "cast terror" [33:26] so that the Muslims killed the men of a Jewish settlement and enslaved their widowss & orphans. Terrorism: its what Islam is; what Muslims do.
entitled to the same freedomFreedom of religion is for legitimate religions, not plunder cults. Jihad is foundational & intrinsic to Islam, it can not be separated or isolated. Islam is all or nothing.
Offensive, aggressive warfare against disbelievers is an intrinsic part of Islam; participation in it is a religious obligation. 9:123. "O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you,[...] " It is not possible that the Establishment Clause should permit that!
Do we or do we not have a right to be secure in our persons & property? Do we or do we not have a right to life? If we do, then there is no right to practice or propagate Islam. If there is a right to practice or propagate Islam, then all our rights are abrogated. Get a clue!
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."
The sanctity of our blood and property and our rights are conditional on embracing Islam. That says it all, exposing the liars.
pluralistic3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
"The Messenger of Allah stated that no two religions should remain in the Arabian Peninsula, and the Jews and Christians should be expelled from it, all praise is due to Allah. " [Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Emphasis added.]
democratic33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.[Emphasis added.]
The fatal facts bear repetition and Imam Rauf provides the opportunity.
rejects the killing of innocent peopleDefine innocent! Were the passengers on those airliners and the office workers in the towers innocent or not?
What is the meaning of that second exception? Muslims won't quote the next verse; I will.
What is the meaning of "wage war against Allah"? Tafsir Ibn Kathir has the answer for us. [...]`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. [...] [Emphasis added] If you contradict Moe or do not believe in Allah, you are waging war against them and may be killed. Only Muslims can be innocent!
sanctity of human lifeMoe said something, which I already quoted: "then their blood and property will be sacred to us ". Only Muslim life has sanctity! He was commanded to fight us until we become Muslim.
represent our religionOne man, dead and damned, represented Islam, defining & exemplifying it. What part of this do you not comprehend?
- I have been ordered to fight the people
- I have been ordered to fight with the people
- I have been ordered to fight the people till they say 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'
- I am commanded to fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah
- Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
- I have been made victorious with terror
Posted By Ben