Sunday, September 6, 2009

Interesting Study: Who hates whom the mostest? Are you in any danger? ...check the charts!

The interesting synopsis of an Islamist threat against the western world or as the article says, "the greatest danger to civilization" led me to this "Whom hates whom the mostest" article where the numbers depicted on the charts (see below) should disturb even the least of the feint of heart. Although on a personal observation I would place the numbers reflecting the growth of Atheists directly proportional to that of Humanists who are not mentioned. At this point in time we could use the two terms interchangeably. They call themselves Humanists to avoid any identification or reference to God or gods. ~ Norman E. Hooben

Muslim Threat Index [also interesting charts ~ Norm]
Posted on September 2, 2009 10:42 PM
Muslim ThreatFor the average infidel in the western world it is extremely difficult to determine which of the 48 Muslim Majority countries in the world represents the greatest danger to civilization. Afghanistan has the Taliban, Lebanon has Hezbollah, Egypt has Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, Algeria has the 'the al-Qaeda Organization of the Islamic Maghreb,' Iran is looking to get nuclear weapons, Pakistan already has the bomb, which countries should we be worried about?

Read the rest of this entry »


________________
Who hates whom the mostest? (aka: better be an atheist...)
Over at Planck’s Constant Blog, fellow grey-beard Bernie has come up with a “Muslim Threat Index”. Good one, Bernie!
No surprises in Pakistan being at the top of the danger league, though perhaps surprising that it’s by such a large margin a greater potential threat than the next on the list Nigeria. I was also surprised – though perhaps fellow Aussies may not be – by Indonesia’s being so high on the threat list.
I can hear all the criticisms of this “Threat Index”, from “you can’t be serious” to “it’s not nuanced enough” and so forth. My view: it’s been done with enough care and with enough factors to make it a useful reference. No doubt it can be improved (“nuanced”) but meantime it’s useful and I commend it, even unto the “government security agencies”…. I know about them from times past and their threat assessments were often nuanced to pabulum…
I’ve just done my own Index: the “Discrimination Index”, aka the “Victimhood Index”. It came about because of the claims we hear from Muslim spokespersons whenever there’s some outrage committed by their co-religionists, that they fear a “backlash” against Muslims. Some of the more egregious examples are: after the Mumbai bombing and the murder of the Jewish leader and his pregnant wife, what we heard from Muslim commentators was concern for the safety of Muslims. And most recently, the Rifqa Bary case, about which I wrote here. There is less concern for Ms Bary’s safety than for the alleged backlash against Muslims that the publicity of the case might entail.
So, is it true that Muslims are discriminated against disproportionately to their numbers in society? To calculate that I got the numbers of Hate Crimes in the US against each religion, and the percentage of those religions in the total population (refs below). Divide hate crime per religion by that religion’s percentage in the population: if the answer is 1 (one), then that religion is experiencing hate crime in proportion to its share of the population. A figure higher than 1 (one) means they’re being disproportionately targeted by hate crimes.
These are the results:
Crimes against:
% of crimes
% of population
Discrimination Index
Jews
69.2%
1.2%
57.67
Muslims
8.7%
0.6%
14.50
Catholics
4.3%
25.0%
0.17
Protestants
4.1%
51.0%
0.08
Atheists
0.5%
15.0%
0.03
Other
9.1%
8.0%
1.14
So: yes, Muslims are disproportionately targeted while we Atheists get off almost scot-free. But way more discriminated against are the Jews, by a factor of 57 versus the base of 1 (one) and four times more than Muslims are. I know there are
anti-anti-Semitism lobby groups; but we do not hear from them nearly so often as we do from the Muslim ones. Why is that? Given that they are way more disproportionately targeted?
What is surprising perhaps, given their co-religionists insistence on attempting to kill infidels, is that the number of hate crimes against Muslims is actually so low: just 141 in 2007. (and btw, Daniel Pipes has shown elsewhere that many of the crimes against Muslims were “manufactured” by the Muslim bodies such as CAIR; but we’ll leave that for the moment).
Another interesting point: the fastest growing belief 1990 to 2008 was Atheism. Islam was fifth fastest growing, after Atheism, Buddhism, Born-again Christians, and non-denominational Christians. Interesting, when we hear so often from Islamic sources, that Islam is the fastest growing religion.
And what about the total number? According to the stats, the number of Muslims in the US is 1.8 million. That’s way less than Muslim lobby groups quote: most often they say 5 to 7 million Muslims in the US. Hmm….. the less the size of the group, the less is your clout. I wonder why they exaggerate by nearly 300%...
US population
305,000,000
2008/1990 Growth
Jews
3,660,000
14.6%
Muslims
1,830,000
156.0%
Catholics
76,250,000
24.3%
Protestants
155,550,000
10.4%
Atheists
45,750,000
204.0%
Other religions
24,400,000
0 to 300%
References:
1. FBI Hate Crime Statistics, 2007, from the Uniform Crime Reporting Progam, FBI, 2008.
2. Demographics: Statistics of Religion in the US from the American Religious Identification Survey, 2008, and on the Population, from the US Census Department, Feb 2009.
___________________
See also(from Obama's foreign policy advisor) It's easier to kill a million people than control a million people.__

No comments: