Saturday, October 30, 2010

Is Obama's Army Ready For Civil War? ...some of his lieutenants are urging it on.

The following from Pamela Geller

The Left's New Strategy: Incitement to Murder
I am seeing a new "tactic" in the comment section. Commenters are attempting to bait, provoke, incite to violence. This out and out call for bloodshed is a new clarion call on the left. It seems they are confident that Obama and this thugocracy will not pursue and investigate this call for murder. Clearly if this was "conservative" making these violent threats, the FBI and DHS would be on it so fast your head would spin. You know, make an example out of it.
But the man (or woman) leaving these comments should be straitjacketed, at the very least.
I am calling your attention to it so that you do no take the bait. Do not respond to this entrapment and poison. Do not fall for this obvious trap.
The IP on this would annihilationist is
Look at the pictures of our communist rally today in DC. We outnumber you fascist conservatives 2 to 1 and we will DESTROY You in upcoming elections. I'll personally vote numerous times and there's not a g-damn thing you can do about it. Want to take this civil war up a notch or two as well? We have a rather startling surprise for you - WE HAVE GUNS TOO - supplied by Obama in the creation of his civilian militia force. We are the answer to you conservatives call to "lock and load" .. BRING IT ON
 1 hour ago on Shot of the Day
Heil Obama! HE will help us finally destroy conservatives, something Hitler failed to do.
 1 hour ago on Did the State Depar…
Look at the pictures of our communist rally in D.C. today .. WE OUT NUMBER YOU CONSERVATIVES as our turn out is WAY bigger than you fascists ..... Oh and you think us commie liberals are against guns? LMAO . Look how many of us signed up to take part in Obama's civilian militia . We are ALSO locked and loaded and we have much more ammo than you. CIVIL WAR IS HERE. STEP UP TO THE PLATE.
 1 hour ago on Terror State: Obama…
Why are you worried about what Obama is doing there? Obama started a civilian military force here in AMERICA and has already started distributing arms to us. We want to see the fall of conservatism in America and when we provoke you enough that YOU make this a violent civil war, we will get our orders from our leader (obama) to take you out. SO when are you conservatives going to actually DO SOMETHING rather than say "lock and load" over and over online like a broken record. Time for you cowards to step up to the plate and BRING IT ON!
2 hours ago on Terror State: Obama…
I have seen so many conservative bloggers comment that it's time to start executing commies in America. Well my answer to that is: BRING IT ON. Every one of us you kill will be a martyr that will help us recruit 10 more in our place. SO LETS GET THIS PARTY STARTED ALREADY! Bring it the fuck on.
2 hours ago on "My brothers of the…
Our communist leader, Bless him (Obama) has started a civilian military and has already started distributing arms so we can destroy right wing America when Obama gives us our orders. Look it up - it's a fact. We are LOCKED AND LOADED too and we won't fight fair. You won't even know who your enemy is till it's too late. CIVIL WAR IS UPON US........Cry or die. Or shut the hell up, because this isn't your country any more and conservatives right to free speech is ABOUT TO COME TO AN END!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 2 hours ago on "My brothers of the…
We are your mortal enemy, you fascist conservatives will FALL, mark my words, you will FALL. Your christian ideology will be destroyed. Your conservative brethren will be destroyed. YOU - YES YOU will be destroyed and you can thank us Commie Democrats for it. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. We f-ing DARE you.
 2 hours ago on "My brothers of the…
We are communists and we are out to BURN CONSERVATIVE AMERICA to the ground and only Communist America will remain. Question is, Why are you all waiting around saying "LOCK AND LOAD" yet you aren't doing a damn thing about it. WE WANT CIVIL WAR !! SO GET OFF YOUR ASS AND BRING IT TO US.
2 hours ago on "My brothers of the…
He also posts as"Angry man." His IP is
Angry man. said:
What planet am I from. I am from the planet who is about to kill all conservatives. My question is. What are you going to do about it? Want civil war? BRING IT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Reply | Edit | View | 2 hours ago on The Backward 50
The Backward 50
Posted: 6 hours ago

Angry man. said:
Seriously. Look up the name Walter Fitzpatrick. he got beat the F up and is now in Jail. The same thing is about to happen to the rest of you conservatives. What are you going to do about it? Want war? Bring it on. We are waiting,
Reply | Edit | View | 2 hours ago on The Backward 50
The Backward 50
Angry man. said:
Welcome to the new America. One side hates the other enough to kill them and not shed a tear. DIVIDED WE FALL and history will show = AMERICA IS ABOUT TO BURN TO THE GROUND. Now die bitches.
Reply | Edit | View | 3 hours ago on The Backward 50
The Backward 50
Posted: 6 hours ago

Angry man. said:
Hell Auntie Madder, You might as well ask pam if you can suck her dick. Your lesbian love is showing... Infuriate us to no end? YES.. you conservatives do ANGER US TO NO END. Indeed it's true. Only because we know you are out to destroy America and that just makes us a bit ticked off. We want to kill you all to get it over with, just so you know.
\ 3 hours ago on The Backward 50

"Just to pay pension obligations! " Yikes! How will we pay for the rest of the stuff?

Direct from World Net Daily

How to vote now … and why

Posted: October 30, 2010

As we roll right up to election eve, the polls all indicate there are still enough eligible, independent voters to turn the elections to the right or left … who haven't made up their minds! I know there are a number of confusing, complex issues voters have to consider. The massive avalanche of TV, radio and Internet ads all add to the confusion; almost every candidate and his or her team feel they have to trash their opponents, painting them as thieves, boobs, incompetents, or latter-day versions of Attila the Hun. In too many recent years, millions of voters have thrown up their hands, and said, in effect, "I don't like any of these candidates, I can't decide who's telling the truth, and I'm just staying home Election Day." And that's what they've done.
But, as millions of us are deeply aware now, this is going to be one of the most important – and future-deciding – elections in our history. At stake is the very structure and freedom of the republic our founders gave us. The current administration, led by the most far-left liberals ever in power, is determined, as President-elect Obama promised, to "fundamentally transform the United States of America." In less than two years, they've demonstrated what that will be like, and they have gathered to themselves unconstitutional powers that will enable them to convert America into a socialist, second-rate nation that could easily meld into a one-world government and economy.
Agonizing over how to get the independents and undecided voters to the polls, I think I've found them an indisputable reason. In our little Beverly Hills Courier newspaper, some information jumped off the page at me. And I couldn't understand why it wasn't front-page news, at least in California, if not the whole nation.
It was a report, just days ago, about a State of the State Conference at the Beverly Hilton, an event that convened policymakers and government leaders from all over our state. The article detailed the findings of the Milken Institute, an independent think tank, about the financial condition of California, especially regarding public pension reform.
Could anything sound so dull? Yet something drew me in, partly because I've known Michael Milken for years and have known of his financial genius and, increasingly, his desire to serve the nation and use his millions to find solutions to physical, social and governmental problems. And what his Institute reported was shocking ... and relevant to every voter in every state in the Union. It's about California, but what's happening here is happening to our whole country.
The Milken Institute predicts that within the next two years, state pensions will be paying out more than five times the state's revenue. I stopped and re-read that, and re-read it again. How is that possible?
It went on. Pension liabilities, already committed, will triple to $10,000 per Californian by 2014, up from $3,000 in 2009! How many Californians realize they must contribute to those payoffs at that rate? Five times every cent the state can raise! Just to pay pension obligations!
Milken projects the number of seniors will triple to 11.6 million during the first half of this century. The Institute calls the situation "a perfect storm," alluding to the need for more state services for an aging populace (a workforce who will spend more years in retirement than they did contributing to funds) and a shrinking ratio of working-age taxpayers to pay for them.
Say it out loud: "Five times more than the state's revenue." Say it several times. Then realize that "as California goes, so goes the nation." That old adage hasn't always been accurate, but in this case, it is. In spades.
Think about the $2 trillion added to our notional debt during the Bush administration – and then the $3 trillion added just in the first two years of the Obama one. Then the $10 trillion more projected to accrue to our debt due to national health care and other fantastic commitments this administration is including in its agenda. Do you want to live in a United States that owes five times more, even 10 times, than it can produce with all its output, commerce and taxes? With the impossible debt growing every year?
Friend, if this doesn't get you to the polls on Election Day – then you'll deserve whatever happens as a consequence. You and your children, and their children and grandchildren, will struggle under such unimaginable debt that the country will not only be bankrupt, it will likely become the chattel of the more rational and profitable nations who will have claimed all our assets as part payment on our debt, which they hold.
It's directly up to you and me – if we vote. That's what our founders intended – that "We the People" would control the reins and call the shots. We can elect men and women who share our respect for the Constitution and our common sense about not spending more than we can afford – no matter what. Because of the mess we're already in, we've got to seek out and elect representatives who will make tough choices – like raising the retirement age, increasing employee contributions and lessening the guarantees, lopping billions and billions out of government spending, dissolving long-obsolete and unnecessary agencies, and immediately stopping billions in foreign aid to countries that vote against us on every issue. These are absolute essentials, if we're going to survive.
There are candidates on every level who are committed to drastically cutting spending, eradicating all pork (earmarks), balancing the budget and retaining tax cuts that will allow small businesses to start hiring and producing again.
We've got to identify these candidates … and elect them.
As you make plans to head to the polls, keep repeating: "Five times the revenue. Five times the revenue. This has to stop!"
Addendum to How to vote now...and why
You may have read this before...but this time I want you to think about it. If you call yourself a Democrat or Republican then you ought to think twice...or more if necessary. When you get to that line that begins, "That he is not free..."; I am the other people. I can see in you what you cannot see in the mirror. Once you figure out who it is that you serve then go out and vote. God Bless America! ~ Storm'n Norm'n

"It is perfectly possible for a man to be out of prison, and yet not free - to be under no physical constraint and yet to be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national state, or of some private interest within the nation, wants him to think, feel and act.
"The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective."

Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley, 1958

(note from Norm: Most, if not all, voters who voted for Obama are psychological captives who cannot think for themselves and they will never admit this because they are who they are, psychological captives!)

Los Zetas Cartel - "The most violent cartel in Mexico...trained in the United States"

And then there's this...

Mexican Gang Execution ( VIDEO ) - WARNING Gruesome!!

 WARNING!!! Very gruesome Video near the end. The guy actually gets his head twisted/pried off by a homemade strap and metal rod contraption. Background on why the guy was executed.. apparently he was killing women and Children. The people who executed him are actually a Mexican Military special forces unit called "Los Zetas".

And This... (From: The Arizona Lawman's News And Phoenix Police Gazette)

EXTRA, EXTRA Read All About It: The Los Zetas are in Los Angeles!

Poster from Los Zetas The Movie

Well not quite like they are known to be in Mexico, and certainly not as we were led to believe that they were/are in the Laredo Texas area but still they are in Los Angeles.
One of the most violent criminal organizations in Mexico has established itself in Los Angeles.
From here, it controls drug distribution to other parts of the country and, according to an informant, has started recruiting former California prisoners to become assassins.
This is the fearsome organization of Los Zetas – a group of Mexican army deserters that in the late 90s became the armed wing of the Gulf Cartel. Since then, they have consolidated as a group of sicarios, fighting wars against some Mexican cartels and partnering with others.
Los Zetas began its incursion into the United States through Texas, but now they have extended their criminal network in California.
The head of the Los Angeles Police Department’s Narcotics Division, Lieutenant Alvin Jackson, admits, “Here in the city, the Sinaloa, Gulf and Los Zetas cartels are operating.”
“They are operating at the middle level and at the street level,” he told La Opinión in an interview, flanked by his team of agents.
“The (anti-drug) agencies working in Los Angeles are combating seven major cartels from Mexico. We’ve detected two of them, Los Zetas and the Gulf Cartel, working in distribution for the area covering San Fernando Valley, Westside, Central and South Central (Los Angeles),” said the police chief.
The other cartels operating in the area are the Arellano Félix, Beltrán Leyva, Sinaloa, La Familia and Carrillo Fuentes cartels.
Since 2006, the Sinaloa cartel, whose main drug lords in Mexico are Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada and Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, has taken over the California territory, displacing the Arellano Félix cartel, to distribute drugs across the United States.
One of the top henchmen working for “El Chapo” and “El Mayo” was identified by the DEA and FBI as Víctor Emilio Cázares Salazar (or Gastélum), as known as “El Licenciado.”
But recently Los Zetas have established their operations in the Los Angeles area, a strategic location for drug trafficking.

The informant sets the date, time and place for the interview. He wants to be in a public place where there are lots of people. He starts giving driving directions over the phone. He changes the location for the meeting three times, as a precaution.
The meeting finally takes place on a public bench at the corner of 83rd Street and Vermont Avenue in South Central Los Angeles.
The man who signals from a distance looks about 50 years old, with long hair in a ponytail, and a green military-style jacket.
He talks fast, says that he was in the army and for a few years has been going back and forth to his native state of Michoacán.
He does not hide his sympathy for the cartel La Familia.
“The truth is that La Familia does more for the people than the f—— government,” he says. “They do care about the people, so the people protect them, and they’ll never be able to destroy them.”
The informant, who keeps looking in every direction, says that in the last few months Los Zetas have been recruiting people after they get out of Los Angeles jails, gang members who are unemployed and would be more than happy to fire an AK-47.
“They’re bringing them to Mexico where they’ll train them. That is their army,” says the informant, who asked to have a longer interview on another day because he is feeling a little anxious.
The days passed and the informant stopped answering his cell phone. He didn’t respond to voicemail. Days later his phone said it was out of service. One of his relatives in Mexico says they haven’t heard from him.
Strategic Point
“That is something we can’t say,” said Los Angeles FBI director Steven Martinez regarding the recruitment of gang members by Los Zetas.
What the local FBI chief does stress is that Los Angeles is a strategic point for drug cartel operations, both for consumption and distribution throughout the country.
“There are people here who are connected with these major groups, for distribution networks, but the cartels are in Mexico, the drug lords are there,” he says.
Martínez explains that the drug lords live where the drugs are produced, and that the marijuana that is produced in California is also sponsored by the cartels.
“There are operations for growing marijuana,” he acknowledges, “but it’s a production sponsored by the cartels in Mexico, Central and South America, something that our intelligence is very interested in and we are working to fight these activities.”
Roger’s story aired live nationwide at about 5:10 pm Monday. Zetas story starts about 5 1/2 minutes into the this podcast. Turn your sound on/up.

Related story: Yes, Texas Has Been Invaded - Laredo Ranch Story Has Been Confirmed

Radical Cleric..."The flag of Islam will fly over the White House." - What say you?

Now that you've seen the video...
What do you think?

Friday, October 29, 2010

Killer village a total wipeout! 30 people died

From CNN

They all look alike in their robes but underneath they're all Democrats

by Norman E. Hooben
Care2 Causes is an extreme Left Wing website that sends out a daily newsletter that exemplifies the twisted mind set of those on the left. I say that they are extreme in that they attempt to persuade their readers by statements that cannot be backed up by facts... like painting a picture of something that does not exist. Their commentary today, Racism Goes Mainstream On Campus is one such attempt. And sadly to say, based on the comments section, that some readers actually believe the words in the newsletter...and I'm not sure if the comments are truly legitimate. Comments can be added by the author of the article under an assumed name to further their cause. The picture (above) can be found (without the added statement) as a lead in to Care2 Causes commentary as if it part of the story (nothing can be further from the truth).

Left Wing writers, instead of simply stating the facts, have a habit of injecting their ideological hate themes into their editorials. One such writer (and I promise I won't veer off track too much) is John Kays, a contributor to the New Blaze. Kays writes an op-ed about Timothy McVeigh where he summarizes his thoughts on the Okalahoma City bombing some years ago. Nowhere in the over 2300 word document is their any realtionship between Timothy McVeigh, the TEA party, and Sarah Palin except in the last paragraph. Kay writes:

Finally, in recent days anti-government sentiment only grows. The Tea-Party
movement is moving further to the right. Could be that they are being
infiltrated with militia and Patriot groups, or that the venom of Sarah Palin, a
mouthpiece for extremists, is just naturally unifying all the multitudinous
factions of the right. Worship of TM is just over the horizon for these
disparate groups who righteously spew hatred for the government no matter what!
A day of reckoning is near at hand-Red Dawn on the shores of the Potomac...

Now I haven't said a whole lot about Sarah Palin but she seems like a decent well rounded patriotic American but militia and venom...give me a break. Now where was I... Oh yeah, that picture that was used by Care2 Causes to illustrate their point...let me illustrate the real story behind that picture...

History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. As a further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is only the second person to serve as president of the three major professional organizations: the Organization of American Historians, American Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.

Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of the Klan's The Kourier Magazine: "I have never voted for any man who was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat…. My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic party."

Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by Democrats against Republicans, black and white.

On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: "Founded in 1866 as a Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every Southern state, launching a 'reign of terror' against Republican leaders black and white." Page 184 of his book contains the definitive statements: "In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the Republican party's infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life."

Heartbreaking are Professor Foner's recitations of the horrific acts of terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: "Jack Dupree, a victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi - assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his wife, who had just given birth to twins - was 'president of a republican club' and known as a man who 'would speak his mind.'"

"White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up Republican meetings," wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page 186, he wrote: "An even more extensive 'reign of terror' engulfed Jackson, a plantation county in Florida's panhandle. 'That is where Santa has his seat,' remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150 persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly with black customers."

The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s. During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

And then there's this...

The Long, Sad, Violent History of Democrats'
Racial Hatred for Blacks

Perry Drake - May 2003

It has always seemed unnatural and unwise to me whenever I hear someone who's been slandered by a particularly egregious lie reply that they're not going to dignify that accusation with a response.

For it has always been crystal clear to me that whenever your honor, integrity and reputation are called into question that you should be quick, thorough and – when circumstances demand – quite loud in defense of them.

Otherwise, people will assume that the accusation must carry some weight and the falsity levied against you just might end up sticking.

That's what has happened to the political party that I belong to – the Republicans. For decades the Party of Lincoln has been under almost constant assault for being "racist" and "openly hostile" to blacks.

However, nothing could be further from the truth – but you would never know it by the party's spineless, practically nonexistent defense of its record on race and civil rights.

From the days of Lincoln until the present, blacks have had no better friend, party-wise, than the Republicans. Since its inception in the mid-19th century, the GOP has built an exemplary record on civil rights, particularly if you want to use the Democrat Party as a comparison.

The party's first president, Abraham Lincoln, issued the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, the height of the Civil War, squelching any chance that the European powers of the day would intervene in the conflict in favor of the Confederacy. With the stroke of his pen, Lincoln destroyed the last real hope the Confederacy had for a victory.

Soon after the war ended, it was a Republican-controlled Congress that rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution that, among other things, abolished slavery, guaranteed equal protection and due process and addressed blacks' right to vote.

In the late 19th century, Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled state legislatures in the South couldn't pass Jim Crow laws fast enough. Those Democrats created a nearly century-long, legal racial caste system that relegated blacks to the lowest educational, political, economic and social strata. I have family members who grew up under Jim Crow. To hear them tell it, it weren't no joke.

And let us not forget that during the same period it was Democrats throughout the United States who organized and ran America's premier terrorist organization – the Ku Klux Klan.

And speaking of the Klan, remember the great Democrat President Woodrow Wilson? After a screening of D.W. Griffith's paean to the Ku Klux Klan, "Birth of a Nation," Wilson, turned-movie critic, said of the film: "It is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true."

Needless to say, the NAACP had a different outlook. After its viewing, the civil rights organization was mortified to the point of launching a nationwide protest in 1915 against the film. The group was equally appalled by President Wilson's comments and it launched a public protest against him.

Before we move on, one more thing about President Wilson. He was the president who led our nation into WWI with the ringing declaration that it was to make the world "safe for democracy." In Woodrow's mind, though, "democracy" applied to everyone except those annoying little dark-skinned people in America who are always clamoring for civil rights. In 1913, Wilson introduced segregation into the federal government.

Yes, dear readers, the man who is worshipped as the utmost "progressive" (where and by who have you heard that term used lately?) of his time allowed federal officials to segregate "toilets, cafeterias and work" areas of various federal departments.

It was left to Wilson's successor, Republican Warren G. Harding to scrap the segregation policy. And Warren G. didn't stop there. In 1922, Harding delivered a bold speech in Birmingham, Ala., (A Democrat stronghold that was later known by blacks as "Bombingham") in which he called for black equality. Up to then, no U.S. president had ever spoken so forcefully about civil rights.

Harding was elected in 1920. Funny thing about the Republican Party platform that Harding ran under. It called for federal anti-lynching legislation. Guess which party didn't? If you said Democrat, go to the head of the line.

Moving on, in answer to the burgeoning civil rights movement in the '50s, it was Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled state legislatures in the South that placed the Confederate battle flag on their state capitol flags. It's an issue that continues to inflame racial passions even today.

In 1957, Orval Faubus, the governor of Arkansas, called out his state's National Guard to prevent the integration of Central High School in Little Rock. In response, President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent U.S. troops to the city to escort nine frightened black teens into the school past riotous mobs inflamed by Faubus' defiance of a federal court order. Faubus was a Democrat. Eisenhower was a Republican.

On June 11, 1963, Alabama Gov. George Wallace stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama to block its integration. Wallace was a Democrat. Now, I grant you, John F. Kennedy was the Democrat president who federalized the Alabama National Guard and ordered its units to the university to force its doors open to black students. But it's not generally known that the then-Sen. Kennedy – with an eye on the Democrat presidential nomination for 1960 – voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the law that really got the ball rolling on federal civil rights legislation.

And it was Kennedy's brother, Robert, who in 1964 assisted the FBI's efforts to destroy Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by approving the wiretapping of the man considered the heart and soul of the civil rights movement.

And to think at one time you could find in black homes across the nation what I used to call the Black Person's Trinity: chintzy, black-velvet portraits of JFK, RFK and Dr. King painted side by side.

As far as other important civil rights legislation, the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would never have became law if not for Republican senators and congressmen whose overwhelming support offset extreme Democrat opposition.

Now honesty demands that I admit that I have never been in favor of affirmative action programs. As a black man I find them demeaning, and as an American, divisive. But that's an argument for another day. However, the fact remains that it was President Nixon who implemented the first affirmative action program with the Philadelphia Plan in the late 1960s. The plan required government contractors to set goals and timetables for hiring minorities. Nixon was a Republican.

Sure, some will say that it's all well and good to cite the historical record, but what about now? What have the Republicans done of late? I begin by pointing out that Democrats continue to demonstrate a curious affinity for standing in schoolhouse doors, especially when black children are involved.

But of late, Democrats are not trying to keep black children out, but in. In public opinion polls on school choice, blacks overwhelmingly favor vouchers to rescue their children from failing schools. No one knows better the damage that poor schools can do to their children's future and communities than blacks. Republicans are in favor of school choice. Democrats aren't.

Also in more contemporary times, President Bush appointed two blacks to the highest positions in government ever occupied by blacks in America. Today, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of State Colin Powell are very powerful, influential members of the Bush administration. Powell, in fact, is fourth in the succession line for the presidency.

Oh, by the way, do you know who is third in line? Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia. Old "Sheets" himself. The same Byrd of the "white niggers" comments on March 5, 2001, and who was a member of the KKK. And Sen. Byrd was not just any old member. No, sir. He was a "grand kleagle" – a recruiter!

Does anyone remember the late war with Iraq? It lasted about a minute but you may have had a chance to notice that the vice chief of operations at Central Command was a brotha – Army Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks.

And let's not let the "fair and free" press off the hook. Back when Jim Crow and segregation were "the law of the land" in the South, the press served as cheerleaders for all those kind, compassionate Democrats as they lovingly lynched black people by the hundreds on a yearly basis.

Small wonder that the press behaved as badly as it did, though. The people who ran those papers, which proudly featured the brutalized and desecrated bodies of black lynching victims on their front pages quite frequently, were all Democrats.

Today, whenever a Republican says anything that can be twisted by Democrats and race hustlers to smack the least bit of racism, the press is quick to pounce on him like Jesse Jackson on a bag of stolen federal dollars.

The hypocrisy of the press on matters of race is appalling. Just take a walk into your average newsroom and tell me what you see? Wait, I'll save you the trip – a sea of white faces and sprinkled here and there, a black face or two. Or better still, tune in to any one of the numerous weekly Sunday news shows and what you'll find is overwhelming white.

Now here's a homework assignment – what political party do you think most of the members of the press belong to? Here's a hint – Democrat.

I need not end here. I could go on all day citing example after example on this matter (Does the name Bull Connor ring a bell, for instance? A Democrat. Hah!). But it would be heartening indeed if the next time accusations of racism are hurled against them, that Republicans would grow a spine and quickly, thoroughly and – when circumstances demand – quite loudly defend their honor, integrity and reputation.

Thursday, October 28, 2010



"It is perfectly possible for a man to be out of prison, and yet not free - to be under no physical constraint and yet to be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national state, or of some private interest within the nation, wants him to think, feel and act.

"The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective."

Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley, 1958

(note from Norm: Most, if not all, voters who voted for Obama are psychological captives who cannot think for themselves and they will never admit this because they are who they are, psychological captives!)

The November G20 - "...they will meet to again advance the process of global governance and global social genocide."

"In November of 2010, the G20 is to be hosted by South Korea, where they will meet to again advance the process of global governance and global social genocide." "Quoted from the editorial, "“Crisis is an Opportunity”: Engineering a Global Depression to Create a Global Government"
You may recall that I've said that nobody runs (for president) on a G8 or G20 Summit meeting and yet that's what it's all about.  No matter what kind of domestic issues they talk about or whether the war is being won or lost or even the current political races it's all for naught.  The real issue is the NWO...the New World Order and it's coming at you faster than you think.  Remember that Obama sent Kissinger on a secret meeting to Russia just after he won the November 2008 election...what was all that about?...Bush was still president!  Then we heard Gordon Brown say, "...the New World Order is emerging." (See video here).  You may also recall over two years ago that I predicted some sort of anarchy and violence late in the year 2010...wake up, do you know what the date is?  I do think that none of this will happen while Obama is still in this country.  If anything arouses the citizenry, it will be while Obama is in India discussing the new global currency.  There's many suggestions for what you may want to do in the coming weeks but as Gideon Rachman said in the Financial Times back in 2008, "These are the kind of ideas that get people reaching for their rifles..."  Any which way you look at it when you finish your homework get ready for battle.  ~ Norman E. Hooben

Let's hear that one again...

Remember this?

More Planned Terrorists Attacks?'s getting bad out there (Question: Is this Virginia man really a Muslim?)

Va. Man Arrested For Plotting DC Attacks
By Mike Levine Fox News
A Virginia man has been arrested for allegedly trying to help Al Qaeda plan multiple bombings around the nation's capital, according to U.S. officials.
Farooque Ahmed, 34, of Ashburn, Va., was arrested today by the FBI and charged with providing material support to terrorists and collecting information for a terrorist attack.
“It’s chilling that a man from Ashburn is accused of casing rail stations with the goal of killing as many Metro riders as possible through simultaneous bomb attacks,” said Neil MacBride, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. “Today’s arrest highlights ... our ability to find those seeking to harm U.S. citizens and neutralize them before they can act."
According to an indictment filed in U.S. Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, between April 2010 and Oct. 25, Ahmed repeatedly met with individuals he thought were affiliated with Al Qaeda to discuss "jihad."
On May 15, in a hotel room in Sterling, Va., Ahmed told one individual that he might be ready to travel overseas to conduct jihad, but only after he completed the Hajj pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia in November, according to the indictment.
In addition, he agreed to watch and photograph Arlington Cemetery Metrorail station and a hotel in Washington, D.C., in order to obtain information about their security and busiest periods.
In fact, on July 7, he participated in surveillance and recording images of Arlington Cemetery Metrorail station. The next month, he allegedy participated in surveillance of the Courthouse, Pentagon City and Crystal City Metrorail stations outside Washington.
During a meeting at a hotel in Herndon, Va., on Sept. 28, he suggested that rolling suitcases be used instead of backpacks, and he said that he wanted to kill as many military personnel as possible, according to the indictment.
Officials say that at no time was the public in danger during this investigation. The FBI was aware of Ahmed’s activities from before the alleged attempt began and closely monitored his activities until his arrest, according to U.S. officials. 
Ahmed is set to make his initial appearance Wednesday afternoon in Alexandria, Va.
Disclaimer: The above picture has no connection with the author of the story or Fox News. ~ Storm'n Norm'n

Related news at USA Today

"En Garde"

Video - Janet Napolitano: "We Can't Seal The Border"

RealClearPolitics - Video - Janet Napolitano: "We Can't Seal The Border"
to see video click on the above link

Napolitano is a disgrace! "We can't seal the border."  That's a bunch of crap!
"...truly the NCO's run the Army and the Air Force, just as the Chiefs run the Navy."
It doesn't matter where that quote came from; what matters is that it's a fact that cannot be disputed.  With that said, I strongly believe that given the mission to close the border we former NCO's could get the job done in about the same time as Janet Napolitano takes to swim across the Rio Grande.  That may be a little exaggerated...then again she probably can't swim either.  Closing the border should be a military operation...and why not?  We are being invaded!  And who is better equipped to handle an invasion...that's right! Us guys! We can do it!  Yes we can!  Make that, "Yes Sir! We can!"  ~ Storm'n Norm'n

Secretary Of Labor Hilda Solis Skirts The Law...hell no! she breaks the law! period!

The economy has created just 654,000 jobs so far this year. At that rate, the U.S. wouldn’t recoup the 8.4 million jobs lost in 2008 and 2009 until June 2017. ~  From Hot Indie News August 9, 2010
Pretty scary jobs picture...until June 2017, whew!  But that's OK the Obama administration is taking care of that even if they have to break the law...says so right here:
So now we have a Secretary of Labor skirting the law and on top of that she can care less about Americans getting a job...says so right here: straight out of the Department of Labor's own website!  Let me remind you, the Department of Labor has no business interfering in the affairs of another country...again, skirting the law!
In fact no agency of the United States government has any business with the internal affairs of another country...none! zero! zilch! nada!  But the Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis continues to ignore Americans and concentrates her efforts in places like Nicargua and even goes so far as to offer $4 million to combat child labor in Jordan!  Nicaragua?  Jordan?  What about Michigan or Rhode Island?

International Scene
"Better Work" for Nicaragua
During a panel discussion at the Labor Department on Wednesday, Secretary Solis and General Alvaro Baltodano of Nicaragua discussed the significance and challenges of the "Better Work" program in creating more and better jobs in the garment industry of Nicaragua. Solis emphasized that the U.S. cannot maintain and improve the conditions of its workers without doing so for workers around the world, adding that a stable global economy that provides good jobs for everyone at home and abroad is needed. Baltodano thanked the Secretary for the department's support and agreed that the program was a win-win for his country. "Nicaragua joins those countries that embrace what is considered a gold standard for the respect of labor rights in the garment sector," said Solis.
Competitive Solicitation for $4 Million to Combat Child Labor in Jordan
The Department of Labor's Bureau of International Labor Affairs announced a $4 million competitive grant solicitation seeking applications from qualified organizations for innovative strategies to combat the worst forms of child labor in Jordan. Applicants will be assessed on the design of strategies that meet the scope of work criteria and includes addressing goals to combat child labor.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Help Wanted: Policeman ...we have 14 openings

Entire police force in Los Ramones, Mexico quits after gunmen attack headquarters
Source: New York Daily News

Wednesday, October 27th 2010

The entire police force in a small Mexican town abruptly resigned Tuesday after its new headquarters was viciously attacked by suspected drug cartel gunmen.

All 14 police officers in Los Ramones, a rural town in northern Mexico, fled the force in terror after gunmen fired more than 1,000 bullets and flung six grenades at their headquarters on Monday night.  No one was injured in the attack. Mayor Santos Salinas Garza told local media that the officers resigned because of the incident.
The gunmen’s 20-minute shooting spree destroyed six police vehicles and left the white and orange police station pocked with bullet holes, the Financial Times reported.  The station had been inaugurated just three days earlier.  The attack was the second in less than a week against police forces in Nuevo Leon. Last week, thugs threw two grenades at police in Sabinas Hidalgo, according to newspaper Noroeste.
Los Ramones is in the Mexican state of Nuevo Leon, which has been a war zone of turf violence between two of the country’s fiercest drug gangs, the Zetas and the Gulf cartel.
Police have blamed members of both cartels for attacks on several police stations throughout the area. Several mayors in the region have been assassinated.
Mexico’s municipal police forces often quit out of fear after being attacked by cartels.
About 90% of forces have less than 100 officers, and 61% of cops earn less than $322 a month, according to the Finanical Times.  Mexico’s intelligence chief said this summer that nearly 30,000 people have died in drug related crimes since 2006.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz...just wanted to make sure you got the name right

The title says she's a 'porker' but don't you think she comes across as a 'fibber' (just trying to be nice...anybody who claims to have created jobs in a declining jobs numbers world is a moron).
Here she says she's a conservative... What?

A tax by any other name is still a tax...

Any money you give or is taken from you by the government is a tax plain and simple!  I don't know how many reports like the one below come out on a weekly, sometimes daily, basis and we still have people out there that do not have a clue.  Prices go up, blame Bush.  How 'bout blaming yourself for allowing the fox into the hen house.  It's the government stupid!...and you put the government where it is...right into your wallet! Complain, complain, complain, and what are you going to do next don't tell me, you're going to vote for your same political hacks because it is so well ingrained in your one-party family.  People need to get off of their party allegiance and vote every single one of those SOB's out of office...if you don't, repeat the complain, complain, complain line here. ~ Norman E. Hooben

The following report from: The Heritage Foundation

Next January the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is set to issue new regulations on emissions from boilers used in facilities like oil refineries, paper mills, and shopping malls. The EPA claims their new regulations will only cost the economy $9.5 billion by 2013. But the American Chemistry Council says the cost will surpass $20 billion and kill 800,000 jobs. Who is right? We don't know. But what we do know is that if you total up all of the new regulations already passed by the Obama administration last year, using their own cost estimates, fiscal 2010 saw the largest increase in regulatory burdens placed on the U.S. economy in the nation's recorded regulatory history.

According to a report released last month by the Small Business Administration, existing total regulatory costs already amount to about $1.75 trillion annually. This "hidden tax" on the economy is nearly twice as large as the sum of all individual income taxes collected last year. Adding to this burden, federal agencies promulgated 43 new rules during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. The total cost of these rules, each one individually calculated by the Obama administration itself, was $28 billion. Only two of these new rules reduced regulatory costs, and then by only $1.5 billion. On net, the Obama administration inflicted $26.5 billion in new regulatory costs on the economy last year. The biggest costs last year all came from the EPA including:
  • Fuel economy and emission standards for passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles. Annual cost: $10.8 billion.
  • Mandated quotas for renewable fuels. Annual cost: $7.8 billion.
  • Efficiency standards for residential water heaters, heating equipment, and pool heaters. Annual cost: $1.3 billion.
  • Limits on “effluent” discharges from construction sites imposed by the EPA. Annual cost: $810.8 million.
As high as this $26.5 billion total is, as the above boiler example shows, the actual costs of all these new regulations is almost certainly much higher. First, the cost of non-economically significant rules—rules deemed not likely to have an annual impact of $100 million or more—is not calculated. Second, no costs were given for 12 of the rules that were deemed economically significant. But most importantly, the costs that were given are likely minimized because the regulators are allowed to make up the cost of their own regulations. A 2005 Office of Management and Budget Report to Congress found that regulators underestimated the costs of their rules 34% of the time.

As bad as last year's rising tide of red tape was it does not hold a candle to the tsunami of regulation the Obama administration is planning to inflict on the U.S. economy during their final two years in office. The 2,319 page financial regulation bill requires 243 new formal rule-makings by 11 different federal agencies. The 2,700 page Obamacare bill contains more than 1,000 instances where Congress instructed HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to regulate the health care industry. And the Federal Communications Commission is considering implementing, for the first time in the history of the internet, "net neutrality" regulations that will undermine investment incentives, thereby robbing the nation of much-needed broadband upgrades.

The left likes to peddle the myth that President George Bush deregulated much of the U.S. economy. But this is just plain false. By every objectively measurable metric, the size and scope of the regulatory state grew significantly under his tenure. But President Obama's regulatory regime is currently rising at more than twice the rate as President Bush's did. No wonder our nation's job creators can't help us escape near double digit unemployment.

Obama's Fall...pretty soon we'll be able to arrest him

I find the following commentary very much to my line of thinking and although I may have not used the same verbiage throughout my blog's theme those of you who have followed me for some time would agree the vernacular is pretty much identical.  Devvy Kidd has gone deeper into some of the background investigation than I have had the opportunity to experience and based on her writings we may have crossed paths between mutual authors.
I highly recommend this particular reading if for no other reason you should start thinking about the events that may follow whenever the king is dethroned...I personally think he ought to be imprisoned but I have thought about the idea of deporting him to Kenya. ~ Norman E. Hooben

By: Devvy© 2010 -

"It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime." ~Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
From the moment Obama/Soetoro was sworn into office, Americans galvanized into Impeach Obama Now! factions.
However, there is a problem here because two wrongs don't make a right, which is why I have not supported any petitions calling for impeachment.
Despite the continued protestations by Obama/Soetoro supporters and professional liars in the dominant media, there is no question the usurper camped out in the White House was never eligible to run for president of these united States of America. All the huffing, puffing, vile name calling and protesting does not and cannot alter the legal fact that Obama/Soetoro was born with dual citizenship. It is his father's citizenship status at the time Obama/Soetoro was born that clearly makes him ineligible to be president.
We're all aware of the 40 or so lawsuits filed to expose Obama/Soetoro's perfidy and the decisions rendered by cowardly federal judges using the cop out - "standing" - as their justification in tossing the lawsuits. We're all aware that even though tens of thousands of Americans demanded the electoral college not certify the vote for the impostor on the ballot, they also proved to be gutless cowards or political hacks who value party loyalty over the U.S. Constitution. The final stop on the way to certifying an ineligible candidate was the U.S. Congress who sat on their cowardly backsides, January 9, 2009, knowing full well there were millions of Americans questioning the legitimacy of Obama/Soetoro's eligibility. Yet, not a single member of Congress (and that includes Ron Paul) stood up on the floor and objected. There is an orderly procedure that could have been triggered had one member of the Outlaw Congress stood up.[1] Instead, they all stood down and here we are today with a constitutional crisis that is not going away.
As Obama/Soetoro clearly was never eligible to run for the presidency, once he "took" office, he legally became a usurper. That action is defined as: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right: The pretender tried to usurp the throne.
Now, we either believe in the supreme law of the land or we pursue an alternative path that sets a horrible legal precedent. What do I mean by that? You cannot impeach a usurper. To do so (even if the House were to file charges) would be to give legitimacy to Obama/Soetoro holding the office of president. That already happened once in our history with Chester Arthur. We cannot allow it to happen again no matter how frustrated and enraged we are about the actions of that empty suit sullying the people's house. To give legitimacy to his presidency would cement all the bills he signed into law as if they were valid under the U.S. Constitution.
We also have to look at reality. Nutty Nancy Pelosi made it quite clear when the Democrats took control of the Outlaw Congress there would be no impeachment against George Bush, Jr. He was worth far more political currency to the morally and ethically bankrupt Democratic Party than removing him. The Republican Party is expected to gain more than enough seats in the house in the upcoming election. Congressman Darrell Issa [R-CA] has made it clear there will be no impeachment proceeding:
"If Republicans take control of the House, there is "not a chance at this point" that they will try to impeach President Obama, a top Republican lawmaker said this week. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who would helm the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if the GOP wins on Election Day, said that his party will not try to bring impeachment charges simply because it disagrees with the president....Look, disagreeing with the president — the president using his authority, maybe even misusing it — that's not what impeachment's for," he added. "Do we have disagreements? Yes. Do we want to see that the president strictly adheres to process? Yes."
I'm not going to rehash all the unconstitutional bills Obama/Soetoro has signed since he was unlawfully sworn into office. One should remember the only way a bill gets to a president's desk is from the Outlaw Congress. That's where the treachery begins. Having said that, without question, the entire nation is shuddering under the weight of Obama/Soetoro's communitarian beliefs and actions. Everyday is a new attack on freedom and liberty spear headed by the usurper.
As I have said for quite some time, I firmly believe there is no way Obama/Soetoro will run in 2012. Certainly, continuing to raise the specter of another Obama/Soetoro term is good for ratings on Hannity, O'Reilly and conservative talk radio. It's also a good theme for dangerous, vile individuals like Newt Gingrich to raise money for their political organizations.

However, Obama/Soetoro's handlers (the shadow government) got away with fraud the first time around, they know it won't happen a second time. There's no way Obama/Soetoro can get ballot qualified in 2012 in a single state. Nancy Pelosi and others pulled off fraud with their candidate declarations to the 50 states of the Union in 2008, but they won't get away with it a second time. Pelosi and her gang of coconspirators should also be indicted by a federal grand jury. Don't think it can't happen. There are many very smart, dedicated individuals working to see all who participated in putting Obama/Soetoro on states ballots are brought to justice.
How this will all play out, I don't know. Obama/Soetoro has admitted to cocaine use; Larry Sinclair has accused him of being a user as late as 1999. Wayne Madsen recently penned a piece outlining how there is a crisis underway in the White House:
Section 4 of the 25th Amendment likely to be invoked; Obama being shipped out!
"Washington has not witnessed so much top level White House intrigue since October 20, 1973, when a Saturday night saw President Nixon fire the Watergate independent counsel, the U.S. attorney general, and the deputy attorney general in the “Saturday Night Massacre.” Just ten days earlier, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned after being charged with accepting bribes while governor of Maryland.
"In the case of President Obama, the senior firings are not happening during a single night but the recent involuntary sudden departures of the White House chief of staff and national security adviser, along with what WMR can confirm from multiple sources is a president who is suffering from Nixonian levels of paranoia, depression, and schizophrenia, has some top-level administration officials considering the first-ever invocation of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment — the involuntary removal of the president from office. The White House meltdown has the Washington political circuit buzzing under the surface.
"Unlike Watergate and the Iran-contra scandal, however, the corporate media is refusing to report on the breakdown of the Obama administration and the internecine political warfare within the Executive Office of the President."
Madsen is a serious investigative journalist with excellent sources. The usurper has had the citizenship issue hanging over his head since mid-2007. He and Militant Michelle have been partying in their White House digs like there's no tomorrow. Whenever there's some heat, Obama/Soetoro hops on his favorite toy, Air Force One, and either goes on another vacation, visiting foreign countries or is out campaigning for his party. Anything to duck sitting around looking incompetent. I believe the fake First Couple know they are a one trick fraud and are living it up while they have the American taxpayers' open checkbook at their disposal. Many pundits continue to remark how detached Obama/Soetoro seems and not really "into" the task of being president. I believe this reflects knowing he won't be around for a second term. He does what he's told and while living it up in style.
Should the usurper remain in office, there is no way he will get the nod at the Democratic National Convention. Take money to the bank on that. It won't happen. There's no way to salvage that shipwreck. Obama/Soetoro's handlers might try to keep him in office as long as possible - if to do nothing more than checkmate any legislation coming out of the "new" Congress in January 2011. You see, if the usurper's handlers throw him under the bus early, next in line is Joseph Biden, who I believe is in the early stages of dementia. Not a good choice for the global cabal running Washington, DC. But, let's put that aside for the moment.
Is there any possibility that Obama/Soetoro can still be removed from office? Yes. There is still one case, Kerchner v Obama, which I have followed from the beginning. The wind has shifted direction since Leo Donofrio's first case was discussed at the Supreme Court level in December 2008. Mario Apuzzo, attorney for Kerchner, et al, is a real warrior and has fought for his clients in the aforementioned case. It has now gone to the next step:
"Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 18 & 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5. U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010."
Let me shift gears for a moment. There's an old saying: Timing in life is everything. HalfPastHuman is a web site that deals in predictive linguistics. Cliff has been pinpointing Nov 8 - 12 as a tipping point for events which could (I stress could) turn this country upside down. I've followed George Ure, Cliff, Bob Chapman and Gerald Celente for a long time. Quite frankly, it's scary how accurate their predictions are in real time. Let's look a few dates here to see what has my attention:
Nov 2 -- National elections
Nov 3 --- Federal Reserve Chairman, Helicopter Ben Bernanke, is expected to announce a new round of printing tons of worthless fiat currency which will, on cue, make the situation worse as far as the economy is concerned.
Nov 4 -- Usurper, Obama/Soetoro leaves for India and other exotic locations. The original departure date was Nov 7, 2010. He is scheduled to return on Nov. 14th. An unusually long trip outside the U.S. for a president. Regardless of any "official" explanation as to why his departure date was moved up, I find it suspicious - as well as the length of time he is to be out of country.
Nov 11 - 12 -- Next meeting of the G-20 group. Those geniuses are going to try to figure out how to reverse decades of unrestrained, irresponsible fiscal policies. Too late.

This year elections may not be decided by five minutes after the polls close. We know electronic ballot fraud as well as scanners and human fraud will play a huge factor, again. I am hopeful that candidates who allegedly lose -- either by a landslide or close margin - will challenge the vote. Having the outcome of some races (especially the senate) drag on for weeks or even months will have more negative impact for our country. Recall the circus over the 2008 election between incumbent Norm Coleman [R-MN] and a vulgar, completely unqualified candidate, Al Franken. That recount lasted 238 days - roughly seven months. It could happen in less than ten days in a half dozen senate races. Fair election results must trump expediency -- even if it means a joke like Franken gets into office. There's that Seventeenth Amendment argument again.....
The banking cartel is on the ropes with their money racket teetering on the brink, and with Foreclosure Gate now in full exposure, the problem is compounded by a factor of a few billion.
The usurper is beating it out of the country three days earlier than originally scheduled and is staying out of the country for a lengthy time.
One of the most important elections in our history is nine days away.
The international banking boys are going to meet in an effort to see which end of the Titanic they should stand on before half the world goes down in economic flames.
All these events clustered in a short period of time; Nov 2 - 12th. Just some food for thought.
Going back to the original theme of this column, besides impeachment, is there any other way to remove Obama/Soetoro? Yes, and it could have and should have been done more than a year ago. But, the requirements to qualify for under a Quo Warranto are stringent. Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon, both brilliant attorneys who have been involved in citizenship cases in the past, now represent roughly 82 Chrysler dealers in bankruptcy proceedings. The history is on Leo's web site. It does require some reading time if you haven't been able to keep up with it all. Leo and Stephen's first obligation to their clients is the bankruptcy lawsuit, but that does not rule out a Quo Warranto which could happen before 2012. [2]
The Quo Warranto statute was specifically written to remove a usurper from office and that without question is Barack Hussein Obama. I know time is an issue for everyone as our beloved republic is under attack 24/7 by those who wish to destroy these united States of America. If you desire to fully understand the entire history behind natural born citizen, the Fourteenth Amendment as it relates to the usurper and quo warranto, I put it all together in one master file here. If you can't read it all at one time, book mark the link and get back to it because it is critical in understanding the fraud perpetrated by Obama/Soetoro and his coconspirators.
Does this mean Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro should get away with his crimes even if he stays until the 2012 election? Absolutely not. He has always known, as well as others, that he was ineligible to run for the presidency because of his dual citizenship. In my mind, there is no question the usurper is guilty under 18 U.S.C. §1343: wire fraud. Obama/Soetoro knowingly solicited campaign funds electronically (TV, radio, Internet) knowing full well his citizenship status made him ineligible. More than $600 million bux poured in and despite enough paper evidence to warrant a full investigation by the FEC regarding foreign contributions, they refuse. However, before the statute of limitations runs, the Department of Justice could indict Obama/Soetoro, and if convicted, he would spend decades in prison where he belongs.
I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday and I'm not naive. At some point, all these holes in the dam will burst and the long arm of the law will go after Obama, just the same as justice should be done in bringing Bush to trial over his lying regarding the illegal invasion of Iraq; which is not a dead issue and that's all I can say about it at this time.
Why are so many talented, decent Americans continuing the Herculean efforts to bring Bush and Obama/Soetoro to justice in a court of law? Because it is the right thing to do for our country. Every time we the people allow lawbreakers (like Marxist duo, Bill and Hillary) to get away with their crimes, the further our country slips into the muck of a banana republic. We cannot and must not allow that to happen.
As badly as we all want the usurper removed from the White House, it will not happen via impeachment. That comes out of the mouth of a powerful Republican who will, barring some disaster or major vote fraud, return to Washington in January. We cannot allow our rage and frustration to set another horrible legal precedent: you cannot impeach someone who has never legally held office. Usurper means that individual never occupied the office. We must stick to the correct legal remedy.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

Right now we need to concentrate our efforts on winning the major fights underway, i.e., getting ALL of the unconstitutional ObamaCare repealed; some provisions are also in the stimulus bill that was signed into law and those must also be repealed and stopped. I would also like to stress how critically important it is to boot out all state reps and state senators who refuse to uphold the U.S. Constitution, who have destroyed their state economies with their foolish legislation and their refusal to take the necessary steps to secure your state from financial disaster; see link below. Get prepared because the worst is about to slam this nation. The elections on November 2, 2010, will not bring some magic bullet relief. It's a long, hard road ahead.
Alaska Judge Orders Release of Miller's Employment Records (U.S. Senate candidate, Joe Miller) Obama/Soetoro worked as a state senator for Illinois before he unlawfully became a U.S. Senator, yet the courts refuse to release any of his school records.
Index of documents in package delivered to: Richard Durbin,
Chief US Attorney for the North-Western, District of TX for
Criminal Matters by Devvy on February 27, 2009, Austin, Texas
© 2010 - - All Rights Reserved